Tory candidate 'has faith in Hampshire schools' (From Daily Echo)

gaylard wrote:
my son went to state schools in southampton became a doctor also has three degrees in science most of his friend,s went onto univercity this was diamond road school bitterne park

Inform Al wrote:
A long winded excuse by a Tory paper for their candidate being too honest for the electorate, you don't get the education to be a heart surgeon at school, that comes later at uni so the excuse really misses the point. Funny thing is I would also want the best for my children and if I could have afforded to send them to Eton I would have, especially since I have seen the wonders they can perform for their obviously academically challenged pupils. The PIP (pair in power) are testament to this.

CharlieOxbridge wrote:
So thats Tory and Labour candidates in U-turns. No sign of Diane James, the straight talking politician going back on her words I notice. VOTE UKIP and have done with these morons.

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........

...

jonnyx wrote:

CharlieOxbridge wrote: So thats Tory and Labour candidates in U-turns. No sign of Diane James, the straight talking politician going back on her words I notice. VOTE UKIP and have done with these morons.

a shame really as what diane james said was pretty disgusting, unproven and morally reprehensible. oh well.

CharlieOxbridge wrote:

jonnyx wrote:

CharlieOxbridge wrote: So thats Tory and Labour candidates in U-turns. No sign of Diane James, the straight talking politician going back on her words I notice. VOTE UKIP and have done with these morons.

a shame really as what diane james said was pretty disgusting, unproven and morally reprehensible. oh well.

Romanians associated with crime - I think you will find that is statistically and factually correct.

CharlieOxbridge wrote:

jonnyx wrote:

CharlieOxbridge wrote: So thats Tory and Labour candidates in U-turns. No sign of Diane James, the straight talking politician going back on her words I notice. VOTE UKIP and have done with these morons.

a shame really as what diane james said was pretty disgusting, unproven and morally reprehensible. oh well.

Romanians associated with crime - I think you will find that is statistically and factually correct.

gaylard wrote:
answer for donald I did not go to a state school I was sent to a private school which I hated

sparkster wrote:
Exactly, I went to a state school too and i didnt fare badly, in fact i went on to become a secretary to a senior partner in a law firm in southampton, i went to college after school to learn shorthand and typing so i feel i did pretty well. I agree with inform Al you dont get the education at school to become a heart surgeon you go on to uni

Velleity wrote:

sparkster wrote:
Exactly, I went to a state school too and i didnt fare badly, in fact i went on to become a secretary to a senior partner in a law firm in southampton, i went to college after school to learn shorthand and typing so i feel i did pretty well. I agree with inform Al you dont get the education at school to become a heart surgeon you go on to uni

I think you were trying to type: "Exactly, I went to a state school too and I didn't fare badly. In fact, I went on to become a secretary to a senior partner in a law firm in Southampton. I went to college after school to learn shorthand and typing so I feel I did pretty well. I agree with Inform Al you don't get the education at school to become a heart surgeon; you go on to uni."

Quite a few errors in grammar for someone as well-educated as you claim to be. Oh, the irony! Correct your mistakes and hand your work in again tomorrow.

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........


...

You need to take the tablets.

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........



...

You need to take the tablets.

I have a tablet thank you.
>
Perhaps instead of making innocuous comments (I note others you've made) perhaps you could best spend the time looking up the background of the said Tory candidate...........

........

Lone Ranger. wrote:
Quote:- Conservative candidate Maria Hutchings says she has “full confidence” in Hampshire's education system. . Your ok with the old U-Turn Ms Hutchings, your Tory led government have been doing it for nearly 3 years now ......... and no-one believes a word that they say anymore

Donald2000 wrote:

Inform Al wrote:
A long winded excuse by a Tory paper for their candidate being too honest for the electorate, you don't get the education to be a heart surgeon at school, that comes later at uni so the excuse really misses the point. Funny thing is I would also want the best for my children and if I could have afforded to send them to Eton I would have, especially since I have seen the wonders they can perform for their obviously academically challenged pupils. The PIP (pair in power) are testament to this.

Al, I am surprised at you. You would have sent your kids to that school!? What we need to do is to build up the local schools before sending our kids to soup schools (rich and thick).

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........

...

Stephen J wrote:
Back of fag packet calculation x what I reckon = Lib Dem hold. After all, 86 per cent of LibDem voters said that the Chris Huhne debacle won't change how they vote. In that light, the Lib Dem campaign so far is brilliant: say nothing, do nothing, and at least you won't make a gaffe!

Donald2000 wrote:

gaylard wrote:
answer for donald I did not go to a state school I was sent to a private school which I hated

They did not teach you much in that case, for which I can express my sympathy for you. You might, however, like to try starting a sentence with a capital letter and trying some punctuation. These are the basics of good writing and I would commend them to you.

jackryan05 wrote:
You can argue all day and night, who ever wins this election you can be sure of one thing. Nothing will change, a politician is just like a banana, they go in green, turn yellow and end up bent.

Just think about it before you vote, these people believe there own B.S., do you really want that to represent you, you only have to look at the out going M.P. for proof of that, trust me if voting actually changed anything, those in power would abolish it.

jimbos wrote:
As Donald has already pointed out there is no such thing as a cardio-respiratory surgeon. Maybe they mean cardiothoracic surgeon. And saints, no, you are not the only one reminded of Hyacinth Bucket.

jonnyx wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

gaylard wrote:
answer for donald I did not go to a state school I was sent to a private school which I hated

They did not teach you much in that case, for which I can express my sympathy for you. You might, however, like to try starting a sentence with a capital letter and trying some punctuation. These are the basics of good writing and I would commend them to you.

on an internet talkboard spelling and grammar pedantry aimed at scoring cheap points is the last resort of the scoundrel (imo). attack the argument not the form.

Donald2000 wrote:

jonnyx wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

gaylard wrote:
answer for donald I did not go to a state school I was sent to a private school which I hated

They did not teach you much in that case, for which I can express my sympathy for you. You might, however, like to try starting a sentence with a capital letter and trying some punctuation. These are the basics of good writing and I would commend them to you.

on an internet talkboard spelling and grammar pedantry aimed at scoring cheap points is the last resort of the scoundrel (imo). attack the argument not the form.

On the contrary, it's designed to help people to write in a more grammatical style, thereby increasing other people's understanding of what is being said. The points being made are not cheap ones but are designed to help. This is an argument about someone who did not know (let alone being able to spell) that a cardio-thoracic surgeon was the currently used appellation for such a position within the NHS.

I would suggest that it is your own goodself who is encouraging ignorance, whilst I am in fact encouraging education. So sad that you want to attack those who are trying to help others to better themselves. Can I ask you why it is you feel that people have to live in perpetual ignorance?

Lone Ranger. wrote:

George4th wrote: I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation.......... ...

Yes but you would vote for a coatstand as long as it was Blue !!

MGRA wrote:

Stephen J wrote:
Back of fag packet calculation x what I reckon = Lib Dem hold. After all, 86 per cent of LibDem voters said that the Chris Huhne debacle won't change how they vote. In that light, the Lib Dem campaign so far is brilliant: say nothing, do nothing, and at least you won't make a gaffe!

very true.... BUT.... the margin was wafer thin, I reckon Sarah Palin , err, sorry Maria could nick it. I am not a tory voter but will tactically vote for her to keep the Camel-kickers wearing beard patrol out.

andysaint wrote:

jackryan05 wrote:
You can argue all day and night, who ever wins this election you can be sure of one thing. Nothing will change, a politician is just like a banana, they go in green, turn yellow and end up bent.

Just think about it before you vote, these people believe there own B.S., do you really want that to represent you, you only have to look at the out going M.P. for proof of that, trust me if voting actually changed anything, those in power would abolish it.

Spot on 100 % agree.
Great post - the only sensible comment here.
Think revolution brothers - DONT VOTE DONT PAY YOUR TAXES until every politician in this country understands that we wont be conned , lied to and cheated anymore

Stephen J wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

jonnyx wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

gaylard wrote:
answer for donald I did not go to a state school I was sent to a private school which I hated

They did not teach you much in that case, for which I can express my sympathy for you. You might, however, like to try starting a sentence with a capital letter and trying some punctuation. These are the basics of good writing and I would commend them to you.

on an internet talkboard spelling and grammar pedantry aimed at scoring cheap points is the last resort of the scoundrel (imo). attack the argument not the form.

On the contrary, it's designed to help people to write in a more grammatical style, thereby increasing other people's understanding of what is being said. The points being made are not cheap ones but are designed to help. This is an argument about someone who did not know (let alone being able to spell) that a cardio-thoracic surgeon was the currently used appellation for such a position within the NHS.

I would suggest that it is your own goodself who is encouraging ignorance, whilst I am in fact encouraging education. So sad that you want to attack those who are trying to help others to better themselves. Can I ask you why it is you feel that people have to live in perpetual ignorance?

Perhaps you mean "good self", which is two words.

skin2000 wrote:

andysaint wrote:

jackryan05 wrote:
You can argue all day and night, who ever wins this election you can be sure of one thing. Nothing will change, a politician is just like a banana, they go in green, turn yellow and end up bent.

Just think about it before you vote, these people believe there own B.S., do you really want that to represent you, you only have to look at the out going M.P. for proof of that, trust me if voting actually changed anything, those in power would abolish it.

Spot on 100 % agree.
Great post - the only sensible comment here.
Think revolution brothers - DONT VOTE DONT PAY YOUR TAXES until every politician in this country understands that we wont be conned , lied to and cheated anymore

'You are right,people are fed up with being conned, and will not stand for being shafted for much longer.

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:
Quote:- Conservative candidate Maria Hutchings says she has “full confidence” in Hampshire's education system. . Your ok with the old U-Turn Ms Hutchings, your Tory led government have been doing it for nearly 3 years now ......... and no-one believes a word that they say anymore

What do mean by 'anymore'?

Did you ever trust the con artist CONservatives?

Most people have always known that putting trust in Tories means pushing the luck bit too far.

That's why last election they could not make majority, but the habitual liars the sugar coated Tories the most unprincipled LibDem jumped with their bed to screw the nation.

That is why Eastleigh is the chance to tell both these parties what most people think of them?

If you are collecting for super glue for certain candidate's mouth I will contribute!!!

Donald2000 wrote:

jonnyx wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

gaylard wrote:
answer for donald I did not go to a state school I was sent to a private school which I hated

They did not teach you much in that case, for which I can express my sympathy for you. You might, however, like to try starting a sentence with a capital letter and trying some punctuation. These are the basics of good writing and I would commend them to you.

on an internet talkboard spelling and grammar pedantry aimed at scoring cheap points is the last resort of the scoundrel (imo). attack the argument not the form.

On the contrary, it's designed to help people to write in a more grammatical style, thereby increasing other people's understanding of what is being said. The points being made are not cheap ones but are designed to help. This is an argument about someone who did not know (let alone being able to spell) that a cardio-thoracic surgeon was the currently used appellation for such a position within the NHS.

I would suggest that it is your own goodself who is encouraging ignorance, whilst I am in fact encouraging education. So sad that you want to attack those who are trying to help others to better themselves. Can I ask you why it is you feel that people have to live in perpetual ignorance?

gaylard wrote:
my son went to state schools in southampton became a doctor also has three degrees in science most of his friend,s went onto univercity this was diamond road school bitterne park

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........




...

You need to take the tablets.

I have a tablet thank you.
>
Perhaps instead of making innocuous comments (I note others you've made) perhaps you could best spend the time looking up the background of the said Tory candidate...........


........

Far from being innocuous, as you so politely put it, my comments are spot on right. You are potentially supporting someone who does not even know that "cardio-respira
tory surgeon" is a position within the NHS which does not exist. In addition, the remarks she made were grossly insulting of state schools and probably most of the schools in Eastleigh. I do not need to know the background of the said person to know immediately that she would become the biggest liability for the people of Eastleigh that ever occured.

Sadly, I can see that you are probably a Tory voter. I pity you your innocence and hope that you are not the victim of Tory Party spin and misinformation. Oh and before you say I am a socialist or LibDdem troll, I would not vote for any of them. Please don't tell me to look up anyone's credentials again. I so hate wasting my time on muppets.

jonnyx wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

jonnyx wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

gaylard wrote:
answer for donald I did not go to a state school I was sent to a private school which I hated

They did not teach you much in that case, for which I can express my sympathy for you. You might, however, like to try starting a sentence with a capital letter and trying some punctuation. These are the basics of good writing and I would commend them to you.

on an internet talkboard spelling and grammar pedantry aimed at scoring cheap points is the last resort of the scoundrel (imo). attack the argument not the form.

On the contrary, it's designed to help people to write in a more grammatical style, thereby increasing other people's understanding of what is being said. The points being made are not cheap ones but are designed to help. This is an argument about someone who did not know (let alone being able to spell) that a cardio-thoracic surgeon was the currently used appellation for such a position within the NHS.

I would suggest that it is your own goodself who is encouraging ignorance, whilst I am in fact encouraging education. So sad that you want to attack those who are trying to help others to better themselves. Can I ask you why it is you feel that people have to live in perpetual ignorance?

someone once said "we are never more deceived than when we mistake gravity for greatness, solemnity for science and pomposity for erudition" any of that strike a chord donald? because you reek of that last one mate.

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........





...

You need to take the tablets.

I have a tablet thank you.
>
Perhaps instead of making innocuous comments (I note others you've made) perhaps you could best spend the time looking up the background of the said Tory candidate...........



........

Far from being innocuous, as you so politely put it, my comments are spot on right. You are potentially supporting someone who does not even know that "cardio-respira

tory surgeon" is a position within the NHS which does not exist. In addition, the remarks she made were grossly insulting of state schools and probably most of the schools in Eastleigh. I do not need to know the background of the said person to know immediately that she would become the biggest liability for the people of Eastleigh that ever occured.

Sadly, I can see that you are probably a Tory voter. I pity you your innocence and hope that you are not the victim of Tory Party spin and misinformation. Oh and before you say I am a socialist or LibDdem troll, I would not vote for any of them. Please don't tell me to look up anyone's credentials again. I so hate wasting my time on muppets.

What you're really saying is that you are scared that you might like the woman!
>
>
Seems that one or two others on here are of a similar ilk and scared of possibly accepting someone of an opposite political persuasion!
>
As I said, the woman has very good life skills, far and above any of her opponents!

Dresnez wrote:

gaylard wrote:
my son went to state schools in southampton became a doctor also has three degrees in science most of his friend,s went onto univercity this was diamond road school bitterne park

Yes my daughters went to state schools and both have done very well. One is a paramedic and one is a director in a bank.

Neither went to university, the daughter who is a director in a bank did her degree and other financial qualifications by distance learning whilst working at the bank and has worked her way up.

Her best friend at the state school went on to become a radio presenter.

A very dear friend of mine sent her son and daughter to private schools because her son was very gifted.

Neither have done particularly well, her son was selling bathrooms and her daughter is a care worker.

One of my grandsons is a bar man and he went to private school.

Private school's pupils do well when they can get into the family business or have parental contacts or friends that smooth their path.

Not so sure state schools will be as good now Gove has been messing around with them though.

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........






...

You need to take the tablets.

I have a tablet thank you.
>
Perhaps instead of making innocuous comments (I note others you've made) perhaps you could best spend the time looking up the background of the said Tory candidate...........




........

Far from being innocuous, as you so politely put it, my comments are spot on right. You are potentially supporting someone who does not even know that "cardio-respira


tory surgeon" is a position within the NHS which does not exist. In addition, the remarks she made were grossly insulting of state schools and probably most of the schools in Eastleigh. I do not need to know the background of the said person to know immediately that she would become the biggest liability for the people of Eastleigh that ever occured.

Sadly, I can see that you are probably a Tory voter. I pity you your innocence and hope that you are not the victim of Tory Party spin and misinformation. Oh and before you say I am a socialist or LibDdem troll, I would not vote for any of them. Please don't tell me to look up anyone's credentials again. I so hate wasting my time on muppets.

What you're really saying is that you are scared that you might like the woman!
>
>
Seems that one or two others on here are of a similar ilk and scared of possibly accepting someone of an opposite political persuasion!
>
As I said, the woman has very good life skills, far and above any of her opponents!

I don't have any political persuasion. Life skills? Are you taking the complete michael, you sad person.

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........






...

You need to take the tablets.

I have a tablet thank you.
>
Perhaps instead of making innocuous comments (I note others you've made) perhaps you could best spend the time looking up the background of the said Tory candidate...........




........

Far from being innocuous, as you so politely put it, my comments are spot on right. You are potentially supporting someone who does not even know that "cardio-respira


tory surgeon" is a position within the NHS which does not exist. In addition, the remarks she made were grossly insulting of state schools and probably most of the schools in Eastleigh. I do not need to know the background of the said person to know immediately that she would become the biggest liability for the people of Eastleigh that ever occured.

Sadly, I can see that you are probably a Tory voter. I pity you your innocence and hope that you are not the victim of Tory Party spin and misinformation. Oh and before you say I am a socialist or LibDdem troll, I would not vote for any of them. Please don't tell me to look up anyone's credentials again. I so hate wasting my time on muppets.

What you're really saying is that you are scared that you might like the woman!
>
>
Seems that one or two others on here are of a similar ilk and scared of possibly accepting someone of an opposite political persuasion!
>
As I said, the woman has very good life skills, far and above any of her opponents!

I don't have any political persuasion. Life skills? Are you taking the complete michael, you sad person.

Stephen J wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........







...

You need to take the tablets.

I have a tablet thank you.
>
Perhaps instead of making innocuous comments (I note others you've made) perhaps you could best spend the time looking up the background of the said Tory candidate...........





........

Far from being innocuous, as you so politely put it, my comments are spot on right. You are potentially supporting someone who does not even know that "cardio-respira



tory surgeon" is a position within the NHS which does not exist. In addition, the remarks she made were grossly insulting of state schools and probably most of the schools in Eastleigh. I do not need to know the background of the said person to know immediately that she would become the biggest liability for the people of Eastleigh that ever occured.

Sadly, I can see that you are probably a Tory voter. I pity you your innocence and hope that you are not the victim of Tory Party spin and misinformation. Oh and before you say I am a socialist or LibDdem troll, I would not vote for any of them. Please don't tell me to look up anyone's credentials again. I so hate wasting my time on muppets.

What you're really saying is that you are scared that you might like the woman!
>
>
Seems that one or two others on here are of a similar ilk and scared of possibly accepting someone of an opposite political persuasion!
>
As I said, the woman has very good life skills, far and above any of her opponents!

I don't have any political persuasion. Life skills? Are you taking the complete michael, you sad person.

Taking the michael? You mean "taking the Michael", the origin of which is the rhyming slang of "taking the Mickey Bliss". Proper capitalisation is key to people fully understanding what you have to say.

Stephen J wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:
Quote:- Conservative candidate Maria Hutchings says she has “full confidence” in Hampshire's education system. . Your ok with the old U-Turn Ms Hutchings, your Tory led government have been doing it for nearly 3 years now ......... and no-one believes a word that they say anymore

What do mean by 'anymore'?

Did you ever trust the con artist CONservatives?

Most people have always known that putting trust in Tories means pushing the luck bit too far.

That's why last election they could not make majority, but the habitual liars the sugar coated Tories the most unprincipled LibDem jumped with their bed to screw the nation.

That is why Eastleigh is the chance to tell both these parties what most people think of them?

If you are collecting for super glue for certain candidate's mouth I will contribute!!!

How was canvassing yesterday?

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:

Donald2000 wrote:

George4th wrote:
I've just read up on this lady. I suggest the folk of Eastleigh do too. I'd vote for her without hesitation..........







...

You need to take the tablets.

I have a tablet thank you.
>
Perhaps instead of making innocuous comments (I note others you've made) perhaps you could best spend the time looking up the background of the said Tory candidate...........





........

Far from being innocuous, as you so politely put it, my comments are spot on right. You are potentially supporting someone who does not even know that "cardio-respira



tory surgeon" is a position within the NHS which does not exist. In addition, the remarks she made were grossly insulting of state schools and probably most of the schools in Eastleigh. I do not need to know the background of the said person to know immediately that she would become the biggest liability for the people of Eastleigh that ever occured.

Sadly, I can see that you are probably a Tory voter. I pity you your innocence and hope that you are not the victim of Tory Party spin and misinformation. Oh and before you say I am a socialist or LibDdem troll, I would not vote for any of them. Please don't tell me to look up anyone's credentials again. I so hate wasting my time on muppets.

What you're really saying is that you are scared that you might like the woman!
>
>
Seems that one or two others on here are of a similar ilk and scared of possibly accepting someone of an opposite political persuasion!
>
As I said, the woman has very good life skills, far and above any of her opponents!

I don't have any political persuasion. Life skills? Are you taking the complete michael, you sad person.

Hmmm! Yet another pseudo intelligent poster who resorts to insults!
:-)

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Stephen J wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:
Quote:- Conservative candidate Maria Hutchings says she has “full confidence” in Hampshire's education system. . Your ok with the old U-Turn Ms Hutchings, your Tory led government have been doing it for nearly 3 years now ......... and no-one believes a word that they say anymore

What do mean by 'anymore'?

Did you ever trust the con artist CONservatives?

Most people have always known that putting trust in Tories means pushing the luck bit too far.

That's why last election they could not make majority, but the habitual liars the sugar coated Tories the most unprincipled LibDem jumped with their bed to screw the nation.

That is why Eastleigh is the chance to tell both these parties what most people think of them?

If you are collecting for super glue for certain candidate's mouth I will contribute!!!

How was canvassing yesterday?

Reasonably well.

NuLabour method of campaign could be better organised, which I am surprised considering John Denham who is normaly very good is involved in organising.

End of the day it is their campaign so I along with their MP from Southall, GLA members and some very good councillors from London area were asked to do.

Got the impression most people are fed up with political parties, so turn out could be low.

So called austerity mantra preached by all main parties is contributing towards putting people off. If Fairoak is reflection of other places, whole of established political class better start listening to people otherwise some will get switched off and others may start falling in the laps of extremists on the right, which worries me.

Serious lesson: Yes us lot playing political ping pong may be enjoying it, but people out in real world are pi55ed off with all of us.

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Stephen J wrote:

Paramjit Bahia wrote:

Lone Ranger. wrote:
Quote:- Conservative candidate Maria Hutchings says she has “full confidence” in Hampshire's education system. . Your ok with the old U-Turn Ms Hutchings, your Tory led government have been doing it for nearly 3 years now ......... and no-one believes a word that they say anymore

What do mean by 'anymore'?

Did you ever trust the con artist CONservatives?

Most people have always known that putting trust in Tories means pushing the luck bit too far.

That's why last election they could not make majority, but the habitual liars the sugar coated Tories the most unprincipled LibDem jumped with their bed to screw the nation.

That is why Eastleigh is the chance to tell both these parties what most people think of them?

If you are collecting for super glue for certain candidate's mouth I will contribute!!!

How was canvassing yesterday?

Reasonably well.

NuLabour method of campaign could be better organised, which I am surprised considering John Denham who is normaly very good is involved in organising.

End of the day it is their campaign so I along with their MP from Southall, GLA members and some very good councillors from London area were asked to do.

Got the impression most people are fed up with political parties, so turn out could be low.

So called austerity mantra preached by all main parties is contributing towards putting people off. If Fairoak is reflection of other places, whole of established political class better start listening to people otherwise some will get switched off and others may start falling in the laps of extremists on the right, which worries me.

Serious lesson: Yes us lot playing political ping pong may be enjoying it, but people out in real world are pi55ed off with all of us.

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c

om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE

_0

southy wrote:
http://www.trueactiv

ist.com/gab_gallery/

12-year-old-girl-get

s-it-why-dont-you/Wh

y-can't-Capitalist/

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.trueactiv


ist.com/gab_gallery/


12-year-old-girl-get


s-it-why-dont-you/Wh


y-can't-Capitalist/

.. oh, how ironic.
You direct us to the 'True Activist' site and it comes up with: -
'404 Error! Page Not Found'

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c


om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE


_0

.. so, 1 minute 18 seconds is all there is?
Air brushed out the rest like a good Stalinist, have we?
Yep, that's the way to do it.

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c



om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE



_0

.. so, 1 minute 18 seconds is all there is?
Air brushed out the rest like a good Stalinist, have we?
Yep, that's the way to do it.

You mean the way ITV, air brushed out the TUSC out of the Hustings on Sunday making it look like Gavin never said a thing, when he got the room agreeing with him, and not the other partys.
Mind you I not suprise, because Gavin showed those right wingers right up even the UKIP lot.

And when you take into account how the media is not giving the TUSC the coverage, they are doing the best out of the lot of them, when media coverage is taken into account.

MGRA wrote:

Stephen J wrote:
Back of fag packet calculation x what I reckon = Lib Dem hold. After all, 86 per cent of LibDem voters said that the Chris Huhne debacle won't change how they vote. In that light, the Lib Dem campaign so far is brilliant: say nothing, do nothing, and at least you won't make a gaffe!

very true.... BUT.... the margin was wafer thin, I reckon Sarah Palin , err, sorry Maria could nick it. I am not a tory voter but will tactically vote for her to keep the Camel-kickers wearing beard patrol out.

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c




om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE




_0

.. so, 1 minute 18 seconds is all there is?
Air brushed out the rest like a good Stalinist, have we?
Yep, that's the way to do it.

You mean the way ITV, air brushed out the TUSC out of the Hustings on Sunday making it look like Gavin never said a thing, when he got the room agreeing with him, and not the other partys.
Mind you I not suprise, because Gavin showed those right wingers right up even the UKIP lot.

And when you take into account how the media is not giving the TUSC the coverage, they are doing the best out of the lot of them, when media coverage is taken into account.

.. ah, so what you are saying is that your dirty tricks are the same as the right wing capitalist dirty tricks. So, the moral high ground is obviously not yours; you’re just as bad.

Meanwhile, as you have already told us that 90% of the internet is incorrect false propaganda, I don't think I'll take the chance of believing this is the wonderfully true 10%.

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c





om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE





_0

.. so, 1 minute 18 seconds is all there is?
Air brushed out the rest like a good Stalinist, have we?
Yep, that's the way to do it.

You mean the way ITV, air brushed out the TUSC out of the Hustings on Sunday making it look like Gavin never said a thing, when he got the room agreeing with him, and not the other partys.
Mind you I not suprise, because Gavin showed those right wingers right up even the UKIP lot.

And when you take into account how the media is not giving the TUSC the coverage, they are doing the best out of the lot of them, when media coverage is taken into account.

.. ah, so what you are saying is that your dirty tricks are the same as the right wing capitalist dirty tricks. So, the moral high ground is obviously not yours; you’re just as bad.

Meanwhile, as you have already told us that 90% of the internet is incorrect false propaganda, I don't think I'll take the chance of believing this is the wonderfully true 10%.

Left wing do not do dirty tricks, we have no need to, thats why we can take the moral high ground.
Left wing do not control the media, Capitalist controls that. Capitalist and its right wing supporters, controls TV, Radio, Films, Newspapers and the majority of the internet (Murdoch wants to totally control the internet).
Look at the Echo who have they been doing majority storys on any Right Wing Party and there favourit seems to be UKIP printing in there favour, We all ways knew the Echo was Capitalist supporting paper just did not relise how far right wing they are.
Look what ITV done on the local news, when it came to the Hustings where all partys was represented, they showed a bit on Torys, Labour, Lib/Dems and UKIP so what about the rest nothing, They dare not show the whole hustings on TV because of Gavin showed what all the other party are about more so Lib/Dems, Torys, Lab and UKIP, He ask them questions that they would not answer over Jobs, NHS, Education, MP's wages and expenses. The people at the husting endded supporting and agreeing with Gavin and not the other partys, but they are not going to show you the full husting on tv or let you listen to it on radio, it was on youtube for just under 2 hours before it got removed.
The powers to be do not want any one seeing or hearing about any alteritive, it might give people ideas to it the system that we have is wrong.

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c





om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE





_0

.. so, 1 minute 18 seconds is all there is?
Air brushed out the rest like a good Stalinist, have we?
Yep, that's the way to do it.

You mean the way ITV, air brushed out the TUSC out of the Hustings on Sunday making it look like Gavin never said a thing, when he got the room agreeing with him, and not the other partys.
Mind you I not suprise, because Gavin showed those right wingers right up even the UKIP lot.

And when you take into account how the media is not giving the TUSC the coverage, they are doing the best out of the lot of them, when media coverage is taken into account.

.. ah, so what you are saying is that your dirty tricks are the same as the right wing capitalist dirty tricks. So, the moral high ground is obviously not yours; you’re just as bad.

Meanwhile, as you have already told us that 90% of the internet is incorrect false propaganda, I don't think I'll take the chance of believing this is the wonderfully true 10%.

Left wing do not do dirty tricks, we have no need to, thats why we can take the moral high ground.
Left wing do not control the media, Capitalist controls that. Capitalist and its right wing supporters, controls TV, Radio, Films, Newspapers and the majority of the internet (Murdoch wants to totally control the internet).
Look at the Echo who have they been doing majority storys on any Right Wing Party and there favourit seems to be UKIP printing in there favour, We all ways knew the Echo was Capitalist supporting paper just did not relise how far right wing they are.
Look what ITV done on the local news, when it came to the Hustings where all partys was represented, they showed a bit on Torys, Labour, Lib/Dems and UKIP so what about the rest nothing, They dare not show the whole hustings on TV because of Gavin showed what all the other party are about more so Lib/Dems, Torys, Lab and UKIP, He ask them questions that they would not answer over Jobs, NHS, Education, MP's wages and expenses. The people at the husting endded supporting and agreeing with Gavin and not the other partys, but they are not going to show you the full husting on tv or let you listen to it on radio, it was on youtube for just under 2 hours before it got removed.
The powers to be do not want any one seeing or hearing about any alteritive, it might give people ideas to it the system that we have is wrong.

Stephen J wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c






om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE






_0

.. so, 1 minute 18 seconds is all there is?
Air brushed out the rest like a good Stalinist, have we?
Yep, that's the way to do it.

You mean the way ITV, air brushed out the TUSC out of the Hustings on Sunday making it look like Gavin never said a thing, when he got the room agreeing with him, and not the other partys.
Mind you I not suprise, because Gavin showed those right wingers right up even the UKIP lot.

And when you take into account how the media is not giving the TUSC the coverage, they are doing the best out of the lot of them, when media coverage is taken into account.

.. ah, so what you are saying is that your dirty tricks are the same as the right wing capitalist dirty tricks. So, the moral high ground is obviously not yours; you’re just as bad.

Meanwhile, as you have already told us that 90% of the internet is incorrect false propaganda, I don't think I'll take the chance of believing this is the wonderfully true 10%.

Left wing do not do dirty tricks, we have no need to, thats why we can take the moral high ground.
Left wing do not control the media, Capitalist controls that. Capitalist and its right wing supporters, controls TV, Radio, Films, Newspapers and the majority of the internet (Murdoch wants to totally control the internet).
Look at the Echo who have they been doing majority storys on any Right Wing Party and there favourit seems to be UKIP printing in there favour, We all ways knew the Echo was Capitalist supporting paper just did not relise how far right wing they are.
Look what ITV done on the local news, when it came to the Hustings where all partys was represented, they showed a bit on Torys, Labour, Lib/Dems and UKIP so what about the rest nothing, They dare not show the whole hustings on TV because of Gavin showed what all the other party are about more so Lib/Dems, Torys, Lab and UKIP, He ask them questions that they would not answer over Jobs, NHS, Education, MP's wages and expenses. The people at the husting endded supporting and agreeing with Gavin and not the other partys, but they are not going to show you the full husting on tv or let you listen to it on radio, it was on youtube for just under 2 hours before it got removed.
The powers to be do not want any one seeing or hearing about any alteritive, it might give people ideas to it the system that we have is wrong.

Just watched Daz Procter's latest video. In 9.5 minutes of unscripted ramble, he basically says, "Big business owes £120bn in tax. We would get that back so no need for cuts. Vote TUSC!" And that's it. Oh dear.

freefinker wrote:

Stephen J wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
http://www.youtube.c







om/watch?v=sxnM82SRE







_0

.. so, 1 minute 18 seconds is all there is?
Air brushed out the rest like a good Stalinist, have we?
Yep, that's the way to do it.

You mean the way ITV, air brushed out the TUSC out of the Hustings on Sunday making it look like Gavin never said a thing, when he got the room agreeing with him, and not the other partys.
Mind you I not suprise, because Gavin showed those right wingers right up even the UKIP lot.

And when you take into account how the media is not giving the TUSC the coverage, they are doing the best out of the lot of them, when media coverage is taken into account.

.. ah, so what you are saying is that your dirty tricks are the same as the right wing capitalist dirty tricks. So, the moral high ground is obviously not yours; you’re just as bad.

Meanwhile, as you have already told us that 90% of the internet is incorrect false propaganda, I don't think I'll take the chance of believing this is the wonderfully true 10%.

Left wing do not do dirty tricks, we have no need to, thats why we can take the moral high ground.
Left wing do not control the media, Capitalist controls that. Capitalist and its right wing supporters, controls TV, Radio, Films, Newspapers and the majority of the internet (Murdoch wants to totally control the internet).
Look at the Echo who have they been doing majority storys on any Right Wing Party and there favourit seems to be UKIP printing in there favour, We all ways knew the Echo was Capitalist supporting paper just did not relise how far right wing they are.
Look what ITV done on the local news, when it came to the Hustings where all partys was represented, they showed a bit on Torys, Labour, Lib/Dems and UKIP so what about the rest nothing, They dare not show the whole hustings on TV because of Gavin showed what all the other party are about more so Lib/Dems, Torys, Lab and UKIP, He ask them questions that they would not answer over Jobs, NHS, Education, MP's wages and expenses. The people at the husting endded supporting and agreeing with Gavin and not the other partys, but they are not going to show you the full husting on tv or let you listen to it on radio, it was on youtube for just under 2 hours before it got removed.
The powers to be do not want any one seeing or hearing about any alteritive, it might give people ideas to it the system that we have is wrong.

Just watched Daz Procter's latest video. In 9.5 minutes of unscripted ramble, he basically says, "Big business owes £120bn in tax. We would get that back so no need for cuts. Vote TUSC!" And that's it. Oh dear.

.. amazing, isn't it.

Now this £120 billion. Apparently it has been 'evaded' not avoided according to Daz. So, the accusation is that these big corporations are acting illegally.

Don’t know where they got this figure from and over how long a period it has been accumulating. These sorts of details are totally missing from this presentation.

And anyway, the public sector net debt was £1,111.4 billion at the end of December 2012. So this £120 billion, even if was illegally withheld, and we could actually collect it, wouldn’t make much of a dent. We are still in a huge financial mess to which TUSC has no practical solutions.

jonnyx wrote:
"Hmm, yet another psuedo intelligent poster who resorts to insults.

Listen birdbrain..."

ironic.