Suspended sentence for attack on stranger and doorman

Suspended sentence for attack on stranger and doorman

Suspended sentence for attack on stranger and doorman

First published in News

A LABOURER, said to hate the way he behaves when drunk, appeared in court on his 29th birthday for two alcohol-fuelled assaults when he attacked a stranger and a doorman.

Steven Jack and a friend had been ejected from Kelly’s nightclub following a confrontation with another group when he deliberately elbowed Shane Brown in the face as he walked past.

Prosecutor Siobhan Linsley said Jack, who was looking for a fight, then threw three punches at Mr Brown which missed.

He then got involved in a fight with another man in the original group, and punched and scratched doorman Lee Parker when he intervened to break it up.

He ran off but was pointed out by the doorman to police who arrested him.

Jack, of Palm Road, Coxford, admitted two charges of battery. He received a two-month suspended sentence, 12 months supervision and a 120 hour community work order.

He was also told to pay each of his victims £200 compensation as well as a victim's surcharge and costs totalling £110.

In mitigation at the city crown court, Richard Martin said Jack had been wound up by what had happened to his friend and lost control.

Quoting the probation report, Mr Martin said: “He hates the way he behaves when drunk but he is motivated to change.”

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:28am Tue 25 Feb 14

Dai Rear says...

Well he must have got to the Crown Court because magistrates , on legal advice from their Advisor, felt their powers were insufficient. This sentence was only too well within their powers. Thus the Judge said "legal Advisor, you are so wrong" Well frankly they very rarely are particularly wrong. They work from Sentencing Guidelines. So what happened?
Well he must have got to the Crown Court because magistrates , on legal advice from their Advisor, felt their powers were insufficient. This sentence was only too well within their powers. Thus the Judge said "legal Advisor, you are so wrong" Well frankly they very rarely are particularly wrong. They work from Sentencing Guidelines. So what happened? Dai Rear
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree