A FORMER police officer who claims that he was subjected to an anti-English campaign by Lothian and Borders Police described yesterday how he was subjected to a torrent of abuse by a senior officer for being five minutes late, writes .
Mr Alan Caulfield, 42, a former sergeant with the force, told an industrial tribunal that he was sworn at repeatedly and prodded in the chest to the point that the officer's behaviour became ''threatening''.
Despite having 14 years service with the Metropolitan Police, he had dropped a rank on transfer to Scotland in 1989 to take account of the differences in the legal system.
He said that the incident happened shortly after transfer while on a two-week induction course at Fettes police headquarters. An inspector had challenged him in the corridor for being five minutes late for class.
''He was using foul language, he was so angry that I could not even understand what he was saying. The inspector was prodding me in the chest and he was getting quite threatening,'' said Mr Caulfield.
Mr Caulfield, who now owns a book shop in Edinburgh, further claimed that senior officers attempted to cover up evidence that they had racially discriminated against him.
According to Mr Caulfield, he was rejected for promotion as a uniformed sergeant only to find that another English officer of the same rank had been selected for interview.
Mr Caulfield blames Detective Chief Superintendent Ronald Turnbull for sidelining him.
He had previously said that a secret memo had been attached to a personnel file which he believed had hindered his career prospects.
However, Lothian and Borders Police denied the existence of such a memo after a written request from Mr Caulfield.
The tribunal continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article