Charlie Rockett gunman caged for threatening family with shotgun in Southampton

Charlie Rockett. Charlie Rockett.

A TEENAGER who threatened to kill a father and son and then their family with a sawn-off shotgun is today beginning a three-year sentence behind bars.

Jurors took less than one hour to find Charlie Rockett, 18, guilty of subjecting Paul Bryan and his son Sam to a terrifying ordeal with the deadly weapon.

During a three-day trial they heard how Rockett approached the pair as they shifted furniture from a block of flats in Kingsdown Way, in Townhill, Southampton, in October.

For no apparent reason he accused Sam of “disrespecting him” before becoming furious when he refused to apologise.

The gunman then warned he would blow Sam’s head off and when his dad tried to calm him down Rockett extended the threat to the whole family.

Paul Bryan asked why he needed the gun and was told it was because he was a drug dealer and once shot someone in the knee.

Jurors heard how he then gestured from a stairwell window to a passing woman with a pushchair, boasting how he could shoot her if he pleased.

Seconds later police arrived.

Panicking, Rockett hid the gun, before trying to escape.

But challenged at gunpoint by armed police, he dropped to his knees and put his hand to his head. He was then arrested.

Sentencing, Judge Patrick Hooton told him: “You had no defence – everyone saw you with the shotgun. You must have known that the writing was on the wall for you.

“First of all you put other people in fear of their lives, and secondly, as a weapon, if it gets into the wrong hands it can cause death or serious injury.

“And the fact was that you had been drinking all day and, with a sense of bravado, you turned up thinking you could frighten everything in sight.

“Now you have to pay the price because having a sawn-off shotgun always gets a substantial prison sentence.”

Throughout the trial, Rockett, of no fixed address, denied possessing a gun without a certificate and affray and passed the chance to defend himself.

But after being found guilty he admitted hiding the gun for someone else – although he would not say who. Defence barrister Susan Ridge said: “Perhaps he is scared of the consequence if he does.”

She said drink and drugs had a large role in his behaviour.

Comments(44)

rich the stitch says...
3:06pm Thu 14 Mar 13

So, he'll do 18months with a roof over his head, have meals cooked everyday for him whilst he sits and watches tv all day, that'll teach him

roofspace says...
3:30pm Thu 14 Mar 13

rich the stitch wrote:
So, he'll do 18months with a roof over his head, have meals cooked everyday for him whilst he sits and watches tv all day, that'll teach him
If you think it is a soft option with free food and accommodation, comfy chair supplied + tv all day - why aren't you in there rather than on the outside griping about it?

townieboy says...
3:37pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Probably cure his acne for him too. Waster,scum,.......a
ll that.

rich the stitch says...
3:45pm Thu 14 Mar 13

roofspace wrote:
rich the stitch wrote: So, he'll do 18months with a roof over his head, have meals cooked everyday for him whilst he sits and watches tv all day, that'll teach him
If you think it is a soft option with free food and accommodation, comfy chair supplied + tv all day - why aren't you in there rather than on the outside griping about it?
I have a family and a job which I enjoy.
I know someone who was sentenced to 40 months, he's been in Ford for the past 6 months. He gets let out twice a month on day visits and also 5 days every 28 days for a week visit. Does a couple of hours work each day then spends the rest of it watching tv, smoking and using the gym. Hardly punishment. So yes, I do think such a short term is a soft option. Do you think 3 years (18months for good behaviour) for having a sawn off and threatening innocent people is the correct sentence?

Forest Resident says...
3:48pm Thu 14 Mar 13

3 years? No wonder gun crime is on the increase if patheticly soft sentences like this are what criminals can expect. The judge should be ashamed of himself, this offers no deterrent whatsoever and very little protection to the law abiding public.

Eric_Cartman says...
4:43pm Thu 14 Mar 13

3 years, because "having a sawn-off shotgun always gets a substantial prison sentence"
Pathetic

wormwood says...
4:47pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Forest Resident wrote:
3 years? No wonder gun crime is on the increase if patheticly soft sentences like this are what criminals can expect. The judge should be ashamed of himself, this offers no deterrent whatsoever and very little protection to the law abiding public.
The judge had no other option as it is a three year mandatory sentences for this type of crime

bigal007 says...
4:50pm Thu 14 Mar 13

thats not very long at all as u get 7 years for a knife he got of easy

Thrush says...
5:33pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Back in 2000 I was looking at 7 to 14 years for threatening 2 people with a gun! I was found not guilty!! How things have changed.. 3 years these days !! That a holiday lol. 🔫

lambo83 says...
6:24pm Thu 14 Mar 13

The armed police should have just shot him and done everyone a favour.

wormwood says...
6:32pm Thu 14 Mar 13

lambo83 wrote:
The armed police should have just shot him and done everyone a favour.
Trust me they should of not I was on that jury and the Echo have not given you all the facts

lambo83 says...
6:41pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him.

How does that sound?

wormwood says...
7:41pm Thu 14 Mar 13

lambo83 wrote:
Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him.

How does that sound?
like you are are an idiot
1 the gun was not loaded
2 you are an idiot
3 you never herd the case so don't amuse you no all the facts you rely on a paper that was not in court for the whole case

Queen Victoria says...
8:09pm Thu 14 Mar 13

bigal007 wrote:
thats not very long at all as u get 7 years for a knife he got of easy
Since when have you known anyone who has actually got anything near 7yrs for a knife.

wormwood says...
8:23pm Thu 14 Mar 13

wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote:
Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him.

How does that sound?
like you are are an idiot
1 the gun was not loaded
2 you are an idiot
3 you never herd the case so don't amuse you no all the facts you rely on a paper that was not in court for the whole case
so if any one else want's to go off on about this case that they no northing about let me know

lambo83 says...
8:37pm Thu 14 Mar 13

wormwood wrote:
wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote: Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him. How does that sound?
like you are are an idiot 1 the gun was not loaded 2 you are an idiot 3 you never herd the case so don't amuse you no all the facts you rely on a paper that was not in court for the whole case
so if any one else want's to go off on about this case that they no northing about let me know
Judging by your spelling and use of punctuation, you're almost certainly an idiot.

business-guru says...
8:40pm Thu 14 Mar 13

so he got only about 4 x the sentence of huhne !! judges are stupid,,,,

voiceof thepeople says...
8:44pm Thu 14 Mar 13

..here you go then wormwood, I'll have a go .....a gun doesn't need to be loaded to be very scary, and another thing - you are a tw@t

wormwood says...
8:48pm Thu 14 Mar 13

lambo83 wrote:
wormwood wrote:
wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote: Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him. How does that sound?
like you are are an idiot 1 the gun was not loaded 2 you are an idiot 3 you never herd the case so don't amuse you no all the facts you rely on a paper that was not in court for the whole case
so if any one else want's to go off on about this case that they no northing about let me know
Judging by your spelling and use of punctuation, you're almost certainly an idiot.
well that would makes two of us at least i was proud to step up and be a juror un like you. don't comment on things you don't now anything about and yes you are an idiot

imspacedout says...
9:01pm Thu 14 Mar 13

I knew both the people from this story. I guess you kind of hope people from back in the day would have grown up but he is another product of society. Just like you on here who feel the need to insult his appearance, this gives you no right. Instead of sitting around placing blame how about you do something to FIX what's going on in all areas of the UK. Why the hate? Why selling drugs? Why guns? Where do they get guns from? Who's bringing the guns in? What could he really be doing with his life? Who profits from him being in jail? But that's right, go back to your trolling.

Sir Ad E Noid says...
9:38pm Thu 14 Mar 13

wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote:
wormwood wrote:
wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote: Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him. How does that sound?
like you are are an idiot 1 the gun was not loaded 2 you are an idiot 3 you never herd the case so don't amuse you no all the facts you rely on a paper that was not in court for the whole case
so if any one else want's to go off on about this case that they no northing about let me know
Judging by your spelling and use of punctuation, you're almost certainly an idiot.
well that would makes two of us at least i was proud to step up and be a juror un like you. don't comment on things you don't now anything about and yes you are an idiot
Not interested if you were on the Jury, this toe rag waved a weapon about and nobody was to know it wasn't loaded. "Disrespecting me", oh yes I will. That toe rag deserves nothing, especially not you trying to defend him. Disrespect, he has done jack apart from being an a**e.

cantthinkofone says...
9:54pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Why is it always this particular ethnic group causing all the violence around the Thornhill area? I'm no racist, but it can't be a coincidence surely!

wormwood says...
9:55pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Sir Ad E Noid wrote:
wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote:
wormwood wrote:
wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote: Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him. How does that sound?
like you are are an idiot 1 the gun was not loaded 2 you are an idiot 3 you never herd the case so don't amuse you no all the facts you rely on a paper that was not in court for the whole case
so if any one else want's to go off on about this case that they no northing about let me know
Judging by your spelling and use of punctuation, you're almost certainly an idiot.
well that would makes two of us at least i was proud to step up and be a juror un like you. don't comment on things you don't now anything about and yes you are an idiot
Not interested if you were on the Jury, this toe rag waved a weapon about and nobody was to know it wasn't loaded. "Disrespecting me", oh yes I will. That toe rag deserves nothing, especially not you trying to defend him. Disrespect, he has done jack apart from being an a**e.
all i can say you are very sad people and i am glad i dont have to sit with you ****

cantthinkofone says...
11:05pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Are you 12?

SouthamptonLegend says...
1:51am Fri 15 Mar 13

voiceof thepeople wrote:
..here you go then wormwood, I'll have a go .....a gun doesn't need to be loaded to be very scary, and another thing - you are a tw@t
AGREED!!!

SouthamptonLegend says...
1:53am Fri 15 Mar 13

cantthinkofone wrote:
Why is it always this particular ethnic group causing all the violence around the Thornhill area? I'm no racist, but it can't be a coincidence surely!
Sounds pretty racist to me

SouthamptonLegend says...
1:56am Fri 15 Mar 13

SouthamptonLegend wrote:
cantthinkofone wrote:
Why is it always this particular ethnic group causing all the violence around the Thornhill area? I'm no racist, but it can't be a coincidence surely!
Sounds pretty racist to me
Wait....

WTF?

Anyway, the 1980's want their racism back! U knob

David Icke says...
6:57am Fri 15 Mar 13

SouthamptonLegend wrote:
SouthamptonLegend wrote:
cantthinkofone wrote: Why is it always this particular ethnic group causing all the violence around the Thornhill area? I'm no racist, but it can't be a coincidence surely!
Sounds pretty racist to me
Wait.... WTF? Anyway, the 1980's want their racism back! U knob
It's Townhill not Thornhill, read stories properly before your write your normal boll*cks

Pikey-Biker says...
8:00am Fri 15 Mar 13

Fine talk from someone in a purple shell suit

David Icke says...
8:17am Fri 15 Mar 13

****-Biker wrote:
Fine talk from someone in a purple shell suit
Did someone just ****?

Taskforce 141 says...
8:27am Fri 15 Mar 13

wormwood wrote:
lambo83 wrote:
Ok in that case I'll negotiate and say that they should have stamped on his toe and poked him in the eye in lieu of shooting him.

How does that sound?
like you are are an idiot
1 the gun was not loaded
2 you are an idiot
3 you never herd the case so don't amuse you no all the facts you rely on a paper that was not in court for the whole case
Jesus Christ! This is why the criminal justice system is fracked!

We got retards like wormwood on the jury who thinks its acceptable to threaten innocent people with a gun because "the gun was not loaded".

The case should be looked at from the victims point of view, did the victims believe the gun was loaded and did that reasonable belief lead to them fearing for their lives? If yes then a 10 year sentence should be the minimum which will allow, for good behaviour, release in 5-7 years which sounds far more proportionate.

Sadly the UK is a push over when it comes to crime and that is one of the reasons our crime rate is high.

Wormwood if you could do us all a favour and not breed it would be greatly appreciated as we do not need more idiots diluting the gene pool.

Thank you.

Pikey-Biker says...
9:03am Fri 15 Mar 13

David Icke wrote:
****-Biker wrote: Fine talk from someone in a purple shell suit
Did someone just ****?
yes David, not sure if was a f**t or someone just talking out of thier @rse

Raxx says...
9:46am Fri 15 Mar 13

David Icke wrote:
SouthamptonLegend wrote:
SouthamptonLegend wrote:
cantthinkofone wrote: Why is it always this particular ethnic group causing all the violence around the Thornhill area? I'm no racist, but it can't be a coincidence surely!
Sounds pretty racist to me
Wait.... WTF? Anyway, the 1980's want their racism back! U knob
It's Townhill not Thornhill, read stories properly before your write your normal boll*cks
Thornnhill *area* you plonker. Thornhill, Townhill, Bitterne, Sholing etc.

David Icke says...
11:34am Fri 15 Mar 13

****-Biker wrote:
David Icke wrote:
****-Biker wrote: Fine talk from someone in a purple shell suit
Did someone just ****?
yes David, not sure if was a f**t or someone just talking out of thier @rse
It was f.a.r.t, as in 'i.ve just heard from an @rsehole'. I think you've been wearing your helmet too tight.

David Icke says...
11:43am Fri 15 Mar 13

Raxx wrote:
David Icke wrote:
SouthamptonLegend wrote:
SouthamptonLegend wrote:
cantthinkofone wrote: Why is it always this particular ethnic group causing all the violence around the Thornhill area? I'm no racist, but it can't be a coincidence surely!
Sounds pretty racist to me
Wait.... WTF? Anyway, the 1980's want their racism back! U knob
It's Townhill not Thornhill, read stories properly before your write your normal boll*cks
Thornnhill *area* you plonker. Thornhill, Townhill, Bitterne, Sholing etc.
Is this the national day of the peni5?

Townhill is not near thorn bl..dy hill.

Thornhill area has nothing to do with the Townhill area, and in no way are they related.

Go back to sleep you mong.

cantthinkofone says...
12:24pm Fri 15 Mar 13

David Icke wrote:
Raxx wrote:
David Icke wrote:
SouthamptonLegend wrote:
SouthamptonLegend wrote:
cantthinkofone wrote: Why is it always this particular ethnic group causing all the violence around the Thornhill area? I'm no racist, but it can't be a coincidence surely!
Sounds pretty racist to me
Wait.... WTF? Anyway, the 1980's want their racism back! U knob
It's Townhill not Thornhill, read stories properly before your write your normal boll*cks
Thornnhill *area* you plonker. Thornhill, Townhill, Bitterne, Sholing etc.
Is this the national day of the peni5?

Townhill is not near thorn bl..dy hill.

Thornhill area has nothing to do with the Townhill area, and in no way are they related.

Go back to sleep you mong.
Look at a bleedin map you tinfoilhatter. Townhill Way is only about 800m away from Thornhill Park Road.

Pikey-Biker says...
3:17pm Fri 15 Mar 13

David Icke wrote:
****-Biker wrote:
David Icke wrote:
****-Biker wrote: Fine talk from someone in a purple shell suit
Did someone just ****?
yes David, not sure if was a f**t or someone just talking out of thier @rse
It was f.a.r.t, as in 'i.ve just heard from an @rsehole'. I think you've been wearing your helmet too tight.
Well I didn’t hear so it must have come from yours

kiddynamite says...
3:50pm Fri 15 Mar 13

I used to live in Townhill Park, we would have delat with this **** ourselves! See people thi sis what happens when families interbreed!!!! He should use his shotty to clear his acne and blow his own empty scummy head off!!! Absolute ****!!

cantthinkofone says...
4:12pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Yeah!
.
Townhill Boyz Massiv in da hood innit blud!

Inform Al says...
7:40pm Fri 15 Mar 13

roofspace wrote:
rich the stitch wrote:
So, he'll do 18months with a roof over his head, have meals cooked everyday for him whilst he sits and watches tv all day, that'll teach him
If you think it is a soft option with free food and accommodation, comfy chair supplied + tv all day - why aren't you in there rather than on the outside griping about it?
It is a soft option and if I ever need constant care and attention I will continue to smash jewellers shop windows until I get sentenced to HMs hostel where I will be looked after. Trouble is I will probably expire before getting lucky and recieving the three square meals a day and warden service 24/7.

cantthinkofone says...
9:37pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Inform Al wrote:
roofspace wrote:
rich the stitch wrote:
So, he'll do 18months with a roof over his head, have meals cooked everyday for him whilst he sits and watches tv all day, that'll teach him
If you think it is a soft option with free food and accommodation, comfy chair supplied + tv all day - why aren't you in there rather than on the outside griping about it?
It is a soft option and if I ever need constant care and attention I will continue to smash jewellers shop windows until I get sentenced to HMs hostel where I will be looked after. Trouble is I will probably expire before getting lucky and recieving the three square meals a day and warden service 24/7.
"if I ever need constant care and attention I will continue to smash jewellers shop windows until..."
.
I'm rather surprised by this Al, you don't seem the type. You really should stop, you'll get into trouble eventually.
.
I hope you've been using a proxy in case the police request your ISP!

Inform Al says...
6:50pm Sun 17 Mar 13

cantthinkofone wrote:
Inform Al wrote:
roofspace wrote:
rich the stitch wrote:
So, he'll do 18months with a roof over his head, have meals cooked everyday for him whilst he sits and watches tv all day, that'll teach him
If you think it is a soft option with free food and accommodation, comfy chair supplied + tv all day - why aren't you in there rather than on the outside griping about it?
It is a soft option and if I ever need constant care and attention I will continue to smash jewellers shop windows until I get sentenced to HMs hostel where I will be looked after. Trouble is I will probably expire before getting lucky and recieving the three square meals a day and warden service 24/7.
"if I ever need constant care and attention I will continue to smash jewellers shop windows until..."
.
I'm rather surprised by this Al, you don't seem the type. You really should stop, you'll get into trouble eventually.
.
I hope you've been using a proxy in case the police request your ISP!
I live in what is supposed to be Supported accommodation, it's a bad joke with staff going home at 4.30 ish each day and no staff at weekends except for about an hour each day. There is also no live in warden on site. Although I myself do not need care, yet, I feel for those here that really could do with getting the care we pay for. Some here would be far better of in prison.

kiddynamite says...
1:56pm Wed 20 Mar 13

cantthinkofone......
.....Nah it aint you ****!

dandydandan says...
3:53pm Sun 7 Apr 13

lambo83 wrote:
The armed police should have just shot him and done everyone a favour.
people deserve what they get every think happens for a reason

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree