News RSS Feed


Fluoride debate Tweet with the Daily Echo Financial Crisis Ford's Future in Southampton


Biggest shake up in Southampton's railway system since it was built

9:00am Tuesday 30th October 2007

comment Comments (18)   Have your say »


SOUTHAMPTON'S clogged roads could be relieved of more than one million lorry journeys a year after the Government backed a long-awaited plan to improve the rail freight network.

The Department for Transport is giving £43m to modernise the railway system round the city. It will give large containers access from the city's port to Birmingham, the north-west and Scotland on the West Coast Main Line.

Money will be spent on lowering tracks, raising bridges and removing obstacles to make the Southampton to West Midlands rail line more compatible with the bigger freight containers.

The work, due to start early next year and finish by 2011, will include improvements to the tunnel linking Southampton port and station with the rest of the network. The growth of rail freight has been hampered by the use of the larger containers, which are too big for certain sections of the network when fitted to standard rail wagons.

The project is likely to mean misery in the short term for commuters on road and rail,with disruption unavoidable.

Work to widen the major tunnel that runs underneath Southampton city centre is set to cause long-running disruption to services and to motorists.

The work is essential to modify the tunnel to cope with today's 9ft 6in high containers - a foot taller than their predecessors, which are being phased out. As a result, the number of containers leaving from the docks by rail has fallen from 35 per cent to just 28 per cent today, or 255,000.

Port bosses aim to get the numbers up to 40 per cent - about 400,000 containers currently, but as the container terminal pushes ahead with ambitious plans to nearly double in size, it could soon approach one million.

As well as cutting road congestion it is hoped that the multi-million-pound scheme will help to boost the city's economy and help the environment.

Southampton docks owner Associated British Ports and regional development agency SEEDA are contributing almost £12m to the scheme.

Port boss Doug Morrisson said: "It is great news and it's something we have all been working towards for some time now.

"The percentage of boxes going by rail out of Southampton has dropped over recent years because of this gauge clearance problem.

"We have an aspiration to get the percentage up to 40 per cent of our total volume and we couldn't do that without this project.

"The real beneficiaries are everyone who lives between here and the Midlands. They will see less traffic on the roads."

Route director David Pape, of track management agency Network Rail, said: "This funding represents a huge opportunity for rail freight.

"Network Rail will now begin delivery of the projects, working with all parties to carry out the enhancements to enable the rail freight market to grow and remove thousands of potential lorry journeys off the congested road network.

"We will now be continuing with feasibility studies into the best way to go ahead with the work.

"We will certainly bear in mind any potential disruption the work could cause, and we will do our best to minimise that disruption."

Bosses at Freightliner, which transports more than 225,000 containers around the country each year on its 34 daily services from Southampton docks, said that the announcement would make a big difference.

"This announcement for funding will make a difference in the ability of rail freight operators to move 9ft 6in containers on standard wagons from the major deep sea ports," said Lindsay Durham, head of rail strategy at Freightliner.

"We are pleased that the DfT recognises the important role that rail plays in the transport of containers from major ports.

"Rail movements have a much lower carbon footprint per container moved than road movements and can help to relieve road congestion.

"Rail freight has not only kept up with market growth but also increased its market share from 17 per cent to 24 per cent over the last ten years.

"This has meant last year about 800,000 lorry journeys were kept off congested roads such as the A34 and the A14 by trains."

The South East England Development Agency, one of several organisations which have contributed funds to the scheme, estimated that reduced congestion on the roads in the Southampton and Winchester area alone would deliver a £13m boost to the economy.

Its chief executive Pam Alexander said: "The port of Southampton is a major player in regional and UK economic performance, so we are delighted that the project has full approval to go ahead."

Southampton's transport bosses said the funding was "fantastic."

Cabinet member for environment and transport, Cllr Gavin Dick, said: "These improvements will help take thousands of lorries off our roads and will help to significantly reduce carbon emissions in Southampton and the UK.

"This is fantastic for both our local environment and our economy."

Captain Jimmy Chestnutt, director general of the Southampton and Fareham Chamber of Commerce, said: "This is exciting news for Southampton and the surrounding region. The Chamber of Commerce, working with other parties, has lobbied in support of this project for a number of years.

"The proposed enhancements to the rail freight gauge will provide improved sustainable transport links to the West Midlands and beyond. This will ensure that the port of Southampton is able to handle the latest generation of containers and enable more freight to be transferred from road to rail systems with the obvious resultant environmental benefits.

"It will also ensure that the transportation links to and from the port and city of Southampton will be able to more effectively support the economic aspirations of this region."

Southampton Itchen MP John Denham said: "This is a fantastic boost for Southampton. It is a real statement of Government confidence in the future prosperity and importance of our port on which so many jobs rely. I'm grateful to the transport ministers who have taken a personal interest in the development of the project."

Southampton Test MP Alan Whitehead said: "As well as helping to ensure the future competitiveness of the docks, this project will deliver huge environmental benefits by reducing the amount of freight transported by lorry and sending it by rail. John Denham and I have lobbied hard for this project and I am delighted it is going ahead."


Your Say YourEcho

Simon Templar, Southampton says...
10:31am Tue 30 Oct 07

The rail freight can be transported via Romsey and Chandler's Ford instead of going through the tunnel, saving the tax payers millions of pounds.

Gladstone, Southampton says...
10:51am Tue 30 Oct 07

Simon Templar wrote:
The rail freight can be transported via Romsey and Chandler's Ford instead of going through the tunnel, saving the tax payers millions of pounds.
Gosh, I wonder why nobody else has thought of that. You are clearly a free-thinking genius and completely wasting your talents by posting on the Echo website. The Government, ABP, Network Rail and SEEDA must all just want to throw their money away unnecessarily. It's astonishing that none of them spotted your solution.

Nick, Winchester says...
11:05am Tue 30 Oct 07

If the containers are too tall how will widening the tunnel help?

LMAO

Andy, Locks Heath says...
11:08am Tue 30 Oct 07

Simon Templar doesn't think properly, if at all. So all freight trains have to reverse at Romsey, then reverse back onto the main line just a few miles beyond the tunnel. And then what? The logistical and time penalty cost of that over a period of years far exceeds the cost of lowering the tunnel floor. And of course you are still 150 miles from the West Coast mainline with all the other bridges and tunnels in between or perhaps you'd forgetten that little bit. I reckon you'd get as far as Wallers Ash tunnel just the other side of Winchester before getting stuck. Actually some container trains already take the Laverstoke avoiding route via Romsey on the Salisbury line but that would also need A10 gauge clearance work anyway.

Adrian Smith, says...
11:17am Tue 30 Oct 07

Gladstone wrote:
Simon Templar wrote: The rail freight can be transported via Romsey and Chandler\'s Ford instead of going through the tunnel, saving the tax payers millions of pounds.
Gosh, I wonder why nobody else has thought of that. You are clearly a free-thinking genius and completely wasting your talents by posting on the Echo website. The Government, ABP, Network Rail and SEEDA must all just want to throw their money away unnecessarily. It\'s astonishing that none of them spotted your solution.
Actually The Saint's suggestion isn't so silly and was probably considered and rejected as the decision makers may live near the lines in Romsey and CF. Of course the other problem is that rejoining the North bound lines from Chandlers Ford would need new track.

The tunnel under Southampton underwent some major works nearly 20 years ago. That was to replace some of the brick lining with steel, which actually widened the tunnel in certain sections, but didn't lower the track. That was very disruptive, but didn't cause problems above ground (which this article infers is the case this time).

What seems strange is that yesterday the £43M was to "strengthen and widen the Southampton to Nuneaton corridor". That sum seemed small. Now we have this work on the tunnel. Was it included in the original figure because if it was the whole project seems a bargain.

Andy, Locks Heath says...
11:52am Tue 30 Oct 07

Sorry Adrian but it is a stupid idea. Apart from the things I mentioned previously The cost of creating a triangular junction at Romsey would easily double the cost of the entire scheme -you'd have to bridge WInchester Road and Botley road with a new flyover chord, and demolish a lot of homes as well, and at the Eastleigh end you'd have to turf out Travis Perkins before you could even start. You'd then have to completely redesign the area signalling. And as you say, you may also want to double the current single line through CF which would add another 30 million or so. It's nothing to do with planning people living near the line.
Interesting point about the tunnel though - they can use floating slab track rather than conventional sleepers on ballast (as they have just done with the Mersey tunnel) as this will lower the cost (and the track) considerably!

Dave, Bournemouth/London says...
1:04pm Tue 30 Oct 07

As a regular commuter who only found out about this shock last night on BBC South TV, I'd like to know what the likely effect is going to be on my commute to London. Does anyone know if SWT have made any comment on this issue? Having only moved down to Bournemouth to escape the Smoke earlier this year I am distraught that I may have to go back and live there during the week until the tunnel and other works are fixed.

Mrs. De Pointe, says...
1:33pm Tue 30 Oct 07

Thank heavens, I thought this was a story about an earthquake disaster on the railways.

Chris, Isle of Wight says...
1:34pm Tue 30 Oct 07

SWT havent commented because its only just been announced and no decisions have been made how the work will be carried out - diversions, weekend blockades etc. It will probably be a bus to Eastleigh or St Denys during the worst of the work, you'll just need to leave extra time.

Craig David, Soton says...
3:08pm Tue 30 Oct 07

Dave wrote:
As a regular commuter who only found out about this shock last night on BBC South TV, I\'d like to know what the likely effect is going to be on my commute to London. Does anyone know if SWT have made any comment on this issue? Having only moved down to Bournemouth to escape the Smoke earlier this year I am distraught that I may have to go back and live there during the week until the tunnel and other works are fixed.
What smoke? Please explain

Dictionary of slang, says...
3:29pm Tue 30 Oct 07

Craig David wrote:
Dave wrote: As a regular commuter who only found out about this shock last night on BBC South TV, I\'d like to know what the likely effect is going to be on my commute to London. Does anyone know if SWT have made any comment on this issue? Having only moved down to Bournemouth to escape the Smoke earlier this year I am distraught that I may have to go back and live there during the week until the tunnel and other works are fixed.
What smoke? Please explain
"The smoke" = slang for "London".

Dave, Bournemouth/London says...
4:27pm Tue 30 Oct 07

Of course that is Smoke with a capital 'S' for all you country types!!

Thanks Chris for the info - I imagine its going to be quite dire and hope they get the work done quickly. Not holding my breath however judging by their reported recent successes with the Portsmouth resignalling?

Mrs de Pointe - for me it IS a disaster!

Alice at Hythe, Hythe says...
4:49pm Tue 30 Oct 07

Where is our People Mover that the Hampshire Plan and New Forest East Plan had all outlined with the station at the Waterside Pub....all that money to draw up those plans and get traffic off the A326 now to no avail!!

gorf, soton says...
8:37pm Tue 30 Oct 07

Hope they accidently knock down central station....then they'd have 2 rebuild the eyesore!


Centra station should be knocked down and rebuilt

Dave, London/Bournemouth says...
11:25am Wed 31 Oct 07

gorf wrote:
Hope they accidently knock down central station....then they'd have 2 rebuild the eyesore! Centra station should be knocked down and rebuilt
You are so right - it has absolutely nothing going for it all. The only redeeming feature might be the fact that the trains don't stay there very long! Mind you with the tunnel work coming up that might be wrong now.......

dave nolan, Southampton says...
9:08am Fri 9 May 08

If southampton tunnel can be lowered or widened which is no mean feat due to the closeness off the canal that run's right next door to it
& was re-discovered by B.R (who apparently had no idea it was even there)when they did the re-inforcing work in the mid 80's how do the planners expect to get around it as i remember the canal runs at a 45% to the tunnel & some points run along side it but if our victorian predacesers can do it then i don't see why we can't do it as well but only as long as we do the job as thoroughly as they did & if it is it might pay even bigger dividens in not only allowing 9ft6in deep sea containers but also avioding awkward to rail move large military vehicules a.k.a. main battle tanks & other such vehicules which if the gauge enhancements worked out would wipe out these costly & time consuming road movements as well.

dave nolan, soutjampton says...
9:39am Fri 9 May 08

May be there is another way instead of going down can we go up just by squaring the top wall of the tunnel off by 2-3 FT& RE-INFORCINING IT with load bearing steel inserts the same gauge enhancements plue it will get rid off the 40 year old 20m.p.h. permanemt speed restriction through the tunnel as well, up to say 40 m.p.h before trains wuald have to slow down for the northam jn curve but that will still allow a faster run through Southampton station in the london/midland bound direction that is allowed at the present time.

adrian Vaughan, norfolk says...
7:36pm Tue 22 Jul 08

I am very pleased to have found this discussion because with so many people interested in the Southampton Tunnel I am hoping one of you will be able to tell me its length in English yards. I need to know to complete a sentence I have written.

Adrian.


Your sayYourEcho

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Video News Food & Restaurant Reviews

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »