ALF Young's analysis (November 11) of Jim Mather's recent letter focuses on the key question of what our competitive edge should be. For Mr Mather, as for the rest of the SNP and Tories, our competitive advantage must be established through a lower rate of business taxes than the rest of the UK. However, this is directly at odds with any understanding that it is impossible and indeed undesirable for Scotland to compete on cost. If we accept that our competitive edge will come from upskilling our workforce, investing in research and development and in both our virtual and physical infrastructure, any logic in Mr Mather's plan to reduce funding in these essential areas proves hard to detect.
But Mr Mather knows this already. This is the same argument he's been peddling for two years or more, and time and again it has been discredited, yet he presses on. He is not a stupid man, so we have to conclude that his motivation in continuing to promote a scheme that is demonstrably unworkable is unconnected to any desire to improve our economic performance, but is just another demonstration of the SNP's propensity to place their own narrow political concerns before the good of the Scottish people.
I would be fascinated to hear Mr Mather comment on how, as a member of the Scottish Parliament, he intends to use the powers of that body to work towards the common good. If, as I suspect, he merely intends to spend his time carping about what he feels he cannot achieve, it seems disingenuous for him to continue to collect a salary as an MSP, and, as a taxpayer, I would urge him to consider his position and perhaps stand aside for someone who does intend to do the job he was elected to do.
Judith Begg,
67 Raeburn Place, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article