I have been advised to invest into a tracker fund but have also read about exchange traded funds (ETF) as they are cheaper. Is that wise?
We all have our pension funds, mortgage repayment vehicles, investments and ISAs etc. Each of these is invested into an investment fund which is a spread across a range of assets like stocks and
shares, property, cash etc. Typically, those funds are either an insurance company's managed fund (a large, expensive, clumpy, underperforming bag of mist), or a range of investments such as unit
trusts or investment trusts, which may also be expensive and underperforming depending on what's been chosen for you.
Each of these funds has a fund manager - the star player who will (you think and hope), be a bit magical and make great decisions for you. Good luck with the hoping! These funds will perform, or
not, based on the ability of the manager to maximise the returns, but in reality, it's an elite group of managers who are consistent enough to add value on a year by year basis.
To cap the 'hoping' the managers charge for the comfort of you knowing they are 'managing' the assets, and they charge well, with 5.25% initial fees along with annual fees in excess of 2% being the
norm. Furthermore, if you buy some of these through a pension or life insurance bond product, there could be an extra layer of fees on top. I have seen product fees of close to 11% in some life
insurance investment bonds!
ETFs have been slow to get going in the UK, perhaps (cynically) because they don’t pay commission. Their advantages are quite simple: Firstly they are much cheaper. You might reasonably expect an
annual charge (described as a total expense ratio) of over 2% for most unit trusts and the average investment trust hovers around 1.75% (1).
An ETFs total expense ratio is closer to 0.2% with the far eastern ETFs topping the expense tree at 0.7%. You mightn’t necessarily expect to pay an ingoing fee thereby saving the 5.25%. Also,
unlike buying shares, most ETFs are not penalised by stamp duty. (2) An ETF is simple in its construction. Unlike an investment fund where the manager makes all the choices of whether or not to be
in the market, which stocks to buy and sell, and which to take gains on, an ETF simply tracks an index. An index is an example of the average performance of a stock market. The FTSE100 is an
example of that. There are a range of global indices and an ETF simply tracks each of these in one of two ways.
The first is called full replication and that is where the ETF buys all the stocks that appear in that index. For example, a fully replicated FTSE 100 ETF will hold all the 102 stocks in the
FTSE100 and have the appropriate weighting according to the FTSE100.
The other solution is to use sampling. This is where a computer is used to design the portfolio and track the index closely but not exactly. The ETF might decide to leave out less liquid stocks
(not easy to buy and sell and might have a large difference between the buy and sell price, meaning extra charges for you) from its portfolio. The difference between the two should be reasonably
minimal. For example, one ETF using the sampling method held 352 stocks as opposed to the index which had 360.
There are no real burning disadvantages to an ETF other than the two obvious ones: Firstly, dividend reinvestment - some ETFs hold dividends in cash, and only pay them out to investors on a
periodic basis. However, some ETFs have the ability to re-invest dividends daily. A lag in dividend re-investment may cause a small amount of underperformance in rising markets.
Secondly, you will receive no investment management and, as such, in a falling or sideways market you won't have the ability the star managers have, which is to move in and out of the market and
trade on the ups and downs. A market that rises and falls constantly will bring opportunities that a simulated index will not be able to take advantage of.
For a fact sheet on the better ETFs call Peter on 0845 230 9876, e-mail email@example.com or take a look at our website.
The value of shares and investments can go down as well as up.
1. Telegraph 2. Sesame