Hampshire Business RSS Feed


Time to halt foreign takeover

Time to halt foreign takeover Time to halt foreign takeover

BAA, ABP, P&O, SPI LASERS. NO, IT’S NOT a chimpanzee at the keyboard, but a sobering list for Hampshire businesses.

And it continues: Raymarine, Insensys, Hanson, Point Source, WestQuay Shopping Centre, Smiths Aerospace, Moody Yachts, Genetix, Solvay, Southampton Football Club, Lucite, Gravatom.

On the face of it, it’s not a list likely to make the heart beat faster.

But maybe it should.

This disparate group of companies, some of which are today just footnotes in history, are all united by one thing.

That’s right, they are all Hampshire firms or companies with significant operations here that have recently fallen to foreign takeovers.

And it’s far from comprehensive. Many, many more, big and small, have succumbed to a fat pile of dollars or euros in just the last few years.

And now, this month, another name looks certain to be added to that sombre group – Chloride.

It is headquartered down here and although not widely known is a highly regarded company with a long history in Northam.

As you can see opposite, a shock bid from Switzerland all but guarantees its future owners now lie overseas, although time will tell whether that’s in Missouri or Zurich.

Chloride is a fantastic outfit, as demonstrated by the sky-high sums on offer for it. Top quality technology, well run, great clients and the world at its feet (albeit the arcane and impenetrable world of uninterruptible power supplies).

And that’s the problem.

Raymarine aside, they don’t come for the weak and the struggling.

They come for our best and the strongest. Those most likely to grow, with the stellar earning potential and the world class intellectual property. And it is happening all the time.

If it were a two-way street, then it would be hard to object, but it’s not.

Apart from a valiant contribution from the likes of Chemring and BAE Systems, it’s pretty much all one-way traffic.

You might be sitting there thinking ‘so what’?

But it seems to me a simple fact that an Arab in Dubai has a different set of priorities to a docker from St Denys. And yet it is this same Middle Eastern gent whose views are today what really matter on the future direction of Southampton’s container terminal, or Dubai Ports World Southampton, as they now insist it be called.

American bankers, Canadian dentists and Singaporean public servants now pull the strings at Southampton docks. The latter lot also own half of the city’s biggest shopping centre. The views of Spanish construction magnates are what really matter over at the airport. German industrialists now own and direct the laser technology developed in Hampshire and it is the black, red and gold of Deutschland that flutters uber alles the stern of the much loved yacht brand that was born on the Hamble.

On the one hand it’s a cause of celebration that foreign firms want to back our talent with their money and yet it’s starting to feel like it’s going too far.

This is no xenophobic rant, more a call to question whether this can simply be allowed to go on indefinitely.

From chocolate to cars to nuclear power we have watched our brightest and best consumed by predators from across the water gorging as though we were some sort of giant corporate buffet.

How long can we keep on selling the family silver?

Comments(9)

DCM says...
5:19pm Sun 4 Jul 10

What a total load of nonsense. The idea that a British businessman will care more for his employees than a Singaporean is completely baseless. They care primarily about profit, any social responsibilty they have is down to the person, not where they're from.
Where do you think the money made from selling your business goes? It's invested in other businesses, often British ones. It's also used to buy foreign businesses, just because you can't name any doesn't mean they don't exist.

Veterus says...
10:03am Wed 7 Jul 10

Far from being "nonsense" I think the point is extremely serious. Unless the UK finds and retains valuable knowledge-based industries to enable profitable exports we will continue in the downward spiral of state bail-outs as we are forced to import more and more products and services from other economies. This is a strategic threat that we are sleepwalking into.
www.veterusconsultin
g.com

DCM says...
2:16pm Wed 7 Jul 10

Veterus wrote:
Far from being "nonsense" I think the point is extremely serious. Unless the UK finds and retains valuable knowledge-based industries to enable profitable exports we will continue in the downward spiral of state bail-outs as we are forced to import more and more products and services from other economies. This is a strategic threat that we are sleepwalking into. www.veterusconsultin g.com
That would be true if we lose all these skills after a foreign takeover, but we don't. The employees stay here, the business stays here, it's just a change of ownership.
There is no "strategic threat" - should we ever enter hostilities with any other country their assets would be frozen - that includes the companies they own.
If we really want to compete with the rest of the world we have to lose this little islander mentality that many people have.

