Bishop of Southampton addresses council meeting over super-casino gambling concerns

Bishop of Southampton Rev Canon Jonathan Frost Bishop of Southampton Rev Canon Jonathan Frost

HE has already voiced his opposition to plans to build a massive super casino in the city.

And now the Bishop of Southampton, Reverend Canon Jonathan Frost, has urged politicians to ensure companies applying to run the venue take measures to curb problem gambling.

The city council is one of eight authorities given a licence to develop a casino housing up to 150 slot machines and companies are currently bidding to develop the Royal Pier site.

But Rev Frost told a full council meeting last night: “We may feel that the benefits of regeneration need to be seized but we need the evidence to make good judgements about social costs. We live in networks and problem gamblers and their families are vulnerable to social problems, mental illness and relationship breakdown and debt.”

He added: “I want the council to look again while they have the chance to tweak it so that Southampton City Council is known for its robustness and its good decisions going forward.”

He also called for measures to ensure debt counselling charities can gain extra funding through the scheme.

Council solicitor Richard Ivory stressed the panel interviewing applicants includes representatives from the Primary Care Trust and debt counselling services and added: “We have the expertise to ask questions of them.” Councillors unanimously agreed a motion put forward by Cllr Peter Baillie ensuring an impact study on problem gamblers is carried out.

Council leader Cllr Richard Williams said: “We want to engage in this sensibly. The more we can engage with as many stakeholders as possible the better. “We feel it’s appropriate to bring this proposal forward and hope it has the feedback from councillors.”

Comments(9)

Linesman says...
11:47am Thu 21 Mar 13

I thought a person had to be a certain age before they could place a bet in a betting shop. Surely the same would apply for a Casino, and maybe even a restriction on those not reaching that age, being permitted to enter a Casino.

Adults are Supposed to have reached the age of responsibility. Is Cannon Frost wanting gamblers to prove their credit worthiness before they place a bet?

Urbane Forager says...
12:17pm Thu 21 Mar 13

Well done Reverend Canon Jonathan Frost!

I agree with the arguments against casinos and gambling in general.

The jobs created by these monsters will not balance out the misery they are capable of creating. How could they?

The income for staff wages plus the building fees and the inevitable massive profits comes form the punters.

Gambling is a loosers game, that is why it is so profitable. It is not about glamour or employment but often just human misery and the exploitation of those who are unable to manage their lives.

J.P.M... says...
12:24pm Thu 21 Mar 13

Urbane Forager wrote:
Well done Reverend Canon Jonathan Frost! I agree with the arguments against casinos and gambling in general. The jobs created by these monsters will not balance out the misery they are capable of creating. How could they? The income for staff wages plus the building fees and the inevitable massive profits comes form the punters. Gambling is a loosers game, that is why it is so profitable. It is not about glamour or employment but often just human misery and the exploitation of those who are unable to manage their lives.
what percentage of the population are unable to manage their life. would you suggest that we legislate for a tiny minority?

In which case, close all the pubs and bars, ban horse racing, stop the sale of non prescription drugs, ban any food that are remotely unhealthy., dont sell anything sharp!

For pity sake says...
1:02pm Thu 21 Mar 13

I agree with his arguments - it would be more credible if he didn't wear a dress and subscribe to fanciful myths.

stay local says...
1:11pm Thu 21 Mar 13

I would strongly urge people to ignore the unelected out date and deluded bishop. It must be hard to get further detached from reality than that of a bishop. This is a man who believes there is an invisible person in he sky who he can talk to and that this person will make things better. Why does he not just put in a call to the boss and get it changed?

Lone Ranger. says...
1:17pm Thu 21 Mar 13

I am sick of the anti-everything brigade just because it doesnt suit them.
.
Who the hell are they, trying to dictate my life choices and those of others.
.
Its simple ....... if you dont like gambling ... Dont gamble ....... If you dont like strip clubs ..... Dont go ..... If you dont like football .... Dont go ......
.
But whatever you do or dont like DONT keep trying to prevent me in doing what i like ..... As long as its legal.
.
Sick to death of do-gooders

teamgreen says...
1:32pm Thu 21 Mar 13

so will the church refuse the money given to them through the national and health lottery then ?

Linesman says...
2:35pm Thu 21 Mar 13

The Bishop supports Freedom of Choice, as long as you make the same choice as him.

nickrb says...
5:51pm Thu 21 Mar 13

Gambling makes addicted, that's why the Bishop is against it. It's variable rate reinforcement, the most powerful influence on behaviour (wiki). And regulation makes sense when protects people from making decisions they can't undo. If I could *decide* to un-addict myself, I'd agree with you. But you can't. So.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree