News RSS Feed


Fluoride debate Tweet with the Daily Echo Financial Crisis Ford's Future in Southampton


Ship makes ferry big impact on first arrival

7:57am Wednesday 3rd September 2008

comment Comments (89)   Have your say »

Photograph of the Author By Chris Yandell »

Campaigners fighting the introduction of controversial new cross-Solent ferries say they are even larger than they feared after getting their first look at the vessels.

There was anger from protesters as the first of the new Wightlink vessels arrived in its new home at Lymington.

Currently moored alongside Lymington Pier railway station, the Croatian-built Wight Light towers above the yachts anchored in the Lymington River.

Roger Wilson, father of Olympic gold medal-winning sailor Pippa Wilson, said: "It's even bigger than we thought and the diagrams suggested."

Dr Don Mackenzie, a leading member of the Lymington Society, said Wight Light appeared to be twice the height of the existing ferries.

He added: "It's massive - much bigger than I expected it to be - and I'm told it creates a huge wash. The new vessels will have a dominating impact on the river and will be very intimidating to sailors, especially those in small craft."

Wight Light is one of three replacement ferries due to enter service as part of a £26m investment in the future of the busy cross-Solent route.

They are longer and taller than the existing vessels, which were built 35 years ago, and displace almost twice as much water.

Critics claim the ships' wash will damage environmentally-sensitive parts of the riverbank by accelerating the erosion that is already taking place.

They can carry 65 vehicles, 15 more than the present craft, and have also sparked fears that they will result in even more traffic using already overcrowded roads.

Lymington River Association and other organisations in the town have spent months fighting the introduction of the new ferries.

Last night the Royal Lymington Yacht Club warned that the vessels were likely to have an adverse impact on sailing in the river.

A statement on the club's website said: "We hope that Wightlink can mitigate these impacts by operational changes but some will remain."

However, Wightlink said sea trials conducted in Croatia had established that Wight Light produced "very little" wash at speeds of up to six knots.

The company added that a study carried out by ABP Mer had confirmed Wightlink's assessment that the ferries' impact would be no greater than that of the existing ships.

The second vessel, Wight Sky, is due to leave Croatia next week.

Andrew Wilson, Wightlink chief executive, said: "The sea trials undertaken by Wight Light went according to plan and provided further evidence that the new Wight-class vessels will be ideal replacements for the existing Lymington-Yarmouth fleet."

Wight Light will enter service later this year if sea trials in the Solent in the next two weeks prove successful.


Your Say YourEcho

Andy, Locks Heath says...
8:21am Wed 3 Sep 08

"I'm told it creates a huge wash" says "Doctor" McKenzie, and on the basis of this unsourced hearsay his organisation opposes these ferries and uses any misinformation and exagerration it can get its hands on. "It will inimidate sailors..." Wightlink's St Clare on the Portsmouth route is more than twice as heavy as these vessels - so have all the blue capped sailors from Wootton Creek run for their lives yet? Perhaps any precious yachtsmen so intimidated should think twice about putting to sea at all lest they meet something a lot larger and faster. If you want more hard evidence "Doctor" I remember the MVs Farringford and Freshwater that preceded the Cenwulf class and though they were much lighter, their wash - especially the paddler Farringford - was far more severe. There is no direct correlation between displacement and wash - it's to do with shape particularly at low speed. Cenwulf and her sisters create very little wash when sailing past the Marinas and I saw this for myself just two weeks ago sailing on Cenred past the RLYC ....but on that subject, how much tidal erosion do dredged yacht basins cause down river, or would the Lymington River association prefer to deflect all the blame onto someone else? The Ferry route provides permanent - not seasonal - careers both directly and indirectly on both sides of the Solent. The LRA don't give a **** about anyone's livelihood unless they are rich enough to own a yacht - Something of hypocritical paradox there that perhaps summarises their outlook.

Condor Man, Southampton says...
8:26am Wed 3 Sep 08

Typical bigotted views of yachty types. Wight Link are trying to boost their income, which in turn goes back to ordinary people who work for them. Will the likes of RYLM pay the wages of the workers who could lose their jobs? No, they want to dominate the land and the people around them.

