Bus passengers face cuts to services

Bus passengers face cuts to services Bus passengers face cuts to services

KEY bus routes across Southampton could be axed in the evening or ditched all together because of the city council’s cost-cutting plans.

Shift workers, hospital visitors and patients, students and pensioners would all be hit by the proposed changes.

Routes affected include the Uni-link U6, linking Southampton University and the city centre to Southampton General.

This would see funding removed for evening services Monday to Saturday after 8pm and all day Sundays and bank holidays.

Under plans subsidies would be axed for services after 8pm, and 6pm on Sunday and bank holidays, on First’s 2, 2A, 3, 8, 8A and 9 routes.

Its S1 and Velvet S2 would be combined into a single service running from Lordshill to Freemantle every 90 minutes.

But the Bluestar P1 faces complete withdrawal.

Southampton city bosses hope cutting the subsidies for those services will save £400,000.

The plan is part of the deepest round of cuts ever made across council services, including libraries, youth clubs and older people’s benefits, in a bid to save £20m in the next year.

Councillor Asa Thorpe, Southampton City Council’s Cabinet member for environment and transport, said: “The proposals to end subsidies for some bus routes in the city have been put forward to help the council find savings needed to close an unprecedented budget gap in the next financial year.

“The council is in ongoing discussions with the bus companies to determine which routes that are currently subsidised are used the most, and consider those which could have the subsidy removed to contribute to the savings.

“If a subsidy is removed this doesn’t necessarily mean that the route will cease to operate as the bus companies may choose to continue to run the service commercially.

“I’d encourage residents to comment on the proposals through the budget consultation so that we can ensure that we’re taking on board as many ideas and views as possible.”

But Conservative environment and transport spokesman Cllr Dan Fitzhenry said the cuts went too far and communities would be devastated.

He said: “The impact will be across the city on people who rely on it as their main form of transport - people working in the evening, young and old going out to people trying to make appointments.”

Rebel councillor Don Thomas, who has formed the breakaway group Labour Councillors Against The Cuts, said: “This going to affect absolutely everyone.

“It is going to stop elderly people going out in the evening. It will affect children and young people going to the pictures or into town, it will affect mothers and fathers.

“Not everyone in the city have cars, especially in the area in which I live and we depend on the bus, including me.

“The service at present is bad enough as it is and cutting it back further would be devastating, especially for elderly people who will miss out on their evening social activities and become prisoners in their own home.”

Andrew Wickham, managing director of Bluestar, said the firm did not yet know the full impact any cut to subsidies would have.

He said: “All I can say is that we will do our best to maintain our network and Uni-Link services we operate for the University, and not make a knee jerk reaction to any loss of subsidy.

But we did see Bluestar’s fuel bill increase with an additional £433,000 tax on fuel when the Government reduced the Bus Service Operators Grant last April. Whilst we would like to expand services the removal of subsidies of any size makes it difficult as we continue to face rising operating costs.”

No one from First was available for comment.

A consultation process on the cuts is under way until February.

Comments(75)

dogbruce says...
7:34am Thu 3 Jan 13

Look forward to all slating the companies again!!! Not difficult to know which company gets the worst comments

Norwegian Saint says...
7:35am Thu 3 Jan 13

When I lived in the New Forest village of Beaulieu we only had 1 bus on a Tuesday and 1 on a Thursday...
So, due to the bus company I never saw my girlfriend for 2 days a week!

loosehead says...
7:54am Thu 3 Jan 13

This is the same party that kicked up when one service was altered & they called it terrible as Lordshill would have no bus services?
17 has disappeared from Lower Brownhill.why? they blame it on the parents blocking the road dropping the kids off at Holy Family many live so close yet still drive.
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ?
What happened? did they know that was total lies?
surely aren't we suppose to be encouraging people to use the buses?
What's the point of OAP's having bus passes if there's no buses?

Just A Voice says...
8:35am Thu 3 Jan 13

loosehead wrote:
This is the same party that kicked up when one service was altered & they called it terrible as Lordshill would have no bus services?
17 has disappeared from Lower Brownhill.why? they blame it on the parents blocking the road dropping the kids off at Holy Family many live so close yet still drive.
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ?
What happened? did they know that was total lies?
surely aren't we suppose to be encouraging people to use the buses?
What's the point of OAP's having bus passes if there's no buses?
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ? What happened? Eric Pickles inflicted increased budgets cuts to Southampton City Council is one answer, even the Tories would have had to have made cuts given what has happened since the local election last year.

so'tongirl says...
8:48am Thu 3 Jan 13

This isn't surprising is it.
My friend works late shifts on the buses in southampton. The fares taken during the evening most certainly DO NOT cover his wages. Not many use the buses in the evenings if they did this wouldn't be happening. Can not wait for all the moaners to comment!

AndyAndrews says...
9:15am Thu 3 Jan 13

The problem is there's no longer a bus SERVICE, only bus BUSINESSES. Bring back council-run services. The cost? Stop giving shedloads of money to things like minority "cultural" events: if people want obscure modern art and ethnic events they should pay for it themselves.

Nicole23 says...
10:04am Thu 3 Jan 13

I'm not liking Asa Thorpe much. He seems to have a total disregard for working people in the city especially with the chaos he is causing on Itchen Bridge.
I hope he is enjoying his post Christmas holiday in the sun while we are all trying to get to and from work.
The comments his partner made about the populous of Southampton seem to sum up his attitude to hard working people who pay their taxes.
I would like to know how much it cost to make the Civic clock tower glow red all over Christmas.

loosehead says...
10:24am Thu 3 Jan 13

Just A Voice wrote:
loosehead wrote:
This is the same party that kicked up when one service was altered & they called it terrible as Lordshill would have no bus services?
17 has disappeared from Lower Brownhill.why? they blame it on the parents blocking the road dropping the kids off at Holy Family many live so close yet still drive.
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ?
What happened? did they know that was total lies?
surely aren't we suppose to be encouraging people to use the buses?
What's the point of OAP's having bus passes if there's no buses?
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ? What happened? Eric Pickles inflicted increased budgets cuts to Southampton City Council is one answer, even the Tories would have had to have made cuts given what has happened since the local election last year.
Wait a minute & get it right, the Tories cut pay they had an agreement with the Isle Of wight which would save both councils millions & what did Williams do as soon as he took over?
they all knew approximately what the cuts to this city would be so why restore the pay? why stop the agreement with the Island?
Let's not forget under a Tory administration a Grant application was made to keep weekly bin collections Labour hiked up the amount wanted & in Parliament the Tory Mp ( Caroline Nookes) plus our local Tory councillors fought to get it approved or else we would have fortnightly collections .
I wonder why the council didn't continue down the path of making bus pass holders contribute towards the fare?
Now more cars on the road? OH! they're talking of charging to park in Shirley so they need more cars to bring in revenue don't they?

Torchie1 says...
10:41am Thu 3 Jan 13

Norwegian Saint wrote:
When I lived in the New Forest village of Beaulieu we only had 1 bus on a Tuesday and 1 on a Thursday...
So, due to the bus company I never saw my girlfriend for 2 days a week!
There was an hourly service between Hythe and Lymington that used to stop at Beaulieu before meandering through the back roads of East Boldre etc before it eventually passed Elmers Court and crossed over the Toll Bridge and up to the bus station. This was how I used travel between the two towns and I wasn't restricted to twice a week.

davel_cats says...
10:43am Thu 3 Jan 13

Nothing in life is free - some people think it is their 'right' to a free bus pass and then moan when there isn't enough money to pay for the busses. Everyone should have to contribute something for their bus ride.
Also, why don't they have minibusses like they do in some continental countries? Surely they must use less fuel than the normal size busses?

bazzeroz says...
10:56am Thu 3 Jan 13

You only have to look at the bus companies yearly reports to see who being taken for a ride! Enough said.

bazzeroz says...
10:57am Thu 3 Jan 13

** who's **

Lone Ranger. says...
11:05am Thu 3 Jan 13

Nicole23 wrote:
I'm not liking Asa Thorpe much. He seems to have a total disregard for working people in the city especially with the chaos he is causing on Itchen Bridge.
I hope he is enjoying his post Christmas holiday in the sun while we are all trying to get to and from work.
The comments his partner made about the populous of Southampton seem to sum up his attitude to hard working people who pay their taxes.
I would like to know how much it cost to make the Civic clock tower glow red all over Christmas.
The Itchen Bridge "fiasco" was set up by the Tories. They wanted to collect toll money via automation not manually.
.
Where does it say that Thorpe in on a post Xmas holiday in the sun ?
.
Do you object to public employees having a holiday.
.
His partner/wife DID NOT make comments re the "populous" of Southampton ....... The Echo printed the story to that effect for political reasons..
.
As regards the clock ........ make some enquiries to the Civic if you are that interested or concerned ..... then you can let us know

loosehead says...
11:22am Thu 3 Jan 13

So charges on car parks that are free? Charges to park in residential car parking zones which are free ?
none of these ideas were/are Tory ideas yet a certain Labour supporter seems to think all the problems of this city were/are the Tories fault?
If the Toll booths being automated were/are such a bad idea why haven't Labour removed them? Why haven't Labour restored the operators?
Why haven't Labour looked at putting on a set price on all bus pass holders journeys to bring in revenue to keep the services?
Votes that's why.
Put more people into cars charge to park in all council car parks & then you can cover the next phase of council workers pay restoration keeping Labours masters ( the Unions) happy

Just A Voice says...
11:36am Thu 3 Jan 13

loosehead wrote:
Just A Voice wrote:
loosehead wrote:
This is the same party that kicked up when one service was altered & they called it terrible as Lordshill would have no bus services?
17 has disappeared from Lower Brownhill.why? they blame it on the parents blocking the road dropping the kids off at Holy Family many live so close yet still drive.
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ?
What happened? did they know that was total lies?
surely aren't we suppose to be encouraging people to use the buses?
What's the point of OAP's having bus passes if there's no buses?
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ? What happened? Eric Pickles inflicted increased budgets cuts to Southampton City Council is one answer, even the Tories would have had to have made cuts given what has happened since the local election last year.
Wait a minute & get it right, the Tories cut pay they had an agreement with the Isle Of wight which would save both councils millions & what did Williams do as soon as he took over?
they all knew approximately what the cuts to this city would be so why restore the pay? why stop the agreement with the Island?
Let's not forget under a Tory administration a Grant application was made to keep weekly bin collections Labour hiked up the amount wanted & in Parliament the Tory Mp ( Caroline Nookes) plus our local Tory councillors fought to get it approved or else we would have fortnightly collections .
I wonder why the council didn't continue down the path of making bus pass holders contribute towards the fare?
Now more cars on the road? OH! they're talking of charging to park in Shirley so they need more cars to bring in revenue don't they?
Decisions need to made in light of budget cuts.

The Tory Government didn't announce the exact amount of money the city would receive until Christmas Eve, One wonders why,,,,burying bad news under the banner of Christmas.

Would you recommend the local authority subsidies private national companies such as First? Why not give subsidies to all companies in Southampton

Before you start saying it's all down to Labour, the Tories cut subsidies to bus companies last year and the year before,,,the 19 service from Millbrook via City Centre & Bitterne to Thornhill was withdrawn completely,,,due to the subsidy being cut by the Tory led council.

Just A Voice says...
11:50am Thu 3 Jan 13

loosehead wrote:
Just A Voice wrote:
loosehead wrote:
This is the same party that kicked up when one service was altered & they called it terrible as Lordshill would have no bus services?
17 has disappeared from Lower Brownhill.why? they blame it on the parents blocking the road dropping the kids off at Holy Family many live so close yet still drive.
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ?
What happened? did they know that was total lies?
surely aren't we suppose to be encouraging people to use the buses?
What's the point of OAP's having bus passes if there's no buses?
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ? What happened? Eric Pickles inflicted increased budgets cuts to Southampton City Council is one answer, even the Tories would have had to have made cuts given what has happened since the local election last year.
Wait a minute & get it right, the Tories cut pay they had an agreement with the Isle Of wight which would save both councils millions & what did Williams do as soon as he took over?
they all knew approximately what the cuts to this city would be so why restore the pay? why stop the agreement with the Island?
Let's not forget under a Tory administration a Grant application was made to keep weekly bin collections Labour hiked up the amount wanted & in Parliament the Tory Mp ( Caroline Nookes) plus our local Tory councillors fought to get it approved or else we would have fortnightly collections .
I wonder why the council didn't continue down the path of making bus pass holders contribute towards the fare?
Now more cars on the road? OH! they're talking of charging to park in Shirley so they need more cars to bring in revenue don't they?
Charging to park in Shirley,,, what about Angel Crescent car park in Bitterne,,,,a closer to home for you isn't it?

Did you or have you taken part in the any of the consultation regarding the budget cuts? Proposal have been made, people have been asked, decision need to be made, plain and simple, at least people are being made aware of the changes.

Did the Tories inform you of disastrous deal the struck with Capita, did they not tell you (along with me) that Sea City wouldn't cost us a penny, Labour may not have all the answers probably why they're asking residents to contribute, unlike the know it all, cost us millions, Tory leader Royston Smith, who wouldn't let any of his Councillors have a say, apart from Jeremy Moulton

kingnotail says...
11:55am Thu 3 Jan 13

Two options: renationalise the bus services, or take away all free travel. I favour the former, but I also understand that private companies will never fund free travel.

kingnotail says...
11:58am Thu 3 Jan 13

So Southampton will soon be demoted from an 18-hour city to a 14-hour one? The bus services here are already worse than pathetic.

Gumbo82 says...
12:11pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Perhaps the council should stop wasting money on rubbish like a stupid museum no one goes to or a row of sheds selling junk at Christmas and put the money towards essential services,I work the late shift at first bus and I know first hand a lot of people are going to be stranded in the evening, nurses, elderly coming back from bingo etc and people going to the general to name a few.Plus it will probably put some drivers out of work, so well done city council another dose of disappointment from you goons behind a desk.

Linesman says...
12:33pm Thu 3 Jan 13

We used to have a Corporation Bus SERVICE, and I emphasise the word SERVICE.

Margaret Thatcher said that there had to be competition, because that would improve service, and keep costs down.

Well, we have seen what privatisation has done for efficiency and keeping fares down on the railways, and bus Companies have replaced bus SERVICE.

The privatised railways are still being bailed out by us, the taxpayers, while they milk the passengers and pay a dividend to their shareholders.

Similarly the bus companies.

The annoying thing is, Thatcher's government raked in £Billions by selling us things that we already owned eg BT, Electricty, Gas, North Sea Oil etc etc etc and yet we had nothing to show for it.

If that money had been ploughed into a schoo and hospital building programme, there would have been no need for PFI.

Oh! I forgot. They lost £Billions on Black Wednesday.

southy says...
12:34pm Thu 3 Jan 13

“I’d encourage residents to comment on the proposals through the budget consultation so that we can ensure that we’re taking on board as many ideas and views as possible.”

Now lets get this right, these meetings of consultations on cuts was not open to all the public, it was a limited invite only. I know I turned up to 2 of the meetings my self uninvited and other members of the SP turned up at the other meeetings in there areas unvited.
I got hold of the compleat maps and writing plans for the whole city and council planned cuts.

good-gosh says...
12:34pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Labour councils love a regular dose of civic chaos. After all, stability and good order is the mark of the Tories and the lefties can't go round displaying any of that sort of thing.

Niel says...
12:38pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Nicole23 wrote:
I'm not liking Asa Thorpe much. He seems to have a total disregard for working people in the city especially with the chaos he is causing on Itchen Bridge.
I hope he is enjoying his post Christmas holiday in the sun while we are all trying to get to and from work.
The comments his partner made about the populous of Southampton seem to sum up his attitude to hard working people who pay their taxes.
I would like to know how much it cost to make the Civic clock tower glow red all over Christmas.
Oh I wish I'd known, a photo of that superimposed on a photo of that 'labia tower' lit up pink in smuff would be good for a laugh!

southy says...
12:45pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Torchie1 wrote:
Norwegian Saint wrote:
When I lived in the New Forest village of Beaulieu we only had 1 bus on a Tuesday and 1 on a Thursday...
So, due to the bus company I never saw my girlfriend for 2 days a week!
There was an hourly service between Hythe and Lymington that used to stop at Beaulieu before meandering through the back roads of East Boldre etc before it eventually passed Elmers Court and crossed over the Toll Bridge and up to the bus station. This was how I used travel between the two towns and I wasn't restricted to twice a week.
So you was here in the 80's then Tourchie and not behind the Iron curtain like you said you was.
The service across the Toll Bridge ended in 1988.

southy says...
12:51pm Thu 3 Jan 13

good-gosh wrote:
Labour councils love a regular dose of civic chaos. After all, stability and good order is the mark of the Tories and the lefties can't go round displaying any of that sort of thing.
The idea behind the Torys is to cut jobs so they can put more money into the wages of the boards that Councillors sit on, making there wage per year above an average wage all for sitting on a board meeting like the Fire service for 1 day a mth, and the Labour Party as joined the Torys in how much can I put in my own pocket at the cost of the tax payers.

Zeo says...
12:51pm Thu 3 Jan 13

So what was the point of privatizing the buses if all we do is pay the companies to run the service... all backwards.

CHARLIE TAYLOR says...
12:58pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Will anything ever get done to stop this company (First ) from operating !
Just returned to Soton from zante and to my amazement they have stopped the route from top of Hill Lane to the railway station,it takes 40 mins to get to town on the hourly service, can walk faster! no service after 5-40pm nor sundays, what a joke, the fare is more expensive than a taxi, for two. So much for green progress! gone and bought a car !!

Torchie1 says...
2:12pm Thu 3 Jan 13

southy wrote:
Torchie1 wrote:
Norwegian Saint wrote:
When I lived in the New Forest village of Beaulieu we only had 1 bus on a Tuesday and 1 on a Thursday...
So, due to the bus company I never saw my girlfriend for 2 days a week!
There was an hourly service between Hythe and Lymington that used to stop at Beaulieu before meandering through the back roads of East Boldre etc before it eventually passed Elmers Court and crossed over the Toll Bridge and up to the bus station. This was how I used travel between the two towns and I wasn't restricted to twice a week.
So you was here in the 80's then Tourchie and not behind the Iron curtain like you said you was.
The service across the Toll Bridge ended in 1988.
I'm fairly certain that the 112 bus ran well past the 1980s. A point that was probably lost on you is that socialism/communism in Eastern Europe didn't collapse until 1989 when the oppressed people rose up against the various tyrants that ruled over them. Following this freedom they realised that wealth could be created by allowing western companies to relocate on favourable terms which a lot of people including myself did in the 1990s. Is this clear enough for you ?

southy says...
2:39pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Torchie1 wrote:
southy wrote:
Torchie1 wrote:
Norwegian Saint wrote:
When I lived in the New Forest village of Beaulieu we only had 1 bus on a Tuesday and 1 on a Thursday...
So, due to the bus company I never saw my girlfriend for 2 days a week!
There was an hourly service between Hythe and Lymington that used to stop at Beaulieu before meandering through the back roads of East Boldre etc before it eventually passed Elmers Court and crossed over the Toll Bridge and up to the bus station. This was how I used travel between the two towns and I wasn't restricted to twice a week.
So you was here in the 80's then Tourchie and not behind the Iron curtain like you said you was.
The service across the Toll Bridge ended in 1988.
I'm fairly certain that the 112 bus ran well past the 1980s. A point that was probably lost on you is that socialism/communism in Eastern Europe didn't collapse until 1989 when the oppressed people rose up against the various tyrants that ruled over them. Following this freedom they realised that wealth could be created by allowing western companies to relocate on favourable terms which a lot of people including myself did in the 1990s. Is this clear enough for you ?
1988 was the last time a bus traveled across the Toll Bridge, the bridge was closed part of that year for repairs and busses never went across it again when it reopened, they kept to the by-pass route.
So your still avoiding that you said you lived behind the Capitalist Communist Iron Curtain before it all came down and yet you now say that you use to use the bus service across the toll bridge, when the service had stop before before the iron curin came down

southy says...
2:41pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Zeo wrote:
So what was the point of privatizing the buses if all we do is pay the companies to run the service... all backwards.
Yes those old city and national bus service was the best bus service we had

kingnotail says...
2:42pm Thu 3 Jan 13

You'd hope that with the west coast mainline fiasco, First group's days would be numbered. In my experience, Stagecoach do a much better job with buses than First, more services, newer and cleaner buses, later running times, lower fares.

sotonmum says...
2:45pm Thu 3 Jan 13

I'm on the number 5 right now trying to figure out if I'm on the late 2:15pm bus or the early 2:45pm bus as it turned up at half past!

loosehead says...
2:53pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Just A Voice wrote:
loosehead wrote:
Just A Voice wrote:
loosehead wrote:
This is the same party that kicked up when one service was altered & they called it terrible as Lordshill would have no bus services?
17 has disappeared from Lower Brownhill.why? they blame it on the parents blocking the road dropping the kids off at Holy Family many live so close yet still drive.
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ?
What happened? did they know that was total lies?
surely aren't we suppose to be encouraging people to use the buses?
What's the point of OAP's having bus passes if there's no buses?
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ? What happened? Eric Pickles inflicted increased budgets cuts to Southampton City Council is one answer, even the Tories would have had to have made cuts given what has happened since the local election last year.
Wait a minute & get it right, the Tories cut pay they had an agreement with the Isle Of wight which would save both councils millions & what did Williams do as soon as he took over?
they all knew approximately what the cuts to this city would be so why restore the pay? why stop the agreement with the Island?
Let's not forget under a Tory administration a Grant application was made to keep weekly bin collections Labour hiked up the amount wanted & in Parliament the Tory Mp ( Caroline Nookes) plus our local Tory councillors fought to get it approved or else we would have fortnightly collections .
I wonder why the council didn't continue down the path of making bus pass holders contribute towards the fare?
Now more cars on the road? OH! they're talking of charging to park in Shirley so they need more cars to bring in revenue don't they?
Charging to park in Shirley,,, what about Angel Crescent car park in Bitterne,,,,a closer to home for you isn't it?

Did you or have you taken part in the any of the consultation regarding the budget cuts? Proposal have been made, people have been asked, decision need to be made, plain and simple, at least people are being made aware of the changes.

Did the Tories inform you of disastrous deal the struck with Capita, did they not tell you (along with me) that Sea City wouldn't cost us a penny, Labour may not have all the answers probably why they're asking residents to contribute, unlike the know it all, cost us millions, Tory leader Royston Smith, who wouldn't let any of his Councillors have a say, apart from Jeremy Moulton
As I live in Lordshill Shirley is closer! As I'm not a Union convener I'm not privy to sit in & help make budget decisions.
Capita has at least ensured those workers jobs which is more than Labour would have done.
Not letting his councillors speak besides Moulton? So Paul Holmes didn't speak Hannides never spoke?
So Williams lies at the beginning to get to power then his lies about Morrel with the rest lying to back him up isn't that bad then?
What about the idiots who came on here & blamed Royston of staging the Submarine tragedy to gain votes?
Get it right the people of this city are waking up to the fact they w3ere blatantly lied to before the election & are still being lied to by Labour

loosehead says...
2:53pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Just A Voice wrote:
loosehead wrote:
Just A Voice wrote:
loosehead wrote:
This is the same party that kicked up when one service was altered & they called it terrible as Lordshill would have no bus services?
17 has disappeared from Lower Brownhill.why? they blame it on the parents blocking the road dropping the kids off at Holy Family many live so close yet still drive.
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ?
What happened? did they know that was total lies?
surely aren't we suppose to be encouraging people to use the buses?
What's the point of OAP's having bus passes if there's no buses?
We were told The Tories Would Cut Services but Not Us ? What happened? Eric Pickles inflicted increased budgets cuts to Southampton City Council is one answer, even the Tories would have had to have made cuts given what has happened since the local election last year.
Wait a minute & get it right, the Tories cut pay they had an agreement with the Isle Of wight which would save both councils millions & what did Williams do as soon as he took over?
they all knew approximately what the cuts to this city would be so why restore the pay? why stop the agreement with the Island?
Let's not forget under a Tory administration a Grant application was made to keep weekly bin collections Labour hiked up the amount wanted & in Parliament the Tory Mp ( Caroline Nookes) plus our local Tory councillors fought to get it approved or else we would have fortnightly collections .
I wonder why the council didn't continue down the path of making bus pass holders contribute towards the fare?
Now more cars on the road? OH! they're talking of charging to park in Shirley so they need more cars to bring in revenue don't they?
Charging to park in Shirley,,, what about Angel Crescent car park in Bitterne,,,,a closer to home for you isn't it?

Did you or have you taken part in the any of the consultation regarding the budget cuts? Proposal have been made, people have been asked, decision need to be made, plain and simple, at least people are being made aware of the changes.

Did the Tories inform you of disastrous deal the struck with Capita, did they not tell you (along with me) that Sea City wouldn't cost us a penny, Labour may not have all the answers probably why they're asking residents to contribute, unlike the know it all, cost us millions, Tory leader Royston Smith, who wouldn't let any of his Councillors have a say, apart from Jeremy Moulton
As I live in Lordshill Shirley is closer! As I'm not a Union convener I'm not privy to sit in & help make budget decisions.
Capita has at least ensured those workers jobs which is more than Labour would have done.
Not letting his councillors speak besides Moulton? So Paul Holmes didn't speak Hannides never spoke?
So Williams lies at the beginning to get to power then his lies about Morrel with the rest lying to back him up isn't that bad then?
What about the idiots who came on here & blamed Royston of staging the Submarine tragedy to gain votes?
Get it right the people of this city are waking up to the fact they w3ere blatantly lied to before the election & are still being lied to by Labour

Just A Voice says...
2:53pm Thu 3 Jan 13

southy wrote:
“I’d encourage residents to comment on the proposals through the budget consultation so that we can ensure that we’re taking on board as many ideas and views as possible.”

Now lets get this right, these meetings of consultations on cuts was not open to all the public, it was a limited invite only. I know I turned up to 2 of the meetings my self uninvited and other members of the SP turned up at the other meeetings in there areas unvited.
I got hold of the compleat maps and writing plans for the whole city and council planned cuts.
I know at least 100 community representative were invited to attend one of the consultation, the attendance was 6 people, one of those uninvited.

You cannot blame the council for invited people who do not attend, you say you have a map of the whole city and council planned cuts,,,,I believe they're proposals not plans,,,,the consultation continues until February, I attended a consultation meeting in ealry December,,,,the Government didn't inform the council of the budget funding until 24th December so how can the council make cuts until they know the budget????

loosehead says...
3:01pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Just A Voice wrote:
southy wrote:
“I’d encourage residents to comment on the proposals through the budget consultation so that we can ensure that we’re taking on board as many ideas and views as possible.”

Now lets get this right, these meetings of consultations on cuts was not open to all the public, it was a limited invite only. I know I turned up to 2 of the meetings my self uninvited and other members of the SP turned up at the other meeetings in there areas unvited.
I got hold of the compleat maps and writing plans for the whole city and council planned cuts.
I know at least 100 community representative were invited to attend one of the consultation, the attendance was 6 people, one of those uninvited.

You cannot blame the council for invited people who do not attend, you say you have a map of the whole city and council planned cuts,,,,I believe they're proposals not plans,,,,the consultation continues until February, I attended a consultation meeting in ealry December,,,,the Government didn't inform the council of the budget funding until 24th December so how can the council make cuts until they know the budget????
So how did the Tories get the figure bang on & even published it in this paper?
So you defender of Williams liars exactly how severe would these cuts have been if the Tory council hadn't applied for a weekly collection grant which your beloved Labour council increased?
If the Tory council had not applied for said grant the Labour council would have had to put in a late bid which they might not have got yet I see no credit from you going to the tories for saving all those binmens jobs?
As it is through the grant our cuts aren't as severe as the tory council had budgeted for so why all these cuts?
Pay restoration by any chance have anything to do with it?

southy says...
3:19pm Thu 3 Jan 13

loosehead wrote:
Just A Voice wrote:
southy wrote:
“I’d encourage residents to comment on the proposals through the budget consultation so that we can ensure that we’re taking on board as many ideas and views as possible.”

Now lets get this right, these meetings of consultations on cuts was not open to all the public, it was a limited invite only. I know I turned up to 2 of the meetings my self uninvited and other members of the SP turned up at the other meeetings in there areas unvited.
I got hold of the compleat maps and writing plans for the whole city and council planned cuts.
I know at least 100 community representative were invited to attend one of the consultation, the attendance was 6 people, one of those uninvited.

You cannot blame the council for invited people who do not attend, you say you have a map of the whole city and council planned cuts,,,,I believe they're proposals not plans,,,,the consultation continues until February, I attended a consultation meeting in ealry December,,,,the Government didn't inform the council of the budget funding until 24th December so how can the council make cuts until they know the budget????
So how did the Tories get the figure bang on & even published it in this paper?
So you defender of Williams liars exactly how severe would these cuts have been if the Tory council hadn't applied for a weekly collection grant which your beloved Labour council increased?
If the Tory council had not applied for said grant the Labour council would have had to put in a late bid which they might not have got yet I see no credit from you going to the tories for saving all those binmens jobs?
As it is through the grant our cuts aren't as severe as the tory council had budgeted for so why all these cuts?
Pay restoration by any chance have anything to do with it?
I will point out to you that the consultation period as endded, the meeting in the Civic Center which I attended was the last one.
And it was ask when would the council have an open public consultation there was no reply every time it was ask.
100 community representative, allowed 1 or 2 people from each group all over the city, (thats not many people with a city population about 1/4 of a million). When its is invites only then its not an open public consultation like the council called it, lets have a real open public cuts consutation book a the hall in the civic to have the meeting and open it up to all the people to come if they wish to, Dont you think that would be best councillor. (and yes I do know)

Stephen J says...
3:58pm Thu 3 Jan 13

I'm amused by those who complain bitterly about how the Department for Transport manages things nationally, and who moan about Southampton City Council's handling of issues such as Itchen Bridge tolls, and yet want bus services to be directly managed by them! Really?

Gumbo82 says...
4:22pm Thu 3 Jan 13

kingnotail wrote:
You'd hope that with the west coast mainline fiasco, First group's days would be numbered. In my experience, Stagecoach do a much better job with buses than First, more services, newer and cleaner buses, later running times, lower fares.
Have you not seen our new enviro buses costing over a million? and more new buses are on there way.First buses are better maintained than a lot of other operator buses

Donald2000 says...
5:02pm Thu 3 Jan 13

davel_cats wrote:
Nothing in life is free - some people think it is their 'right' to a free bus pass and then moan when there isn't enough money to pay for the busses. Everyone should have to contribute something for their bus ride.
Also, why don't they have minibusses like they do in some continental countries? Surely they must use less fuel than the normal size busses?
Well said, you attention seeking Tory troll. Actually I have paid my own bus fares from the age of 5 to 61, so yes, I do think I am entitled to a free bus pass - nasty little person that you are.

Torchie1 says...
5:26pm Thu 3 Jan 13

southy wrote:
Torchie1 wrote:
southy wrote:
Torchie1 wrote:
Norwegian Saint wrote:
When I lived in the New Forest village of Beaulieu we only had 1 bus on a Tuesday and 1 on a Thursday...
So, due to the bus company I never saw my girlfriend for 2 days a week!
There was an hourly service between Hythe and Lymington that used to stop at Beaulieu before meandering through the back roads of East Boldre etc before it eventually passed Elmers Court and crossed over the Toll Bridge and up to the bus station. This was how I used travel between the two towns and I wasn't restricted to twice a week.
So you was here in the 80's then Tourchie and not behind the Iron curtain like you said you was.
The service across the Toll Bridge ended in 1988.
I'm fairly certain that the 112 bus ran well past the 1980s. A point that was probably lost on you is that socialism/communism in Eastern Europe didn't collapse until 1989 when the oppressed people rose up against the various tyrants that ruled over them. Following this freedom they realised that wealth could be created by allowing western companies to relocate on favourable terms which a lot of people including myself did in the 1990s. Is this clear enough for you ?
1988 was the last time a bus traveled across the Toll Bridge, the bridge was closed part of that year for repairs and busses never went across it again when it reopened, they kept to the by-pass route.
So your still avoiding that you said you lived behind the Capitalist Communist Iron Curtain before it all came down and yet you now say that you use to use the bus service across the toll bridge, when the service had stop before before the iron curin came down
Are you terminally stupid? At no time have I ever said I lived nor have I ever lived in Prague under the communists because I wouldn't want to and the old communist/socialist rulers wouldn't allow the free movement of westerners before they were chucked out on their ear. I can't see anything that I wrote that suggests when I used this bus route and all I can think is that you've created another fantasy story to wind yourself up again. Try to read things slowly and make sure you fully understand what's been written before you put your foot in your mouth, again.

kingnotail says...
5:41pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Gumbo82 wrote:
kingnotail wrote:
You'd hope that with the west coast mainline fiasco, First group's days would be numbered. In my experience, Stagecoach do a much better job with buses than First, more services, newer and cleaner buses, later running times, lower fares.
Have you not seen our new enviro buses costing over a million? and more new buses are on there way.First buses are better maintained than a lot of other operator buses
And the chance of these enviro buses being used in Southampton in the next decade? More likely they'll be in the big cities. Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to big up Stagecoach or anything (I would like to see bus services renationalised), it's just in my experience Stagecoach provide a much better service than first. In fact, the only time I've thought First were anything better than abysmal is on the buses in Bristol and on the Transpennine express rail network.

bigfella777 says...
5:55pm Thu 3 Jan 13

That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead.
To hell with public safety.

Gumbo82 says...
6:01pm Thu 3 Jan 13

kingnotail wrote:
Gumbo82 wrote:
kingnotail wrote:
You'd hope that with the west coast mainline fiasco, First group's days would be numbered. In my experience, Stagecoach do a much better job with buses than First, more services, newer and cleaner buses, later running times, lower fares.
Have you not seen our new enviro buses costing over a million? and more new buses are on there way.First buses are better maintained than a lot of other operator buses
And the chance of these enviro buses being used in Southampton in the next decade? More likely they'll be in the big cities. Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to big up Stagecoach or anything (I would like to see bus services renationalised), it's just in my experience Stagecoach provide a much better service than first. In fact, the only time I've thought First were anything better than abysmal is on the buses in Bristol and on the Transpennine express rail network.
They are already on the number 7 route, to be fair any bus company has so much to fight against these days it's a thankless task.My company do try it's best regardless of what the public think!

Donald2000 says...
6:21pm Thu 3 Jan 13

bigfella777 wrote:
That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead.
To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.

thinklikealocal says...
7:28pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!

Donald2000 says...
8:01pm Thu 3 Jan 13

thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education.
Pillock.

Donald2000 says...
8:04pm Thu 3 Jan 13

I thought this would come soon enough, the hatred society where pensioners are deemed not to be worthy of their free bus passes, even though they have worked and paid taxes for many years and sure enough,thanks to the fascist trolls in this column I am not disappointed.

thinklikealocal says...
8:34pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education. Pillock.
So anyone who doesn't agree with you is a pillock? Well that 6 years of higher education was clearly wasted on you....

Donald2000 says...
9:03pm Thu 3 Jan 13

thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education. Pillock.
So anyone who doesn't agree with you is a pillock? Well that 6 years of higher education was clearly wasted on you....
No, your post is spiteful, ill thought out and wasteful of words. Plus, you are clearly a troll who does not have a brain cell, or any original thoughts of his or her own, who takes a delight in taking the mickey out of honest contributors on here, who are affronted at the council's plans for the bus service. Now get back to your dustbin, or where-ever it is you crawled out from. Troll.

loosehead says...
9:17pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education.
Pillock.
Look I've got nothing against low income pensioners getting bus passes but some are on more money than people in work so what we give them all free transport?
As I've said on other posts after talking to pensioners many would quite happily pay say 20p to travel on the busses they would rather have regular busses than none at all so why not put into place a very low set rate for bus pass holders?
I don't remember being told that by paying N.I stamp I'd be getting free TV licenses & free Bus travel etc; ?
So I've lost two brothers before they drew their pensions so can they claim the money back if they & you did indeed pay towards this?
I don't agree with thinklikealocal often but on this I don't think she's far off the mark.
Universal payments in this country have gone to far.
In a country where we need to pay off the debt we have people not using family allowance to feed & clothe children but to pay for holidays?
We have OAP's financially well off getting the same allowances that were put in place to protect the not so well off how's this fair?
Sort this mess out & maybe the cut's won't have to be so deep no matter who's in power or shall we carry on saying "So what I'm entitled to it so I'm having it"
I for one have 4 years to go before I'm 60 & if I'm alive & entitled to a free bus pass but can afford to run a car I won't take up my bus pass will all those who can afford to get around not take up their pass?

Donald2000 says...
9:23pm Thu 3 Jan 13

loosehead wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education.
Pillock.
Look I've got nothing against low income pensioners getting bus passes but some are on more money than people in work so what we give them all free transport?
As I've said on other posts after talking to pensioners many would quite happily pay say 20p to travel on the busses they would rather have regular busses than none at all so why not put into place a very low set rate for bus pass holders?
I don't remember being told that by paying N.I stamp I'd be getting free TV licenses & free Bus travel etc; ?
So I've lost two brothers before they drew their pensions so can they claim the money back if they & you did indeed pay towards this?
I don't agree with thinklikealocal often but on this I don't think she's far off the mark.
Universal payments in this country have gone to far.
In a country where we need to pay off the debt we have people not using family allowance to feed & clothe children but to pay for holidays?
We have OAP's financially well off getting the same allowances that were put in place to protect the not so well off how's this fair?
Sort this mess out & maybe the cut's won't have to be so deep no matter who's in power or shall we carry on saying "So what I'm entitled to it so I'm having it"
I for one have 4 years to go before I'm 60 & if I'm alive & entitled to a free bus pass but can afford to run a car I won't take up my bus pass will all those who can afford to get around not take up their pass?
Well I am on Pension Credit at the moment, that means the lowest of the low, therefore I am entitled to the free bus pass.

