Judge concerned after wanted man had to be chased into churchyard

Daily Echo: Man in court after running from police Man in court after running from police

A JUDGE spoke of his concern about a Southampton man’s attitude to the police when he spared him a prison sentence.

The city crown court heard how police wanted to speak to Fraidoon Hamidy about an alleged incident at his former girlfriend’s home.

Prosecutor Ed Elton said that while driving down Chapel Road, two support officers saw him and one ordered him to wait.

But Hamidy ran off, throwing down a fast food meal he was eating and discarding a jacket and a hat. He was pursued into a churchyard where with his fists clenched, he waved his arms around and struck one officer on the hands, causing him to suffer small cuts to a palm and a finger.

Hamidy, 22, of Bursledon Road, admitted obstruction and breaching a conditional discharge imposed at the crown court for damaging his ex-girlfriend’s clothing and household effects.

Defence barrister Charles Gabb said it was an absurd way for Hamidy to behave. “He has a lot of growing up to do and his behaviour was completely unacceptable.”

Judge Derwin Hope told Hamidy he was concerned about his attitude and behaviour. “The pre-sentence report says you don’t have a proper approach to police officers in particular. They have an extremely difficult time and it should not be made more difficult by your attitude. It has to change.”

Hamidy received a 100-hour community order, 18 months’ supervision and told to pay £180 costs and a £60 surcharge.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:06am Mon 10 Feb 14

peenut81 says...

Maybe if the police stopped shooting innocent people, harassing the poor and defenceless, kettling innocent protestors, defending corporate property over people and sorted out their attitude to SERVING the public. The judge is displaying a typical out of touch establishment approach.
Maybe if the police stopped shooting innocent people, harassing the poor and defenceless, kettling innocent protestors, defending corporate property over people and sorted out their attitude to SERVING the public. The judge is displaying a typical out of touch establishment approach. peenut81
  • Score: -9

3:34pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Inform Al says...

peenut81 wrote:
Maybe if the police stopped shooting innocent people, harassing the poor and defenceless, kettling innocent protestors, defending corporate property over people and sorted out their attitude to SERVING the public. The judge is displaying a typical out of touch establishment approach.
And just what are you on moron.
[quote][p][bold]peenut81[/bold] wrote: Maybe if the police stopped shooting innocent people, harassing the poor and defenceless, kettling innocent protestors, defending corporate property over people and sorted out their attitude to SERVING the public. The judge is displaying a typical out of touch establishment approach.[/p][/quote]And just what are you on moron. Inform Al
  • Score: 4

7:26pm Mon 10 Feb 14

X Old Bill says...

peenut81 wrote:
Maybe if the police stopped shooting innocent people, harassing the poor and defenceless, kettling innocent protestors, defending corporate property over people and sorted out their attitude to SERVING the public. The judge is displaying a typical out of touch establishment approach.
Did they shoot him? - No.
Was he innocent? - No.
Was he poor and defenceless? - No.
Was he making a protest ? - No.
Was there any corporate property involved? - No.
Was he complying with a previous Court order? - No.

Are you reading the same article as everyone else? - Probably not.
[quote][p][bold]peenut81[/bold] wrote: Maybe if the police stopped shooting innocent people, harassing the poor and defenceless, kettling innocent protestors, defending corporate property over people and sorted out their attitude to SERVING the public. The judge is displaying a typical out of touch establishment approach.[/p][/quote]Did they shoot him? - No. Was he innocent? - No. Was he poor and defenceless? - No. Was he making a protest ? - No. Was there any corporate property involved? - No. Was he complying with a previous Court order? - No. Are you reading the same article as everyone else? - Probably not. X Old Bill
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree