Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
5:55am Friday 30th May 2008
CAMPAIGNERS have vowed to fight on to save a bus link set to be axed because it is too expensive to run.
South West Trains yesterday confirmed it will stop funding a Romsey-Winchester rail link bus service from July 28, because too few people use it.
Since December, SWT has funded seven bus services as part of the X66 route. Stagecoach will continue to run two: the 7.40am Winchester-Romsey and the 8.07am Romsey-Winchester as sufficient passengers use them.
Ceasing from July 28 will be the 6.15am, 6.45am and 9.45pm from Romsey and the 8.10pm and 10.10pm from Winchester.
SWT says that on average they only carry between one and eight passengers. The daytime X66 service is unaffected.
Disappointed Bus campaigner Nadine Taylor said she was "angry and disappointed".
She said: "We are losing the last remnants of a bus service that was relied heavily on by the working people of the town and villages along the way.
"Do not think this is the end of our campaign as we believe that the people of Romsey need and deserve a bus service that meets their needs."
SWT area manager Chris Haresign said: "We realise that those who do use it will be disappointed and we are sorry that they will now have to look for alternative ways of getting to the city centre."
A working group was set up last December to evaluate the service, comprising of representatives from SWT, Stagecoach, Hampshire County Council, Test Valley Borough Council, Winchester City Council and councillors representing the communities along the route.
SWT said the group accepted SWT's decision that they could no longer subsidise these services bearing in mind the low number of passengers using them.
paul b, says...
7:10am Fri 30 May 08
Iain, Lordshill says...
8:47am Fri 30 May 08
hah, says...
9:35am Fri 30 May 08
hmm wrote:Integer? You mean like 2.4 children? Oh wait, that's not an integer, is it? Come to think of it, they only mentioned average, no mention was actually made of it being the mean average.
\"that on average they only carry between one and eight passengers\"
How does that makes sense. Surely the average should be a single integer?
Simon, Southampton says...
10:21am Fri 30 May 08
Lou, says...
1:12pm Fri 30 May 08
Iain wrote:I guess you don't need this bus to get to work then. Nor will you be having to give up your job because you have no other means of transport. Must be nice living in and around Southampton where there are lots of buses. Not everyone in Romsey can afford a car or can actually drive so the bus was a life line as well as means of getting to work. No one disagrees that Stagecoach are a commercial venture, but HCC had a responsibility to its residents but sadly they put their commercial relationship with Stagecoach before the people it stings for Council Tax every month.
"a bus service that was relied heavily on by the working people of the town and villages along the way." Well, no it wasn't... The simple economics are that if no one uses a service, it's not viable to continue offering that service. No one used this, so it's going. Accept it, move on.
paul b, says...
6:45pm Fri 30 May 08
Lou wrote:WEll your a fool for taking the job if you only have one means to get there.
Iain wrote:I guess you don't need this bus to get to work then. Nor will you be having to give up your job because you have no other means of transport. Must be nice living in and around Southampton where there are lots of buses. Not everyone in Romsey can afford a car or can actually drive so the bus was a life line as well as means of getting to work. No one disagrees that Stagecoach are a commercial venture, but HCC had a responsibility to its residents but sadly they put their commercial relationship with Stagecoach before the people it stings for Council Tax every month.
"a bus service that was relied heavily on by the working people of the town and villages along the way." Well, no it wasn't... The simple economics are that if no one uses a service, it's not viable to continue offering that service. No one used this, so it's going. Accept it, move on.
George, says...
12:33pm Sun 1 Jun 08
paul b wrote:For once we're in agreement, Paul. It's been common knowledge for years that buses - particularly those servicing rural areas - are notoriously unreliable. Being dependent upon them to this extent is asking for trouble. And, yes, it is nice to live in Southampton where there are lots of buses and people can get to work easily. See what I did there? Moved to a place where getting to work would be nice and easy. It's not that difficult
Lou wrote:WEll your a fool for taking the job if you only have one means to get there.
Iain wrote:I guess you don't need this bus to get to work then. Nor will you be having to give up your job because you have no other means of transport. Must be nice living in and around Southampton where there are lots of buses. Not everyone in Romsey can afford a car or can actually drive so the bus was a life line as well as means of getting to work. No one disagrees that Stagecoach are a commercial venture, but HCC had a responsibility to its residents but sadly they put their commercial relationship with Stagecoach before the people it stings for Council Tax every month.
"a bus service that was relied heavily on by the working people of the town and villages along the way." Well, no it wasn't... The simple economics are that if no one uses a service, it's not viable to continue offering that service. No one used this, so it's going. Accept it, move on.
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
hmm, says...
6:07am Fri 30 May 08
How does that makes sense. Surely the average should be a single integer?