William Russell charts the history of cross dressing in the cinema and
interviews Robin Williams, a man pretending to be a woman in his new
film Mrs Doubtfire
DECEIT, complicity, and outrageous behaviour -- cross dressing in the
cinema comes into all three categories. There is, of course, nothing new
about actors cross dressing. Men pretending to be women are as old as
theatre itself, and only ended as a commonplace with the arrival of the
actress upon the scene a couple of hundred years ago.
The cinema, however, has always been a place where women's roles are
played by women, hence the interest aroused by the occasional male foray
into skirts. The latest to do so is, on all past cinematic evidence, the
hirsute comedian, Robin Williams in Mrs Doubtfire.
Not that cross dressing is confined to men. Women from time to time
cross dress, the most recent being Tilda Swinton. She makes something of
a habit of it having done so in the theatre as well. Her performance in
Orlando was a notable piece of impersonation, as was in Theatre of Blood
that of the distinguished and, unlike Ms Swinton, one-time television
sex goddess Diana Rigg.
Ms Swinton's task was easier in that she was required to be an
Elizabethan gallant, a breed whose sexuality was always slightly
suspect, and to metamorphose into a woman. Ms Rigg had to convince as a
man because it was one of the disguises she used to help her actor
manager father, Vincent Price, get his revenge on the critics who had
destroyed his career as a great Shakespearian.
Ms Swinton falls into the category of deceit because the role of the
male could as easily have been played by a man, whereas Ms Rigg's
performance falls into the category of complicity because we know,
although nobody in the film does, this is no man. In the outrageous
category is Marlene Dietrich's role in Morocco. Playing a cabaret
singer, she emerges in top hat, white tie, and tails, and plants a
lubricious kiss on the lips of a woman in the audience who is getting
too close to Gary Cooper, Marlene's man. There is no pretence Dietrich
is playing a man, she is simply dressing like one. Kissing the woman,
acting like a man is what makes the scene outrageous.
But it is men making up as, as opposed to making, women which is the
more interesting phenomenon. Let us take the categories in turn.
Deceit.
A classic example is the performance by Alistair Sim as the
headmistress of St Trinians, a role a woman could have played and one
did. In the last of the St Trinians series about the Great Train Robbery
the headmistress was played by Dora Bryan. Sim is a perfectly believable
woman, a grotesque perhaps, but a grande dame that character actresses
in the Hermione Gingold or Edith Evans mould would instantly recognise
as the kind of woman they could play. Patricia Routledge is today's
equivalent.
The point is Sim never winks at the camera or invites the audience to
share the joke. Similarly, in The Mouse That Roared, Peter Sellers plays
the Grand Duchess of Fenwick without for one moment implying he is other
than a very grande dame, an approached endorsed by the fact that in the
sequel, Mouse on the Moon, the role was played by a woman, Margaret
Rutherford. Had Sellers camped it up, done a standard man-in-drag act,
then pretty well any character actor male star could have followed in
the part.
THE most recent piece of deceit was the performance by Jaye Davidson
in The Crying Game in which he plays what the audience and his leading
man take, until let into the secret together, to be a girl. Davidson is
playing a boy who would be a girl, but playing him as a her without ever
giving away the fact he is a man.
It is not, however, a drag performance. There is no point to drag
unless that unanswered question lingers -- not unspoken because Danny La
Rue, one of the most celebrated drag artists, was always putting it to
his audiences -- What have I done with it? Ellen Barkin has played a
man, but as a woman in a film in which a male chauvinist is turned into
a woman. She did not play the male role, but had to play the female role
as if a man inhabited her body.
Complicity.
This is when we know, and the actor knows he is not a woman, but
nobody in the film does, even when this implies they are both blind and
very stupid. The greatest film in this category is Some Like It Hot, in
which Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis disguise themselves as flappers and
join an all-girl band to escape the Mob. Neither looks remotely like a
woman and, when surrounded by the real women in the band, stand out like
sore thumbs.
The same is true of Dustin Hoofman's Tootsie. Small he may be in male
terms, but his whole physical shape, as was true of Lemmon and Curtis,
shouts man. He is broad where a broad is narrow and vice versa, no
matter how much he enjoys being, and we enjoy his being, a girl.
Williams' performance in Mrs Doubtfire is similarly a piece of
complicity. We share the joke. We marvel at the latex and the layers of
Max Factor which have transformed a chunky, butch little man into an
elderly, douce, allegedly Scottish nanny. But we do not for one moment
believe this is a woman. That is left to the people in the film, and
they too are flying in the face of all the evidence.
The other side of the coin is Julie Andrews in Victoria, Victoria as a
female singer who can only get work dressed as a boy. As a women she is
not known for being sexy, as a boy she is a woman dressed as a boy and
is still not sexy, although the plot requires James Garner to fall for
the boy woman and worry about his sexual orientation.
Silent stars were always dragging up. Chaplin did it a lot in his
silent shorts, simpering deliciously behind a strategically held muff
which concealed that little toothbrush moustache, and relying not on a
transforming make-up to suggest femininity, but on his essentially
feminine features in reality. He had dark eyes, a roguish smile, and was
slight enough in build to look female when confronted by the Heavy, who
was invariably immense.
A few performances escape categorisation, usually when the cross
dressing is merely a plot device. Michael Caine, for instance, appears
as a woman in Dressed to Kill. The deceit used by director Brian de
Palma is to imply that the serial murderer is a woman by giving us
discreet shots of the killer, only to reveal at the end that she was
Caine. But the killer woman role is thinly characterised, merely a
visual presence, the ''real'' character is the man Caine plays.
Outrageous behaviour.
A classic instance of this, Dietrich apart, is the performance by
Danny La Rue in his sole film, Our Miss Fred. He plays a drag artist
dragooned into spying in drag. The pretence that he is a real woman is
perfunctory. The joke is he is a man beneath the falsies.
The same is true of Bernard Bresslaw in Carry On Girls in which he is
required to dress up as a contestant in a beauty competition. He makes
an incredible woman, fools nobody in the audience or the cast for one
minute, except for the statutory short-sighted lecher, and is there only
to be the butt of jokes. The femininity is irrelevant. This is not drag
in the music hall or pub sense, nor even in the classic pantomime sense.
The same is true of Cary Grant required to dress up in a black wig and
female army uniform in I Was a Male War Bride. He is very funny, but he
is not playing a woman, he is playing a big butch man dressed up.
Robbie Coltrane and Eric Idle in Nuns on the Run also remained men in
habits rather than sisters, while in Victoria, Victoria Robert Preston's
stint in drag is just that, a classic instance of outrageous behaviour.
Why do male actors do it?
There are the demands of a screenplay, which is fine in situations
like Grant finds himself in I Was A Male War Bride or Bing Crosby and
Bob Hope kept doing in more than just the Road movies. (I have a
horrific memory of Bing in his latter years as the dean of some college
turning up at the senior prom in a crinoline and getting mashed.)
Sometimes they are joking when they do it.
Why should an actor do it for real? One answer is probably that given
by the great Hardy Amies recently when asked why it was mostly
homosexual men who became great dress designers. He said this was
because they liked to wear frocks themselves, hastily adding that in his
case this was not true.
Some actors enjoy the technical challenge, which is why inflated
claims can be made for a performance as they were in the case of
Tootsie.
Sometimes the technical challenge is real, as was the case with Tilda
Swinton's impersonation of Orlando. Sometimes it is a case of men taking
their revenge on the women in their lives by playing a truly awful woman
and softening the savagery of what they are doing with the excuse that
no woman is really like that so they can only be joking, honest. But
they're not.
The fact is that they are only doing what men actors have been doing
since the first mask was donned in the first arena in the first play by
the first playwright, whatever that was and wherever it was. They are
just going Back to Basics.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article