'Boris Bike' scheme for New Forest rejected

'Boris Bike' scheme for New Forest rejected

'Boris Bike' scheme for New Forest rejected

First published in News Daily Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Senior Reporter

A CONTROVERSIAL public bike scheme for the New Forest has been scrapped despite support from professional cyclists and a 2,000-signature petition in its favour.

The New Forest National Park Authority did a “massive U-turn” yesterday when it decided not to proceed with the controversial £2m Boris Bikes-style project.

Members of the authority voting against the plans argued that it was not financially viable due to a spending deadline of March 2015.

But they also pointed to an increasing anti-cycling sentiment across the area which follows repeated problems involving organised mass cycling events.

The meeting heard how a task and finish group set up by the authority met three times and collected public feedback, contacted businesses and produced a map of the proposed scheme before concluding the plans should be dropped.

But member David Harrison, who is also a Hampshire County Councillor, spoke at length to set out his support for the scheme.

He said: “We have a duty to encourage use of forms of transport that could ease congestion and help promote healthy lifestyles and this would be a significant step in the right direction.

“The only real risks are that we back out and we let down the Government, and we pass up a rare opportunity to get £2m that we will never see again.

“Those that argue that cycling is unpopular in the New Forest are just wrong.”

Last year the Department for Transport awarded the New Forest NPA £3.57m total funding to support family cycling.

Plans were drawn up for a system involving 250 bikes being available for hire at 20 locations, and initial interest showed that 11 out of 12 businesses contacted wanted to be part of it.

A 2,100-strong petition in favour of the scheme was given public support by British Olympic gold-winning cyclist Chris Boardman, but this failed to sway members.

At the meeting there were concerns voiced over potential financial problems given Barclay’s announcement in December that it would no longer sponsor the bike scheme in London.

Oliver Crosthwaite-Eyre, who chaired the meeting and proposed the recommendation that the scheme be discontinued, said: “It’s about whether this particular project has a chance of success and that rests on whether it has a financial chance of success.

“Let’s not forget it will be run as a business and if it fails it will fail quite quickly, so we have to be sure that the figures stack up.”

Following the decision the Campaign for National Parks, a charity dedicated to campaigning to protect and promote national parks, issued a statement saying it was “really disappointed” at the move.

It said: “We’re aware of local concerns about mass bike rides but these should not have been allowed to influence decisions on a scheme which is aimed at encouraging a completely different type of cycling.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:09pm Wed 20 Aug 14

good-gosh says...

I could cycle all day at 10 miles an hour,
and do one or two hours up to 20.
But would struggle to ride much above 25,
and would definitely die over 30.
I could cycle all day at 10 miles an hour, and do one or two hours up to 20. But would struggle to ride much above 25, and would definitely die over 30. good-gosh
  • Score: -2

2:21pm Wed 20 Aug 14

Torchie1 says...

I expect the nine established bike hire businesses dotted around the forest will just have to soldier on.
I expect the nine established bike hire businesses dotted around the forest will just have to soldier on. Torchie1
  • Score: 5

11:03am Thu 21 Aug 14

Drhysted says...

There are serious ramifications from this decision. First of all they have reduced the chances of obtaining government grants in future. When we were awarded this grant to trial this scheme (it's first in the country) it meant another National Park lost. By not using the grant, it will be returned unless they can get alternative sustainable cycle provisions agreed and paid for before April 2015. Secondly the National backlash from cyclists is that many that holiday here with their families are now planning alternative destinations. You may not think that this is too much of a problem, but a lot of the NF is now dependant upon tourism, and the cycling fraternity is worth millions. One UKCE event last year brought £300,000 to the NF over one weekend. Other National Parks have realised this and are going out of their way to encourage cyclists, the Isle of Wight has it's own website to encourage them there. Yet here we turn free money down, and effectively put up a sign advertising that non-locals are not welcome.
There are serious ramifications from this decision. First of all they have reduced the chances of obtaining government grants in future. When we were awarded this grant to trial this scheme (it's first in the country) it meant another National Park lost. By not using the grant, it will be returned unless they can get alternative sustainable cycle provisions agreed and paid for before April 2015. Secondly the National backlash from cyclists is that many that holiday here with their families are now planning alternative destinations. You may not think that this is too much of a problem, but a lot of the NF is now dependant upon tourism, and the cycling fraternity is worth millions. One UKCE event last year brought £300,000 to the NF over one weekend. Other National Parks have realised this and are going out of their way to encourage cyclists, the Isle of Wight has it's own website to encourage them there. Yet here we turn free money down, and effectively put up a sign advertising that non-locals are not welcome. Drhysted
  • Score: 2
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree