Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
3:49pm Saturday 10th May 2008
RSPCA inspectors found breaches of animal welfare laws at a crisis-hit charity sanctuary just days before it closed its doors to the public, the Daily Echo can reveal.
Officers issued eight notices to the management at St Francis Animal Welfare in Fair Oak relating to conditions some of the rescued pets were being kept in.
The shelter has been closed to people without pre-arranged appointments since April 25, following the inspectors' visit, which came after complaints from the public.
Some of the animals have been moved to specialist sanctuaries.
Read the full story in today's Daily Echo
The shelter has also been inspected by animal welfare officers from Eastleigh Council who were investigating allegations that it was offering a boarding service for pets without a licence - an offence that could have led to it being closed down.
St Francis' live-in manager of nearly 30 years, Ann Hillman, is currently suspended on full pay by the charity's ruling committee and is still waiting to learn her fate.
As reported earlier, the charity has been the centre of an internal power struggle. At its annual meeting in March, about 50 apparently paid-up members were refused entry.
Six police officers attended Fair Oak Village Hall after being called in by the committee, who said they feared for the safety of genuine members.
The Charity Commission has since been investigating a deluge of complaints from those kept out of the meeting, at which the committee was re-elected.
It is thought that most of those refused entry were supporters of Mrs Hillman, some of whom had launched a bid to join the committee a month earlier.
The arguments have focused on how the charity is being run, but until now the care of the animals had apparently not been called into question.
The RSPCA carried out an inspection of theMortimers Lane shelter at the invitation of the committee, after it received complaints from the public.
"Two officers went to the shelter and eight Animal Welfare Act forms were issued to the management with pieces of various welfare advice," said an RSPCA spokesman.
"Since the visit we have been working closely with the committee to achieve its aim of reopening to the public as soon as possible, and will continue to offer them support as necessary.
"The advice we've given has been taken seriously and issues have been addressed and people should be confident that they can continue to support the charity."
As well as moving some animals from the shelter, it is understood St Francis has employed new vets and changed all locks.
A spokesman for Eastleigh Council confirmed that its officers had inspected the shelter to see if it was operating a boarding service for dogs and cats without a licence.
"They found no evidence of animal boarding taking place at all,"
he said.
St Francis' chairman David Whitmore said he was unable to comment on the RSPCA or council inspections because of the ongoing internal investigation.
But he said he is hopeful the issues will be resolved soon, and the shelter will fully reopen to the public soon.
Mrs Hillman was suspended on April 25, and was initially due to have her internal disciplinary case held this week, but this has now been postponed while the committee takes expert advice on the situation. It is not yet known how long that process will take.
A second member of staff who was suspended at the same time but over a separate issue, Sarah Eckton, has since resigned from her post.
Read the full story in today's Daily Echo
paul b, says...
10:14am Sat 10 May 08
rosie wrote:chinese take away?
so what happens to the animals now then, hopefully they will get taken in by the rspca.
David Tyne, Amersham says...
11:25am Sat 10 May 08
Dubious of dodgy claims, says...
11:34am Sat 10 May 08
David Tyne wrote:So what about the council also investigating it?
This story is consistent with the RSPCA's attacks on rescue charities and farmers who don't pay the RSPCA's tithe. The experience of Pat Seager (all many of the others) was that the "welfare breaches" are likely to be keeping animals in enclosures which don't meet the RSPCA standards for centres other than its own. Another boost for the number of animals that the RSPCA can claim to have seized too.
Ken, Stubbington says...
1:12pm Sat 10 May 08
Benny Fitt, Thornhill says...
3:18pm Sat 10 May 08
Ken wrote:Never fancied it myself Ken, we usually have a turkey!
A dog is for Christmas, not for life.
Lisa, soton says...
4:33pm Sat 10 May 08
Fred, says...
9:02pm Sat 10 May 08
Dubious of dodgy claims wrote:Not directly - but the RSPCA isn't the organisation it was 15 years ago. It is an unelected, private regulator with an over-arching role for animal welfare which Parliament dare not touch.
David Tyne wrote: This story is consistent with the RSPCA's attacks on rescue charities and farmers who don't pay the RSPCA's tithe. The experience of Pat Seager (all many of the others) was that the "welfare breaches" are likely to be keeping animals in enclosures which don't meet the RSPCA standards for centres other than its own. Another boost for the number of animals that the RSPCA can claim to have seized too.So what about the council also investigating it? Or are they also in on the conspiracy?
max, soton says...
12:23am Sun 11 May 08
SURICATE, Sway says...
8:01am Sun 11 May 08
Dave the Dog, NW England says...
12:36pm Sun 11 May 08
paula, winchester says...
12:46pm Sun 11 May 08
Dave the Dog, NW England says...
2:12pm Sun 11 May 08
concerned member of the public!, Portsmouth says...
4:26pm Sun 11 May 08
Bizarre, Waterlooville says...
4:42pm Sun 11 May 08
Fred Bassett, Bishopstoke says...
11:40am Wed 28 May 08
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
rosie, new forest says...
8:29am Sat 10 May 08