Work begins to revamp city estates (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Work begins to revamp Southampton estates
11:09am Friday 15th March 2013 in News
By Luke Tugby, Senior reporter
AMBITIOUS multi-million pound plans to revamp a clutch of Southampton estates have moved a step closer.
Demolition work has begun at two of city’s oldest estates, as housing chiefs bid to breathe new life into the area.
Bulldozers have moved in at Laxton Close, in Sholing, and Exford Avenue, in Harefield, where run-down 1960s flats are being flattened to make way for 200 new builds.
As previously reported by the Daily Echo, the £30m scheme will see 30 houses and 33 flats built at Laxton Close, while the Exford Avenue shopping parade has been torn down to make way for 35 houses and 90 flats.
New shops and a post office will also be built on the site of the Exford Arms pub.
Demolition work took place at the third site involved in the scheme, Meggeson Avenue, in Townhill Park, last August, where run-down flats have made way for ten houses and 23 flats.
Half of the new homes will be available to buy, while others will be on offer for “affordable” rent.
The plans by Lovell and the First Wessex housing association, which form part of Southampton City Council’s estate regeneration programme, were approved by councillors in September 2011.
They form a key part of Southampton City Council’s estate regeneration programme, which aims to build more good quality homes, create local jobs and improve residents’ wellbeing.
Councillor Warwick Payne, the city’s housing and leisure boss, said: “We are committed to providing a brighter future for our residents by working with them to create more affordable and private homes to meet the need of our residents across the city.
“With Meggeson Avenue already demolished and the start of demolition at Laxton Close and Exford Avenue, we are one step closer to improving the lives of many of our residents.”
David Gough, regional director at Lovell, said: “We are looking forward to getting started on building high quality, attractive, secure and comfortable new homes both for existing residents and also for new buyers attracted by the exciting and ambitious plans for these areas.”
The developments have been supported by a £1.2m investment from the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) and a £1.24m grant from the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH).
Comments(28)
loosehead
says...
12:34pm Fri 15 Mar 13
sotonboy84 wrote:When I did a bit of leafletting I went into old & new build flats,I would rather buy an older flat than the new ones that look pretty shabby after a few months of use.
It's great news that more housing is being built but I wonder why they can't refurbish the flats that are there as well as build homes on the other land?
It would be interesting to know how many extra homes are being created in addition to the exisiting buildings that are being demolished as £30m seems lot of money.
I've seen door handles falling off I've seen the hinges on fire doors working loose & many,many other faults with these cheap build new flats.
I agree with you would the flats have been better off refurbishing them or maybe build houses instead of more flats?
southy
says...
12:53pm Fri 15 Mar 13
Council homes also being lost to the private sector, so that will mean less funds going to wards the city.
commonsence
says...
1:18pm Fri 15 Mar 13
bigfella777
says...
2:08pm Fri 15 Mar 13
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
southy
says...
2:11pm Fri 15 Mar 13
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
Stillness
says...
2:47pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
southy
says...
3:08pm Fri 15 Mar 13
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Stillness
says...
3:13pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
loosehead
says...
3:23pm Fri 15 Mar 13
I lived in a flat in Golden Grove & I loved it there & the flat/maisonette was a great place to live.
knocking down perfectly good buildings to replace with new builds isn't always improving an area or standard of the properties.
An estate was built under the Tory council it was an ECO housing mini estate now if they were to build homes ( houses) like this it would be a way forward & improve this cities Green credentials but if it's the same type of flats as Angelsea Rd or opposite St marks school where the old Co-Op was then this is a wrong step as is the case with Liverpool knocking down good Victorian terraced houses to replace them with plastic Barret homes
southy
says...
3:37pm Fri 15 Mar 13
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
loosehead
says...
3:42pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy wrote:What about the Communist state of China who knocked down peoples homes to build Olympic parks to show off Communist China ?
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Capitalist? tell the elite of the communist party there they're the hated capitalists & see how long you have your freedom
loosehead
says...
3:45pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy
says...
4:23pm Fri 15 Mar 13
loosehead wrote:That was Capitalist Communism Loose, and is why the Chineses Socialist party was hunted down and still are today, they can only opperate under ground.
southy wrote:What about the Communist state of China who knocked down peoples homes to build Olympic parks to show off Communist China ?
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Capitalist? tell the elite of the communist party there they're the hated capitalists & see how long you have your freedom
China used State Capitalism have done since the chinese Nationalist and Imperialist Capitalist where kick out of power, even today in China if your found out to be a member to the Chinese Socialist Party you are imprison. the CWI as members there that have not gone to trail and have been in prison for 6 years.
befriendly
says...
4:47pm Fri 15 Mar 13
-Winston Churchill
Georgem
says...
6:20pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy wrote:Compare: the average communist nirvana. Oooh, let's say, China. A paradise, right?
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Stillness
says...
6:59pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy wrote:Give it up Pete. Your backing a loser on this one. Again :-(
loosehead wrote:That was Capitalist Communism Loose, and is why the Chineses Socialist party was hunted down and still are today, they can only opperate under ground.
southy wrote:What about the Communist state of China who knocked down peoples homes to build Olympic parks to show off Communist China ?
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Capitalist? tell the elite of the communist party there they're the hated capitalists & see how long you have your freedom
China used State Capitalism have done since the chinese Nationalist and Imperialist Capitalist where kick out of power, even today in China if your found out to be a member to the Chinese Socialist Party you are imprison. the CWI as members there that have not gone to trail and have been in prison for 6 years.
Georgem
says...
9:02pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy wrote:I suggest you go and read up on the phrase "No true Scotsman", because you lose a hearty chunk of arguments by not understanding it.
loosehead wrote:That was Capitalist Communism Loose, and is why the Chineses Socialist party was hunted down and still are today, they can only opperate under ground.
southy wrote:What about the Communist state of China who knocked down peoples homes to build Olympic parks to show off Communist China ?
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Capitalist? tell the elite of the communist party there they're the hated capitalists & see how long you have your freedom
China used State Capitalism have done since the chinese Nationalist and Imperialist Capitalist where kick out of power, even today in China if your found out to be a member to the Chinese Socialist Party you are imprison. the CWI as members there that have not gone to trail and have been in prison for 6 years.
loosehead
says...
9:06pm Fri 15 Mar 13
southy wrote:So what is North korea?
loosehead wrote:That was Capitalist Communism Loose, and is why the Chineses Socialist party was hunted down and still are today, they can only opperate under ground.
southy wrote:What about the Communist state of China who knocked down peoples homes to build Olympic parks to show off Communist China ?
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Capitalist? tell the elite of the communist party there they're the hated capitalists & see how long you have your freedom
China used State Capitalism have done since the chinese Nationalist and Imperialist Capitalist where kick out of power, even today in China if your found out to be a member to the Chinese Socialist Party you are imprison. the CWI as members there that have not gone to trail and have been in prison for 6 years.
Georgem
says...
9:10pm Fri 15 Mar 13
loosehead wrote:The site of the future "Strait of Freedom", brought to us by the good old US of A.
southy wrote:So what is North korea?
loosehead wrote:That was Capitalist Communism Loose, and is why the Chineses Socialist party was hunted down and still are today, they can only opperate under ground.
southy wrote:What about the Communist state of China who knocked down peoples homes to build Olympic parks to show off Communist China ?
Stillness wrote:It is the nature of Capitalism world wide, History as proven that over and over again, it do not want people uniting and working together on mass, thats why it wants to control every thing.
southy wrote:What! Like Redbridge? You are forever going on about your own little corner of the world southy so dont try and blame it all on the capitalists theirs a good chap.
Stillness wrote:None under a Capitalist system, because Capitalism divides people up, pits people against people
southy wrote:So an emergency home is not a home? Ah, well that explains it all then. Why should someone get "extra points" for coming from Southampton? If someone from Southampton moved to (name your own choice of location) and was told that they are less deserving than a local purely because of where they had links to they would well hacked off, and deservedly. If people from the same country can't be treated equally what chance is there for peace between nations?
bigfella777 wrote:A homeless family would go into a 2 year emergency home first before given a home
commonsence wrote:You get extra points for having proven links to Southampton, but that is never going to give you more points than a family who is homeless, no matter where they are from.
Ok , but will the affordable rented places be let to people born in the Southampton area ? Homebid stated at the start of bidding for homes that people born in Southampton would be given priority over basically outsiders , this does not appear to have happened.
"Do you want to be in my gang, my gang, my gang."
Capitalist? tell the elite of the communist party there they're the hated capitalists & see how long you have your freedom
China used State Capitalism have done since the chinese Nationalist and Imperialist Capitalist where kick out of power, even today in China if your found out to be a member to the Chinese Socialist Party you are imprison. the CWI as members there that have not gone to trail and have been in prison for 6 years.
loosehead
says...
9:10pm Fri 15 Mar 13
surely if these flats are past there life expectancy then we should look at replacing all of them not just those over one side of the city?
Townhill Park is being redeveloped so why not then redevelop these type of flats in Millbrook or is it politics?
MiddleOfRoad
says...
10:57pm Fri 15 Mar 13
Public housing should never be regarded as a right for those who are able and capable of buying or renting in the private sector. Public housing should never be regarded as a life time tenure to be passed onto able and capable offspring.
Surely long term public housing is intended solely for those who cannot meet the private sector housing demands thru regularly verified ill-health.
Yes there will also be a need for short-term public housing - say a maximum of 5 yrs - for specific circumstances. Breeding kids just to get the housing allowance should not be one of those circumstances.
We in the western world have set in concrete a psychology of entitlement among some sectors of our communities which demands someone else works hard to pay for those entitlements. All without any sense of gratitude for the privilege.
Whatever happened to the old ethos of working 2-3 jobs, if necessary, to get a deposit and then maybe upgrading your home along the way. What happened to the pride of making that 1st purchase and knowing that when you passed on your kids would get some sort of genuinely earnt inheritance.
I am not against public housing - just against the attitude that is blighting our western worlds. Remember there is only so much money in the pot to service an increasingly larger and grabbing populace.
bazzeroz
says...
11:17pm Fri 15 Mar 13
loosehead
says...
8:46am Sat 16 Mar 13
MiddleOfRoad wrote:I agree with you,what about two firemen losing their lives due to a couple wanting to move?
This topic raises illustrates an attitude blighting the UK and other western countries. The issue of public housing and how it is used and perceived.
Public housing should never be regarded as a right for those who are able and capable of buying or renting in the private sector. Public housing should never be regarded as a life time tenure to be passed onto able and capable offspring.
Surely long term public housing is intended solely for those who cannot meet the private sector housing demands thru regularly verified ill-health.
Yes there will also be a need for short-term public housing - say a maximum of 5 yrs - for specific circumstances. Breeding kids just to get the housing allowance should not be one of those circumstances.
We in the western world have set in concrete a psychology of entitlement among some sectors of our communities which demands someone else works hard to pay for those entitlements. All without any sense of gratitude for the privilege.
Whatever happened to the old ethos of working 2-3 jobs, if necessary, to get a deposit and then maybe upgrading your home along the way. What happened to the pride of making that 1st purchase and knowing that when you passed on your kids would get some sort of genuinely earnt inheritance.
I am not against public housing - just against the attitude that is blighting our western worlds. Remember there is only so much money in the pot to service an increasingly larger and grabbing populace.
What about the Philpots who also wanted a bigger house & who wanted to blame his mistress?
I was one of eleven kids we never had two houses knocked into one we lived in what was deemed a 5 bedroom house but the "Fifth"bedroom was a downstairs "Front"room & was never used as a bedroom
southy
says...
12:23pm Sat 16 Mar 13
loosehead wrote:They all ready started doing that here under your Tory Council, cumbrian way shops and flats, nothing wrong with them and yet they got demolish to make way for a few new council homes and shops and private rented homes also, another case of Council owned land sold to the private sector cheap.
Why is it Cllr williams is standing for Parliament next time around in Itchen & all these type of flats are being demolished in Itchen but none in Millbrook which is Test ward?
surely if these flats are past there life expectancy then we should look at replacing all of them not just those over one side of the city?
Townhill Park is being redeveloped so why not then redevelop these type of flats in Millbrook or is it politics?
100%HANTSBOY
says...
7:31pm Sat 16 Mar 13
southy wrote:We all know of one council house "lost" to the private sector..........YOUR
Question that needs to be ask is, how many homes will be demolish, and how many will be built, then look at the +&-.
Council homes also being lost to the private sector, so that will mean less funds going to wards the city.
S....you hypocrite!
kingnotail
says...
11:25am Mon 18 Mar 13
loosehead
says...
3:44pm Mon 18 Mar 13
southy wrote:Pity you didn't work out your classified as the private sector when you privately bought your council home wasn't it?
loosehead wrote:They all ready started doing that here under your Tory Council, cumbrian way shops and flats, nothing wrong with them and yet they got demolish to make way for a few new council homes and shops and private rented homes also, another case of Council owned land sold to the private sector cheap.
Why is it Cllr williams is standing for Parliament next time around in Itchen & all these type of flats are being demolished in Itchen but none in Millbrook which is Test ward?
surely if these flats are past there life expectancy then we should look at replacing all of them not just those over one side of the city?
Townhill Park is being redeveloped so why not then redevelop these type of flats in Millbrook or is it politics?
sotonboy84 says...
11:59am Fri 15 Mar 13
It would be interesting to know how many extra homes are being created in addition to the exisiting buildings that are being demolished as £30m seems lot of money.