Plans to modernise Parliament could mean a spring Budget, backbenchers scrutinising senior appointments and shorter set-piece debates on annual Bills, Leader of the House of Commons Ann Taylor revealed yesterday.
Mrs Taylor, who is to head a new committee aimed at bringing the Commons up-to-date, stressed that there was no ''blueprint'' for the process.
But she did not rule out the notion of transferring more power to backbench select committees and make more Parliamentary time available to debate their reports.
''I think you can only have more time on one item if you have less on another, but I do favour looking at the balance of the Parliamentary timetable,'' she said.
Mrs Taylor told BBC TV's On the Record: ''Part of the purpose of having a committee to look at modernisation is to try to get some agreement on where we should be going and I am not going to sit on that committee with a blueprint of what is going to happen in the future.''
The reforms, Mrs Taylor said, were an attempt to make better legislation.
''A lot of legislation that has been passed in the past few years has not been of a very good quality,'' she said.
''We want to acknowledge there are areas of straight forward political disagreement . . . but there are some problems where if we had a different approach to legislation, if we have Government Ministers listening to try and develop some consensus towards a problem, then we are more likely to get that legislation right.''
Mrs Taylor also expressed her backing for calls to ensure that Ministers were accountable to Parliament.
She said: ''I think they have to be accountable. They have to answer reasonable questions and we need a new framework to decide what happens in practice.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article