- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@dailyecho
Daily Echo on Twitter
@the_saints
Saints News on Twitter
SceneSouth
Leisure news on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
Facebook
Daily Echo on Facebook
Sports clubs lose grants as Saints Foundation keeps council handout (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Voluntary groups set to close as grants target EU migrants
4:00pm Sunday 3rd March 2013 in News
Funding has been cut for Southampton Diving academy.
SOUTHAMPTON’S Olympic legacy is among several areas that have seen the axe fall as sports groups and other bodies have missed out on thousands of pounds of council grant funding.
Just seven months after the London Olympics, groups such as the Southampton Diving Academy and the Southampton Amateur Gymnastics Club have not received a penny of funding from the city council.
But in a move that has angered some, the council has given money to Southampton Football Club-affiliated Saints Foundation.
As the authority approved its list of grants to organisations, deputy leader Jacqui Rayment acknowledged there had been “winners and losers”, as 29 groups will receive no grant funding at all for 2013/14.
The Mount Pleasant Media Workshop, which runs drama and video projects in communities throughout the city, will close next month after its grant funding was withdrawn entirely.
And the chairman of the Solent Sea Rescue Organisation, which operates eight lifeboats and rescue units around the region, described the withdrawal of its £10,500 funding to his organisation as a “kick in the teeth” for sea safety.
The city’s Solent Skies museum has seen its funding cut, while money has been granted to projects to help migrants from EU countries move into the area.
Other funds have been diverted to green projects and helping those facing cuts in housing benefit cope with reduced incomes.
The sheer scale of the cut-backs along with how funds have been divided up has been attacked by organisations as well as cuncil opposition groups who fear political influence in the decsion-making process.
Among the groups to win significant grant money were the Environment Centre, which won £50,000, the Southampton Advice and Representation Centre, which was awarded £188,000, and Southampton Voluntary Services, which won £147,317.
A total of 65 voluntary organisations applied for a portion of the £1.699 million funding available to the council.
That pot will shrink to £1.576 million in 2014/15 and £1.441 million the following year.
The council has faced criticism on how the applications for grant money were assessed by officers.
Applications were marked on various criteria, such as if they supported the community, the environment or the arts, or contributing to tackling poverty.
Saying he felt the assessments were ‘fair’, the Cabinet member for efficiency and improvement, John Noon, said: “Some organisations didn’t take it seriously enough.
“I think they all make major contributions to the community, and it’s very difficult for me personally and I think for the rest of my colleagues.”
He said the Cabinet had decided to award grants to organisations which had not received funding before, while also ensuring it made grants to organisations able to help people hit by the impending benefit changes.
He added: “It was a very hard decision and it hit me quite hard.
“But I feel it is important that we need to bring in fresh blood and when there are not enough resources some people are going to suffer.”
Cllr Rayment said it may be in the future that many voluntary organisations would not be able to be ‘reliant’ on the council for funding.
Conservative councillor Jeremy Moulton said: “The way these grants have been allocated does not strike me as being logical.
“It smacks of political involvement, although we have been told repeatedly by officers that there was no such involvement in the decision-making process.”
WINNERS
EU Welcome It had originally been recommended that the group, which provides advice for people coming to Southampton from other countries in the EU, receive no funding.
But their grant allocation was amended and they will now receive £27,000 in 2014/15, £25,110 in 2014/15 and £23,352 in 2015/16.
Environment Centre The centre, which has been running since 1992, received £50,000 in the grant hand-out.In the past, it has worked on major fuel poverty projects within Hampshire, as well as managing EU projects which have brought new skills to the region, although it is currently unclear what the grant money will be spent on.
Southampton Advice and Representation Centre Council leaders are keen that advice is available to the thousands of city residents who will be affected by changes to the benefits system from April 1 onwards.
The centre, which provides advice and support in welfare and employment matters, has received a grant of £188,000.
Art Asia Trust The group describes its mission as 'communicating the rich and exciting experience of south Asian arts' to the public, and puts on the Mela Festival in Southampton.
It received £39,000 of grant funding.
Southampton Citizens' Advice Bureau The organisation, which provides free advice for people with a wide variety of financial, legal and other issues, got the biggest grant from the council - £222,088.
It was, however, significantly less than the £309,309 it received in last year's budget.
LOSERS
Mount Pleasant Media Workshop The group's Jenny Levitt said the organisation, which runs media and video projects and is based at Mount Pleasant Junior School, has been forced into the 'drastic decision' of closing its workshop by the withdrawal of grant funding.
She criticised the assessment of their grant application, saying there had been 'gross factual errors' made by officers, but added that organisers are looking at new ways to continue its 35-year contribution to the community in Southampton.
Southampton Diving Academy Less than a year after academy president and Southampton diver Peter Waterfield featured in the Olympics, the academy's application for a £5,000 grant was turned down.
A spokesman for the academy said: “This is hard on many of our members and inevitably there will be a negative 'legacy impact' if the funding cannot be replaced from other sources.”
Southampton Amateur Gymnastics Club The group, based at Redbridge Community School, has produced world medal-winning athletes in its four decades of work in the city.
But it was left empty-handed after its application for £40,000 of funding was rejected.
Hampshire and Wight Trust for Maritime Archaeology The institute has carried out numerous research projects on the area's maritime history, including studies on HMS Invincible, which sunk on Dean Sand in 1758, and submerged prehistoric settlements.
But its application for £9,900 of funding was unsuccessful, meaning a festival planned for later this year may have to be downsized.
The Salvation Army, H20 Project The charity's Homelessness 2 Opportunity project runs a day-centre for homeless and vulnerable adults in the city.
But despite an application for £50,000 to help with running costs and staff salaries, the project received nothing.
Comments(17)
beiroot
says...
4:02pm Sat 2 Mar 13
mickey01
says...
5:26pm Sat 2 Mar 13
J.P.M
says...
6:16pm Sat 2 Mar 13
redsnapper
says...
4:11pm Sun 3 Mar 13
Linesman
says...
7:26pm Sun 3 Mar 13
redsnapper wrote:What about the RNLI?
The Solent Sea Rescue should get money from all the yachties and others who get into trouble at sea.
It covers more than the Solent.
Huffter
says...
7:40pm Sun 3 Mar 13
loosehead
says...
9:34pm Sun 3 Mar 13
Linesman wrote:SORRY? who decided to give money to a private companies foundation & not to other sports?
Has not take Cameron long to do a U-Turn on his Olympic promise to support sport.
No doubt he will have a change of heart in the run-up to the next election.
Why did they give the money to the Saints aren't the Liebher family rich enough?
when Labour were in power before they spent a million pounds finding Saints a private company a new home did they get that money back?
This is wrong & this money should have gone to the other sports
loosehead
says...
9:38pm Sun 3 Mar 13
while money has been granted to projects to help migrants from EU countries move into the area.
why are we giving money for this?
do we give money to help Northerners move down here?
do we give money to our own people to live here?
I wasn't asked if my money could go to help EU people to move here & take our homes & jobs what the hell's going on with this council?
Linesman
says...
10:43pm Sun 3 Mar 13
loosehead wrote:I suppose you have conveniently forgotten the promises that Cameron made when he was basking in the success of the Olympics.
Linesman wrote:SORRY? who decided to give money to a private companies foundation & not to other sports?
Has not take Cameron long to do a U-Turn on his Olympic promise to support sport.
No doubt he will have a change of heart in the run-up to the next election.
Why did they give the money to the Saints aren't the Liebher family rich enough?
when Labour were in power before they spent a million pounds finding Saints a private company a new home did they get that money back?
This is wrong & this money should have gone to the other sports
Linesman
says...
10:46pm Sun 3 Mar 13
loosehead wrote:Have you been hitting the bottle?
Please explain to me why we're doing this?
while money has been granted to projects to help migrants from EU countries move into the area.
why are we giving money for this?
do we give money to help Northerners move down here?
do we give money to our own people to live here?
I wasn't asked if my money could go to help EU people to move here & take our homes & jobs what the hell's going on with this council?
What the hell has funding for sport in the UK got to do with the EU?
Your mind is in such a tangle, no wonder you support Cameron&Co.
FoysCornerBoy
says...
11:18pm Sun 3 Mar 13
loosehead wrote:I think there is a big difference between making a grant 'to help migrants from EU countries move into the area' and providing support and assistance to those that have already done so.
Please explain to me why we're doing this?
while money has been granted to projects to help migrants from EU countries move into the area.
why are we giving money for this?
do we give money to help Northerners move down here?
do we give money to our own people to live here?
I wasn't asked if my money could go to help EU people to move here & take our homes & jobs what the hell's going on with this council?
This type of inaccurate reporting by the Echo only fuels the xenophobia which sadly has been in so much evidence recently on this site and reflected in the vote for UKIP in the recent Eastleigh by election.
Immigration is a sensitive issue and emotion often gets in the way of reason.We need a balanced debate on this subject and,sadly, the Echo is failing to provide it.
loosehead
says...
7:27am Mon 4 Mar 13
Linesman wrote:Linesman read the article again.
loosehead wrote:Have you been hitting the bottle?
Please explain to me why we're doing this?
while money has been granted to projects to help migrants from EU countries move into the area.
why are we giving money for this?
do we give money to help Northerners move down here?
do we give money to our own people to live here?
I wasn't asked if my money could go to help EU people to move here & take our homes & jobs what the hell's going on with this council?
What the hell has funding for sport in the UK got to do with the EU?
Your mind is in such a tangle, no wonder you support Cameron&Co.
it states in the article about EU immigrants settling here.
the answer to your other question "are you hitting the bottle again" I haven't touched alcohol for at least two months what's your excuse?
loosehead
says...
7:28am Mon 4 Mar 13
Linesman wrote:this is the title of the article.
loosehead wrote:Have you been hitting the bottle?
Please explain to me why we're doing this?
while money has been granted to projects to help migrants from EU countries move into the area.
why are we giving money for this?
do we give money to help Northerners move down here?
do we give money to our own people to live here?
I wasn't asked if my money could go to help EU people to move here & take our homes & jobs what the hell's going on with this council?
What the hell has funding for sport in the UK got to do with the EU?
Your mind is in such a tangle, no wonder you support Cameron&Co.
Voluntary groups set to close as grants target EU migrants
get it?
Tenderhearts wife
says...
8:31am Mon 4 Mar 13
Linesman
says...
9:22am Mon 4 Mar 13
loosehead wrote:My apologies.
Linesman wrote:this is the title of the article.
loosehead wrote:Have you been hitting the bottle?
Please explain to me why we're doing this?
while money has been granted to projects to help migrants from EU countries move into the area.
why are we giving money for this?
do we give money to help Northerners move down here?
do we give money to our own people to live here?
I wasn't asked if my money could go to help EU people to move here & take our homes & jobs what the hell's going on with this council?
What the hell has funding for sport in the UK got to do with the EU?
Your mind is in such a tangle, no wonder you support Cameron&Co.
Voluntary groups set to close as grants target EU migrants
get it?
I got it wrong!
I note that these grants have not just been made to sports organisations, but I think that the committee that handed out these grants should give an explanation as to how they arrived at their decision.
If it is a case that groups had to apply to be considered then, of course, if a group did not apply, they have no complaint.
My understanding from Cameron's statement at the Olympics was that funding would be made available from Central government, and not be the responsibility of local councils to fund. If the responsibility has been shifted, then this would be the first that I, and many others, would have heard of it.
loosehead
says...
3:14pm Mon 4 Mar 13
he told me he'd objected to the money going to help EU immigrants but it was voted through.
Now if he's telling the truth the Echo have got at least part of this wrong.
Now being a Tory voter this remark might be strange but I personally believe Yachties should pay an insurance & if in trouble & the RNLI or another rescue organisation rescues or helps them they should be able to claim the costs from the insurance.
I find it crazy if you drive a car you have to belong to the AA or Greenflag or RAC to get rescued but sailing you don't pay for some one risking their life to save you?
Linesman says...
11:59am Sat 2 Mar 13
No doubt he will have a change of heart in the run-up to the next election.