Police and crime commissioner defends decision to hire a deputy

Police and crime commissioner Simon Hayes Police and crime commissioner Simon Hayes

IT’S been the most controversial change to how policing in Hampshire is governed in decades.

The scrapping of the outdated police authority and the creation of a police and crime commissioner (PCC) caused much debate – and criticism from people who didn’t understand why or what it was all about.

There was so much disinterest that less than 20 per cent of people even bothered to turn out at the county’s polling stations.

But for those who did, the message was clear – they wanted politically-independent Simon Hayes to take on the £80,000 job.

Today, as he marks 100 days in the post of PCC, he tells how he has hit the ground running and already started to make difficult decisions that could have major ramifications for the taxpayer and the police officers in the county.

He also:

  • Defended a decision to spend thousands of pounds of public money hiring a deputy.
  • Revealed he is considering going against the government and increasing police officers’ starting pay.
  • Sent a stern message to contractors that Hampshire police will not accept or pay the price for their mistakes.

It’s been a tough start for Mr Hayes, who has been so busy recruiting a new chief constable, drafting a long-term police and crime plan, attending countless meetings and trying to ingratiate himself with police officers and the public, that his feet have barely touched the ground.

He shrugs off the suggestion that he is still unknown to the residents of Hampshire, because it’s something he is determined to overcome. 

Related links

He’s making strenuous efforts to get into communities and meet the people he now serves and make them understand that he has a mission “to protect people and places, reduce crime and reduce victims” and also meet the men and women working on the thin blue line.

He told the Daily Echo: “I have always recognised that the vast majority didn’t understand what a PCC was about, so I am keen to explain to people as I meet them what I am doing and what I can bring to the table.

“People can recognise the priorities that I am talking about, particularly the criminality that comes as a result of drug and alcohol issues, like thefts to feed a habit. 

“I feel enormously privileged. I don’t feel stressed, I don’t feel tired, I just want to get on and do the job.”

But he says the past four months, during which he has attended more than 200 meetings, met over 2,000 people and travelled in excess of 2,000 miles, have taught him that he can’t do it on his own.

In coming months he will be drafting a job description with a salary that he hopes will attract someone who can fill his shoes at top level meetings as well as in the public eye.

Mr Hayes admits it’s highly unlikely that an ex-police officer would be suitable – and more likely he will be looking for someone from a legal or business background.

And while that salary, which is currently unknown, is bound to raise eyebrows, it’s wages at the other end of the scale for new police recruits that has blood boiling within Hampshire police. 

The Windsor report to the government has recommended starting salaries for new officers be slashed to £19,000, which, Mr Hayes says, poses a “big dilemma” as they look to fill 112 new posts.

He said: “To put it mildly, it is unfortunate what the government is proposing and what Tom Windsor’s report is recommending.

“The constabulary draws a lot of people from the pool of PCSOs who work for them who could be currently earning four or five thousand pounds more than that. 

“I have the right to increase that starting salary and I am seriously looking at doing that because I believe it is the right thing to do.

“Although it does bring with it considerable budgetary pressures, I want Hampshire Constabulary to attract the best quality police officers and staff, with the best capability.”

The other pressing task for Mr Hayes, at a time of extraordinary savings of £50m being met by the force, was the costly building stock – not to mention the £9.2m purchase of Alpha Park in Chandler’s Ford, which was destined for a new police HQ but for years has sat empty and unused.

As we revealed last month, he has drafted in an independent adviser to carry out a comprehensive estates review to look again – and couldn’t rule out that the controversial site would be sold off amid concerns over why it was ever bought in the first place.

Mr Hayes said: “The review is ongoing but is already showing some good ideas that have confirmed to me that this was necessary.”

But while some might guess, he remains tight-lipped on what exactly that might mean for now.

However, following the revelation that Southampton’s new police HQ is riddled with leaks because of failings by Kier and Balfour Beatty,the contractors who built it, he remained firm that their “mistakes” would not be paid for from the public purse.

Firing a warning shot across the bows he said: “It is not our mistake, it was not a design fault, this was a basic building error as I understand it. 

“It remains functioning as a building and at the moment it is still delivering a public service. There will be internal disruption and there are currently talks about how this will work.

“However the cost of the repairs, even from moving desks and computers, will not be met by Hampshire police and that may mean that the issue of compensation will be raised.

“The message to the contractors should be clear that we are not a soft touch.”

Comments(11)

SotonGreen says...
10:36am Sat 2 Mar 13

How insulting to the many of your readers who like me understood only too well what the election was all about and far from disinterest decided not to dignify the election of an unwanted police commissioner with the dignity of electoral legitimacy.

pepepe says...
10:38am Sat 2 Mar 13

"But he says the past four months, during which he has attended more than 200 meetings, met over 2,000 people and travelled in excess of 2,000 miles, have taught him that he can’t do it on his own"
If that's all he's done in 100 working days why does he need an assistant? According to Mr Hayes it's doubtful if he would have time to talk to an assistant. Looks like another waste of money.

On the inside says...
1:21pm Sat 2 Mar 13

Some basic problems here;

1. Four months = 100 working days. Wrong, it is a maximum of 80 days.

2. Over 200 meetings = 2.5 meetings a day. Hardly flogging himself.

3. Over 2000 people met = 25 a day. Since a lot of them will have been in large meetings this is actually lacklustre.

4. Travelled over 2000 miles = 25 a day. Hardly getting out and about in a vast county like Hampshire, little more than a normal commute.

All on over £200 a day. Nice work if you can get it or if you can get almost none of the electorate to vote for you.

On the inside says...
1:22pm Sat 2 Mar 13

Also, is he actually related to the reporter, or does it just read that way?

ReverendPaul says...
2:01pm Sat 2 Mar 13

have written to him twice so far and to date not even a thank You from him for the correspondance. Wonder whether he wants to meet the people at the heart of the community who elected him

SotonGreen says...
2:12pm Sat 2 Mar 13

He would certainly need to pile on the miles in order to meet no anyone that voted for him. Having received 30% of first choice votes on a 20% turnout.

Paramjit Bahia says...
2:32pm Sat 2 Mar 13

On the inside wrote:
Some basic problems here;

1. Four months = 100 working days. Wrong, it is a maximum of 80 days.

2. Over 200 meetings = 2.5 meetings a day. Hardly flogging himself.

3. Over 2000 people met = 25 a day. Since a lot of them will have been in large meetings this is actually lacklustre.

4. Travelled over 2000 miles = 25 a day. Hardly getting out and about in a vast county like Hampshire, little more than a normal commute.

All on over £200 a day. Nice work if you can get it or if you can get almost none of the electorate to vote for you.
Obviously for this guy that is very hard work that is why he wants us the public to pay even more money for his Deputy.

Ever wondered who will be provided with plenty of pay and perks without even being voted for in so called democratic system introduced by Tories and unprincipled opportunist Lib-Dems?

Paramjit Bahia says...
2:36pm Sat 2 Mar 13

SotonGreen wrote:
He would certainly need to pile on the miles in order to meet no anyone that voted for him. Having received 30% of first choice votes on a 20% turnout.
Was the turn out really 20%, I am under the impression that it was around 15%

SotonGreen says...
4:07pm Sat 2 Mar 13

Sorry you are right he got 22.5% of the vote on a turnout of just under 15%

4-front says...
8:17pm Sat 2 Mar 13

ReverendPaul wrote:
have written to him twice so far and to date not even a thank You from him for the correspondance. Wonder whether he wants to meet the people at the heart of the community who elected him
Likewise - once by email and once by first class post over a month ago and no reply or aknowledgement. I drew to Simon's attention the importance some of the less "visible" services provided by the police including missing persons. mental incapacity, hate crime, victim support, CID work, gun licensing and so on. The media inform us (the public) that we want a highly visible police presence in our neighbourhoods but quite frankly, with multi-million pound cuts, it is hard to see how the police can deliver everything the way it has tried to until recently!

A few lesser-used police stations will have to close. Support services will have to be shared with other public services . There will be redundancies.

I have yet to be convinced that Police and Crime Commissioners are necessary, especially with a Crime Panel that looks very similar to the previous Police Authority ..... and the additional appointment of deputies / assistants concerns me even more! However, I am sure Cameron's Big Society will come to he rescue (a bit like the TA expected to meet armed services shortfalls) and all will be hunky dory ..... 'ello, 'ello, 'ello!!

100%HANTSBOY says...
7:10am Sun 3 Mar 13

4-front wrote:
ReverendPaul wrote:
have written to him twice so far and to date not even a thank You from him for the correspondance. Wonder whether he wants to meet the people at the heart of the community who elected him
Likewise - once by email and once by first class post over a month ago and no reply or aknowledgement. I drew to Simon's attention the importance some of the less "visible" services provided by the police including missing persons. mental incapacity, hate crime, victim support, CID work, gun licensing and so on. The media inform us (the public) that we want a highly visible police presence in our neighbourhoods but quite frankly, with multi-million pound cuts, it is hard to see how the police can deliver everything the way it has tried to until recently!

A few lesser-used police stations will have to close. Support services will have to be shared with other public services . There will be redundancies.

I have yet to be convinced that Police and Crime Commissioners are necessary, especially with a Crime Panel that looks very similar to the previous Police Authority ..... and the additional appointment of deputies / assistants concerns me even more! However, I am sure Cameron's Big Society will come to he rescue (a bit like the TA expected to meet armed services shortfalls) and all will be hunky dory ..... 'ello, 'ello, 'ello!!
I wouldn't reply to you if you e-mailed me telling me how to do my job,either.
5 out of 6 didn't bother to vote during the PCC elections,so the public shouldn't moan, IMO. (me included)

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree