When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
9:20am Thursday 18th June 2009 in
A BENEFITS cheat has appeared in court after pocketing more than £12,000 in fraudulent claims – two years after stealing thousands of pounds from a Southampton pre-school.
Serina Barker, previously known as Serina Weeks, wrongly claimed the money from income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit payments during an 11-month period.
Her deception began just three months after she admitted stealing £13,235 while she was a treasurer at Oaktrees Pre-School, attached to Mason Moor Primary School in Millbrook.
She used some of that cash to fund a holiday to Gran Canaria while her thieving eventually led to the cancellation of children’s trips and nonreplacement of equipment.
On that occasion the 36-year-old was ordered to pay all the money back, carry out 200 hours community service and given an eight month suspended sentence by Judge John Boggis QC at Southampton Crown Court.
But just a few months later London’s Appeal Court slashed the amount she had to repay to just £750 – to be paid off at the rate of £10 a week.
Judges said it would cause her “25 years of heartache” to pay back the entire amount.
Now Barker will be sentenced before the city’s crown court next month after admitting three charges of benefit fraud at Southampton Magistrates’ Court.
She also faces serving her original eight-month prison term that was suspended on the condition she stayed out of trouble.
When Barker, of Langrish Road, Southampton, signed on for the benefits in 2004 she told the Department for Work and Pensions that she was a single mum-of-three.
But three years later she failed to notify the department that her circumstances had changed and that she had married Keith Barker, with whom she has a ten-month-old baby.
He left her last December.
Robert Booker, prosecuting, told how Barker wrongly claimed £12,190.27 in income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit that she was not entitled to from September 2007 to July 2008.
Mr Booker said: “She obtained those benefits when she was not entitled to after failing to notify the Department for Work and Pensions that she was living with Keith Barker as husband and wife.”
He said that during an interview Barker admitted that she and her husband had “massive financial problems” and could not afford to lose the benefits as she was pregnant with his child.
The offences came to light after her husband used the couple’s home address as his work address.
Peter Clark, mitigating, said Mr Barker was himself “financially irresponsible”
with lots of debt.
“He was working but did not seem to assist my client with her debts.”
He added that Barker’s offence was “unsophisticated”.
“She kept signing on without declaring that Mr Barker had moved in. It was no surprise she got caught.
Far from spending the money on an extravagant lifestyle she has spent the money on her debts.”
Barker will be sentenced at Southampton Crown Court next month.
Comments(23)
jimmy.little
says...
2:50pm Wed 17 Jun 09
Mahoney212
says...
2:51pm Wed 17 Jun 09
deadly666
says...
9:31am Thu 18 Jun 09
Bright Sparky
says...
10:10am Thu 18 Jun 09
Ozmosis
says...
10:22am Thu 18 Jun 09
goard
says...
10:27am Thu 18 Jun 09
yummy_mummy
says...
10:47am Thu 18 Jun 09
Tobeblunt
says...
11:18am Thu 18 Jun 09
jimmy.little wrote:i'm waiting for a member of her family or close friend to come on this site and defend her case and say "she has paid for her crime and is extremely traumatised". They obviously have no sense of justice and compassion towards those who have lost out because of this c@ws thieving habbits. Cut all her benifits and reclaim all her property to repay for the stolen monies.
just fine her £13,000 and make her pay back £1 a month, then ask the court of appeal to slash that figure down to £1000 and reduce her payment to 50p a month to save her a 'lifetime of heart ache'
yummy_mummy
says...
11:29am Thu 18 Jun 09
Tobeblunt wrote:I can't imagine any of her friends using the words 'extremely' and 'traumatised' in the same sentence :-)
jimmy.little wrote: just fine her £13,000 and make her pay back £1 a month, then ask the court of appeal to slash that figure down to £1000 and reduce her payment to 50p a month to save her a 'lifetime of heart ache'i'm waiting for a member of her family or close friend to come on this site and defend her case and say "she has paid for her crime and is extremely traumatised". They obviously have no sense of justice and compassion towards those who have lost out because of this c@ws thieving habbits. Cut all her benifits and reclaim all her property to repay for the stolen monies.
Ozmosis
says...
11:42am Thu 18 Jun 09
yummy_mummy wrote:... Or in any sentence for that matter. More like f---, off and innit? ;-)
Tobeblunt wrote:I can't imagine any of her friends using the words 'extremely' and 'traumatised' in the same sentence :-)
jimmy.little wrote: just fine her £13,000 and make her pay back £1 a month, then ask the court of appeal to slash that figure down to £1000 and reduce her payment to 50p a month to save her a 'lifetime of heart ache'i'm waiting for a member of her family or close friend to come on this site and defend her case and say "she has paid for her crime and is extremely traumatised". They obviously have no sense of justice and compassion towards those who have lost out because of this c@ws thieving habbits. Cut all her benifits and reclaim all her property to repay for the stolen monies.
upthe
says...
11:51am Thu 18 Jun 09
Higginz
says...
11:52am Thu 18 Jun 09
Hardworking&Underpaid
says...
12:03pm Thu 18 Jun 09
Condor Man
says...
12:15pm Thu 18 Jun 09
Iain
says...
12:48pm Thu 18 Jun 09
upthe wrote:Careful. I'm sure the bridge structure can only bear a certain weight.
She should be hanging from the itchen bridge with Rupert Lowe. Wonder if they would sing always look on the bright side of live
goard
says...
1:39pm Thu 18 Jun 09
jammyswine
says...
2:24pm Thu 18 Jun 09
goard wrote:Here here, well said. I have much more respect for a parent who scrapes the best they can but teaches a modicum of honesty and integrity than one who like you said, sold them out for a holiday.
Sadly, above, one can see the public are thoroughly fed up with the structure of Court procedures - this mother with children is not up to supporting her kids - naturally we all want to spoil them but they must learn that there is only bread and dripping on the table - sorry no dripping - we cannot get the meat. Many of us have had less and now have a great respect and love of our mums when she 'scraped the barrel'. BUT how much respect can the kids have for their Mum when she sold them out to a holiday in Gran Canaria? The kids have a loser of a Mum. goard
Linesman
says...
3:25pm Thu 18 Jun 09
delighted
says...
6:18pm Thu 18 Jun 09
Refresh
says...
6:34pm Thu 18 Jun 09
billywhizz61
says...
12:02am Fri 19 Jun 09
delighted
says...
7:18pm Fri 19 Jun 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
rich the stitch says...
2:30pm Wed 17 Jun 09