Andy, Locks Heath says...
8:29am Wed 3 Sep 08

...and a note to the Editor - the word censored by your automatic obscenity filter in my last post is d-a-m-n. It might be classed as offensive in the more bigotted parts of the American Bible Belt but I think here in Hampshire we're a little more enlightened. In view of some of the offensive immature tripe that gets onto a lot of your threads at the moment you should get yourself a better product or have someone edit the posts manually. Now perhaps I should go back to bed and get up again.

Fed up, On board says...
8:30am Wed 3 Sep 08

Last night the Royal Lymington Yacht Club warned that the vessels were likely to have an adverse impact on sailing in the river.


My heart bleeds for you

Lymo, says...
8:30am Wed 3 Sep 08

Unfortunately, it will never hit home to many of the well-to-do lot in this area that we are in an economic slow down and therefore, having investment such as a new ferry is something to be thankful for.

I wouldn't be at all surprised that if the ferry company said it was pulling out of Lymington, a lot of the yachties would be glad!

bacon bufty, the poop deck says...
8:37am Wed 3 Sep 08

mmmm, sailors

Frank, Hants says...
8:37am Wed 3 Sep 08

The boat is bigger than I had imagined. Pity it couldn't have been built in Britain. I'm wondering if it might get stuck on the mud at low tide?

Shorecrab, Penno marshes says...
10:11am Wed 3 Sep 08

How typical of the yachties to only care for themselves and their precious hobby, which to them takes priority over the local working men and womens needs. And to use the environment as a tool because their real argument is to flimsy. That is one butt ugly ship though.

Andy, Locks Heath says...
10:23am Wed 3 Sep 08

With regard to the RLYC's comments about sailing on the river, when we sailed to Yarmouth two Saturdays ago on Cenred every single yacht bar one wayfarer (outside the channel marker posts anyway) was under power, not under sail and all the yachts only put sails up as they neared Jack-in-the-Basket. This is not because of the ferries, this is because the yachties are either not skilled enough or are just too imaptient to get out to the Solent as quickly as possible. I challenge the LRA and the RLYC to deny that this is normal for Lymington River and pretty much always has been.

D. Waterman, Horndean says...
11:02am Wed 3 Sep 08

If these supposedly intimitated sailors are worried about this apparently massive new ship, perhaps they are not fit to be sailing at all. How about having a look at the super tankers, container ships and cruise liners that use the solent and Southampton Water every day and the cross channel ferries and naval ships that use the very narrow entrance to Portsmouth Harbour?

They may find something to be intimidated about then. Perhaps a lenght of string attached to their precious little yachts may be advisable? That should keep them from danger.

Bright Spark, Stubbington says...
11:05am Wed 3 Sep 08

I would rather sail across The Solent in a yot ... yocht ... yoghurt ... yoh! .. yatch but don't have a spare £90,000 lying around, so like most would have to use the ferry servicee. For those of us without dingys what is the alternative?

sailor, says...
11:41am Wed 3 Sep 08

Andy wrote:
With regard to the RLYC's comments about sailing on the river, when we sailed to Yarmouth two Saturdays ago on Cenred every single yacht bar one wayfarer (outside the channel marker posts anyway) was under power, not under sail and all the yachts only put sails up as they neared Jack-in-the-Basket. This is not because of the ferries, this is because the yachties are either not skilled enough or are just too imaptient to get out to the Solent as quickly as possible. I challenge the LRA and the RLYC to deny that this is normal for Lymington River and pretty much always has been.
Ignorant statement. Sailors drop their sails on entrance to the river (which officially starts at Jack in the Basket) because it is more controlled to motor down the narrow, bendy, shallow river, not because of lack of skill or impatience. There is a speed limit in the river of 6 knots anyway which most yachts could do under sail. Dinghies (such as a Wayfarer, sail down the river because they are more manoeuvrable and they have no engines. When the Royal Lymington refers to sailing in the river it means the use of the river by all craft, not explicitly travelling down the river with sails up.

bacon butty, says...
11:47am Wed 3 Sep 08

sail or motor, who cares you are all harming the enviroment, I say the only thing that should be alloweed up and down that river be the ferry then the river bank is only exposed to wash for a set number of times a day. The yotties dont care they are up and down it all day and all break the speed limits. It is not right they could keep there boats moored out to see and get droped off by the ferry on route to the island, see how many want to sail then. Just a status thing with most of them look at me i got a yot, yeah well done if you decide to mortgage your 3 bedromm semi for a small boat well done, you aint no big shot. Get off the water and get the ferry it makes sence

Andy, Locks Heath says...
11:53am Wed 3 Sep 08

sailor wrote:
Andy wrote:
With regard to the RLYC's comments about sailing on the river, when we sailed to Yarmouth two Saturdays ago on Cenred every single yacht bar one wayfarer (outside the channel marker posts anyway) was under power, not under sail and all the yachts only put sails up as they neared Jack-in-the-Basket. This is not because of the ferries, this is because the yachties are either not skilled enough or are just too imaptient to get out to the Solent as quickly as possible. I challenge the LRA and the RLYC to deny that this is normal for Lymington River and pretty much always has been.
Ignorant statement. Sailors drop their sails on entrance to the river (which officially starts at Jack in the Basket) because it is more controlled to motor down the narrow, bendy, shallow river, not because of lack of skill or impatience. There is a speed limit in the river of 6 knots anyway which most yachts could do under sail. Dinghies (such as a Wayfarer, sail down the river because they are more manoeuvrable and they have no engines. When the Royal Lymington refers to sailing in the river it means the use of the river by all craft, not explicitly travelling down the river with sails up.
Excellent. So if you acknowledge that virtually all yachts are under power while in the river then what is the RLYC's point? There is no problem of manouevreability, yachts are not having to tack or jibe, and they can stick to a course. So if I am so ignorant (which I am palpably not) - then articulate exactly why the new ferries pose such as problem as to be banned from the river.

bacon butty, says...
11:57am Wed 3 Sep 08

Look at that last post by Andy, this is typical of the yotty type of concil scum who think they are something there not, why on this thread has everyone found it nessesary to break out long paragraths and big words...............
...because they are all trying to be something there not.

bobbyboy, eastern southampski says...
12:04pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Oh dear some-body's stuck a floating block of flats in the yachties Paradise at least yours will move ours will be permanent just another "blot on the landscape".

Mental Mickey, Tatchbury says...
12:05pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Correction - they are being something that you're not.

sailor, says...
12:06pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Andy wrote:
sailor wrote:
Andy wrote: With regard to the RLYC\'s comments about sailing on the river, when we sailed to Yarmouth two Saturdays ago on Cenred every single yacht bar one wayfarer (outside the channel marker posts anyway) was under power, not under sail and all the yachts only put sails up as they neared Jack-in-the-Basket. This is not because of the ferries, this is because the yachties are either not skilled enough or are just too imaptient to get out to the Solent as quickly as possible. I challenge the LRA and the RLYC to deny that this is normal for Lymington River and pretty much always has been.
Ignorant statement. Sailors drop their sails on entrance to the river (which officially starts at Jack in the Basket) because it is more controlled to motor down the narrow, bendy, shallow river, not because of lack of skill or impatience. There is a speed limit in the river of 6 knots anyway which most yachts could do under sail. Dinghies (such as a Wayfarer, sail down the river because they are more manoeuvrable and they have no engines. When the Royal Lymington refers to sailing in the river it means the use of the river by all craft, not explicitly travelling down the river with sails up.
Excellent. So if you acknowledge that virtually all yachts are under power while in the river then what is the RLYC\'s point? There is no problem of manouevreability, yachts are not having to tack or jibe, and they can stick to a course. So if I am so ignorant (which I am palpably not) - then articulate exactly why the new ferries pose such as problem as to be banned from the river.
The new ferries pose a problem because they are larger (less room for yachts), taller (more windshadow for those under sail), travel quicker (less time to manouevre) and displace around twice as much water as the former ferries (destroying Lymington River).

bacon butty, says...
12:08pm Wed 3 Sep 08

dont want to be MM, and thats a Walter Mitty, always got something to say hav'nt you, always implying your something you are not, well you are the same as the rest, bet your really mental really craaaaaazy, you are so small minded

bacon butty, says...
12:10pm Wed 3 Sep 08

ha ha mental mitty

Forest Hump, Forest says...
12:19pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Sailor's quote

"The new ferries pose a problem because they are larger (less room for yachts), taller (more windshadow for those under sail), travel quicker (less time to manouevre) and displace around twice as much water as the former ferries (destroying Lymington River)".

Who or what gives sailors the divine right to dictate the right to use Lymington river? You are both pompus and self-rightous. I think the dredging of Lymington Marina has caused more damage than the new ferry could. As for the displacement argument, Andy has already stated it is not proportional to wash generation. Stop being so selfish and think of all the people who truly benefit from this service

Don Life Jacket, Aground on Brambles says...
12:19pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Sailor says the ferries travel quicker (less time to manouevre) but shipmate, the speed limit in the river is the same for all vessels whatever their size, I advise that you and your crew maintain a sharp lookout, carry flares, don life jackets, maintain a listening watch on vhf channel 16, don't drink Pimms before your return journey, check the wx forecast and never stand in a bite or coil. See you in The Gun Inn on completion for tea and medals.

Andy, Locks Heath says...
12:26pm Wed 3 Sep 08

You can't have it both ways "Sailor" - are the boats under sail or not? You talk about windshadow one minute and then berate me for ignorance the next because I pointed out that almost all yachts use motors in the river. regarding size, it's beam, not length that predominates in Lymington River - but if you think the enlarged footprint of a single vessel makes that much difference then perhaps we should also ban any increase in yachts and yacht sizes as well. Are you happy to sign up to that? And as to your point about estuarial damage, prove it. Could you compare that with the tidal suck caused by the Marina basins where your boat may be? Unfortunately you are not only prejudiced but you are also a bigot for prejudging (wrongly) that I know nothing about sailing. As it happens I have been instrumental in stopping my own sailing club from supporting the LRA in its false, selfish and hypocritical aims, which you wholeheartedly support. You are not only ignorant yourself. but something of a hypocrite too.

bacon butty, says...
12:32pm Wed 3 Sep 08

wow are they so clever, read the arguments carefully they dont have a clue

the vengeful cabbage, says...
12:36pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Yawn who cares how big the ferry is if the company feels it needs this size of ferry to turn a proffit then the economy of Lymigton can hardly afford to force the ferry company out by saying no. To all you yacht loving pims sippers out there what is going to be more annoying
1. A several hundred tonne 60ft high ferry moving very slowly and broadcasting its presence.
or
2. A load more jetskis that would not be put off by the presence of a ferry.

sailor, says...
12:43pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Andy wrote:
You can't have it both ways "Sailor" - are the boats under sail or not? You talk about windshadow one minute and then berate me for ignorance the next because I pointed out that almost all yachts use motors in the river. regarding size, it's beam, not length that predominates in Lymington River - but if you think the enlarged footprint of a single vessel makes that much difference then perhaps we should also ban any increase in yachts and yacht sizes as well. Are you happy to sign up to that? And as to your point about estuarial damage, prove it. Could you compare that with the tidal suck caused by the Marina basins where your boat may be? Unfortunately you are not only prejudiced but you are also a bigot for prejudging (wrongly) that I know nothing about sailing. As it happens I have been instrumental in stopping my own sailing club from supporting the LRA in its false, selfish and hypocritical aims, which you wholeheartedly support. You are not only ignorant yourself. but something of a hypocrite too.
hang on a sec, you said yachts motor in the river because of lack of skill and impatience. I pointed out that neither of these are true, hence the ignorant comment. i'm not suggesting you don't know anything about sailing, i'm suggesting that your previous comments as to why yachts drop their sails are false. and yes i do believe the footprint of one vessel will make a difference, because it is drastically larger than any other vessel using the river. remember, yachts were using lymington river a long time before any ferries turned up. Neither am I ignorant or hypocritical.