I have paid into the system for years and have no other income - we are not all rich ****.

So I do feel I am entitled to the free bus pass. I know there is an expectation in this country now that anyone who doesn't work and who is not super-rich should go to the gas chambers - and our trolling friend is an example of it. Good old Tory fodder - you just cannot beat it.

Huffter says...
9:44pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Amazing how many comments there are on here compared with the number of people who actually support the bus services by using and paying for them!

thinklikealocal says...
9:53pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
loosehead wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education. Pillock.
Look I've got nothing against low income pensioners getting bus passes but some are on more money than people in work so what we give them all free transport? As I've said on other posts after talking to pensioners many would quite happily pay say 20p to travel on the busses they would rather have regular busses than none at all so why not put into place a very low set rate for bus pass holders? I don't remember being told that by paying N.I stamp I'd be getting free TV licenses & free Bus travel etc; ? So I've lost two brothers before they drew their pensions so can they claim the money back if they & you did indeed pay towards this? I don't agree with thinklikealocal often but on this I don't think she's far off the mark. Universal payments in this country have gone to far. In a country where we need to pay off the debt we have people not using family allowance to feed & clothe children but to pay for holidays? We have OAP's financially well off getting the same allowances that were put in place to protect the not so well off how's this fair? Sort this mess out & maybe the cut's won't have to be so deep no matter who's in power or shall we carry on saying "So what I'm entitled to it so I'm having it" I for one have 4 years to go before I'm 60 & if I'm alive & entitled to a free bus pass but can afford to run a car I won't take up my bus pass will all those who can afford to get around not take up their pass?
Well I am on Pension Credit at the moment, that means the lowest of the low, therefore I am entitled to the free bus pass. I have paid into the system for years and have no other income - we are not all rich ****. So I do feel I am entitled to the free bus pass. I know there is an expectation in this country now that anyone who doesn't work and who is not super-rich should go to the gas chambers - and our trolling friend is an example of it. Good old Tory fodder - you just cannot beat it.
Oh dear we are feeling sorry for ourselves aren't we! I am not a troll or a tory. I just don't agree with all this poor old pensioner cr@p. there are hard up people of all ages and i don't understand why 'pensioners', especially 61 year olds feel such a sense of entitlement to this that and the other at the expense of the young who are already paying far more in taxes than they ever did and can expect a great deal less in old age i suspect. Grow up!

thinklikealocal says...
10:03pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education. Pillock.
So anyone who doesn't agree with you is a pillock? Well that 6 years of higher education was clearly wasted on you....
No, your post is spiteful, ill thought out and wasteful of words. Plus, you are clearly a troll who does not have a brain cell, or any original thoughts of his or her own, who takes a delight in taking the mickey out of honest contributors on here, who are affronted at the council's plans for the bus service. Now get back to your dustbin, or where-ever it is you crawled out from. Troll.
Having read my post and yours it us clear who the spiteful one is. I'm as disappointed as anyone that central government cuts will force this cut in subsidised bus services in the City. What i have issue with is older citizens who somehow think they should have this that and the other, paid for by others, who may very well have no more, or even less, than them. That's all, no name calling, just my opinion as a citizen in a democratic country (or am i too you young for that?).

Donald2000 says...
10:37pm Thu 3 Jan 13

thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education. Pillock.
So anyone who doesn't agree with you is a pillock? Well that 6 years of higher education was clearly wasted on you....
No, your post is spiteful, ill thought out and wasteful of words. Plus, you are clearly a troll who does not have a brain cell, or any original thoughts of his or her own, who takes a delight in taking the mickey out of honest contributors on here, who are affronted at the council's plans for the bus service. Now get back to your dustbin, or where-ever it is you crawled out from. Troll.
Having read my post and yours it us clear who the spiteful one is. I'm as disappointed as anyone that central government cuts will force this cut in subsidised bus services in the City. What i have issue with is older citizens who somehow think they should have this that and the other, paid for by others, who may very well have no more, or even less, than them. That's all, no name calling, just my opinion as a citizen in a democratic country (or am i too you young for that?).
Its stuff you started and I put a finish to it.It's clear you know nothing about anything whatsoever and are just putting your air-headed views out on here. Spiteful is, as spiteful gets. If you don't like it coming back at you, don't come on here with your own spiteful and constipated views. Don't bother to reply - I know I have won the argument.

thinklikealocal says...
10:46pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education. Pillock.
So anyone who doesn't agree with you is a pillock? Well that 6 years of higher education was clearly wasted on you....
No, your post is spiteful, ill thought out and wasteful of words. Plus, you are clearly a troll who does not have a brain cell, or any original thoughts of his or her own, who takes a delight in taking the mickey out of honest contributors on here, who are affronted at the council's plans for the bus service. Now get back to your dustbin, or where-ever it is you crawled out from. Troll.
Having read my post and yours it us clear who the spiteful one is. I'm as disappointed as anyone that central government cuts will force this cut in subsidised bus services in the City. What i have issue with is older citizens who somehow think they should have this that and the other, paid for by others, who may very well have no more, or even less, than them. That's all, no name calling, just my opinion as a citizen in a democratic country (or am i too you young for that?).
Its stuff you started and I put a finish to it.It's clear you know nothing about anything whatsoever and are just putting your air-headed views out on here. Spiteful is, as spiteful gets. If you don't like it coming back at you, don't come on here with your own spiteful and constipated views. Don't bother to reply - I know I have won the argument.
I think not. Unfortunately your attitude does great harm to the cause you seek to promote, senior citizens.

Donald2000 says...
10:52pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Self opinionated, bigoted, unknowledgeable, claptrap. You know nothing about what I do for the senior citizen community and are only interested in coming on here and blowing your own trumpet, supported by other bigots.

Although why I should even bother typing stuff to an airhead such as yourself, I can't imagine.

thinklikealocal says...
11:01pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
Self opinionated, bigoted, unknowledgeable, claptrap. You know nothing about what I do for the senior citizen community and are only interested in coming on here and blowing your own trumpet, supported by other bigots. Although why I should even bother typing stuff to an airhead such as yourself, I can't imagine.
Pot, kettle, black.......

mr.southampton says...
11:39pm Thu 3 Jan 13

CHARLIE TAYLOR wrote:
Will anything ever get done to stop this company (First ) from operating !
Just returned to Soton from zante and to my amazement they have stopped the route from top of Hill Lane to the railway station,it takes 40 mins to get to town on the hourly service, can walk faster! no service after 5-40pm nor sundays, what a joke, the fare is more expensive than a taxi, for two. So much for green progress! gone and bought a car !!
It's shocking, but true. In most cases if there's more than one of you travelling a taxi is often a cheaper option than the bus.

Personally I got so sick of First Bus years ago I bought a bike.

loosehead says...
7:42am Fri 4 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
loosehead wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
bigfella777 wrote: That's alright, we can all walk about getting stabbed,raped,robbed and beaten with planks instead. To hell with public safety.
Well that's absolutely right and heaven help any pensioner who would want to travel by bus at night.They are already talking about taking away our winter fuel payments; we have paid into the system all our lives and now all people want to do is to sh1t on us. Welcome to brave new Britain, whereupon each citizen is encouraged to rip out the other citizens throats.
I think you'll find it's the younger citizens who are being shat on. Where did a ripe old 61 year old get such a sense of public entitlement from? You have not paid for a free bus pass or winter fuel allowance all your life, they've only been around a few years!
Through 34 years of National Insurance contributions. Wind your neck in. Oh and plus 6 years of Higher Education.
Pillock.
Look I've got nothing against low income pensioners getting bus passes but some are on more money than people in work so what we give them all free transport?
As I've said on other posts after talking to pensioners many would quite happily pay say 20p to travel on the busses they would rather have regular busses than none at all so why not put into place a very low set rate for bus pass holders?
I don't remember being told that by paying N.I stamp I'd be getting free TV licenses & free Bus travel etc; ?
So I've lost two brothers before they drew their pensions so can they claim the money back if they & you did indeed pay towards this?
I don't agree with thinklikealocal often but on this I don't think she's far off the mark.
Universal payments in this country have gone to far.
In a country where we need to pay off the debt we have people not using family allowance to feed & clothe children but to pay for holidays?
We have OAP's financially well off getting the same allowances that were put in place to protect the not so well off how's this fair?
Sort this mess out & maybe the cut's won't have to be so deep no matter who's in power or shall we carry on saying "So what I'm entitled to it so I'm having it"
I for one have 4 years to go before I'm 60 & if I'm alive & entitled to a free bus pass but can afford to run a car I won't take up my bus pass will all those who can afford to get around not take up their pass?
Well I am on Pension Credit at the moment, that means the lowest of the low, therefore I am entitled to the free bus pass.

I have paid into the system for years and have no other income - we are not all rich ****.

So I do feel I am entitled to the free bus pass. I know there is an expectation in this country now that anyone who doesn't work and who is not super-rich should go to the gas chambers - and our trolling friend is an example of it. Good old Tory fodder - you just cannot beat it.
You've paid into the system so you are entitled?
Those passes,TV licences, Heating Allowances can be taken away at any time as they are not anything you've contributed for.
you as I contributed to a pension when you retired true?
please tell me where it's stated you'd get all those allowances?
these allowances were introduced by ( I think) different Labour Governments to help the poor ( Family allowance,Tax credits) & the low income OAP's.
I can't believe they ever thought the middle class & the well off would be using them to go on holidays?
one word is hated but it has to be considered & that's a form of Means testing people as we cannot go on like this.
you say your on credits? your the type who deserves our help but you know that some people lived the live of Riley never put into a pension scheme or wanted to buy their homes & now are on basic state pensions.
whilst others who did invest & struggled to survive are being forced to sell their homes for care so some genius has to come up with a fair solution to this problem & as that's not me I'm signing off but please don't get into an argument with thinklikealocal

Donald2000 says...
9:06am Fri 4 Jan 13

Please don't get into an argument with thinklikelocal.

The last time I looked that person was not appointed God. I can come on here and get into an argument with whomsoever I please. The trouble with this country know is that it's getting full of little knowalls who want to tell the rest of us about their superinflated and egotistical views and they don't want any argument. This time your friend did get an argument and they did not like it.

It's called democracy. I can argue with whom I like; unless you would like to ban my freedom of speech in favour of some party line perpetrated by some other correspondent on this newspaper.

loosehead says...
1:17pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
Please don't get into an argument with thinklikelocal.

The last time I looked that person was not appointed God. I can come on here and get into an argument with whomsoever I please. The trouble with this country know is that it's getting full of little knowalls who want to tell the rest of us about their superinflated and egotistical views and they don't want any argument. This time your friend did get an argument and they did not like it.

It's called democracy. I can argue with whom I like; unless you would like to ban my freedom of speech in favour of some party line perpetrated by some other correspondent on this newspaper.
Donald I've been in many a disagreement with thinklikealocal so go ahead I'm not trying to tell you what to do I was trying to give you some advice that's all

Donald2000 says...
2:47pm Fri 4 Jan 13

The problem with that advice is, that it's not proper advice - to tell people not to argue with certain people on a talk board is tantamount to giving those people credence to talk whatever gibberish they want to without ever being challenged.

Then it becomes more than just a debate, it becomes a single feature for that person to perpetuate their narrow minded views without anyone else being able to put their own point of view.

If your friend thinklikealocal is so good and their comments are so right, then they can always start off their own vanity blog - there are plenty of these sites available and they can state their ridiculous or anal views for as long as they like. But meanwhile, back in the real world, such views are likely to be challenged. We have not yet reached a state where one person's views have been allowed to take over a whole newspaper. It's sounds to me as if you are scared of this one person and to me that's far from healthy.

loosehead says...
3:00pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
The problem with that advice is, that it's not proper advice - to tell people not to argue with certain people on a talk board is tantamount to giving those people credence to talk whatever gibberish they want to without ever being challenged.

Then it becomes more than just a debate, it becomes a single feature for that person to perpetuate their narrow minded views without anyone else being able to put their own point of view.

If your friend thinklikealocal is so good and their comments are so right, then they can always start off their own vanity blog - there are plenty of these sites available and they can state their ridiculous or anal views for as long as they like. But meanwhile, back in the real world, such views are likely to be challenged. We have not yet reached a state where one person's views have been allowed to take over a whole newspaper. It's sounds to me as if you are scared of this one person and to me that's far from healthy.
My friend? she's called me a racist & god knows what else but you put over your point & replied I think your wrong but we all have our own point of view so hey!
look I'm not hear to tell you to stop so go ahead argue.

thinklikealocal says...
7:05pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
Please don't get into an argument with thinklikelocal.

The last time I looked that person was not appointed God. I can come on here and get into an argument with whomsoever I please. The trouble with this country know is that it's getting full of little knowalls who want to tell the rest of us about their superinflated and egotistical views and they don't want any argument. This time your friend did get an argument and they did not like it.

It's called democracy. I can argue with whom I like; unless you would like to ban my freedom of speech in favour of some party line perpetrated by some other correspondent on this newspaper.
It's clear to me that the only person commenting here who has a problem with other peoples freedom of speech is you!

Donald2000 says...
7:39pm Fri 4 Jan 13

thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote:
Please don't get into an argument with thinklikelocal.

The last time I looked that person was not appointed God. I can come on here and get into an argument with whomsoever I please. The trouble with this country know is that it's getting full of little knowalls who want to tell the rest of us about their superinflated and egotistical views and they don't want any argument. This time your friend did get an argument and they did not like it.

It's called democracy. I can argue with whom I like; unless you would like to ban my freedom of speech in favour of some party line perpetrated by some other correspondent on this newspaper.
It's clear to me that the only person commenting here who has a problem with other peoples freedom of speech is you!
That's purely because you personally don't like being argued with and the fact that you made that comment illustrates that perfectly well. The only person who is not going to argue with you is the person you see every day in the mirror. Other people are going to have their own opinion and their own say.

Ginger_cyclist says...
11:41pm Fri 4 Jan 13

mr.southampton wrote:
CHARLIE TAYLOR wrote:
Will anything ever get done to stop this company (First ) from operating !
Just returned to Soton from zante and to my amazement they have stopped the route from top of Hill Lane to the railway station,it takes 40 mins to get to town on the hourly service, can walk faster! no service after 5-40pm nor sundays, what a joke, the fare is more expensive than a taxi, for two. So much for green progress! gone and bought a car !!
It's shocking, but true. In most cases if there's more than one of you travelling a taxi is often a cheaper option than the bus.

Personally I got so sick of First Bus years ago I bought a bike.
I got sick of buses altogether, got on a double decker when the 3 was the 10 and it was an OLD bus without cctv, think it was what replaced the double deckers that looked like they had an arse but this bus, I got on, sat on the top deck, a couple gets on and sits on the top deck at the front, obviously wasted in someway, halfway home, the bloke decides to spark up a bloody fag, I may be a smoker myself but there is a time and a place to smoke, on a bus is NOT one of those times or places, so now I cycle everywhere.

thinklikealocal says...
12:21pm Sat 5 Jan 13

Donald2000 wrote:
thinklikealocal wrote:
Donald2000 wrote: Please don't get into an argument with thinklikelocal. The last time I looked that person was not appointed God. I can come on here and get into an argument with whomsoever I please. The trouble with this country know is that it's getting full of little knowalls who want to tell the rest of us about their superinflated and egotistical views and they don't want any argument. This time your friend did get an argument and they did not like it. It's called democracy. I can argue with whom I like; unless you would like to ban my freedom of speech in favour of some party line perpetrated by some other correspondent on this newspaper.
It's clear to me that the only person commenting here who has a problem with other peoples freedom of speech is you!
That's purely because you personally don't like being argued with and the fact that you made that comment illustrates that perfectly well. The only person who is not going to argue with you is the person you see every day in the mirror. Other people are going to have their own opinion and their own say.
Look, you posted your opinion then I posted mine. YOU are the one who name calls, demeans and whinges about 'not being entitled to an opinion' and 'others not liking their opinions being opposed'. It is quite clear that YOU are the one who has a problem with their opinion being countered. I am quite happy with people having opinions different to mine but you don't! Stop contradicting yourself by talking about a right to freedom of speech and then trying to shut up others with an opinion!

lisa whitemore says...
8:45pm Sat 5 Jan 13

Gumbo82 wrote:
Perhaps the council should stop wasting money on rubbish like a stupid museum no one goes to or a row of sheds selling junk at Christmas and put the money towards essential services,I work the late shift at first bus and I know first hand a lot of people are going to be stranded in the evening, nurses, elderly coming back from bingo etc and people going to the general to name a few.Plus it will probably put some drivers out of work, so well done city council another dose of disappointment from you goons behind a desk.
quite agree Gumbo, Larger than life Pen Pushers & number crunchers who really do not live in the real world! As for this Asa asking for the public views and opinions as stated below:
"I’d encourage residents to comment on the proposals through the budget consultation so that we can ensure that we’re taking on board as many ideas and views as possible.”
Didnt realise he had become a comedian now....What a load of boloney There is no point trying to negotiate,suggest or oppose anything with this labour run council,they simply do not care.
the sooner everyone realises it the better!

lisa whitemore says...
8:56pm Sat 5 Jan 13

Nicole23 wrote:
I'm not liking Asa Thorpe much. He seems to have a total disregard for working people in the city especially with the chaos he is causing on Itchen Bridge.
I hope he is enjoying his post Christmas holiday in the sun while we are all trying to get to and from work.
The comments his partner made about the populous of Southampton seem to sum up his attitude to hard working people who pay their taxes.
I would like to know how much it cost to make the Civic clock tower glow red all over Christmas.
Yes Nicole Your opinion pretty much mirrors my own personal feelings about Him & His Nursemaid Wife. It was my Dad who she was targeting as an annonomous member of public who knew far too much private and personal info and tried to provacate a response to enable scc to sack him! Thats how Soton Labour Party run their city, by lies,cover ups and misleading members of the public.This will all come out soon especially with enquiry on council leader if not then its time for planB..Watch this Space as they say!!

lisa whitemore says...
8:56pm Sat 5 Jan 13

Nicole23 wrote:
I'm not liking Asa Thorpe much. He seems to have a total disregard for working people in the city especially with the chaos he is causing on Itchen Bridge.
I hope he is enjoying his post Christmas holiday in the sun while we are all trying to get to and from work.
The comments his partner made about the populous of Southampton seem to sum up his attitude to hard working people who pay their taxes.
I would like to know how much it cost to make the Civic clock tower glow red all over Christmas.
Yes Nicole Your opinion pretty much mirrors my own personal feelings about Him & His Nursemaid Wife. It was my Dad who she was targeting as an annonomous member of public who knew far too much private and personal info and tried to provacate a response to enable scc to sack him! Thats how Soton Labour Party run their city, by lies,cover ups and misleading members of the public.This will all come out soon especially with enquiry on council leader if not then its time for planB..Watch this Space as they say!!

loosehead says...
9:13pm Sat 5 Jan 13

lisa whitemore wrote:
Gumbo82 wrote:
Perhaps the council should stop wasting money on rubbish like a stupid museum no one goes to or a row of sheds selling junk at Christmas and put the money towards essential services,I work the late shift at first bus and I know first hand a lot of people are going to be stranded in the evening, nurses, elderly coming back from bingo etc and people going to the general to name a few.Plus it will probably put some drivers out of work, so well done city council another dose of disappointment from you goons behind a desk.
quite agree Gumbo, Larger than life Pen Pushers & number crunchers who really do not live in the real world! As for this Asa asking for the public views and opinions as stated below:
"I’d encourage residents to comment on the proposals through the budget consultation so that we can ensure that we’re taking on board as many ideas and views as possible.”
Didnt realise he had become a comedian now....What a load of boloney There is no point trying to negotiate,suggest or oppose anything with this labour run council,they simply do not care.
the sooner everyone realises it the better!
I agree with most but as someone who's been to the museum I don't agree with all he/she says.
They say they didn't know the size of the cut to the budget this year?
the Tories had set out their store on a cut far bigger than we are now facing thanks to the Tories putting in for a grant which labour were able to increase.
The budget the Tories were looking at was £8billion lower than Labour now have but no cuts to bus subsidies was even talked about.
Just remember one lot of pay was restored ( the smallest group) & they promised to restore the rest this year next year so where do you think that money's coming from?
CUTS!

lisa whitemore says...
9:58am Tue 29 Jan 13

Lone Ranger. wrote:
Nicole23 wrote:
I'm not liking Asa Thorpe much. He seems to have a total disregard for working people in the city especially with the chaos he is causing on Itchen Bridge.
I hope he is enjoying his post Christmas holiday in the sun while we are all trying to get to and from work.
The comments his partner made about the populous of Southampton seem to sum up his attitude to hard working people who pay their taxes.
I would like to know how much it cost to make the Civic clock tower glow red all over Christmas.
The Itchen Bridge "fiasco" was set up by the Tories. They wanted to collect toll money via automation not manually.
.
Where does it say that Thorpe in on a post Xmas holiday in the sun ?
.
Do you object to public employees having a holiday.
.
His partner/wife DID NOT make comments re the "populous" of Southampton ....... The Echo printed the story to that effect for political reasons..
.
As regards the clock ........ make some enquiries to the Civic if you are that interested or concerned ..... then you can let us know
Yes she did call her husbands voters in southampton inbred cretins and no it was not a political reason by the Echo but to try to belittle and misguide members of public.Aswell as a Misleading Press release too for your information.

loosehead says...
12:15pm Tue 29 Jan 13

lisa whitemore wrote:
Lone Ranger. wrote:
Nicole23 wrote:
I'm not liking Asa Thorpe much. He seems to have a total disregard for working people in the city especially with the chaos he is causing on Itchen Bridge.
I hope he is enjoying his post Christmas holiday in the sun while we are all trying to get to and from work.
The comments his partner made about the populous of Southampton seem to sum up his attitude to hard working people who pay their taxes.
I would like to know how much it cost to make the Civic clock tower glow red all over Christmas.
The Itchen Bridge "fiasco" was set up by the Tories. They wanted to collect toll money via automation not manually.
.
Where does it say that Thorpe in on a post Xmas holiday in the sun ?
.
Do you object to public employees having a holiday.
.
His partner/wife DID NOT make comments re the "populous" of Southampton ....... The Echo printed the story to that effect for political reasons..
.
As regards the clock ........ make some enquiries to the Civic if you are that interested or concerned ..... then you can let us know
Yes she did call her husbands voters in southampton inbred cretins and no it was not a political reason by the Echo but to try to belittle and misguide members of public.Aswell as a Misleading Press release too for your information.
Lisa this poster has the cheek to call me a liar don't they read articles if it's from one of their beloved Labour council or is it they change the words to make it sound better?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree