REPRIEVE: Savage cuts and hikes in fees for vital care put on hold

Daily Echo: Mum Liz Chapman and son Robert Mum Liz Chapman and son Robert

SAVAGE funding cuts and hikes in day care costs for thousands of Southampton’s most vulnerable residents have been temporarily put on ice amid huge concerns about the drastic impact they would have.

Southampton City Council’s scrutiny committee voted unanimously to stall the controversial decision so it can be looked at again – and called for the entire plan to be halted while a full review is carried out.

The decision was made last night after a heated two-and-ahalf- hour debate in which carers and organisations representing them made impassioned pleas before councillors voted to refer the issue back to be reexamined and the final decision was deferred for one week.#

It comes after the Daily Echo highlighted the impact the cuts and hikes in fees would have on some of the city's most vulnerable residents.

 The council plans to make savings of more than £500,000 by scrapping rent allowance payments to 91 families who care at home for adults who are severely disabled and have learning difficulties.

As part of massive changes to the adult social care budget they also plan to hike charges paid for day care at home, currently used by 2,300 elderly and vulnerable residents.

The meeting heard claims that the consultation had been flawed and that a meeting called to address those affected saw nearly 2,500 invitations sent out but only nine people turn up.

Among them was mum Liz Chapman, who cares for son Robert, 24, who has complex needs and is severely disabled.

Speaking after the meeting she said she was pleased that the decision had been referred back, but feared that it was just a “paper exercise” and nothing would be done to change it.

Ian Loynes, from Southampton Centre for Independent Living, told councillors that there needed to be a reality check and that the consultation had made it “virtually impossible to figure out what the impact would be on individuals”.

His views were echoed by Brian Strevens, from mental health charity Mencap, who called for the funding cuts to be stopped for one year while every carer and family was assessed.

Speaking after the meeting, Cllr Matt Stevens, the Cabinet member responsible, said he felt that one week was enough time to consider the concerns.

However, scrutiny committee chairman Cllr Jeremy Moulton said that there needed to be a full consultation with users

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:55am Wed 20 Feb 13

aldermoorboy says...

We must give full support to these people in need and their carers.Good decision for full investigation.
We must give full support to these people in need and their carers.Good decision for full investigation. aldermoorboy

11:55am Wed 20 Feb 13

Stephen J says...

aldermoorboy wrote:
We must give full support to these people in need and their carers.Good decision for full investigation.
Probably the only decision open to them. There's a whiff of potential judicial review about this.
[quote][p][bold]aldermoorboy[/bold] wrote: We must give full support to these people in need and their carers.Good decision for full investigation.[/p][/quote]Probably the only decision open to them. There's a whiff of potential judicial review about this. Stephen J

3:19pm Wed 20 Feb 13

bazzeroz says...

Then you must stop the so called 'Bedroom Tax' as well. The 'bedroom tax' is doomed to fail. Where are the houses/properties to assist downsizing? According to some figures there are about 600,000 tenants that are 'over housed' by at least one bedroom and on housing benefit. This new law comes into effect on April 1st so there will no doubt, be thousands of tenants that will rush to exchange/downsize to save the penalty of lost benefits. After that once again the question: where are the houses/properties for the remainder of tenants that want to move? They are then caught in a catch 22 situation due to, no fault of their own and, losing benefit. The government say how much a person can claim to live on and then take back some and leave them poorer than what the law says is enough to live on......... Madness!!
Sign the petitions:http://you
.38degrees.org.uk/pe
titions/stop-the-bed
room-tax-3
And here: http://epetitions.di
rect.gov.uk/petition
s/41600
Then you must stop the so called 'Bedroom Tax' as well. The 'bedroom tax' is doomed to fail. Where are the houses/properties to assist downsizing? According to some figures there are about 600,000 tenants that are 'over housed' by at least one bedroom and on housing benefit. This new law comes into effect on April 1st so there will no doubt, be thousands of tenants that will rush to exchange/downsize to save the penalty of lost benefits. After that once again the question: where are the houses/properties for the remainder of tenants that want to move? They are then caught in a catch 22 situation due to, no fault of their own and, losing benefit. The government say how much a person can claim to live on and then take back some and leave them poorer than what the law says is enough to live on......... Madness!! Sign the petitions:http://you .38degrees.org.uk/pe titions/stop-the-bed room-tax-3 And here: http://epetitions.di rect.gov.uk/petition s/41600 bazzeroz

3:55pm Wed 20 Feb 13

Subject48 says...

I cannot look this up right now. But, whare are the statistics for people who are 'underhoused'? You seem to have a good source of intel.

Thanks.
I cannot look this up right now. But, whare are the statistics for people who are 'underhoused'? You seem to have a good source of intel. Thanks. Subject48

4:19pm Wed 20 Feb 13

aldermoorboy says...

There is no bedroom tax, end of.
There is no bedroom tax, end of. aldermoorboy

11:03pm Wed 20 Feb 13

bazzeroz says...

aldermoorboy wrote:
There is no bedroom tax, end of.
You are correct but it's being dubbed 'bedroom tax'. In fact some councils are actually printing it as 'bedroom tax' in their leaflets. Car tax isn't car tax but we still call it that!
[quote][p][bold]aldermoorboy[/bold] wrote: There is no bedroom tax, end of.[/p][/quote]You are correct but it's being dubbed 'bedroom tax'. In fact some councils are actually printing it as 'bedroom tax' in their leaflets. Car tax isn't car tax but we still call it that! bazzeroz

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree