Report this comment
  • "
    Stillness wrote:
    southy wrote:
    Stillness wrote:
    I would imagine that Helius must be most disappointed if they are monitoring this story. After all they have spent thousands of hours and millions of pounds on working out the best, most profitable location for the plant and it turns out that they got it all wrong. If only they had asked southy in the first place it would have been built and operational by now. Trust me Peter, your arrogance is only outshone by your ignorance.
    Your showing your lack of knowledge of the area, Helius would not off come here if they had not been promise a cash insentive.
    Poole Harbour was there first choice next to that power station but there was no cash insentive.
    Read what Sir Ad E Noid posted or is he arrogant and ignorant also, he seems to know this area also or at lest part of it, which you lack in very much.
    No he isn't but that doesn't change the fact that you are. Why should they not take a "cash incentive" in to account when deciding on the location? Or are you implying that someone at Helius was given a backhander?
    I would have thought people would welcome employment opportunities in Southampton. Unless of course they are worried that they may have to get off their backsides and go back to working for a living again.
    Stillness use your brain will you, companys like Helius go where there is a cash incentive, your the one implying a back hander I am not.
    Which councillor is or was on the Docks quango, and who do you think pays for this cash incentive.
    And how many job opportunities you think theres going to be, very few, any quay side work will be done by the steveadores, and will be the bulk of the work, while building it will be done by a contractor who majority of its work force will be traveling men who travel with the company.
    And its that cash incentive that makes them decide on a location and not weather if its the right or wrong location, Helius only interested in one thing how much tax payers money they can get.
    and your more arrogant and ignorant than I will ever be."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

New designs for Southampton biomass plant revealed

Daily Echo: The High-Tech design for Southampton biomass The High-Tech design for Southampton biomass

THESE are the visions energy bosses hope could finally win residents round to the idea of a huge £300m power plant on their doorsteps.

The Daily Echo can today reveal the three new designs for a controversial 100 megawatt wood-fuelled power station at Southampton’s docks.

Helius Energy hopes it will be a case of third time lucky after its previous plans for a biomass plant sparked outrage from residents living just yards from the proposed “giant polluting tin shed”.

The firm will next week launch another consultation on its aims to bring a renewable energy facility to the city, capable of powering 200,000 homes. It will write to around 25,000 homes and businesses in Southampton and on the Waterside, as well as holding a string of public exhibitions to show off its plans and try to ease residents’ fears.

Bosses say they will listen to which of the marine, wave or hi-tech designs people like best before putting one forward to planners.

Last year, Helius’ controversial bid to build on land at Western Docks caused outrage from people living nearby, horrified at the “monstrous”

prospect of a 100mhigh chimney stack and other buildings towering over their homes. A campaign group, No Southampton Biomass, was quickly set up to fight the plans and gained support from hundreds of people. It even led to a protest march being held.

As well as the visual blot dominating the area, fears were raised about the safety of having a power station just 250m from homes in Millbrook and Freemantle following fires at similar plants around the country.

Campaigner Chris Jenkins, of Testwood Road, said last year: “Nobody wants this monstrosity anywhere near their homes. We will never give up our fight until they say they won’t come here.”

Politicians have also condemned the scheme. Southampton’s Labour group, which swept to power in last week’s council elections, made a pre-election pledge to fight the plant, which was also opposed by the previous Tory administration.

Labour said in its manifesto: “We will stand shoulder to shoulder with officers, political colleagues and most importantly the community against inappropriate developments in our city, such as the latest plans for the biomass power station.”

But because the scheme is classed as a “nationally significant infrastructure project”

the final say over whether it gets the go-ahead or not will not lie with councillors, but with the national planning inspectorate.

Helius, which has already revised its plans once but faced further criticism for failing to provide sufficient notice of public events, now says it has “significantly”

altered the proposals again.

Bosses argue the scheme will be good for Southampton.

The firm, which claims the plant will create 100 direct and indirect jobs and contribute around £10m a year to the city’s economy, said the new version would see the facility twice as far from the nearest residents, lower in height and with a smaller building footprint.

It is also hoping to engage with people by giving them the chance to influence which of the three architectdesigned approaches for the external design of the power station is adopted.

Paul Brighton, Helius Energy’s planning director, said: “We listened carefully to what people had to say in our consultation last year and we believe our revised proposals have really addressed those concerns.

“We are committed to carrying out a full and inclusive public consultation that gives people detailed information about our scheme so they can make their minds up based on the facts.”

It said its power station would save the equivalent of 470,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide from being belched into the air compared to an average fossil fuel plant.

The consultation will run from May 14 to August 3, before Helius applies to the National Infrastructure Directorate of the Planning Inspectorate “later in the year”.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree