Cut winter fuel allowance for majority of pensioners says MP (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Cut winter fuel allowance for majority of pensioners says MP
7:43am Thursday 3rd January 2013 in News
The majority of pensioners should see their winter fuel allowance cut to help fund a reformed system of care for the elderly, a former minister said.
Lib Dem MP Paul Burstow said targeting the allowance for all but the poorest of pensioners would help pay for a fairer system of state support for old age care.
Mr Burstow, a former care minister, said the move would help meet the cost of implementing the findings of the Dilnot Commission, which proposed capping the amount individuals have to pay for care during their lifetime.
In a report by the Centre Forum think-tank, Mr Burstow suggested setting the cap at £60,000, higher than the £35,000 proposed by the Dilnot Commission, saving the taxpayer up to £1.5 billion a year.
Currently, elderly people in England have to contribute to their own care costs if they have savings of more than £23,000.
The Centre Forum report suggested the costs could be met by ending the universal entitlement to winter fuel payment and granting it only to those receiving pension credit.
The report said: "The Government needs to be clear in its message that a reformed capped funding system is the most appropriate way of dealing with a broken social care system, a crisis that has lasted over 10 years."
It added: "The Treasury needs to grasp the 'best opportunity in a decade' provided by the Dilnot Commission, the goodwill expressed by the financial services industry and by care providers.
"Most importantly it should pay heed to the views of thousands of people who risk losing their entire life's work through having to pay for unexpected and unlimited care costs.
"The Treasury must understand that the care funding crisis is one which will only
Comments(8)
MoanLess
says...
9:09am Thu 3 Jan 13
I hate benefit scroungers as much as the next guy, but your statement is wrong Hulla.
hulla baloo
says...
9:30am Thu 3 Jan 13
MoanLess wrote:Thats the way I interprerted it, and if I am wrong, then I hold my hands up. But with the cap already set at 35000, that is ample enough. Now the increase to 60,000 makes more people involved. How many benefit scroungers.work shy and feckless have savings over 23000. None. So the good bail out the bad, yet again.
Actually, as stated in the article, the money is going towards helping elderly people in other areas.
I hate benefit scroungers as much as the next guy, but your statement is wrong Hulla.
Lone Ranger.
says...
9:47am Thu 3 Jan 13
Linesman
says...
10:13am Thu 3 Jan 13
Many pensioners either served in the armed forces during WWII, in armament industries, merchant navy or agriculture.
Pensioners are the people who put the country back on its feet after WWII, in jobs that did not have a pension scheme.
They are people who had to save for what they wanted, because there were no credit cards, and hire-purchase was not the easiest of things to obtain.
Any money that these pensioners have accumulated is because they have been careful with their money, and not spent more than they can afford.
We now have a 50 year old politician, who has more income from his parliamentary allowances than many pensioners have, who wants to cut allowances paid to pensioners.
Obama has the right idea in that he is increasing the tax on those who earn the most, in an attempt to protect the less well off.
Paul Burstow should take a leaf from his book.
Linesman
says...
10:14am Thu 3 Jan 13
Linesman wrote:ps. I would add that many of those pensioners also did National Service, something that Burstow missed out on.
Many pensioners were born before the days of the NHS.
Many pensioners either served in the armed forces during WWII, in armament industries, merchant navy or agriculture.
Pensioners are the people who put the country back on its feet after WWII, in jobs that did not have a pension scheme.
They are people who had to save for what they wanted, because there were no credit cards, and hire-purchase was not the easiest of things to obtain.
Any money that these pensioners have accumulated is because they have been careful with their money, and not spent more than they can afford.
We now have a 50 year old politician, who has more income from his parliamentary allowances than many pensioners have, who wants to cut allowances paid to pensioners.
Obama has the right idea in that he is increasing the tax on those who earn the most, in an attempt to protect the less well off.
Paul Burstow should take a leaf from his book.
Bagamn
says...
1:59pm Thu 3 Jan 13
Vonnie
says...
5:24pm Thu 3 Jan 13
What world does this man live in? It is not the same one that I and millions of ordinary people are inhabiting.
These "perks" have been bought and paid for over the past 60 odd years by people who have worked hard, paid their taxes and their pension contributions, scrimped and saved and gone without, and now see it all being frittered away by over the top control freaks like this politician.
hulla baloo says...
8:48am Thu 3 Jan 13