Scout leader who fractured spine sliding down firemen's pole wins £167, 500 damages

Scout leader who fractured spine sliding down firemen's pole wins £167, 500 damages Scout leader who fractured spine sliding down firemen's pole wins £167, 500 damages

A Hampshire scout leader who fractured his spine on a cross country assault course has won £167,514 damages.

Robert Wilson, 49, fell on his bottom after sliding down a fireman's pole on an obstacle called the Burma Bridge during a week's camp at the Clyne Farm Centre, near Swansea.

He suffered great pain from the injury to his first lumbar vertebra which needed surgical fixing and left him in a spinal brace for six months.

The discomfort affected his work as a taxi driver and made it difficult to help his disabled wife.

Today, Mrs Justice Swift allowed Mr Wilson's claim against chartered structural engineer Geoff Haden, trading as Clyne Farm Centre, who denied liability.

Mr Haden, who devised the course with the assistance of a former army assault course instructor, had told London's High Court that over 20 years about 300,000 people - half of them children - had used the course with no similar accident.

His lawyers claimed that Mr Wilson, of New Road, Whitehill, Bordon, Hampshire, was the author of his own misfortune.

The judge said that the August 2009 accident probably happened because Mr Wilson failed to appreciate the importance of wrapping his legs firmly around the pole immediately he launched himself onto it.

She added that as the course instructor concluded that the technique was so obvious that no demonstration was necessary, it was vital she should at least give clear and specific instructions about how to negotiate the pole, so as to control the speed of descent - but she did not.

''I consider that those circumstances gave rise to a breach of duty which on a balance of probabilities was causative of the claimant's accident.''

Comments(21)

rightway says...
4:04pm Fri 15 Feb 13

So now its OK to sue someone for your mistake.

The Wickham Man says...
4:17pm Fri 15 Feb 13

rightway wrote:
So now its OK to sue someone for your mistake.
Unfortunately yes. Let's close down everything in case it's dangerous. Sadly this is the thin end of the wedge that sees carnivals and events cancelled for health and safety reasons, and children barred from playing games because some fool of a grownup didn't know how to slide down a pole properly

Stephen J says...
4:31pm Fri 15 Feb 13

All they had to do was give a brief instruction on how do it safely, and no problem. But they didn't, so Mr Wilson's into them for £167, 500. No need to ban anything, just do what's reasonable to make sure it's done safely.

sotonboy84 says...
4:32pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Sounds like a right bloody idiot, out to get anything he can.

Yeah, it was unfortunate he hurt himself but it was his own fault!

lemon cake says...
4:47pm Fri 15 Feb 13

I broke my leg playing football......can I sue the hampshire FA for not telling me that trying to win the ball off of someone may hurt a bit?
Should they have given me a demo of how to do a tackle properly?

I also broke my finger trapping it in a door in my council owned house, should i sue the council for not demostrating how to shut a door without any of my limbs in the way?

If i keep going i could be worth millions.

Stephen J says...
4:52pm Fri 15 Feb 13

lemon cake wrote:
I broke my leg playing football......can I sue the hampshire FA for not telling me that trying to win the ball off of someone may hurt a bit?
Should they have given me a demo of how to do a tackle properly?

I also broke my finger trapping it in a door in my council owned house, should i sue the council for not demostrating how to shut a door without any of my limbs in the way?

If i keep going i could be worth millions.
If you could show that either the FA or the council were negligent and had failed in their duty of care, yes.

On the inside says...
4:52pm Fri 15 Feb 13

The bloke running this place will be insured so I don't suppose he gives a ***k either way, he will still be minted.

rightway says...
5:02pm Fri 15 Feb 13

On the inside wrote:
The bloke running this place will be insured so I don't suppose he gives a ***k either way, he will still be minted.
Except that his premiums will now go up so he will charge more to cover the cost, just because no-one explained the laws of gravity to Mr Wilson, does that now mean he can sue the family of Sir Isaac Newton.

MGRA says...
5:20pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Firemen get extensive training on how to use the pole properly. Yet this guy was expected to know because it was "obvious" !?!? No this is fair judgement.

rightway says...
5:27pm Fri 15 Feb 13

MGRA wrote:
Firemen get extensive training on how to use the pole properly. Yet this guy was expected to know because it was "obvious" !?!? No this is fair judgement.
Yeah, they're told to hold tight and don't let go untill they reach the bottom.
Next week Rocket Science.

Lone Ranger. says...
5:46pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Overall condemnation of this chap who makes, and wins, a claim of £167k.
.
Just wonder if the 10 previous posters would have done exactly the same if they had been in his position and probably received a call from a firm of Solicitors stating how big a possible windfall it could be ..................
.
Wonder if any own up !!!!!

J.P.M says...
6:01pm Fri 15 Feb 13

How tall was the fireman?

Stephen J says...
6:13pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Lone Ranger. wrote:
Overall condemnation of this chap who makes, and wins, a claim of £167k.
.
Just wonder if the 10 previous posters would have done exactly the same if they had been in his position and probably received a call from a firm of Solicitors stating how big a possible windfall it could be ..................
.
Wonder if any own up !!!!!
There's not really anything to own up to. A firm is negligent, fails in its duty of care, you make a claim and get the compensation the court says you deserve. The fact that you call it a "windfall" suggests you're as cynical about it as those you're trying to provoke.

meltdown says...
7:49pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Stephen J wrote:
All they had to do was give a brief instruction on how do it safely, and no problem. But they didn't, so Mr Wilson's into them for £167, 500. No need to ban anything, just do what's reasonable to make sure it's done safely.
It's being called 'taking responsibility for your own actions',.......have you ever heard of that?

Stephen J says...
8:08pm Fri 15 Feb 13

meltdown wrote:
Stephen J wrote:
All they had to do was give a brief instruction on how do it safely, and no problem. But they didn't, so Mr Wilson's into them for £167, 500. No need to ban anything, just do what's reasonable to make sure it's done safely.
It's being called 'taking responsibility for your own actions',.......have you ever heard of that?
I have. And when I pay to do something like this I can reasonably expect my actions to be guided by proper instruction.

Lone Ranger. says...
8:18pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Stephen J wrote:
Lone Ranger. wrote:
Overall condemnation of this chap who makes, and wins, a claim of £167k.
.
Just wonder if the 10 previous posters would have done exactly the same if they had been in his position and probably received a call from a firm of Solicitors stating how big a possible windfall it could be ..................
.
Wonder if any own up !!!!!
There's not really anything to own up to. A firm is negligent, fails in its duty of care, you make a claim and get the compensation the court says you deserve. The fact that you call it a "windfall" suggests you're as cynical about it as those you're trying to provoke.
I think that you are reading too deeply into my post .......

huckit P says...
9:50pm Fri 15 Feb 13

MGRA wrote:
Firemen get extensive training on how to use the pole properly. Yet this guy was expected to know because it was "obvious" !?!? No this is fair judgement.
Actually no. when the poles were installed in fire stations firemen were considered intelligent enough to use them properly. I can honestly say that in years of service I was never shown how to use the pole properly but it was thought that if I had enough common sense to be in the job I could figure it out myself.
Now, with Health & Safety crippling everything that moves most poles have been removed.

elvisimo says...
9:56pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Pathetic. Don't let anyone remotely thick as pig sh@t on it in future.

rightway says...
3:08am Sat 16 Feb 13

As a scout leader isn't he supposed to take charge and instruct the children in his care.
I would not feel comfortable leaving any of my children in the care of someone who needs instruction on how to slide down a pole, would anyone.
Maybe he has yet to achieve his sliding down a pole badge.

rightway says...
10:20am Sat 16 Feb 13

huckit P wrote:
MGRA wrote: Firemen get extensive training on how to use the pole properly. Yet this guy was expected to know because it was "obvious" !?!? No this is fair judgement.
Actually no. when the poles were installed in fire stations firemen were considered intelligent enough to use them properly. I can honestly say that in years of service I was never shown how to use the pole properly but it was thought that if I had enough common sense to be in the job I could figure it out myself. Now, with Health & Safety crippling everything that moves most poles have been removed.
Hard Luck MGRA.
I see someone who knows what they're talking about has caught you out making up your own facts. "obvious"

Subject48 says...
12:16pm Sat 16 Feb 13

rightway says...
3:08am Sat 16 Feb 13

As a scout leader isn't he supposed to take charge and instruct the children in his care.
I would not feel comfortable leaving any of my children in the care of someone who needs instruction on how to slide down a pole, would anyone.
Maybe he has yet to achieve his sliding down a pole badge.”



+1

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree