Four teenagers arrested over fridge thrown from Redbridge Towers in Southampton

Daily Echo: The remains of the fridge in the car park at Redbridge Towers The remains of the fridge in the car park at Redbridge Towers

POLICE have swooped to arrest four teenagers in connection with an incident in which a fridge was thrown from a Southampton tower block.

The large white fridge was hurled from a window at Redbridge Towers, crashing down into the car park in the early hours of last Sunday.

It smashed into pieces, narrowly avoiding a van parked nearby.

Miraculously no one was hurt in the incident. The incident shocked residents living at the 20-storey block, who branded the culprits “mindless idiots” and said it was lucky no one was killed following the act.

Officers arrested three boys aged 16, and one aged 15, all from Southampton, on suspicion of criminal damage recklessly endangering life after carrying out extensive inquiries in the area.

The suspects have been bailed until February 6 and 7 pending further police inquiries.

Police were alerted to the incident at around 12.40am on Sunday and spent time leafleting all home inside the 187ft block as they launched a hunt to find those responsible.

Residents expressed their horror over the incident, and one a woman's car windscreen was smashed after it was claimed a toaster was thrown from one of the windows.

The arrests come after officers urged people in the block, who may have known those responsible, to do the right thing and come forward with information.

Police said it was fortunate no one was seriously hurt in both incidents.

Anyone with information on the incidents is asked to contact Hampshire police on 101, or call Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Comments (25)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:08am Sat 14 Dec 13

Dai Rear says...

If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths.
Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.
If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths. Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time. Dai Rear

8:42am Sat 14 Dec 13

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. says...

remanded to a mental secure unit would be in the public interest.
remanded to a mental secure unit would be in the public interest. WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.

8:49am Sat 14 Dec 13

lct4001 says...

My in-laws lived on the12th floor for years in the 70's/80's loved it, quiet, clean, no trouble. Used to remark on how safe they felt after changing from a 4bedroom house in Cuckmere lane when their kids left home, Would they be able to say that now if they were still about.??
My in-laws lived on the12th floor for years in the 70's/80's loved it, quiet, clean, no trouble. Used to remark on how safe they felt after changing from a 4bedroom house in Cuckmere lane when their kids left home, Would they be able to say that now if they were still about.?? lct4001

9:04am Sat 14 Dec 13

Datarater says...

We are in the age of the feckless.
We are in the age of the feckless. Datarater

9:45am Sat 14 Dec 13

Linesman says...

Perhaps a spell in the cooler would be appropriate.
Perhaps a spell in the cooler would be appropriate. Linesman

9:56am Sat 14 Dec 13

Dai Rear says...

"Save up to £200 on Refrigeration. Free Delivery and Free Recycling"
This advert, appearing next to the article, makes me suspect it was actually a crew from Currys recycling the fridge
"Save up to £200 on Refrigeration. Free Delivery and Free Recycling" This advert, appearing next to the article, makes me suspect it was actually a crew from Currys recycling the fridge Dai Rear

11:24am Sat 14 Dec 13

skeptik says...

Police swooped? They will be getting bird then.
Police swooped? They will be getting bird then. skeptik

12:13pm Sat 14 Dec 13

Inform Al says...

Dai Rear wrote:
If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths.
Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.
Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.
[quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths. Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.[/p][/quote]Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing. Inform Al

12:41pm Sat 14 Dec 13

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. says...

Inform Al wrote:
Dai Rear wrote:
If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths.
Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.
Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.
His username is what he always speaks.
[quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths. Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.[/p][/quote]Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.[/p][/quote]His username is what he always speaks. WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.

5:29pm Sat 14 Dec 13

Dai Rear says...

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. wrote:
Inform Al wrote:
Dai Rear wrote:
If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths.
Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.
Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.
His username is what he always speaks.
How original. You've actually said it before and it doesn't get better. Housing is public if it belongs to the public. Housing is not "unsocial" if it is bought by working people. I wouldn't put a bet on the perpetrators coming from working families but you both probably buy 10 lottery tickets because you think that improves your odds of winning so I guess you'll be off to Ladbrookes tonight. You'll get good odds on the Etonians. Go for it munchkins.
[quote][p][bold]WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths. Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.[/p][/quote]Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.[/p][/quote]His username is what he always speaks.[/p][/quote]How original. You've actually said it before and it doesn't get better. Housing is public if it belongs to the public. Housing is not "unsocial" if it is bought by working people. I wouldn't put a bet on the perpetrators coming from working families but you both probably buy 10 lottery tickets because you think that improves your odds of winning so I guess you'll be off to Ladbrookes tonight. You'll get good odds on the Etonians. Go for it munchkins. Dai Rear

6:20pm Sat 14 Dec 13

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. says...

Dai Rear wrote:
WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. wrote:
Inform Al wrote:
Dai Rear wrote:
If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths.
Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.
Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.
His username is what he always speaks.
How original. You've actually said it before and it doesn't get better. Housing is public if it belongs to the public. Housing is not "unsocial" if it is bought by working people. I wouldn't put a bet on the perpetrators coming from working families but you both probably buy 10 lottery tickets because you think that improves your odds of winning so I guess you'll be off to Ladbrookes tonight. You'll get good odds on the Etonians. Go for it munchkins.
Bigotry and blackguarding seems to be your MO , very strange indeed ,nice spitroast tomorrow for the Etonians , The Bullers mob were known hooligans,would have found throwing a fridge off a highrise a frightful hoot ,what .what.
[quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths. Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.[/p][/quote]Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.[/p][/quote]His username is what he always speaks.[/p][/quote]How original. You've actually said it before and it doesn't get better. Housing is public if it belongs to the public. Housing is not "unsocial" if it is bought by working people. I wouldn't put a bet on the perpetrators coming from working families but you both probably buy 10 lottery tickets because you think that improves your odds of winning so I guess you'll be off to Ladbrookes tonight. You'll get good odds on the Etonians. Go for it munchkins.[/p][/quote]Bigotry and blackguarding seems to be your MO , very strange indeed ,nice spitroast tomorrow for the Etonians , The Bullers mob were known hooligans,would have found throwing a fridge off a highrise a frightful hoot ,what .what. WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.

9:19pm Sat 14 Dec 13

loosehead says...

I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts.
She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job?
if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs?
how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in.
maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there
I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts. She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job? if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs? how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in. maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there loosehead

11:39pm Sat 14 Dec 13

sparkster says...

pity they couldn't put their energy to something constructive, thank goodness nobody was injured or worse
pity they couldn't put their energy to something constructive, thank goodness nobody was injured or worse sparkster

6:42am Sun 15 Dec 13

Rising_Son says...

loosehead wrote:
I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts.
She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job?
if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs?
how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in.
maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there
The article says nothing about the marital status of anyone or drunkeness or parties, so what "facts" are you suggesting we look at?
[quote][p][bold]loosehead[/bold] wrote: I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts. She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job? if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs? how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in. maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there[/p][/quote]The article says nothing about the marital status of anyone or drunkeness or parties, so what "facts" are you suggesting we look at? Rising_Son

7:26am Sun 15 Dec 13

loosehead says...

Rising_Son wrote:
loosehead wrote:
I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts.
She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job?
if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs?
how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in.
maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there
The article says nothing about the marital status of anyone or drunkeness or parties, so what "facts" are you suggesting we look at?
rising son in the original article it was stated in posts that this young lady was having parties(drunken.mayb
e drug) all the time in posts by a person that named her.
I did say if single as I do not know if she had a partner & read it again as I was asking that question.
So let me get it straight you're saying these youths were sober not high but found it enjoyable to hoist up a fridge freezer (hers) & throw it off the balcony?
please read the original article
[quote][p][bold]Rising_Son[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]loosehead[/bold] wrote: I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts. She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job? if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs? how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in. maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there[/p][/quote]The article says nothing about the marital status of anyone or drunkeness or parties, so what "facts" are you suggesting we look at?[/p][/quote]rising son in the original article it was stated in posts that this young lady was having parties(drunken.mayb e drug) all the time in posts by a person that named her. I did say if single as I do not know if she had a partner & read it again as I was asking that question. So let me get it straight you're saying these youths were sober not high but found it enjoyable to hoist up a fridge freezer (hers) & throw it off the balcony? please read the original article loosehead

7:36am Sun 15 Dec 13

loosehead says...

Rising_Son wrote:
loosehead wrote:
I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts.
She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job?
if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs?
how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in.
maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there
The article says nothing about the marital status of anyone or drunkeness or parties, so what "facts" are you suggesting we look at?
Pinguboy says...

Let's introduce a little bit of what is factual and what isn't here.

In the last two years, there have been 49 (est) police complaints about the residents of where this Fridge Freezer had been thrown. Last week, Police were called to the property at 2:10am, the police turned up at 3:55am and told them to wrap up the noise. At 4:05 a stereo was thrown from the balcony of the flat, along with several empty bottles of vodka and several bottles of nail varnish, this landed on a car and smashed the car windscreen and covered the car with varnish. Police were informed, and when the 'resident' involved to refuse to give the names of the people who done this, the police took no further action.

There have been more complaints to the council about this 'tenant', and they have so far refused to do anything about it. The wardens of the block are NOT at fault, they do have the powers that some people think they have, and have a hard enough job as it is doing their daily duties.

Can someone tell me if there is anything within a council tenancy agreement, that allows such behaviour to continue for so long?
does it not mention Vodka bottles?
[quote][p][bold]Rising_Son[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]loosehead[/bold] wrote: I'm not saying they're from council housing or that they're chavs but let's look at the facts. She a single mum yes? lives in a council flat with a child has parties all the time yet we constantly hear about how hard pressed people on welfare now are with the cuts or are you saying she has a job? if on welfare how can she afford to party? How old were those being questioned? three aged 16 & one aged 15 so if they were drunk who bought their drinks? if high who supplied the drugs? how old is she as it doesn't seem to me she's of a high enough mentality to be on her own & maybe the council should force her parents to take on their parental responsibility if over 18 then maybe social services should be looking to take the child & put it into a safe environment as she can't clearly supply what a parent should supply & that's a safe environment for the child to grow up in. maybe these four should be made to stand on the spot where they chucked the fridge freezer from & one is dropped & only let them move at the last minute as this act could be seen as attempted murder they were just lucky no one was stood there[/p][/quote]The article says nothing about the marital status of anyone or drunkeness or parties, so what "facts" are you suggesting we look at?[/p][/quote]Pinguboy says... Let's introduce a little bit of what is factual and what isn't here. In the last two years, there have been 49 (est) police complaints about the residents of where this Fridge Freezer had been thrown. Last week, Police were called to the property at 2:10am, the police turned up at 3:55am and told them to wrap up the noise. At 4:05 a stereo was thrown from the balcony of the flat, along with several empty bottles of vodka and several bottles of nail varnish, this landed on a car and smashed the car windscreen and covered the car with varnish. Police were informed, and when the 'resident' involved to refuse to give the names of the people who done this, the police took no further action. There have been more complaints to the council about this 'tenant', and they have so far refused to do anything about it. The wardens of the block are NOT at fault, they do have the powers that some people think they have, and have a hard enough job as it is doing their daily duties. Can someone tell me if there is anything within a council tenancy agreement, that allows such behaviour to continue for so long? does it not mention Vodka bottles? loosehead

8:17am Sun 15 Dec 13

Dai Rear says...

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER you may find the class war rubbish fun but I'm afraid I heard it all in the 60's at uni and it's just incredibly boring. Do you really think I applaud the little rich Milibands Cleggs and Camerons and their vacuity? My point quite simply is that we've got too many non-workers in this country and they're pretty grim. They are dysfunctional and produce children on welfare who are never going to have anything of a life and will be very unhappy. I had peripheral involvement with "Operation Bullfinch " in Oxford and it made me cry to see the poor little welfare girls who were victims. So, the welfarism so beloved of Brown and Miliband is toxic and scandalous and the class war totally irrelevant.
WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER you may find the class war rubbish fun but I'm afraid I heard it all in the 60's at uni and it's just incredibly boring. Do you really think I applaud the little rich Milibands Cleggs and Camerons and their vacuity? My point quite simply is that we've got too many non-workers in this country and they're pretty grim. They are dysfunctional and produce children on welfare who are never going to have anything of a life and will be very unhappy. I had peripheral involvement with "Operation Bullfinch " in Oxford and it made me cry to see the poor little welfare girls who were victims. So, the welfarism so beloved of Brown and Miliband is toxic and scandalous and the class war totally irrelevant. Dai Rear

10:23am Sun 15 Dec 13

Dr Martin says...

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. wrote:
remanded to a mental secure unit would be in the public interest.
really?
[quote][p][bold]WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.[/bold] wrote: remanded to a mental secure unit would be in the public interest.[/p][/quote]really? Dr Martin

10:40am Sun 15 Dec 13

Bally_Hoo says...

Inform Al wrote:
Dai Rear wrote:
If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths.
Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.
Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.
What is the likelihood that any old Etonians would be in a council tower block,?

Rather unlikely I would suggest.

In all fairness, sometimes teenagers from any background, will do things for a laugh without thinking about the possible consequences, but lets not try to pretend that someone with an entry in Debrett's and whose father owns wiltshire is going to be in a Millbrook tower block hurling around kitchen appliances. It is rather more likely that it would be some chavs on cheap cider.

They don't need to call in Hercule Poirot to work this one out!
[quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths. Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.[/p][/quote]Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.[/p][/quote]What is the likelihood that any old Etonians would be in a council tower block,? Rather unlikely I would suggest. In all fairness, sometimes teenagers from any background, will do things for a laugh without thinking about the possible consequences, but lets not try to pretend that someone with an entry in Debrett's and whose father owns wiltshire is going to be in a Millbrook tower block hurling around kitchen appliances. It is rather more likely that it would be some chavs on cheap cider. They don't need to call in Hercule Poirot to work this one out! Bally_Hoo

12:13pm Sun 15 Dec 13

richard57 says...

sterilise the woman and put the men i the army I say.
sterilise the woman and put the men i the army I say. richard57

3:51pm Sun 15 Dec 13

Dai Rear says...

richard57 wrote:
sterilise the woman and put the men i the army I say.
The Army wouldn't have them. I'm afraid they're totally useless
[quote][p][bold]richard57[/bold] wrote: sterilise the woman and put the men i the army I say.[/p][/quote]The Army wouldn't have them. I'm afraid they're totally useless Dai Rear

4:17pm Sun 15 Dec 13

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. says...

Dai Rear wrote:
WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER you may find the class war rubbish fun but I'm afraid I heard it all in the 60's at uni and it's just incredibly boring. Do you really think I applaud the little rich Milibands Cleggs and Camerons and their vacuity? My point quite simply is that we've got too many non-workers in this country and they're pretty grim. They are dysfunctional and produce children on welfare who are never going to have anything of a life and will be very unhappy. I had peripheral involvement with "Operation Bullfinch " in Oxford and it made me cry to see the poor little welfare girls who were victims. So, the welfarism so beloved of Brown and Miliband is toxic and scandalous and the class war totally irrelevant.
If class war is rubbish as you put it , why do ninety per cent of the people live on five per cent of the land ? Bring in a land tax and watch them go ballistic.
[quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER you may find the class war rubbish fun but I'm afraid I heard it all in the 60's at uni and it's just incredibly boring. Do you really think I applaud the little rich Milibands Cleggs and Camerons and their vacuity? My point quite simply is that we've got too many non-workers in this country and they're pretty grim. They are dysfunctional and produce children on welfare who are never going to have anything of a life and will be very unhappy. I had peripheral involvement with "Operation Bullfinch " in Oxford and it made me cry to see the poor little welfare girls who were victims. So, the welfarism so beloved of Brown and Miliband is toxic and scandalous and the class war totally irrelevant.[/p][/quote]If class war is rubbish as you put it , why do ninety per cent of the people live on five per cent of the land ? Bring in a land tax and watch them go ballistic. WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.

9:16pm Sun 15 Dec 13

loosehead says...

WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. wrote:
Dai Rear wrote:
WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER you may find the class war rubbish fun but I'm afraid I heard it all in the 60's at uni and it's just incredibly boring. Do you really think I applaud the little rich Milibands Cleggs and Camerons and their vacuity? My point quite simply is that we've got too many non-workers in this country and they're pretty grim. They are dysfunctional and produce children on welfare who are never going to have anything of a life and will be very unhappy. I had peripheral involvement with "Operation Bullfinch " in Oxford and it made me cry to see the poor little welfare girls who were victims. So, the welfarism so beloved of Brown and Miliband is toxic and scandalous and the class war totally irrelevant.
If class war is rubbish as you put it , why do ninety per cent of the people live on five per cent of the land ? Bring in a land tax and watch them go ballistic.
two of the biggest land owners are the Armed forces(Army) & the Church ( or it was) so what hit us with taxes as we pay the army's costs?
I don't like Barker Mills but they put a lot of money into charities & good causes what would happen if they got hammered with taxes all these charities would lose out wouldn't they?
The National Trust is also a huge land/property owner what do you suggest we tax them to?
I'd rather people like this look after our history & land than let people who have done nothing good for society have it handed to them only for these idiots to abuse our charity it's people like these that should be chucked into a hall with just a bed alongside others like them
[quote][p][bold]WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER you may find the class war rubbish fun but I'm afraid I heard it all in the 60's at uni and it's just incredibly boring. Do you really think I applaud the little rich Milibands Cleggs and Camerons and their vacuity? My point quite simply is that we've got too many non-workers in this country and they're pretty grim. They are dysfunctional and produce children on welfare who are never going to have anything of a life and will be very unhappy. I had peripheral involvement with "Operation Bullfinch " in Oxford and it made me cry to see the poor little welfare girls who were victims. So, the welfarism so beloved of Brown and Miliband is toxic and scandalous and the class war totally irrelevant.[/p][/quote]If class war is rubbish as you put it , why do ninety per cent of the people live on five per cent of the land ? Bring in a land tax and watch them go ballistic.[/p][/quote]two of the biggest land owners are the Armed forces(Army) & the Church ( or it was) so what hit us with taxes as we pay the army's costs? I don't like Barker Mills but they put a lot of money into charities & good causes what would happen if they got hammered with taxes all these charities would lose out wouldn't they? The National Trust is also a huge land/property owner what do you suggest we tax them to? I'd rather people like this look after our history & land than let people who have done nothing good for society have it handed to them only for these idiots to abuse our charity it's people like these that should be chucked into a hall with just a bed alongside others like them loosehead

9:18pm Sun 15 Dec 13

B. L. says...

At the pearly gates this man was asked how did you die. He replied that he was having an affair with this woman when her husband suddenly arrived home, he decided to hide in the fridge, her husband was so enraged he threw the fridge out of the window.
The second man at the pearly gates was asked how did you die and he replied that he was walking along minding his own business when suddenly this fridge............

Never mind, it was an old joke anyways. :)
At the pearly gates this man was asked how did you die. He replied that he was having an affair with this woman when her husband suddenly arrived home, he decided to hide in the fridge, her husband was so enraged he threw the fridge out of the window. The second man at the pearly gates was asked how did you die and he replied that he was walking along minding his own business when suddenly this fridge............ Never mind, it was an old joke anyways. :) B. L.

12:17am Mon 16 Dec 13

dolomiteman says...

Dai Rear wrote:
WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER. wrote:
Inform Al wrote:
Dai Rear wrote:
If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths.
Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.
Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.
His username is what he always speaks.
How original. You've actually said it before and it doesn't get better. Housing is public if it belongs to the public. Housing is not "unsocial" if it is bought by working people. I wouldn't put a bet on the perpetrators coming from working families but you both probably buy 10 lottery tickets because you think that improves your odds of winning so I guess you'll be off to Ladbrookes tonight. You'll get good odds on the Etonians. Go for it munchkins.
IT'S FORUM TIME.
[quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WILLIAM HAGUES TWIN BROTHER.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dai Rear[/bold] wrote: If there's sufficient evidence PLEASE CPS don't make it a criminal damage charge. Charging affray means appropriate penalties are available, even for half- wit feral public housing youths. Criminal damage would be a waste of the court's time.[/p][/quote]Whilst one of these idiots probably is resident in the block there is nothing in the article that says where the others live, they could even be Etonians which would not go with your bigotted ideas. Also public houses are where we used to go for a drink before they all started closing down, the correct term is either council or social housing.[/p][/quote]His username is what he always speaks.[/p][/quote]How original. You've actually said it before and it doesn't get better. Housing is public if it belongs to the public. Housing is not "unsocial" if it is bought by working people. I wouldn't put a bet on the perpetrators coming from working families but you both probably buy 10 lottery tickets because you think that improves your odds of winning so I guess you'll be off to Ladbrookes tonight. You'll get good odds on the Etonians. Go for it munchkins.[/p][/quote]IT'S FORUM TIME. dolomiteman

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree