Hampshire Business RSS Feed


Nil point for city ambitions

Nil point for city ambitions Nil point for city ambitions

WITH THE CLARITY AFFORDED BY 20- 20 hindsight, it is clear now how disastrously Southampton has been led since the turn of the Millennium.

It is today as apparent as the gaping hole where Tyrrell and Green used to be that the city spectacularly failed to cash in on a boom without compare since the time of Good Queen Bess It was a time where money was cheap and plentiful and ambitious dreams were realised by forward thinking cities from Manchester to Portsmouth.

But not here.

No. Throughout this golden era the city managed to realise precisely no major projects, Not one. Nothing. Nada. Nil point. The last one of real commercial significance was WestQuay, which opened at the start of the decade in September 2000. I’ll give you St Mary’s Stadium (opened August 2001) if you really insist.

But from that day to this, it’s been a grim tide of collapse. Of failure snatched from the jaws of victory. Cock-up and calamity have been the hallmarks of administration after administration, whatever the hue.

Today our leaders have left us mortgaged to the whims of developers. Helpless when they go belly-up, as has happened with depressing monotony. Angry at opportunities missed. Mystified as to why we can’t do better when we are the powerhouse of the south’s economy one of Europe’s biggest regional economies.

That’s why, as Brown, Cameron and Clegg vie for our affections, it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that it’s all a bit of a sideshow for Southampton.

As they might have it in Hamlet, there’s something rotten in the state of Southampton and the flavour of national government is going to do little to root it out.

At the time of writing, local elections are also underway but no matter who wins, you again fear little is really going to change.

The system is not delivering and it is long past time we looked for another way down here, something that can deliver the sort of city changing projects we need.

Quietly, momentum is growing behind the calls for an elected city mayor. You hear it talked about time and time again.

And maybe there’s something in it.

Imagine a charismatic leader with half an eye on their legacy, powerfully able to sweep aside petty obstacles and political infighting and just get things done. It could see the Civic Centre reborn, phoenix like from the ashes of a decade of decline as a dynamic and creative force.

It’ll probably never happen and, weirdly, that’s largely the fault of one of Southampton’s favourite sons. They call it the le Tissier effect, after the fear among city mandarins that the sainted Matt’s a shoe-in for the job and will be swept to power on a tidal wave of red and white striped support.

However unlikely that may be today after his ill advised and embarrassing dabble in the world of low finance during a Saints takeover bid, he stands as a cipher for any populist but unsuitable candidate.

It famously happened in Hartlepool, where they elected a monkey called H’Angus, the football team mascot, on a platform of free bananas for schoolchildren.

But the nightmare didn’t pan out.

He was re-elected in 2005 with a thumping majority and, by now standing under his real name of Stuart Drummond, was the first mayor in Britain to win a third term last year.

It’s said you get the leaders you deserve – isn’t about time we did.?

Comments(6)

RadicalEmu says...
11:43am Mon 10 May 10

We voted in another Tory council. We did get the leaders we deserve.
Unfortunately.

dennytg says...
3:27pm Thu 13 May 10

I know this comment is a bit late, but I have been busy elsewhere.
The two large pieces of development mentioned in the article were delivered by a LABOUR Council, mainly by the sterling efforts of John Arnold and Councillor Stephen Barnes-Andrews.
The other Parties opposed both West Quay and the Stadium. The stadium was also opposed by our neighbouring Councils, none of whom were Labour.
People tend to forget that for most of the past decade, it was the other two main Parties who ran the Council.

Elgy says...
4:09pm Fri 14 May 10

Sorry, but countless of awful decisions by Labour and the Lib Dems over a long period (and the Tories before them) dwarf the successes of St Mary's and West Quay. Although, to be honest, St Mary's is a meccano set in an industrial wasteland; uninspiring, rarely full and already being considered for replacement by the new and slightly more romantic European owners of SFC. Meanwhile, West Quay may have been exciting for the city ten years ago, but now the reality is it is an outdated, badly designed, ugly, unfriendly, pretentious, crowded monstrosity comprised of faceless (inter)national brands. Rupert Lowe has more personality, and evokes more emotion! The cafe's within are boring, copycat, noisy, crowded and not relaxing (a pre-requisite, surely?). And as for the WQ retail park - yuck! No matter what party has been in power the Council has made a mockery of the city for decades.

Elgy says...
4:20pm Fri 14 May 10

And another thing, the problem with Southampton goes far deeper than just bad planning and lack of long-term joined-up thinking. Southampton as a whole does not have the community 'feeling' and cohesion that places such as Eastleigh, Romsey, Chandler's Ford and (dare I say it) Portsmouth have. No matter what tripe the Council and other patronising organisations come up with, Southampton is not working as a multi-cultural city. It is a city full of different groups that have little to do with each other. The only thing they have in common is a fear of one another - whether it is the chavs vs the elderly in Merry Oak, the students vs the residents of Bassett, Highfield and Polygon, or the various ethnic minority communities around the city. They rarely mix and the difference in feel and look between these areas is quite amazing, compared to most other cities in this country. Southampton is the only place I have ever been to, or lived in, where you can turn a corner and think you are in a completely different world. It is a pity the town is so disjointed. Many people think of Southampton not as a home, but simply as a place to shop and get drunk.

Redback says...
5:34pm Wed 19 May 10

"the city spectacularly failed to cash in on a boom without compare since the time of Good Queen Bess"

I suspect various councillors cashed in on it very nicely though.

soton1980 says...
6:48pm Wed 19 May 10

A good article, which pretty much sums up the lost potential of our city. Whilst other cities like Bristol have built beautiful shopping centres and riverside broadwalks with upmarket restaurants, Southampton has just made a complete hash of things. Ocean Village had great potential to rival Gunwharf/Port Solent in terms of nice restaurants, but now looks like a modern housing estate. Not to mention countless other bad decisions made with a lack of foresight. As our town centre is so spread out, what about a tram system like the brilliant one on Nottingham? It annoys me so much!

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree