Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
8:22am Tuesday 13th May 2008
PARENTS are putting the heat on a Hampshire school to drop its compulsory uniform rule as the county continued to sizzle in heatwave temperatures.
One mum yesterday described the policy as "child torture" on a day when the Met Office said the south had reached a sweltering 22C (72F).
Pupils at Hounsdown School, Totton, must individually seek and be granted permission to remove their jumpers in class regardless of soaring temperatures.
Anyone who takes off their jumper without teacher's consent is given detention.
Concerns have been raised that shy youngsters are suffering in silence A mum, whose identity the Daily Echo has agreed to withhold, was horrified when her 11-year-old came home feeling unwell.
She said: "The school is violating the human rights of their children by getting them to wear jumpers in this heat.
It's just insane. They are left to boil alive while the teachers arrive in their summer blouses. These are really thick jumpers and my daughter arrived home red-faced with her hair sticking to her."
The rule is set to be tested further today and tomorrow when temperatures are forecast to reach a high of 24C (75F) before falling to 19C (66F) on Thursday and 17C (63F) on Friday.
Click here for more education stories
Past pupils recalled that the rule has been in place for more than a decade.
One former pupil called for common sense to prevail. He said: "The school is very militant with this rule. I remember having to put my hand up and ask permission - sometimes I was refused. There were other pupils too intimidated to ask."
The issue has divided parents with some maintaining that the jumpers look smart and professional while others have called for the rule to be reviewed. Head teacher Di Nightingale defended the rule as a normal part of school uniform.
She said: "If a pupil wishes to remove their jumper, all they have to do is ask a member of staff and permission is normally granted. Certainly in the current hot weather a large number of pupils have done just that."
Mrs. T, hedge end says...
8:44am Tue 13 May 08
quote
Parent of Wildern Pupil, 056-868 says...
8:59am Tue 13 May 08
Miss M, Totton says...
9:03am Tue 13 May 08
Sue, Southampton says...
9:10am Tue 13 May 08
pug, Bash Street says...
9:14am Tue 13 May 08
paul b, says...
9:20am Tue 13 May 08
Sue wrote:The flaw with this argument is the contempt created by stupid rules.
This is why our society is in such moral decline because nobody obeys rules/laws. Even the church people fail to obey basic laws like not riding on the pavement and not parking on yellow lines. They also fail to apologise when they are in the wrong. Rules/Laws are there for a purpose. It is teaching manners. What on earth is wrong with a student asking politely to remove their jumper? It is teaching basic social skills which many people do not have. It is teaching communication between student and adults. University students have no idea how to communicate with adults. Our society would be a better place if all laws were implemented. Sadly the police are no longer interested in upholding laws either.
Jeanne, Southampton says...
9:27am Tue 13 May 08
John, Lyndhurst says...
9:29am Tue 13 May 08
George, says...
9:32am Tue 13 May 08
Sue wrote:So you unquestioningly obey all rules at all times, regardless of how utterly pointless or counter-productive they are, without even thinking of challenging them? This is why we've got a country full of people who are unable to think for themselves. Friggin' robots
This is why our society is in such moral decline because nobody obeys
rules/laws. Even the church people fail to obey basic laws like not
riding on the pavement and not parking on yellow lines. They also fail
to apologise when they are in the wrong. Rules/Laws are there for a
purpose. It is teaching manners. What on earth is wrong with a student
asking politely to remove their jumper? It is teaching basic social
skills which many people do not have. It is teaching communication
between student and adults. University students have no idea how to
communicate with adults. Our society would be a better place if all
laws were implemented. Sadly the police are no longer interested in
upholding laws either.
Steve, Southampton says...
9:42am Tue 13 May 08
Kirsty, West End, Soton says...
9:57am Tue 13 May 08
Sue wrote:Sue you are ridiculous, manners are saying please and thank you, and holding the door open for people. I remember when I was at school and as a quiet pupil, did not like having to put my hand up in front of the whole class, especially having to interrupt the whole class just to take my jumper off. I can imagine you're probably too old to even remember school and how scary it was!
This is why our society is in such moral decline because nobody obeys rules/laws. Even the church people fail to obey basic laws like not riding on the pavement and not parking on yellow lines. They also fail to apologise when they are in the wrong. Rules/Laws are there for a purpose. It is teaching manners. What on earth is wrong with a student asking politely to remove their jumper? It is teaching basic social skills which many people do not have. It is teaching communication between student and adults. University students have no idea how to communicate with adults. Our society would be a better place if all laws were implemented. Sadly the police are no longer interested in upholding laws either.
Denzil, Chilworth says...
9:59am Tue 13 May 08
Suzi, New Forest says...
10:06am Tue 13 May 08
pug wrote:No it's torture by those abusing their power and so yes it's human rights. Why don't you wear a thick black jumper all day and see if you can handle it. Idiot
Less of the whining about 'human rights' please. let's keep it in context: it's a school uniform issue, it's not like they're being waterboarded by sadists.
Suzanne, Lyndhurst says...
10:10am Tue 13 May 08
Ted, Southampton says...
10:30am Tue 13 May 08
Ex Student, from the 1980's!! says...
10:55am Tue 13 May 08
George, says...
10:56am Tue 13 May 08
Suzi wrote:Torture? Human rights? Grow up, Suzi, for goodness sake. This is hardly torture. You might want to talk to some actual torture victims about what they think of being made to wear a wooly jumper on a hot day, and how it compares to having their fingernails ripped out with pliers, or electrical charges being applied to their wet skin. Torture does not mean "any slightly unpleasant act that someone wishes did not happen". Look it up. As for human rights, try getting Amnesty International involved if you like, love, but I think they've got bigger fish to fry
pug wrote: Less of the whining about 'human rights'No it's torture by
please. let's keep it in context: it's a school uniform issue, it's not
like they're being waterboarded by sadists.
those abusing their power and so yes it's human rights. Why don't you
wear a thick black jumper all day and see if you can handle it. Idiot
SUE, ELING TOTTON says...
10:58am Tue 13 May 08
Suzi, On george's doorstep with a jumper! says...
11:09am Tue 13 May 08
George wrote:George why be so stupid! You look it up, love! So what is the dripping of a tap, that isn't physical pain.
Suzi wrote:Torture? Human rights? Grow up, Suzi, for goodness sake. This is hardly torture. You might want to talk to some actual torture victims about what they think of being made to wear a wooly jumper on a hot day, and how it compares to having their fingernails ripped out with pliers, or electrical charges being applied to their wet skin. Torture does not mean "any slightly unpleasant act that someone wishes did not happen". Look it up. As for human rights, try getting Amnesty International involved if you like, love, but I think they've got bigger fish to fry
pug wrote: Less of the whining about 'human rights'No it's torture by
please. let's keep it in context: it's a school uniform issue, it's not
like they're being waterboarded by sadists.
those abusing their power and so yes it's human rights. Why don't you
wear a thick black jumper all day and see if you can handle it. Idiot
Pug is quite right, this is so far removed from "torture" and "human rights" it's unbelievable.
bunny, hamble says...
11:14am Tue 13 May 08
Lucy, Hounsdown area says...
11:16am Tue 13 May 08
bunny, hamble says...
11:28am Tue 13 May 08
shaz, says...
11:28am Tue 13 May 08
Grandmother of student, New Forest says...
11:31am Tue 13 May 08
SUE wrote:This just shows what sort of teachers we're dealing with. This should go further and all school children should be able to take off their jumper at anytime of year if they are too hot. What sort of person makes up rules like this - it's just unbelievable.
MY DAUGHTER GOES TO HOUNSDOWN, SHE TOLD ME LAST NIGHT THAT ON FRIDAY THE SCHOOL TURN OF THE DRINKING WATER TAPS AS THE PUPILS WERE SPLASHING THERE FACES WITH WATER BECAUSE OF THE HOT WEATHER AND THEY WERE TOLD THAT IF THEY DID THIS AGAIN THE TAPS WOULD BE TURN OFF FOR GOOD. IF THEY ARE SO WORRIED ABOUT THE PUPILS NOT HAVING THE SCHOOL NAME ON THERE SHIRTS, THEN HAVE A POLO SHIRT WITH THE SCHOOL NAME ON IT IN THE SUMMER, I AM NOT HAPPY THAT MY CHILD IS MADE TO WEAR HER JUMPER IN THIS WEATHER WHEN THE TEACHER ARE ALL WEARING THERE SUMMER CLOTHES.
shaz, says...
11:31am Tue 13 May 08
George, says...
11:34am Tue 13 May 08
Lucy wrote:It would be unpleasant, yes. But that does not constitute torture
George, I think you're going a bit overboard ! But I agree with Suzi,
if I had to sit with sweatshirt on all day or especially outside it
would play on my mind to the extreme. I wish I could watch you sit
outside in a jumper for just half and hour and see how you feel and
then go into a class and be expected to concentrate.
Osama Bin Laden, A Cave far far away says...
11:34am Tue 13 May 08
Lucy, says...
11:35am Tue 13 May 08
John, Lyndhurst says...
11:59am Tue 13 May 08
Sally, Locks Heath says...
12:10pm Tue 13 May 08
fred, bristol says...
12:12pm Tue 13 May 08
grumpy old man, 277-129 says...
12:18pm Tue 13 May 08
Condor Man, Southampton says...
12:38pm Tue 13 May 08
Ex-Pupil, Totton says...
1:27pm Tue 13 May 08
bunny, hamble says...
1:42pm Tue 13 May 08
fred wrote:its not as simple as that,when they start school we dont get told this so we havent agreed to let our son or daughter feel like there in ovens!
Talk about an over the top reaction, comparisons to torture etc are a bit melodramatic. Instead of writing to the governors why not simply ask your child to raise their hand in class and ask to remove their jumper? This is simply a school rule that every parent agreed too when their child joined the school, so whats the problem? The kids should be obeying the rules and not rebelling as has been suggested here already.
Brian, Soton says...
1:42pm Tue 13 May 08
Grandmother of student wrote:My Son attends Bitterne Park school, and only wears a polo shirt, and this is what the school reccomends, Just shows that one school has it right. As far as the water fountains are concerned I wouldnt mind betting they are worried about slip hazzards, are they all going MAD.
SUE wrote: MY DAUGHTER GOES TO HOUNSDOWN, SHE TOLD ME LAST NIGHT THAT ON FRIDAY THE SCHOOL TURN OF THE DRINKING WATER TAPS AS THE PUPILS WERE SPLASHING THERE FACES WITH WATER BECAUSE OF THE HOT WEATHER AND THEY WERE TOLD THAT IF THEY DID THIS AGAIN THE TAPS WOULD BE TURN OFF FOR GOOD. IF THEY ARE SO WORRIED ABOUT THE PUPILS NOT HAVING THE SCHOOL NAME ON THERE SHIRTS, THEN HAVE A POLO SHIRT WITH THE SCHOOL NAME ON IT IN THE SUMMER, I AM NOT HAPPY THAT MY CHILD IS MADE TO WEAR HER JUMPER IN THIS WEATHER WHEN THE TEACHER ARE ALL WEARING THERE SUMMER CLOTHES.This just shows what sort of teachers we're dealing with. This should go further and all school children should be able to take off their jumper at anytime of year if they are too hot. What sort of person makes up rules like this - it's just unbelievable.
IAN, aldermoor says...
2:10pm Tue 13 May 08
Grandmother, says...
2:10pm Tue 13 May 08
ann m. taylor, vancouver says...
2:13pm Tue 13 May 08
Carole, Bitterne Park says...
2:16pm Tue 13 May 08
Jeanne wrote:In regards to Jeanne's comment, I don't think this is down the school but the individual child's choice not to wear a coat. I know some children refuse to wear a coat, I really have to try hard to get my daughter to wear one. My daughter is due to start Bitterne Park School in September and I know that the school allows polo shirts to be worn in the summer term and half way into the autumn term, but these must have the school logo on. If the children do not choose to wear these polo shirts, then it has to be shirts or blouses but with the school jumper. All the schools are doing is ensuring that their pupils are easily identifiable by wearing one piece of clothing, whether it be jumper or polo shirt, that has the school logo on it; then, if that child should have an accident, cause trouble etc, etc, it would aid any 'authority' in identifying them.
I don't know what the rule is at Bitterne Park School, but I would like to see the children being made to wear waterproofs and/or warm clothing during the wet and rainy winter. I see the children going to school in the morning, both boys and girls dressed in trousers and shirts - not even a jumper in the depths of winter!
Dave, Southampton says...
2:29pm Tue 13 May 08
Theresa, Hedge End says...
2:32pm Tue 13 May 08
Denise, Bitterne Park says...
3:16pm Tue 13 May 08
grandma, says...
3:52pm Tue 13 May 08
sotonian, Southampton says...
4:01pm Tue 13 May 08
Suzi wrote:don't the powers that be at Hounsdown realise that black absorbs heat and therefore would be hotter than a teachers light coloured clothing. Think of how hot a black car gets. Its not rocket science!!
pug wrote: Less of the whining about 'human rights' please. let's keep it in context: it's a school uniform issue, it's not like they're being waterboarded by sadists.No it's torture by those abusing their power and so yes it's human rights. Why don't you wear a thick black jumper all day and see if you can handle it. Idiot
JIM, hounsdown says...
4:12pm Tue 13 May 08
concerned parent, hants says...
4:26pm Tue 13 May 08
concerned, southampton says...
4:29pm Tue 13 May 08
IAN wrote:I trust theat you are joking Ian.
I t could be worse, your child could go to Regents park.Knowing that school the kids probabably have to wear coats as well.
get the facts right, TOTTON says...
4:30pm Tue 13 May 08
Bambi, says...
4:35pm Tue 13 May 08
sotonian wrote:That "black absorbs heat therefore black clothing makes you hot" thing was debunked a while ago. All irrelevant, though, because a thick woollen jumper is gonna make you hot regardless of heat.
Suzi wrote:don't the powers that be at Hounsdown realise that black
pug wrote: Less of the whining about 'human rights'No it's torture by
please. let's keep it in context: it's a school uniform issue, it's not
like they're being waterboarded by sadists.
those abusing their power and so yes it's human rights. Why don't you
wear a thick black jumper all day and see if you can handle it.
Idiot
absorbs heat and therefore would be hotter than a teachers light
coloured clothing. Think of how hot a black car gets. Its not rocket
science!!
At my school the pupils don't have to wear their jumpers after easter.
Progress.
Not true, totton says...
4:36pm Tue 13 May 08
bunny wrote:yes its in the school prosperus website and parent newsletter --- guess you dont read or take account of the information sent to you,,,, perhaps we should ring each parents who agreeds to the school uniform to check they read it
fred wrote: Talk about an over the top reaction, comparisons to torture etc are a bit melodramatic. Instead of writing to the governors why not simply ask your child to raise their hand in class and ask to remove their jumper? This is simply a school rule that every parent agreed too when their child joined the school, so whats the problem? The kids should be obeying the rules and not rebelling as has been suggested here already.its not as simple as that,when they start school we dont get told this so we havent agreed to let our son or daughter feel like there in ovens!
concerned, southampton says...
4:54pm Tue 13 May 08
paul b, says...
5:17pm Tue 13 May 08
bunny, hamble says...
5:21pm Tue 13 May 08
Not true wrote:how rude!hope your not my childs teacher,and yes a phone call would be very nice thank you.well phoned the school and if a child asks then it shouldnt be a promblem.
bunny wrote:yes its in the school prosperus website and parent newsletter --- guess you dont read or take account of the information sent to you,,,, perhaps we should ring each parents who agreeds to the school uniform to check they read itfred wrote: Talk about an over the top reaction, comparisons to torture etc are a bit melodramatic. Instead of writing to the governors why not simply ask your child to raise their hand in class and ask to remove their jumper? This is simply a school rule that every parent agreed too when their child joined the school, so whats the problem? The kids should be obeying the rules and not rebelling as has been suggested here already.its not as simple as that,when they start school we dont get told this so we havent agreed to let our son or daughter feel like there in ovens!
Pupil, totton says...
5:25pm Tue 13 May 08
Chrissy May, Southampton says...
5:33pm Tue 13 May 08
teacher, hounsdown says...
5:37pm Tue 13 May 08
concerned wrote:the water was only during lessons so we could ensure it was not running it was on at break and lunch and YES they are encouraged and as is clearly stated just not fizzy drinks in school.... I wish the parents that are so upset would join the school association and governors to change it if they feel so strongly but they dont and noone complaining above has applied to be a parent governor need I say more
I feel this story has been exagerated. All schools want children to wear full school uniform at all times but through the duration of the day I cannot accept that teachers would make these children keep their jumpers on if they are hot as it would obviously effect their ability to learn as they would be uncomfortable and irriatable and secondly the school would realise they would get bad press and absolute up-roar from most of the parents governors etc. In respect of the water as it is a problem that pupils are soaking others then the school should issue letters home to all parents to make them aware that the water supply has to be turned off during the school day as there have been incidents involving pupils, but the pupils should be allowed to bring in water in sports bottles as they are accepted in a lot of schools during these hot peaks.
quote
Realistic parent of hounsdown, hounsdown says...
5:42pm Tue 13 May 08
Bambi wrote:Its a black uniform after consultation with parents so it doesnt show the dirt ,,, now you want to change that fine join the school council ,,, too busy ,,,, then stop complaining
sotonian wrote:That \"black absorbs heat therefore black clothing makes you hot\" thing was debunked a while ago. All irrelevant, though, because a thick woollen jumper is gonna make you hot regardless of heat. The real point pug was making, and Suzi et al are failing quite spectacularly to grasp, is that - whilst unpleasant - is in no way \"torture\"Suzi wrote:don\'t the powers that be at Hounsdown realise that black absorbs heat and therefore would be hotter than a teachers light coloured clothing. Think of how hot a black car gets. Its not rocket science!! At my school the pupils don\'t have to wear their jumpers after easter. Progress.pug wrote: Less of the whining about \'human rights\' please. let\'s keep it in context: it\'s a school uniform issue, it\'s not like they\'re being waterboarded by sadists.No it\'s torture by those abusing their power and so yes it\'s human rights. Why don\'t you wear a thick black jumper all day and see if you can handle it. Idiot
Bambi, says...
5:47pm Tue 13 May 08
Realistic parent of hounsdown wrote:Either you've quoted the wrong post, or you've completely failed to understand what I've said. Which is it?
Bambi wrote:Its a black uniform after
sotonian wrote:That \"black absorbs heatSuzi wrote:don\'t the powers that be at Hounsdown
pug wrote: Less of the whining about \'human
rights\' please. let\'s keep it in context: it\'s a school uniform
issue, it\'s not like they\'re being waterboarded by sadists.
No it\'s torture by those abusing their power and so yes it\'s human
rights. Why don\'t you wear a thick black jumper all day and see if you
can handle it. Idiot
realise that black absorbs heat and therefore would be hotter than a
teachers light coloured clothing. Think of how hot a black car gets.
Its not rocket science!! At my school the pupils don\'t have to wear
their jumpers after easter. Progress.
therefore black clothing makes you hot\" thing was debunked a while
ago. All irrelevant, though, because a thick woollen jumper is gonna
make you hot regardless of heat. The real point pug was making, and
Suzi et al are failing quite spectacularly to grasp, is that - whilst
unpleasant - is in no way \"torture\"
consultation with parents so it doesnt show the dirt ,,, now you want
to change that fine join the school council ,,, too busy ,,,, then stop
complaining
are you servious, Eling says...
5:48pm Tue 13 May 08
bunny wrote:Yes sure they will ring 1200 parents got plenty of time to do that, just will not teach your children,,, are you serious. Previous writer was correct, the information is there you should read it as a parent I did and Im glad someone is standing up for the school, so easy to throw stones If you that bother become a school governor or join association if you dont like the rules but the way to change them ,,,
Not true wrote:how rude!hope your not my childs teacher,and yes a phone call would be very nice thank you.well phoned the school and if a child asks then it shouldnt be a promblem.bunny wrote:yes its in the school prosperus website and parent newsletter --- guess you dont read or take account of the information sent to you,,,, perhaps we should ring each parents who agreeds to the school uniform to check they read itfred wrote: Talk about an over the top reaction, comparisons to torture etc are a bit melodramatic. Instead of writing to the governors why not simply ask your child to raise their hand in class and ask to remove their jumper? This is simply a school rule that every parent agreed too when their child joined the school, so whats the problem? The kids should be obeying the rules and not rebelling as has been suggested here already.its not as simple as that,when they start school we dont get told this so we havent agreed to let our son or daughter feel like there in ovens!
Now some comment sense, hounsdown says...
6:00pm Tue 13 May 08
Pupil wrote:finally a pupil that confirms how much this has turned into a witch hunt - you can take your jumpers off -- you dont get detentions - thats for having the guts to tell these misinformed paretns the truth
Im a pupil at the school and to be honest you cant blame the teachers because they are just told what to do and dont make up the rules, thats the heads job. And in the summer the pupils dont ask to take there jumpers off they just do it but in the winter they have to ask and no one gets detentions for it.
paul b, says...
6:10pm Tue 13 May 08
bunny, hamble says...
7:00pm Tue 13 May 08
are you servious wrote:like i said i rung the school and yes they can take blazers of if they ask which im pleased about.i havent got a problem with the school its good!i cant beleave u took me serious about the phone call,and dont throw stones i do help out at the school
bunny wrote:Yes sure they will ring 1200 parents got plenty of time to do that, just will not teach your children,,, are you serious. Previous writer was correct, the information is there you should read it as a parent I did and Im glad someone is standing up for the school, so easy to throw stones If you that bother become a school governor or join association if you dont like the rules but the way to change them ,,,Not true wrote:how rude!hope your not my childs teacher,and yes a phone call would be very nice thank you.well phoned the school and if a child asks then it shouldnt be a promblem.bunny wrote:yes its in the school prosperus website and parent newsletter --- guess you dont read or take account of the information sent to you,,,, perhaps we should ring each parents who agreeds to the school uniform to check they read itfred wrote: Talk about an over the top reaction, comparisons to torture etc are a bit melodramatic. Instead of writing to the governors why not simply ask your child to raise their hand in class and ask to remove their jumper? This is simply a school rule that every parent agreed too when their child joined the school, so whats the problem? The kids should be obeying the rules and not rebelling as has been suggested here already.its not as simple as that,when they start school we dont get told this so we havent agreed to let our son or daughter feel like there in ovens!
Grandmother, says...
7:10pm Tue 13 May 08
John, Lyndhurst says...
7:22pm Tue 13 May 08
get the facts right wrote:The facts are that I sent an e-mail to the school last Thursday, as follows:
LET GET SOME FACTS RATHER THAN GOSSIP. I work at this school and yes the kids need to ask to take their jumpers off. THATS MANNERS REMEMBER THOSE However NEVER have I heard or seen a pupil refused, noone is ever given a detention who asks to take it off FACT. The taps where turned off during lesson time (not break or lunch) because the children left them running and earlier. Some children were not just spashing their faces but sooking others people walking passed and making water bombs. FACT Torture ? Human rights ? I suggest these people look up the meaning of the word you can not compaire this to Torture, get a life its nothing of the sort. Ask true victims how they feel, it nothing like what they have suffured. -- If this is the best new the Echo can make up from hearsay I feel sorry for the readers who believe it, check your facts first its like chinese whispers ...
Henry's Mate's Mate, henry Land says...
7:29pm Tue 13 May 08
Jannersaint, Plymuff says...
8:14pm Tue 13 May 08
Sue wrote:Amazing how a school jumper story can get to Policing issues!!
This is why our society is in such moral decline because nobody obeys rules/laws. Even the church people fail to obey basic laws like not riding on the pavement and not parking on yellow lines. They also fail to apologise when they are in the wrong. Rules/Laws are there for a purpose. It is teaching manners. What on earth is wrong with a student asking politely to remove their jumper? It is teaching basic social skills which many people do not have. It is teaching communication between student and adults. University students have no idea how to communicate with adults. Our society would be a better place if all laws were implemented. Sadly the police are no longer interested in upholding laws either.
Jannersaint, Plymuff says...
8:18pm Tue 13 May 08
Suzanne wrote:Not that I'd be looking for an argument with this school (I suppose I would though) but what if they did give your child detention. I'd be telling my child to not wear their jumper and I dare any teacher to tell me my child is in detention for it.
I spoke to the assistant head teacher yesterday about this problem and additionally they are expected to wear their jumpers at break times, lunchtimes, between classes and to and fro from school. I took my daughter to school yesterday and saw teachers wondering in with no jumpers just shirts and thin blouses at that. I think they should be made to conform to the same rules and see how long it takes for the union to step in!!
Jannersaint, Plymuff says...
8:21pm Tue 13 May 08
George wrote:George, look up "Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights".
Lucy wrote: George, I think you're going a bit overboard ! But I agree with Suzi, if I had to sit with sweatshirt on all day or especially outside it would play on my mind to the extreme. I wish I could watch you sit outside in a jumper for just half and hour and see how you feel and then go into a class and be expected to concentrate.It would be unpleasant, yes. But that does not constitute torture
George, says...
8:34pm Tue 13 May 08
Jannersaint wrote:Au contraire, I couldn't give a toss what the European Convention says. These guidelines are the same guidelines that prevent pictures of escaped dangerous criminals from being published as it "violates their human rights", so excuse me if I take them with a pinch of salt. Anyone who equates a dress code - albeit a stupid, pointless jobsworth of a dress code - with actual, real torture, is the exact sort of liberal pansy that's got this country into the state it's in now. If being forced to wear woolly jumpers is so tortuous, why have there never been any reports of evil dictators forcing their citizens to parade about in a Pringle? Is there an evil Axis of Cashmere around the corner, waiting to force us all to dress like studenty-alternative types?
George wrote:George, look up "Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights".
Lucy wrote: George, I think you're going a bit overboard ! But I agree with Suzi, if I had to sit with sweatshirt on all day or especially outside it would play on my mind to the extreme. I wish I could watch you sit outside in a jumper for just half and hour and see how you feel and then go into a class and be expected to concentrate.It would be unpleasant, yes. But that does not constitute torture
You don't have much of an argument regardless of your opinion.
Condor Man, Southampton says...
8:34pm Tue 13 May 08
SuzieD, Locks Heath says...
8:36pm Tue 13 May 08
get the facts right wrote:I hope you don't teach English to the students there - your spelling is terrible!!
LET GET SOME FACTS RATHER THAN GOSSIP. I work at this school and yes the kids need to ask to take their jumpers off. THATS MANNERS REMEMBER THOSE However NEVER have I heard or seen a pupil refused, noone is ever given a detention who asks to take it off FACT. The taps where turned off during lesson time (not break or lunch) because the children left them running and earlier. Some children were not just spashing their faces but sooking others people walking passed and making water bombs. FACT Torture ? Human rights ? I suggest these people look up the meaning of the word you can not compaire this to Torture, get a life its nothing of the sort. Ask true victims how they feel, it nothing like what they have suffured. -- If this is the best new the Echo can make up from hearsay I feel sorry for the readers who believe it, check your facts first its like chinese whispers ...
Pupil, Totton says...
9:19pm Tue 13 May 08
parent, totton says...
9:55pm Tue 13 May 08
nelly, soton says...
10:05pm Tue 13 May 08
Robert, says...
12:15am Wed 14 May 08
Ron Enderstick, says...
7:49am Wed 14 May 08
nelly wrote:Oh, that's beautiful, isn't it! The children have the decency not to complain, and how do you reward them? By destroying their literature. Good grief
havent heard one youngster moan,why dont we all take a leaf out of there books
Suzi, Lyndhurst says...
9:58am Wed 14 May 08
Condor Man wrote:The children you refer to in Blazers are usually at private school, no wonder they are employable due to the fact their parents can pay for them to go to university at £10,000 per annum!
Comfort? blimey, we've been living in Blair/Brown world for 11 years too long. Surely the most important issue is whether kids are educated. Rules are there to instill values. Look at the employment rates of young working class kids- it's risable. Those wearing blazers do much better because they are toughened up and can take on challenges in later life. This bunch of weeds and their no marks parents are only fit for the benefits queue.
Suzi, New Forest says...
10:07am Wed 14 May 08
get the facts right wrote:I phoned the school and spoke to the assistant head, SHE told me they HAVE to wear their jumpers unless the teacher says they can take it off. In break times, dinner hours and to and from school they MUST wear the jumpers. In the summer time the management decide if it is hot enough for the kids to take them off. Then and only then are the entire school allowed to not wear their jumpers.BUT they have to bring them in and from next term it's jumpers back on. SO....facts from the assistant head!!!
LET GET SOME FACTS RATHER THAN GOSSIP. I work at this school and yes the kids need to ask to take their jumpers off. THATS MANNERS REMEMBER THOSE However NEVER have I heard or seen a pupil refused, noone is ever given a detention who asks to take it off FACT. The taps where turned off during lesson time (not break or lunch) because the children left them running and earlier. Some children were not just spashing their faces but sooking others people walking passed and making water bombs. FACT Torture ? Human rights ? I suggest these people look up the meaning of the word you can not compaire this to Torture, get a life its nothing of the sort. Ask true victims how they feel, it nothing like what they have suffured. -- If this is the best new the Echo can make up from hearsay I feel sorry for the readers who believe it, check your facts first its like chinese whispers ...
Bemused, says...
10:11am Wed 14 May 08
kt, says...
11:58am Wed 14 May 08
Sally wrote:I completely agree, my child also attends Brookfield and I have had to fork out £50 on polo shirts with the logo on just to save my child from getting overheated in lessons!!
They also have this rule at Brookfield Community School in Locks Heath. The silly thing is, you're allowed to where one of their own logo polo shirts without a jumper, but if you where a blouse and tie you must always where a jumper. Wheres the sense in that!!!!!! How they expect the kids to concentrate I really don't know. I think these schools should be named and shamed into using common sense. Lets put the teachers in dentention with sweatshirts on and no windows open. What do you reckon?
milly, hamble says...
1:27pm Wed 14 May 08
Suzi wrote:hamble wear blazers thats not a private school and they all look very smart
Condor Man wrote: Comfort? blimey, we\'ve been living in Blair/Brown world for 11 years too long. Surely the most important issue is whether kids are educated. Rules are there to instill values. Look at the employment rates of young working class kids- it\'s risable. Those wearing blazers do much better because they are toughened up and can take on challenges in later life. This bunch of weeds and their no marks parents are only fit for the benefits queue.The children you refer to in Blazers are usually at private school, no wonder they are employable due to the fact their parents can pay for them to go to university at £10,000 per annum! Shame you weren\'t educated with common sense!
jem, says...
3:50pm Wed 14 May 08
PJM, says...
4:02pm Wed 14 May 08
jem wrote:So were you allowed to take your jumper/jacket off when you learnt to spell !!
Wot eye 'ave notissed on thiss diskushun is that no-wun kan spel, eavan the teechers. Praps thay Keppt there jumpers on at skule and it effected there consentrashion.
jem, says...
4:28pm Wed 14 May 08
PJM wrote:No, I went to a posh grammar school and wore a blazer. It was called a blazer 'cos if you put it on in this weather you caught fire!
jem wrote: Wot eye 'ave notissed on thiss diskushun is that no-wun kan spel, eavan the teechers. Praps thay Keppt there jumpers on at skule and it effected there consentrashion.So were you allowed to take your jumper/jacket off when you learnt to spell !!
Student of Hounsdown, Totton says...
4:35pm Wed 14 May 08
HAYLEY, BURSLEDON says...
5:11pm Wed 14 May 08
PJM wrote:I AGREE WITH PJM
jem wrote: Wot eye 'ave notissed on thiss diskushun is that no-wun kan spel, eavan the teechers. Praps thay Keppt there jumpers on at skule and it effected there consentrashion.So were you allowed to take your jumper/jacket off when you learnt to spell !!
john, Lyndhurst says...
5:18pm Wed 14 May 08
pupil, totton says...
5:32pm Wed 14 May 08
bemused, says...
5:58pm Wed 14 May 08
Student of Hounsdown wrote:Very well written pupil!!! My grandchild is at Hounsdown and until this week has never been told that the class could take their jumper off. I know of students who have now left who definitely did get detentions. Why do students have to get permissin to take their jumpers off at anytime of the year. Many time central heating is too hot on days in the rest of the year.
I am a student at Housndown school I must say the Daily Echo really has twisted a few words through out this report \"If students are caught with jumpers off without permission to take them off, they are given a detention,\" this isn\'t true; students are either told to put their jumper back on and ask, or they are able to keep it off but have to ask next time The student who came home feeling unwell is only in year 7 and the thing that the parents do not know is that end of May beginning of June, the summer rule is in force where students may go around with jumpers off, and the boys get the advantage of not having to wear their school tie, as long as shirts are tucked in. I know the weather recently has been rather warm, and that they should have enforced the summer rule, but temperatures are due to go down as we have some wet wether on the way. And yes the water taps were turned off for a small amount of time as students were wasting water, not by splashing it on their faces to cool down, but as a water fight. They were only switched off during lunch and during lessons and were on during the crossing to lessons with a member of staff stood by I am really annoyed with this rather false report that has been made, its not child torture, students are able to take their jumpers off with permission and some teachers will say as you come into the classroom, \"please take your jumpers off if you get too hot,\" which is reasonable as long as students put them back on again to look neat and tidy at the end of the lesson
PJM, 017-513 says...
6:02pm Wed 14 May 08
jem wrote:Excellent - good one Jem !!
PJM wrote:No, I went to a posh grammar school and wore a blazer. It was called a blazer 'cos if you put it on in this weather you caught fire!jem wrote: Wot eye 'ave notissed on thiss diskushun is that no-wun kan spel, eavan the teechers. Praps thay Keppt there jumpers on at skule and it effected there consentrashion.So were you allowed to take your jumper/jacket off when you learnt to spell !!
Chrissy May, Southampton says...
10:54am Thu 15 May 08
Pupil wrote:Out of the mouthes of babes and sucklings, Hounsdown is a good school and it appears that we all just like a good complain.
I am a pupil at hounsdown, and this report isnt really true. Teachers regularly say throughout lessons \"you may take your jumpers off if you would like to\" and the teachers enforce a new rule the same time every year saying that, aslong as shirts are tucked in and we still look neat, we are able to take them off without asking. Also; the taps were turned off briefly at the end of lunchtime as some people were having a water fight, and were drenched from head to toe, and had to then sit through the rest of the day in their P.E kits as they were so wet. Basically, i think that there are more important issues than the fact that someone cant be bothered to ask to take their jumper off.
Staff, Southampton says...
9:41pm Thu 15 May 08
Anon, Northern Ireland says...
7:08pm Fri 16 May 08
ohdear, close by says...
4:17pm Mon 19 May 08
Get over it, Totton says...
8:47pm Mon 19 May 08
you're all sooks, Sydney, Australia says...
2:55pm Sat 24 May 08
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Kirsty, West End, Soton says...
8:43am Tue 13 May 08