bacon butfy, says...
12:50pm Wed 3 Sep 08

bacon butty wrote:
Look at that last post by Andy, this is typical of the yotty type of concil scum who think they are something there not, why on this thread has everyone found it nessesary to break out long paragraths and big words...............
...because they are all trying to be something there not.
the real question is, why do you have such a problem with "big words"? feeling a tad inadequate? you can always ask an adult for help with any words you don't understand

bacon butfy, says...
12:51pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Mental Mickey wrote:
Correction - they are being something that you're not.
You mean literate and articulate? Yep, that'd be my guess, too

southy, redbridge says...
12:59pm Wed 3 Sep 08

rlyc will get no backing from me i know to well what they are like.
iow ferry in lymington been there a lot longer than any yacht club.
back in the late 50's and early 60's rlyc broke its own rules by exceding its own max membership limit and registering none local people,just so they could get a yacht basing build built in the 60,s
there is more than enough manouevre room. and if you need more room then you should learn how to sail and learn the rules of the sea.sail-be-for-stea

m do not apply in shipping lanes and channels.has most yachties seem to think.if you cant controll you vessel in a channel then you get out the tender and you tow it in.
most yachties now days are no more than sunday drivers on the water
(andy try spelling d-a-m-n,dam)

bacon butfy, says...
1:01pm Wed 3 Sep 08

bacon butty wrote:
What did i ever do to you........dont have a go at me cause you were abused as a child, I aint done nothing wrong just airing my veiws minding my own business and you go calling me a name, you are so low, you like the boats do you shall we humour you shall we, daddt let you see big boat id you very good and suck this
A tantrum. Nice. Dishes out endless abuse, basically starts crying when he gets it back. What a turd

what, says...
1:12pm Wed 3 Sep 08

southy wrote:
rlyc will get no backing from me i know to well what they are like. iow ferry in lymington been there a lot longer than any yacht club. back in the late 50's and early 60's rlyc broke its own rules by exceding its own max membership limit and registering none local people,just so they could get a yacht basing build built in the 60,s there is more than enough manouevre room. and if you need more room then you should learn how to sail and learn the rules of the sea.sail-be-for-stea m do not apply in shipping lanes and channels.has most yachties seem to think.if you cant controll you vessel in a channel then you get out the tender and you tow it in. most yachties now days are no more than sunday drivers on the water (andy try spelling d-a-m-n,dam)
what the??? Can somebody translate this for me. I dont mind that Southys spelling aint allways all that but this is completely unintelligable.

bacon butfy, says...
1:14pm Wed 3 Sep 08

what wrote:
southy wrote:
rlyc will get no backing from me i know to well what they are like. iow ferry in lymington been there a lot longer than any yacht club. back in the late 50's and early 60's rlyc broke its own rules by exceding its own max membership limit and registering none local people,just so they could get a yacht basing build built in the 60,s there is more than enough manouevre room. and if you need more room then you should learn how to sail and learn the rules of the sea.sail-be-for-stea m do not apply in shipping lanes and channels.has most yachties seem to think.if you cant controll you vessel in a channel then you get out the tender and you tow it in. most yachties now days are no more than sunday drivers on the water (andy try spelling d-a-m-n,dam)
what the??? Can somebody translate this for me. I dont mind that Southys spelling aint allways all that but this is completely unintelligable.
I wouldn't worry about it. most of his posts are just made up anyway

General Malaise, Nearby says...
1:22pm Wed 3 Sep 08

what wrote:
southy wrote: rlyc will get no backing from me i know to well what they are like. iow ferry in lymington been there a lot longer than any yacht club. back in the late 50's and early 60's rlyc broke its own rules by exceding its own max membership limit and registering none local people,just so they could get a yacht basing build built in the 60,s there is more than enough manouevre room. and if you need more room then you should learn how to sail and learn the rules of the sea.sail-be-for-stea m do not apply in shipping lanes and channels.has most yachties seem to think.if you cant controll you vessel in a channel then you get out the tender and you tow it in. most yachties now days are no more than sunday drivers on the water (andy try spelling d-a-m-n,dam)
what the??? Can somebody translate this for me. I dont mind that Southys spelling aint allways all that but this is completely unintelligable.
You need to check your own grammar and spelling before you start criticising.

Unless you're trying to be ironic.

southy, redbridge says...
1:32pm Wed 3 Sep 08

General Malaise, Nearby he not being ironic.he one of them people that keep changing there names and cant be counted

Iain, Lordshill says...
1:44pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Forest Hump wrote:
Sailor's quote "The new ferries pose a problem because they are larger (less room for yachts), taller (more windshadow for those under sail), travel quicker (less time to manouevre) and displace around twice as much water as the former ferries (destroying Lymington River)". Who or what gives sailors the divine right to dictate the right to use Lymington river? You are both pompus and self-rightous. I think the dredging of Lymington Marina has caused more damage than the new ferry could. As for the displacement argument, Andy has already stated it is not proportional to wash generation. Stop being so selfish and think of all the people who truly benefit from this service
Was ready to compose a comment, then realised that this bloke had said it already, and far better than I'd have been able to articulate.

General Malaise, Nearby says...
1:46pm Wed 3 Sep 08

southy wrote:
General Malaise, Nearby he not being ironic.he one of them people that keep changing there names and cant be counted
Same old me again.

Same old you by the look of it - unintelligible.

Tut tut, says...
1:52pm Wed 3 Sep 08

southy wrote:
Tut tut wrote:
yachts were using lymington river a long time before any ferries turned up
You don\'t own the fricking river mate. Get over it and deal with it.
tut tut its the other way round the ferry been there longer than any yacht club,the ferry been around for a number hundred years now,first started up by a boat builder and fisherman
either way, neither of them own it and despite the arguments I'm sure it is big enough for both to go about their business

tool, says...
1:55pm Wed 3 Sep 08

southy wrote:
Tut tut wrote:
yachts were using lymington river a long time before any ferries turned up
You don\'t own the fricking river mate. Get over it and deal with it.
tut tut its the other way round the ferry been there longer than any yacht club,the ferry been around for a number hundred years now,first started up by a boat builder and fisherman
sailor doesn't say yacht club, he says yachts. the ferry was NOT there before yachts used the river.

southy, redbridge says...
2:12pm Wed 3 Sep 08

the ferry gets its first mention back in the tudor times.when this area was only used by fisherman,small men-of-warships and merchant shipping only,there was no yachts around in them days.first yachts seen in this country was not till charles II

the vengeful cabbage, says...
2:30pm Wed 3 Sep 08

southy wrote:
the ferry gets its first mention back in the tudor times.when this area was only used by fisherman,small men-of-warships and merchant shipping only,there was no yachts around in them days.first yachts seen in this country was not till charles II
Source please

southy, redbridge says...
2:53pm Wed 3 Sep 08

a book call history of sea vessels vol 5.in there it say's:-Yacht from the Dutch word Jacht, was originally disigned in 1667 and used as a light, fast sailing vessel used by the Dutch navy to pursue pirates,smugglers and other transgressors around and into the shallow waters of the Low Countries. After its selection by Charles II of England as the vessel of choice for his return to Britain from the Netherlands for his restoration, it came to be used to convey important persons.And was used has a pleasure craft from the 1800's

clair, Solent says...
2:58pm Wed 3 Sep 08

I don't know a thing about sailing but its a joy to hear all you know it alls having an educated interested all things 'sails' keep going - I love to hear it.

clair

King Mush, Woolston says...
3:02pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Same old story of the Politics of Envy amongst the sensible posts.

If somebody has the money to buy an expensive yacht and use it around our waters I say good luck to them.


They bring money to the area and all the spin-offs in brokering, mooring,maintenance and much more for the local economy.

We all know about the odd numpty that can hardly handle a paddle boat on Southsea Common then gets into 'difficulties' when jumping into his boat after a night on the gin.

Deal with it you Socialist suckers.

General Malaise, Nearby says...
3:03pm Wed 3 Sep 08

clair wrote:
I don't know a thing about sailing but its a joy to hear all you know it alls having an educated interested all things 'sails' keep going - I love to hear it. clair
A kindred spirit for Southy.

Stanley Unwin eat your heart out.

Devil's Advocate, says...
3:11pm Wed 3 Sep 08

southy wrote:
a book call history of sea vessels vol 5.in there it say's:-Yacht from the Dutch word Jacht, was originally disigned in 1667 and used as a light, fast sailing vessel used by the Dutch navy to pursue pirates,smugglers and other transgressors around and into the shallow waters of the Low Countries. After its selection by Charles II of England as the vessel of choice for his return to Britain from the Netherlands for his restoration, it came to be used to convey important persons.And was used has a pleasure craft from the 1800's
mmm, so not specific to their usage on Lymington River then?

southy, redbridge says...
3:21pm Wed 3 Sep 08

mmm, so not specific to their usage on Lymington River then?
nope it would of been well after this date would you off seen them in the lymtoning area,and would be still only used has a goverment vessel and not a pleasure craft,was not till the victorian times did yachts start to be used has pleasure craft.

A Wilson, Broadst says...
3:26pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Dr Don Mckenzie is away with the tooth fairies and a nimby and spoiling my fun

Dave, says...
3:34pm Wed 3 Sep 08

southy wrote:
mmm, so not specific to their usage on Lymington River then?
nope it would of been well after this date would you off seen them in the lymtoning area,and would be still only used has a goverment vessel and not a pleasure craft,was not till the victorian times did yachts start to be used has pleasure craft.
so when (approx obviously) were ferries used on the Lymington River?

sailor sam, says...
3:36pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Britain excels in yachting, rowing and sailing, and as an avid highly trained do no interferer, I’d say let's not nacy panct interfere, what’s a little slash of water here and there going to do, eh.

southy, redbridge says...
4:08pm Wed 3 Sep 08

so when (approx obviously) were ferries used on the Lymington River?
well in a book first talk about a ferry in lymington river dates it in the tudor times,i think they range from 1485 (henry 7th )to elizabeth 1st (1603)so it be some time in this era

the vengeful cabbage, says...
4:11pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Ferry well then i say let the yacht loving fools have their own way no commercial ferry to spoil their fun. It will mean noone of the imbred freaks can escape the island which will make me feel much safer.

Derek, Dibden Purlieu says...
4:27pm Wed 3 Sep 08

It will mean noone of the imbred freaks can escape the island


What about the route to Portsmouth?

In the know, Southsea says...
4:41pm Wed 3 Sep 08

Derek wrote:
It will mean noone of the imbred freaks can escape the island
What about the route to Portsmouth?
Won't matter anyway once the planning permission for the new bridge has been approved.

harbour master, says...
5:06pm Wed 3 Sep 08

bacon butfy wrote:
what wrote:
southy wrote:
rlyc will get no backing from me i know to well what they are like. iow ferry in lymington been there a lot longer than any yacht club. back in the late 50's and early 60's rlyc broke its own rules by exceding its own max membership limit and registering none local people,just so they could get a yacht basing build built in the 60,s there is more than enough manouevre room. and if you need more room then you should learn how to sail and learn the rules of the sea.sail-be-for-stea m do not apply in shipping lanes and channels.has most yachties seem to think.if you cant controll you vessel in a channel then you get out the tender and you tow it in. most yachties now days are no more than sunday drivers on the water (andy try spelling d-a-m-n,dam)
what the??? Can somebody translate this for me. I dont mind that Southys spelling aint allways all that but this is completely unintelligable.
I wouldn't worry about it. most of his posts are just made up anyway
Spot on.

He makes up stuff. Did it for weeks with Tower Ice Rink fibs but got 100% busted by several posters. Churns out claims with monotonous regularity. They seem at first to be of substance, but when challenged, these spurious claims do not substantially meet the litmus test of truth. His trick is to throw in a small kernel of truth or fact but surround it with fairy stories. Challenges are usually met with even more wooly, vague, unsubstantiated references he cannot prove, and/or attempts to rubbish the challenger or convert the individual challenger in a multi id poster he believes is set on annoying him. He is a 100% fraud. Review his posts. Check them out for yourself. Try nailing him to a hard solid fact. You will grow old in the process. The folksy writing style masks a smart intelligent articulate person who for some reason cannot be honest.