Shergold says...
5:05pm Wed 7 Jul 10

I agree that there is worry over the foriegn take overs as it will always mean less jobs for the locals, and the if the company is not registered here then they do not pay the taxes/or less?
That is what happens in many parts of the world. If they make more money or want take the company abroad to cheaper places for cheaper wages, the locals will still lose out and we lose that infrastructure. By keeping a company in this Country it means more stability and sustainability for the locals - but no body cares about that.

mollie says...
9:40pm Wed 7 Jul 10

DCM wrote:
Veterus wrote:
Far from being "nonsense" I think the point is extremely serious. Unless the UK finds and retains valuable knowledge-based industries to enable profitable exports we will continue in the downward spiral of state bail-outs as we are forced to import more and more products and services from other economies. This is a strategic threat that we are sleepwalking into. www.veterusconsultin g.com
That would be true if we lose all these skills after a foreign takeover, but we don't. The employees stay here, the business stays here, it's just a change of ownership.
There is no "strategic threat" - should we ever enter hostilities with any other country their assets would be frozen - that includes the companies they own.
If we really want to compete with the rest of the world we have to lose this little islander mentality that many people have.
Oh please do wake up at the back there! I could almost laugh at the naivete of some like dcm, if you seriously believe that it is just a change of ownership and the employees stay here along with the business. Then what happens ? the company decides it can employ cheaper labour and brings that labour in , thereby creating massive unemployment, eventually this new owner realises it will be even cheaper to ship this lot out to where the cheap labour is . and so another business bites the dust, this has been going on large scale since we got sucked into the tentacles of the EU and until we get out nothing will change, this little islanders mentality has been watching this happen for too long and the only beneficiaries are those in the big business of PROFIT. what business did you say you were in ?

DCM says...
10:45pm Sat 10 Jul 10

mollie wrote:
DCM wrote:
Veterus wrote: Far from being "nonsense" I think the point is extremely serious. Unless the UK finds and retains valuable knowledge-based industries to enable profitable exports we will continue in the downward spiral of state bail-outs as we are forced to import more and more products and services from other economies. This is a strategic threat that we are sleepwalking into. www.veterusconsultin g.com
That would be true if we lose all these skills after a foreign takeover, but we don't. The employees stay here, the business stays here, it's just a change of ownership. There is no "strategic threat" - should we ever enter hostilities with any other country their assets would be frozen - that includes the companies they own. If we really want to compete with the rest of the world we have to lose this little islander mentality that many people have.
Oh please do wake up at the back there! I could almost laugh at the naivete of some like dcm, if you seriously believe that it is just a change of ownership and the employees stay here along with the business. Then what happens ? the company decides it can employ cheaper labour and brings that labour in , thereby creating massive unemployment, eventually this new owner realises it will be even cheaper to ship this lot out to where the cheap labour is . and so another business bites the dust, this has been going on large scale since we got sucked into the tentacles of the EU and until we get out nothing will change, this little islanders mentality has been watching this happen for too long and the only beneficiaries are those in the big business of PROFIT. what business did you say you were in ?
This debate is about whether foreign or British ownership is better.
If you believe that it's only foreign companies that will close down British operations and get the products/services produced for less in other countries then you are very much mistaken. All businesses regardless of ownership will do this.
Given that you have mentioned the EU and wanting to get out of it then you are plainly one of the little Islanders who are, frankly, quite wrong. Whilst there have been some negative effects, Britain has benefitted massively from both the EU and wider globalisation.
Yes, I am in the business world. I work for a company that was bought several years ago by a foreign company and has actually expanded, hiring high quality, skilled people in the process. This means that, unlike you, I know what i'm talking about.

namussi says...
11:55am Mon 26 Jul 10

I cannot believe that you are so ignorant of what makes modern business work, and yet you work as a journalist specialising in business. Your views are nationalistic nonsense, and not so far from some political extremists.

If you think that it is wrong for people from one country to own businesses in another, then I hope that your personal investments reflect that.

Or is this just a dig at your employer -- after all, the Daily Echo is owned by a US company?

Linesman says...
7:37am Fri 30 Jul 10

namussi wrote:
I cannot believe that you are so ignorant of what makes modern business work, and yet you work as a journalist specialising in business. Your views are nationalistic nonsense, and not so far from some political extremists. If you think that it is wrong for people from one country to own businesses in another, then I hope that your personal investments reflect that. Or is this just a dig at your employer -- after all, the Daily Echo is owned by a US company?
You are right. There are British owners of companies in other countries, so why not foreigners owning companies here.
However, would the foreigner who pulls the strings of ABP know anything about Dibden Bay and the strength of local feeling?
I very much doubt it!
All he would seee would be £ and $ signs and to hell with the locals.

Bassett-Mikey says...
6:19pm Sat 31 Jul 10

A foreign takeover normally does not mean significant job loss in general.
The very real and hidden job losses are those of what is known as out-sourcing. Mumbai has tens of thousands of employees looking after call desks, computer systems, help desks and a variety of other areas. These are all skilled areas where the job has just vanished from the UK. You know, when you phone your bank, or BT etc...

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree