What health inspectors found at Premier League football grounds (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
What health inspectors found at Premier League football grounds
8:33am Sunday 13th January 2013 in News
Mice, uncooked chicken and out of date turkey are just some of the hygiene nasties that health inspectors have discovered at Premier League football grounds.
The two most recent environmental reports from teams in the top tier of English football have revealed some surprising findings.
An inspection of Manchester United's stadium Old Trafford discovered that the club has previously had to deal with the presence of rodents.
The report, which also found a broken tap and flaking pipework, instructed them to "continue to monitor and react to the mouse activity".
At St Mary’s Stadium, home of the Saints, Southampton were instructed to clean one of their ceilings, refill a soap dispenser and sort out a gap in a floor which provided potential access for pests.
The information, which was obtained through Freedom of Information requests, also highlighted some other interesting discoveries.
Swansea City were guilty of serving ready cooked chicken that was still pink, leaving an open packet of ham in a kitchen and allowing some pate to go out of date.
At Fulham's ground, Craven Cottage, an open box of bread rolls was left out under a wash basin, while Reading FC were told to clean out the dead insects and cobwebs in a drinks area.
But for many other teams in the league, such as Aston Villa, Wigan, QPR and West Ham, it was just smaller issues such as temperature control and general cleaning that were highlighted.
And reigning champions Manchester City were given top marks, with the inspector writing there was "very good hygiene standards in place".
In response to the report Manchester United said they had a "robust pest control system" and that if any incidents do occur they take "immediate and appropriate action".
HOW THE CLUBS FARED:
Arsenal - The London club scored top marks with inspectors with no contraventions of legislation witnessed;
Aston Villa - The Villains were picked up on maintaining temperature control, a lack of water being provided to certain units and a leaking drain pipe;
Chelsea - Health inspectors detailed how out of date turkey saddles were almost served, how frozen pies were not correctly labelled and also expressed concerns about the sale stockpot. But it seems the warning was taken, as a follow up inspection recorded hygiene being generally excellent;
Everton - High standards of food hygiene and safety were noted by the inspectors;
Fulham - Areas of concern shared with Fulham included an open box of bread rolls under a basin, a hole in a wall which could have given access to pests, and a pair of rusty scissors;
Liverpool - Like their Merseyside neighbours, Liverpool showed good standards and procedures;
Manchester City - The Premier League champions were noted for their very good standards and no action was required;
Manchester Utd - The Red Devils were criticised for flaking paintwork and concerns were raised about the presence of rodents, with the report instructing the club to continue to monitor and react to the mouse activity;
Newcastle United - No problems were discovered by inspectors at St James's Park with good standards observed;
Norwich City - no response;
Queens Park Rangers - A few minor problems were found at Loftus Road such as a few loose taps, no hot water to a hand basin and low lighting in certain areas;
Reading - Health inspectors found dead insects and cobwebs at the Madejski Stadium, which they instructed the club to clean away, as well as a hole in a ceiling and rubbish behind the PG Tips table;
Southampton - Southampton were instructed to clean one of their ceilings, refill a soap dispenser and sort out a gap in a floor which provided potential access for pests;
Stoke City - The Potters were told to clean a dirty vacuum packer and take action on some pouches for vacuum packing that were stored in a dirty box;
Sunderland - The inspection found the Stadium of Light to comply with hygiene and food legislation;
Swansea City - Some of the issues highlighted by the reports included chicken being served that was still pink, out of date watercress, out of date pate and an open packet of cooked ham left in a kitchen;
Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham scored well in the report with food hygiene being recorded as well managed; ::
West Bromwich Albion - Top marks for West Brom as hygiene standards were recorded as being very high;
West Ham United - Not many problems were discovered at Upton Park with inspectors just instructing some extractor filters to be cleaned and to replace a missing ceiling tile;
Wigan Athletic - High standards were noted at Wigan with the report just telling them to ensure temperatures were recorded properly.
Comments(23)
forest hump
says...
9:59am Sun 13 Jan 13
Costa Baz
says...
10:50am Sun 13 Jan 13
Just another reader
says...
10:54am Sun 13 Jan 13
If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain.
Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.
PlymouthSAINT123
says...
11:18am Sun 13 Jan 13
peachy1
says...
11:19am Sun 13 Jan 13
I saw rats pitch side at Birmingham city told the steward he said they were the subs warming up lol
WECOMING4U
says...
11:42am Sun 13 Jan 13
MGRA
says...
11:43am Sun 13 Jan 13
Just another reader wrote:spot on.... the standard of food sold is also extremely poor almost everywhere.... The Rose bowl is not perfect but the food there is lights years ahead of anything I have ever eaten at a footy ground... Having said that, SMS is amongst the best .
If you consider that most of these food outlets are used on average once a fortnight they should be spotless at all times.
If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain.
Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.
sotonman2012
says...
1:00pm Sun 13 Jan 13
Just another reader
says...
1:22pm Sun 13 Jan 13
PlymouthSAINT123 wrote:That's only the main kitchen that gets used, I refer to the multiple bars and food serveries that are below the stands. After all these are what 'fans' get to eat from at the match.
Don't forget St Marys is used for functions etc so not just on average once a fortnight. Considering how many thousand people they cater for I don't think Southampton have done to bad. I can't fault them when I buy food from there its football not a top class resturant quick pie and beer in the concourse keeps me happy
Just another reader
says...
1:24pm Sun 13 Jan 13
thinklikealocal
says...
2:13pm Sun 13 Jan 13
MGRA wrote:Sorry don't agree. I think the choice and quality of food sold at St M is appalling. Have been to footie grounds all over the country and almost always better. Coventry fabulous. I choose not to buy at the ground but regret that it appears to be a great commercial opportunity being 'lost', surprised too considering the Chairman's relentless business mantra.
Just another reader wrote: If you consider that most of these food outlets are used on average once a fortnight they should be spotless at all times. If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain. Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.spot on.... the standard of food sold is also extremely poor almost everywhere.... The Rose bowl is not perfect but the food there is lights years ahead of anything I have ever eaten at a footy ground... Having said that, SMS is amongst the best .
mickey01
says...
3:24pm Sun 13 Jan 13
MGRA
says...
4:11pm Sun 13 Jan 13
thinklikealocal wrote:hotdogs are pricey but ok, burgers are garbage, pies are ok sometimes ... had a lot worse than the food at SMS....
MGRA wrote:Sorry don't agree. I think the choice and quality of food sold at St M is appalling. Have been to footie grounds all over the country and almost always better. Coventry fabulous. I choose not to buy at the ground but regret that it appears to be a great commercial opportunity being 'lost', surprised too considering the Chairman's relentless business mantra.
Just another reader wrote: If you consider that most of these food outlets are used on average once a fortnight they should be spotless at all times. If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain. Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.spot on.... the standard of food sold is also extremely poor almost everywhere.... The Rose bowl is not perfect but the food there is lights years ahead of anything I have ever eaten at a footy ground... Having said that, SMS is amongst the best .
three halves
says...
4:27pm Sun 13 Jan 13
J.P.M
says...
4:36pm Sun 13 Jan 13
three halves wrote:Spot-on.
All the food and drinks at football grounds is a rip off just like the ticket prices epecially in the premier league
Thread closed.
SPIKEISLANDTRADER
says...
4:58pm Sun 13 Jan 13
Costa Baz wrote:Oh the vermin in Fratton let alone the stench of boneless SKATE . Bet its Cccrawling . Soon to be demolished though so NO WORRY
Lucky they didn't go to Fratton Park, where there would have been reports of rats leaving a sinking ship.
Linesman
says...
5:04pm Sun 13 Jan 13
As has been said, it has conference facilities which would be in frequent use, bringing money into the club.
This money should be used to ensure that there is a regular maintenance programme to make sure that, when these facilites are inspected, they pass with flying colours.
Nicole23
says...
5:23pm Sun 13 Jan 13
Linesman
says...
7:06pm Sun 13 Jan 13
Nicole23 wrote:With the age of Fratton Park, there would be more excuse.
I wonder what they would find at Pompey?Doesn't bear thinking about.
good-gosh
says...
7:51pm Sun 13 Jan 13
derek james
says...
9:59pm Sun 13 Jan 13
CHARLIE TAYLOR
says...
10:20am Mon 14 Jan 13
manimaul says...
8:56am Sun 13 Jan 13