Dealership manager Mark Nash said: "We have not seen him or dealt with him, but he is obviously around the area.

He added: "I don't know if I'd want to sell him a car, business is business, but you don't want to be seen to be dealing with unpopular people."

I thought used car dealers were unpopular people. Are sales so poor that people must resort to this sort of news story.

I'd be more concerned about living next door to Sion Jenkins than this ageing weirdo.

Just a note to the hard-of-thinking, the branding/bell comment is sarcasm

Giner wig, Warsash? Sure it was not our own WGS??

George wrote:
Just a note to the hard-of-thinking, the branding/bell comment is sarcasm

Branded,bell,tattoo and wig? Near Portsmouth? Has anybody seen GG and Mr Westwood together?

George wrote:
Just a note to the hard-of-thinking, the branding/bell comment is sarcasm

Just a not to the rest of you.......this man is a proper cretin ha ha this is sarcasm

I HAVE JUST GONE THREW THE DRIVE THROUGH AT FAREHAM AND SEEN GLITTER IN THE MCDONALDS EATING A BIG BREAKFAST SHOCKING HE EVEN SIGNED A COUPLE OF PICTURES FOR PEOPLE!!

Mandy wrote:

Andy wrote:
I'd be more concerned about living next door to Sion Jenkins than this ageing weirdo.

Why? Jenkins was found not guilty..I suppose kangaroo courts are still acceptable in Locks Heath are they?

OJ Simpson was found "not guilty"...

MARK wrote:
I HAVE JUST GONE THREW THE DRIVE THROUGH AT FAREHAM AND SEEN GLITTER IN THE MCDONALDS EATING A BIG BREAKFAST SHOCKING HE EVEN SIGNED A COUPLE OF PICTURES FOR PEOPLE!!

A happy meal, and he is dressed in a ginger wig? Maybe he has got a job as Ronald McGlitter? Anyway the press are hanging around Hill Head still, that's where he's loitering, near a certain sea front pub.

Why bother allowing comments on the story, Echo, knowing full well what the gist of most of them will be, if you're just going to spend all day deleting half of them?

Maybe he went to McDonalds because he knew he could get bacon on his cheeseburger. A service kebab man will not provide for some reason.

Can I just say to Sean Woodward that I would rather Gadd lived in Fareham or Southampton with the knowledge of the police than that he was forced to go into hiding by irresponsible comments like Mr Woodward's.

Unless we are contemplating either locking up sex offenders for life, or execution, they have to live somewhere after they have served their sentences. It is better that this is done with police knowledge and without the threat of local vigilantes forcing them to live in secret with their whereabouts unknown to the police. And yes Mr Woodward, I am a parent.

Mr Angry wrote:
Stupid pathetic comments by Mr Woodward.Probably thinking about his own selfish thoughts and probably doesnt give a **** about our children. Along with your council stick to persecuting people who overfill their dustbins as thats all your any good at! ;-)

quote

Exactly. £10 says Woodward couldn't give two hoots about where Gadd lives. It's a purely political move, aiming for - and, sadly, probably getting - the "anti-nonce" vote. It's only a step or two away from "A vote against me is a vote for child molesters. You don't want child molesters, do you?"

forget where's wally....this is much better...where's glitter

George - Yes, this is indeed very true! And I don't know if I'm comfortable with the idea that there are 'chef's' in McDonalds to be honest.... not really chef's at all actually, just... zombies.. It was probably the only place he could get served. I mean, the guy's banned from 18 countries. Imagine being BANNED from 18 countries. Actually, no don't. Its not a nice thought. To be honest, anyone who changes their name to 'Gary Glitter' has to have a few issues..

Christoff wrote:

George wrote:

Mr Angry wrote: Stupid pathetic comments by Mr Woodward.Probably thinking about his own selfish thoughts and probably doesnt give a **** about our children. Along with your council stick to persecuting people who overfill their dustbins as thats all your any good at! ;-)

quote

Exactly. £10 says Woodward couldn't give two hoots about where Gadd lives. It's a purely political move, aiming for - and, sadly, probably getting - the "anti-nonce" vote. It's only a step or two away from "A vote against me is a vote for child molesters. You don't want child molesters, do you?"

rats, I missed Woodwards comments before the Echo cleared them....care to summarise?

The comments are in the story itself, Christoff. He's a councillor in Fareham

kebab man wrote:

Ed Case wrote:
Come on, come on, Come on come on. Come on, come on, Come on... still waiting to be served at McD's, there's some strange bloke in front of me fiddling with his change.

no that's George mate

Do you wanna be in my gang Kebab man?

Andy wrote:
I'd be more concerned about living next door to Sion Jenkins than this ageing weirdo.

Well said Andy.

I cant wait for the day we get justice against that evil man!!!

George wrote:

Christoff wrote:

George wrote:

Mr Angry wrote: Stupid pathetic comments by Mr Woodward.Probably thinking about his own selfish thoughts and probably doesnt give a **** about our children. Along with your council stick to persecuting people who overfill their dustbins as thats all your any good at! ;-)

quote

Exactly. £10 says Woodward couldn\'t give two hoots about where Gadd lives. It\'s a purely political move, aiming for - and, sadly, probably getting - the \"anti-nonce\" vote. It\'s only a step or two away from \"A vote against me is a vote for child molesters. You don\'t want child molesters, do you?\"

rats, I missed Woodwards comments before the Echo cleared them....care to summarise?

The comments are in the story itself, Christoff. He\'s a councillor in Fareham

More proof that there are certain users of this site who click on the headline and then immediately scroll down past the story to post...

Apparently hes living in Hill Head, the press are camped outside Old Street

Markmag wrote:

George wrote:

Christoff wrote:

George wrote:

Mr Angry wrote: Stupid pathetic comments by Mr Woodward.Probably thinking about his own selfish thoughts and probably doesnt give a **** about our children. Along with your council stick to persecuting people who overfill their dustbins as thats all your any good at! ;-)

quote

Exactly. £10 says Woodward couldn\'t give two hoots about where Gadd lives. It\'s a purely political move, aiming for - and, sadly, probably getting - the \"anti-nonce\" vote. It\'s only a step or two away from \"A vote against me is a vote for child molesters. You don\'t want child molesters, do you?\"

rats, I missed Woodwards comments before the Echo cleared them....care to summarise?

The comments are in the story itself, Christoff. He\'s a councillor in Fareham

More proof that there are certain users of this site who click on the headline and then immediately scroll down past the story to post...

Possibly, but to be fair, this is a bit of a hot topic, and the headline tells most of the story. It's not surprising people leap straight to the comments, it's what most of us are reading this particular story for, after all

Markmag wrote:

George wrote:

Christoff wrote:

George wrote:

Mr Angry wrote: Stupid pathetic comments by Mr Woodward.Probably thinking about his own selfish thoughts and probably doesnt give a **** about our children. Along with your council stick to persecuting people who overfill their dustbins as thats all your any good at! ;-)

quote

Exactly. £10 says Woodward couldn\'t give two hoots about where Gadd lives. It\'s a purely political move, aiming for - and, sadly, probably getting - the \"anti-nonce\" vote. It\'s only a step or two away from \"A vote against me is a vote for child molesters. You don\'t want child molesters, do you?\"

rats, I missed Woodwards comments before the Echo cleared them....care to summarise?

The comments are in the story itself, Christoff. He\'s a councillor in Fareham

More proof that there are certain users of this site who click on the headline and then immediately scroll down past the story to post...

normally I scan the story unless it is of particular interest. Sorry to have offended you by not doing things how you like them to be done.

The Echo stories normally don't have anything of interest after the first few paragraphs anyway. This one has been an exception.

Tony wrote:
Can I just say to Sean Woodward that I would rather Gadd lived in Fareham or Southampton with the knowledge of the police than that he was forced to go into hiding by irresponsible comments like Mr Woodward's. Unless we are contemplating either locking up sex offenders for life, or execution, they have to live somewhere after they have served their sentences. It is better that this is done with police knowledge and without the threat of local vigilantes forcing them to live in secret with their whereabouts unknown to the police. And yes Mr Woodward, I am a parent.

I find that even looking at a picture of 'Gadd' repulses me but I totally agree with 'Tony'. It is better to know where the disgusting little twerp is than to discover he is near when he has committed another of his disgusting crimes. Your comments Tony are appropriate and "sane" in this page of 'knee jerk' and reactionary comments.

I'm no fan of his but... wrote:
Dealership manager Mark Nash said: "We have not seen him or dealt with him, but he is obviously around the area. He added: "I don't know if I'd want to sell him a car, business is business, but you don't want to be seen to be dealing with unpopular people." I thought used car dealers were unpopular people. Are sales so poor that people must resort to this sort of news story.

I can say that Mark Nash is a lovely man and so are his family who also own the garage. You shouldn't say things like that, he is a used car salesman but he doesn't sell old bangers and he certainly wouldn't use a newspaper article to drum up business the reporter came to him not the other way around.

Its not much of a secret hideaway if we know where he is. What happened to his assets anyway I don't believe after what he has done he should be allowed to own nice things like Merc's etc...

neighbour of Mark Nash wrote:

I'm no fan of his but... wrote: Dealership manager Mark Nash said: "We have not seen him or dealt with him, but he is obviously around the area. He added: "I don't know if I'd want to sell him a car, business is business, but you don't want to be seen to be dealing with unpopular people." I thought used car dealers were unpopular people. Are sales so poor that people must resort to this sort of news story.

I can say that Mark Nash is a lovely man and so are his family who also own the garage. You shouldn't say things like that, he is a used car salesman but he doesn't sell old bangers and he certainly wouldn't use a newspaper article to drum up business the reporter came to him not the other way around.

Agree with mark nash's neighbour


Im sure someone who sells cars as prestige as he does, does not need to use something like the daily echo for publicity lol

the vengeful cabbage wrote:
Its not much of a secret hideaway if we know where he is. What happened to his assets anyway I don't believe after what he has done he should be allowed to own nice things like Merc's etc...

sorry but I have to disagree there. His accumulated wealth has nothing to do with his sexual preferences whatsoever.

Christoff wrote:

the vengeful cabbage wrote:
Its not much of a secret hideaway if we know where he is. What happened to his assets anyway I don't believe after what he has done he should be allowed to own nice things like Merc's etc...

sorry but I have to disagree there. His accumulated wealth has nothing to do with his sexual preferences whatsoever.

So you agree with what he's done, then? You support child molesters?

Christoff wrote:

the vengeful cabbage wrote: Its not much of a secret hideaway if we know where he is. What happened to his assets anyway I don't believe after what he has done he should be allowed to own nice things like Merc's etc...

sorry but I have to disagree there. His accumulated wealth has nothing to do with his sexual preferences whatsoever.

No but the emotional damage he has wrought should be cause to seize his assets. Reguardless of what impact his actions had on the aquasition of his wealth i personally would like to see the courts take a stand with this and order his assets be surrendered to a childrens charity. He does not deserve nice things nor does any criminal.

the vengeful cabbage wrote:

Christoff wrote:

the vengeful cabbage wrote: Its not much of a secret hideaway if we know where he is. What happened to his assets anyway I don't believe after what he has done he should be allowed to own nice things like Merc's etc...

sorry but I have to disagree there. His accumulated wealth has nothing to do with his sexual preferences whatsoever.

No but the emotional damage he has wrought should be cause to seize his assets. Reguardless of what impact his actions had on the aquasition of his wealth i personally would like to see the courts take a stand with this and order his assets be surrendered to a childrens charity. He does not deserve nice things nor does any criminal.

Then you're a short-sighted idiot, and no different to those baying for him to be hanged. The way you lot talk, he's the worlds worstest-ever predatory paedophile, when the reality is, he's far from that. He's done wrong, and he's already paid for it, and will continue to forever. Baying for his blood just shows that the media is manipulating you exactly as they planned. You now believe this man is evil incarnate. No criminal deserves nice things? So you think all criminals should be treated equally? There should be no mercy system at all? Think that through. Think what it would actually mean to society.

Fool

I have been reading the comments posted over the last two days and have until now kept out of it because i know what i am about to post will invoke a reaction mostly negative towards me and others who may stand up and say what they think. Paul Gadd/Gary Glitter has been convicted of a crime commited in another country he has served time for this and rightly or wrongly has been released. Now part of that sentance included deportation to his native country - the UK - so he is here not because he chooses to be - remember how he tried to enter Thiland and Hong Kong- but because this is the only place he can be at present and like it or not if as i suspect he is schedule 3 on the offenders list he will not be allowed to travel anywhere else. Do you realy think with all the Hate thrown at him just from this site he is here through choice?. As for his chances of reoffending that remains to be seen.Most child abusers are known to there victims as close family members or family friends not "famous" ex pop stars. This histeria has been fuelled by misinformation, predudice, and a media that only exists to line the pockets of its owners.Are we not all intellegent human beings who can think for ourselves and not follow the herd.In my opinion the guy has served his sentance, been deported and should be left alone to get on with his life, lets face it next week this will have been forgotten about anyway, theres enough in the world to realy get concerned about without hounding others. And before the comments start i am a parent and it wouldn't bother me if he lived next door. After all do you know your neigbours that well that you can honestly say they are "normal"?

Jebus wept! wrote:

bob wrote:

neighbour of Mark Nash wrote:

I\'m no fan of his but... wrote: Dealership manager Mark Nash said: \"We have not seen him or dealt with him, but he is obviously around the area. He added: \"I don\'t know if I\'d want to sell him a car, business is business, but you don\'t want to be seen to be dealing with unpopular people.\" I thought used car dealers were unpopular people. Are sales so poor that people must resort to this sort of news story.

I can say that Mark Nash is a lovely man and so are his family who also own the garage. You shouldn\'t say things like that, he is a used car salesman but he doesn\'t sell old bangers and he certainly wouldn\'t use a newspaper article to drum up business the reporter came to him not the other way around.

Agree with mark nash\'s neighbour Im sure someone who sells cars as prestige as he does, does not need to use something like the daily echo for publicity lol

Are all of poor, defenseless Mr Nash\'s neighbours this lily-livered and sensitive? Nobody\'s said anything about him, personally. It was an empty comment about the stereotype of second-hand car dealers. Are you going to run around the entire country nay-saying everything anybody ever says against them?

as a friend of Mr Nash's neighbours I would like to say that Mr Nash's neighbours are very nice people and you lot should leave them alone.

the vengeful cabbage wrote:

apathetic carrot wrote:

the vengeful cabbage wrote:

Christoff wrote:

the vengeful cabbage wrote: Its not much of a secret hideaway if we know where he is. What happened to his assets anyway I don't believe after what he has done he should be allowed to own nice things like Merc's etc...

sorry but I have to disagree there. His accumulated wealth has nothing to do with his sexual preferences whatsoever.

No but the emotional damage he has wrought should be cause to seize his assets. Reguardless of what impact his actions had on the aquasition of his wealth i personally would like to see the courts take a stand with this and order his assets be surrendered to a childrens charity. He does not deserve nice things nor does any criminal.

Then you're a short-sighted idiot, and no different to those baying for him to be hanged. The way you lot talk, he's the worlds worstest-ever predatory paedophile, when the reality is, he's far from that. He's done wrong, and he's already paid for it, and will continue to forever. Baying for his blood just shows that the media is manipulating you exactly as they planned. You now believe this man is evil incarnate. No criminal deserves nice things? So you think all criminals should be treated equally? There should be no mercy system at all? Think that through. Think what it would actually mean to society. Fool

it would mean idiots like you wouldn't be able to own a computer for a start.

No more questions m'lud

Glitter is just a sad old man, in his day o.k he was no Bowie or Bolan but he was a 'star'. Due to his actions he has thrown away that nostalgic goodwill the public felt for him pre the chlid **** scandal and subsequent underage sex charges, he will be forever looking over his shoulder and doubtfully ever in a situation where he can re-offend.He deserves nothing more than to be forgotten..much like the whole glam period really!

Glitter came into our takeaway last night, he said he fancied a chinese.

neighbour of Mark Nash wrote:

I'm no fan of his but... wrote: Dealership manager Mark Nash said: "We have not seen him or dealt with him, but he is obviously around the area. He added: "I don't know if I'd want to sell him a car, business is business, but you don't want to be seen to be dealing with unpopular people." I thought used car dealers were unpopular people. Are sales so poor that people must resort to this sort of news story.

I can say that Mark Nash is a lovely man and so are his family who also own the garage. You shouldn't say things like that, he is a used car salesman but he doesn't sell old bangers and he certainly wouldn't use a newspaper article to drum up business the reporter came to him not the other way around.

I can say that Mark is a grate giy and we love him.

p.s. can I borrow that bmw this weekend Mark?