News RSS Feed


Mobile news, sport and travel from the Daily Echo Coverage of the swine flu outbreak The Daily Echo is now on Facebook Southampton Cenotaph Memorial Wall Campaign


How much do you earn?

9:00am Sunday 3rd February 2008

comment Comments (22)   Have your say »


IT'S the question we all want answered but are too polite to ask; how much do you earn? The answer is often surprising and the comparisons are truly fascinating.

For example, did you know that a RAF pilot and a pole dancer have more in common than just flying through the air? Well they both take home roughly £30,000 to £40,000, according to a recent survey of wages.

The pay packets of train drivers (£37,231) far outstrip paramedics (£21,720), nurses (£23,044), secondary school teachers (£31,340) and even dentists (£31,747).

Criticism of company directors for their "fat cat" salaries seems justified according to figures from the Office for National Statistics.

Directors and chief executives of major organisations saw their salaries increase by more than 30 per cent to £212,910 to make theirs the best paid job in Britain - perhaps after Premier League football stars who will earn on average a whopping £1.1m this year.

The sports minister Gerry Sutcliffe last year labelled Chelsea captain John Terry's salary - believed to be £6.8m a year - "obscene".

More surprisingly fillers and drillers enjoyed a 24.7 per cent increase on their earnings last year taking them to £31,747, thanks to the property boom.

Skilled workers in Southampton - which has seen thousands of new flats go up in recent years - are in high demand according to local recruitment agencies and training colleges.

Andy Gannon, careers manager at Southampton City College, said many workers unsatisfied with their office jobs were switching industries for a more lucrative career.

"We are finding adults who have done four or five years in an office job coming to us saying they want to learn a trade or a skill. They often talk about having made the wrong decisions and they've realised that they might be happier doing other things," he said.

"They probably wouldn't have as much money as if they were in full-time work, but there is financial support to help them through those studies and in the long run they could be earning a lot more money by working in high demand industries."

The manager of leading Southampton recruitment agency, who did not want to be named, revealed there had been a downturn in the IT industry with many jobs being taken by migrants willing to work for less money.

"The country has been flooded with highly skilled people over the last few years and that has pretty much knocked out the IT industry, so things are really shifting. People coming into the country will work for less and you'll find jobs with a base salary of £25,000 a few years ago has now dropped to £18,000 for the same kind of skills," he said.

While it might only bring cold comfort, another survey found money doesn't always bring happiness, with 90 per cent of wealthy families who earn £88,000 a year feeling that they don't make enough.

Instead they say they would need to earn about £150,000 a year, own more than one property and send their children to a private school before they felt rich.

WHO EARNS WHAT

1. £0 to £10,000:Cleaners, hairdressers, some agricultural labourers, people on benefits, fast food restaurant staff, school cooks, fine artists, holiday representatives, swimming pool attendants, broadcasting/film runners.

2. £10,001 to £20,000:Manual workers, sewer cleaners, call centre staff, mortuary assistants, farmers, electronic assembly line workers, nursery and care workers, imams, Army privates, bus drivers, checkout staff, landscape designers, fishermen, charity fundraisers, junior civil servants, local government administrators, soil scientists, florists, counsellors, air cabin crew, miners.

3. £20,001 to £30,000:Junior MI5 officers, rabbis, vicars, social workers, NHS nurses, naval cooks, electricians, carpenters, binmen, international aid workers, health service managers, media buyers, plant breeders, textile designers, museum administrators, lorry drivers, map makers, journalists.

4. £30,001 to £40,000: Newly qualified RAF pilots, London Tube drivers, some television presenters, London police officers, pole dancers, sandwich shop managers, bishops, London cab drivers, vets, paramedics, architects, diplomats, timber merchants, trading standards officers, zookeepers, probation officers, opticians, literary agents, immigration officers.

5. £40,001 to £50,000:Air traffic controllers, solicitors, RAF Flight Lieutenants, theatre managers, office managers, foresters, engineers, TV producers.

6. £50,001 to £75,000:Marketing and senior managers, senior police officers, commercial airline pilots, Royal Navy captains, education administrators, top PAs, fashion designers, town planners, MPs, senior social workers, tax inspectors, medical sales representatives.

7. £75,001 to £100,000: Senior managers, senior civil servants, Army brigadiers, secondary school heads, celebrity stylists, some plumbers, advertising executives, senior PRs, distribution managers, accountants.

8. £100,001 to £500,000:GPs, High Court judges, Prime Minister, business whizzkids, Cabinet ministers, Chief of Defence Staff, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, chief executives, senior company secretaries, NHS chief executives, private psychotherapists, financial advisers, quarry managers.

9. £500,001 to £1,000,000:Director General of the BBC, heads of larger companies, including the managing director of Arsenal and the chief executive of Sainsbury's.

10. Over £1,000,000: Chief executives of the UK's biggest firms, celebrities, footballers, bestselling authors, football managers, senior solicitors, investment bankers.


Your Say YourDaily Echo

An angry soton resident, says...
10:24am Sun 3 Feb 08

Wow what an eye opener. A binman get's paid more than I do!! As well as a sandwich shop manager!! Lol

paul berton, says...
10:31am Sun 3 Feb 08

WHO EARNS WHAT

1. £0 to £10,000:Cleaners, hairdressers, some agricultural labourers, people on benefits , fast food restaurant staff, school cooks, fine artists, holiday representatives, swimming pool attendants, broadcasting/film runners.

Benefit scroungers earn SOD ALL[/bold, they scrounge off the state

Gazbo Stunt, Eatleigh says...
11:02am Sun 3 Feb 08

..and Binmen went on stike because they were "low paid"!

£20,000 to £30,000 for collecting rubbish AND most have additional afternoon jobs.

That's more than the £10,000 to £20,000 a soldier earns and they are prepared to risk their lives!

The whole thing's a complete joke.

paul berton, says...
11:07am Sun 3 Feb 08

Gazbo Stunt wrote:
..and Binmen went on stike because they were "low paid"!

£20,000 to £30,000 for collecting rubbish AND most have additional afternoon jobs.

That's more than the £10,000 to £20,000 a soldier earns and they are prepared to risk their lives!

The whole thing's a complete joke.
Just an idea, dont join the army if you dont want to risk your life

Idiot

R, Baghdad says...
11:23am Sun 3 Feb 08

Or you could join the army risk your neck for a pittance for a several years, then become a highly paid ‘Security Contractor’ and earn over £100,000 tax free, sweet.

paul berton, says...
11:32am Sun 3 Feb 08

An angry soton resident wrote:
paul berton wrote:
Gazbo Stunt wrote: ..and Binmen went on stike because they were \"low paid\"! £20,000 to £30,000 for collecting rubbish AND most have additional afternoon jobs. That\'s more than the £10,000 to £20,000 a soldier earns and they are prepared to risk their lives! The whole thing\'s a complete joke.
Just an idea, dont join the army if you dont want to risk your life Idiot
This chap is not an idiot. The whole balance of it is \'crap\'. I\'m sure he doesn\'t want to be in the army but the fact is these people risk their lives, willingly, yet they are paid less than a person who comes round and empties your rubbish. Bin men should get less not more.
If you join the army you know what the pay will be, you know what you might be asked to do

Therefore you (they) have nothing to moan about

Boatman, Marchwood says...
2:09pm Sun 3 Feb 08

1. £0 to £10,000:Cleaners, hairdressers, some agricultural labourers, people on benefits, fast food restaurant staff, school cooks, fine artists, holiday representatives, swimming pool attendants, broadcasting/film runners.


Anyone working fulltime (35 hours p.w. or more) will either earn mor than £10k or their employers are committing the offence of paying less than the National Minimum Wage!

Gordon the Binny, Romsey says...
3:29pm Sun 3 Feb 08

An angry soton resident wrote: " risk their lives, willingly, yet they are paid less than a person who comes round and empties your rubbish. Bin men should get less not more."

You obviously haven't done a bin round in Millbrook!

Afghanistan by comparison is a walk in the park!

George, says...
3:43pm Sun 3 Feb 08

Gordon the Binny wrote:
An angry soton resident wrote: " risk their lives, willingly, yet they are paid less than a person who comes round and empties your rubbish. Bin men should get less not more."

You obviously haven't done a bin round in Millbrook!

Afghanistan by comparison is a walk in the park!
Yeh, but have you walked in a park recently? Millbrook bin rounds are a WI tea dance by comparison

Our brave employees, says...
8:30pm Sun 3 Feb 08

Having seen the pay and risks, I wouldn't join the army. But I don't criticise those who have done, attracted by the lifestyle, the job role and the money, as well as the previous track record of not having to actually fight even if posted abroad.

We have a professional army, not a band of plucky volunteers or conscripts forced to protect our shores.

They have made the decision and taken the queen's shilling. Did I say queen's ? I mean taxpayers' salary. We offer pay to people to do this task, they take it. End of story.

hmm, says...
8:39am Mon 4 Feb 08

paul berton sucks wrote:
paul berton wrote:
An angry soton resident wrote:
paul
berton
wrote:
Gazbo Stunt wrote: ..and
Binmen went on stike because they were \"low paid\"! £20,000 to £30,000
for collecting rubbish AND most have additional afternoon jobs. That\'s
more than the £10,000 to £20,000 a soldier earns and they are prepared
to risk their lives! The whole thing\'s a complete joke.
Just
an idea, dont join the army if you dont want to risk your life
Idiot
This chap is not an idiot. The whole balance of it is
\'crap\'. I\'m sure he doesn\'t want to be in the army but the fact is
these people risk their lives, willingly, yet they are paid less than a
person who comes round and empties your rubbish. Bin men should get
less not more.
If you join the army you know what the pay will
be, you know what you might be asked to do Therefore you (they) have
nothing to moan about
Oh paul you are a bit of a twerp ain't
ya?! Go crawl back in ur cave or put your head down the toilet and
flush it to refresh the one brain cell you have.
Im with Paul berton on this one

They knew the pay when they signed up, therefore have nothing to complain about.

John B, Eastleigh says...
8:39am Mon 4 Feb 08

You guys are missing the point - you are all argueing over who should get the lowest pay - you should be up in arms over the disproportionately high pay of those fat cats at the top. Many of whom work part time for massive salaries.

George, says...
10:05am Mon 4 Feb 08

hmm wrote:
paul berton sucks wrote:
paul berton wrote:
An angry soton resident wrote:
paul
berton
wrote:
Gazbo Stunt wrote: ..and
Binmen went on stike because they were \"low paid\"! £20,000 to £30,000
for collecting rubbish AND most have additional afternoon jobs. That\'s
more than the £10,000 to £20,000 a soldier earns and they are prepared
to risk their lives! The whole thing\'s a complete joke.
Just
an idea, dont join the army if you dont want to risk your life
Idiot
This chap is not an idiot. The whole balance of it is
\'crap\'. I\'m sure he doesn\'t want to be in the army but the fact is
these people risk their lives, willingly, yet they are paid less than a
person who comes round and empties your rubbish. Bin men should get
less not more.
If you join the army you know what the pay will
be, you know what you might be asked to do Therefore you (they) have
nothing to moan about
Oh paul you are a bit of a twerp ain't
ya?! Go crawl back in ur cave or put your head down the toilet and
flush it to refresh the one brain cell you have.
Im with Paul berton on this one

They knew the pay when they signed up, therefore have nothing to complain about.
Does the military recruitment process include a comparison of salaries against other sectors such as rubbish collection? I think both you and Paul are missing the point: there's a huge imbalance, and these guys, even if they're accepting it, do have a right to be disgruntled. If it's just accepted as "that's the way it is, stop moaning about it", the imbalance stands no chance of being addressed, as opposed to the virtually no chance it stands now

hmm, says...
11:28am Mon 4 Feb 08

George wrote:
hmm wrote:
paul berton sucks wrote:
paul berton wrote:
An angry soton resident wrote:
paul
berton
wrote:
Gazbo Stunt wrote: ..and
Binmen went on stike because they were \"low paid\"! £20,000 to £30,000
for collecting rubbish AND most have additional afternoon jobs. That\'s
more than the £10,000 to £20,000 a soldier earns and they are prepared
to risk their lives! The whole thing\'s a complete joke.
Just
an idea, dont join the army if you dont want to risk your life
Idiot
This chap is not an idiot. The whole balance of it is
\'crap\'. I\'m sure he doesn\'t want to be in the army but the fact is
these people risk their lives, willingly, yet they are paid less than a
person who comes round and empties your rubbish. Bin men should get
less not more.
If you join the army you know what the pay will
be, you know what you might be asked to do Therefore you (they) have
nothing to moan about
Oh paul you are a bit of a twerp ain't
ya?! Go crawl back in ur cave or put your head down the toilet and
flush it to refresh the one brain cell you have.
Im with Paul berton on this one

They knew the pay when they signed up, therefore have nothing to complain about.
Does the military recruitment process include a comparison of salaries against other sectors such as rubbish collection? I think both you and Paul are missing the point: there's a huge imbalance, and these guys, even if they're accepting it, do have a right to be disgruntled. If it's just accepted as "that's the way it is, stop moaning about it", the imbalance stands no chance of being addressed, as opposed to the virtually no chance it stands now
I call people like you Victims of Life

They just go along with things and prefer to moan rather than moving on

I wouldnt join the army if i wanted more money and would become a bin man or something that offered better pay

If no one as joining the army they would put their pay up, simple

George, says...
11:35am Mon 4 Feb 08

hmm wrote:
George wrote:
hmm wrote:
paul berton sucks wrote:
paul berton wrote:
An angry soton resident wrote:
paul
berton
wrote:
Gazbo Stunt wrote: ..and
Binmen went on stike because they were \"low paid\"! £20,000 to £30,000
for collecting rubbish AND most have additional afternoon jobs. That\'s
more than the £10,000 to £20,000 a soldier earns and they are prepared
to risk their lives! The whole thing\'s a complete joke.
Just
an idea, dont join the army if you dont want to risk your life
Idiot
This chap is not an idiot. The whole balance of it is
\'crap\'. I\'m sure he doesn\'t want to be in the army but the fact is
these people risk their lives, willingly, yet they are paid less than a
person who comes round and empties your rubbish. Bin men should get
less not more.
If you join the army you know what the pay will
be, you know what you might be asked to do Therefore you (they) have
nothing to moan about
Oh paul you are a bit of a twerp ain't
ya?! Go crawl back in ur cave or put your head down the toilet and
flush it to refresh the one brain cell you have.
Im with Paul
berton on this one
They knew the pay when they signed up, therefore have nothing to
complain about.
Does the military recruitment process include a
comparison of salaries against other sectors such as rubbish
collection? I think both you and Paul are missing the point: there's a
huge imbalance, and these guys, even if they're
accepting it, do have a right to be
disgruntled. If it's just accepted as "that's the way it is, stop
moaning about it", the imbalance stands no chance of being addressed,
as opposed to the virtually no chance it stands now
I call
people like you Victims of Life
They just go along with things and prefer to moan rather than moving on
I wouldnt join the army if i wanted more money and would become a bin
man or something that offered better pay
If no one as joining the army they would put their pay up, simple
I know you do. That's because you're incapable of being disagreed with without resorting to insults. Your logic here is flawed. You have said we "victims of life" just go along with things and prefer to moan rather than move on, and at the same time berating soldiers for not doing so. Which is it? Shouls people just put up with the status quo or not? See if you can manage to explain this paradox without calling me any names

George, says...
11:44am Mon 4 Feb 08

For the record, 'hmm', I'm certainly not a Victim of Life, I fall quite comfortably into the upper half of the earning brackets outlined in the story, and got there by a series of conscious decisions derived from dissatisfaction with my lot, which doesn't tie in with your "go along with things, moan instead" theory at all. Being able to recognize an injustice when one sees it does not render one a victim of anything

King Mush, Woolston says...
3:46pm Mon 4 Feb 08

The Army is a way of life that suits some and not others. For many, it is a family link and others do have a sense of 'duty' although, sadly, soldiers do not fight for Queen and country any more.

They fight stupid no-win wars against other countries, thanks to the maniacs who govern the USA and UK. Old cliche - lions led by donkeys.

The services provide an escape for the disadvantaged youth of today and give them a purpose in life as well as a whole new social perspective as they make good loyal mates.

The pay and conditions are secondary and they have a choice when contemplating a career in the services.

Same with nursing to some degree

Gillian Burch, Highgate says...
6:44pm Thu 7 Feb 08

The article is full of statistics, as if they are true. Where's the source for this and how can we believe it. Journalists thrive on hype - they love outraging the general public so they have a story

kieran, bristol says...
4:22pm Mon 3 Mar 08

i quite agree with king mush in that soldiers no longer fight for Queen and country. this is because the monarchy are no longer of any use to the country and are merely figure heads that cost us too much money and make the actual governing of the country more problematic.

also they no longer fight for country because this country is lost for a number of reasons i will not go into at a risk of sounding racist which im not.

Mike, Birmingham says...
8:24pm Tue 4 Mar 08

I don’t think the Binman’s wage should be lowered. I think every ones wage that is below the binman’s should be raised.

Sophie Hugh, Newland says...
9:01am Fri 23 May 08


i DISAGRRE U MIGHT THINK THAT BINMEN JUST COLLECT YOUR RUBBISH BUT THEY WEAR SCRUFFY CLOTHES AND PICK UP YOUR DIRTY DIRTY **** IN YOUR BINS EVERY MORNING AT 6:30 SO DONT TELL ME THAT U DONT THINK THEY DESERVE TO GET PAYED THAT MUCH. THEY ALSO DRIVE TO LANDFILLS AND EMPTY IT SO DONT CRITICISE THEM , BECAUSE U WOULDNT LIKE TO DO IT WOULD YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!

Jamie, Coventry says...
3:12pm Mon 1 Sep 08

Journalists are 20-30k? Tell that to the trainee reporter on your local weekly, who can expect to take home as little as 12k, and thats starting after achieving a university degree. For such a specialised role its appalling.

Comments are closed on this article.

Video News Food & Restaurant Reviews

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »