WERE You Still Up for Portillo? Such was the low regard in which the former MP for Enfield Southgate was once held that Brian Cathcart's book of this title, charting the collapse of the Conservative vote in the 1997 general election, became an instant bestseller. The nation did not exactly rejoice at the fall of the man whom Margaret Thatcher saw as her natural successor, but it did produce a collective smirk. Yet he made it back to parliament and restored his reputation to such an extent that it was possible yesterday for him to announce his departure at the next election and garner some sincere tributes.
Chief among the mourners at his departure was Michael Howard, the new Conservative leader, who had offered him a job. In rejecting politics in favour of a career in the media, Mr Portillo has landed his boss with a headache, made worse when Kenneth Clarke, another centre-left figure, said he would not accept a shadow cabinet role either. Mr Howard may yet find a way of leading his party from ''the centre'', as he has promised, but he will feel the loss of such big hitters.
Will politics and parliament, too, feel the loss of Mr Portillo? It is a pity that, having travelled so far from right to left in his party, the MP for Kensington and Chelsea should now be buying a ticket out. Politics needs independent thinkers, and that is what Mr Portillo had become. He had the courage to change, to become his own man and admit to past mistakes, yet in the end he felt there was no place for him. Politics may not be poorer for his loss, but it will certainly be less interesting.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article