Cut winter fuel allowance for majority of pensioners says MP

The majority of pensioners should see their winter fuel allowance cut to help fund a reformed system of care for the elderly, a former minister said.

Lib Dem MP Paul Burstow said targeting the allowance for all but the poorest of pensioners would help pay for a fairer system of state support for old age care.

Mr Burstow, a former care minister, said the move would help meet the cost of implementing the findings of the Dilnot Commission, which proposed capping the amount individuals have to pay for care during their lifetime.

In a report by the Centre Forum think-tank, Mr Burstow suggested setting the cap at £60,000, higher than the £35,000 proposed by the Dilnot Commission, saving the taxpayer up to £1.5 billion a year.

Currently, elderly people in England have to contribute to their own care costs if they have savings of more than £23,000.

The Centre Forum report suggested the costs could be met by ending the universal entitlement to winter fuel payment and granting it only to those receiving pension credit.

The report said: "The Government needs to be clear in its message that a reformed capped funding system is the most appropriate way of dealing with a broken social care system, a crisis that has lasted over 10 years."

It added: "The Treasury needs to grasp the 'best opportunity in a decade' provided by the Dilnot Commission, the goodwill expressed by the financial services industry and by care providers.

"Most importantly it should pay heed to the views of thousands of people who risk losing their entire life's work through having to pay for unexpected and unlimited care costs.

"The Treasury must understand that the care funding crisis is one which will only

Comments(8)

hulla baloo says...
8:48am Thu 3 Jan 13

Yet again, those that have worked all their lives, been careful with their money, paid most into the system are those getting the least out to subside the feckless, lazy and work shy.

MoanLess says...
9:09am Thu 3 Jan 13

Actually, as stated in the article, the money is going towards helping elderly people in other areas.

I hate benefit scroungers as much as the next guy, but your statement is wrong Hulla.

hulla baloo says...
9:30am Thu 3 Jan 13

MoanLess wrote:
Actually, as stated in the article, the money is going towards helping elderly people in other areas.

I hate benefit scroungers as much as the next guy, but your statement is wrong Hulla.
Thats the way I interprerted it, and if I am wrong, then I hold my hands up. But with the cap already set at 35000, that is ample enough. Now the increase to 60,000 makes more people involved. How many benefit scroungers.work shy and feckless have savings over 23000. None. So the good bail out the bad, yet again.

Lone Ranger. says...
9:47am Thu 3 Jan 13

Its amazing that in just over 2.5 short years the number of Lib Dems MP's have become Tories.

Linesman says...
10:13am Thu 3 Jan 13

Many pensioners were born before the days of the NHS.

Many pensioners either served in the armed forces during WWII, in armament industries, merchant navy or agriculture.

Pensioners are the people who put the country back on its feet after WWII, in jobs that did not have a pension scheme.

They are people who had to save for what they wanted, because there were no credit cards, and hire-purchase was not the easiest of things to obtain.

Any money that these pensioners have accumulated is because they have been careful with their money, and not spent more than they can afford.

We now have a 50 year old politician, who has more income from his parliamentary allowances than many pensioners have, who wants to cut allowances paid to pensioners.

Obama has the right idea in that he is increasing the tax on those who earn the most, in an attempt to protect the less well off.

Paul Burstow should take a leaf from his book.

Linesman says...
10:14am Thu 3 Jan 13

Linesman wrote:
Many pensioners were born before the days of the NHS.

Many pensioners either served in the armed forces during WWII, in armament industries, merchant navy or agriculture.

Pensioners are the people who put the country back on its feet after WWII, in jobs that did not have a pension scheme.

They are people who had to save for what they wanted, because there were no credit cards, and hire-purchase was not the easiest of things to obtain.

Any money that these pensioners have accumulated is because they have been careful with their money, and not spent more than they can afford.

We now have a 50 year old politician, who has more income from his parliamentary allowances than many pensioners have, who wants to cut allowances paid to pensioners.

Obama has the right idea in that he is increasing the tax on those who earn the most, in an attempt to protect the less well off.

Paul Burstow should take a leaf from his book.
ps. I would add that many of those pensioners also did National Service, something that Burstow missed out on.

Bagamn says...
1:59pm Thu 3 Jan 13

As a LibDem he should remember the Golden Rule, Make sure brain is in gear before opening mouth. He has just made sure that his Party doesn't get elected on their own ever. What a so-called educated idiot.

Vonnie says...
5:24pm Thu 3 Jan 13

What a twerp! On his income and expected pension he will not be amongst the army of pensioners who, even with the winter fuel allowance, still have to think hard about whether to "heat or eat".

What world does this man live in? It is not the same one that I and millions of ordinary people are inhabiting.

These "perks" have been bought and paid for over the past 60 odd years by people who have worked hard, paid their taxes and their pension contributions, scrimped and saved and gone without, and now see it all being frittered away by over the top control freaks like this politician.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree