Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
6:00am Tuesday 3rd June 2008
DUTCH club Helmond Sport are digging their heels in on the release of Jan Poortvliet - until a compensation package for the new Saints head coach is settled.
The Dutch World Cup finalist was unveiled to the media as Nigel Pearson's replacement last Friday on a one-year rolling contract at St Mary's and he is due to begin work with Saints on June 20.
But Poortvliet later revealed to a Dutch newspaper that he has only at this stage signed a pre-contract agreement and a compensation fee has yet to be agreed with Helmond, which he is due to pay himself.
Although this has led to suggestions of a potential stalling of Poortvliet's arrival at St Mary's, Saints remain confident he will officially be the club's head coach on his scheduled starting date.
The Daily Echo understands that, though Helmond are reluctant to lose Poortvliet after he steered them into an unexpected play-off spot in the Eerste Divisie last season, the hitch centres on agreeing compensation rather than if the move to Saints will take place.
If push comes to a shove the fee will be decided by a Dutch FA arbitration panel and could at most amount to the full value of the year remaining on his two-year contract.
Full story in today's Daily Echo
ed, Just as well be on mars says...
7:15am Tue 3 Jun 08
Yorkie, Pocklington says...
7:40am Tue 3 Jun 08
Realist, says...
7:40am Tue 3 Jun 08
ed, Might as well be on mars says...
7:41am Tue 3 Jun 08
Steve, SaintsFanHidinginMal
ta says...
7:45am Tue 3 Jun 08
the totton scrutineer, TOTTON says...
8:04am Tue 3 Jun 08
John B, Bitterne says...
8:09am Tue 3 Jun 08
the totton scrutineer, TOTTON says...
8:10am Tue 3 Jun 08
Robbie, Fareham says...
8:29am Tue 3 Jun 08
couzzy, says...
8:48am Tue 3 Jun 08
Andy Andrews, Tunisia holiday/West End says...
8:52am Tue 3 Jun 08
NAPOLEAN SO LOW, MISSION CONTROL says...
8:57am Tue 3 Jun 08
Andy P, MILLBROOK says...
9:14am Tue 3 Jun 08
John B wrote:Give up you prized pratt,Lowe has not and never has had a clue on how to run a FC.
Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much money
Pensioner in Spain, says...
9:15am Tue 3 Jun 08
saintsdeservebetter, nativesotonian says...
9:16am Tue 3 Jun 08
alan, eastleigh says...
9:16am Tue 3 Jun 08
sd, soton says...
9:25am Tue 3 Jun 08
rational, says...
9:25am Tue 3 Jun 08
billy 2 baps, says...
9:27am Tue 3 Jun 08
John B wrote:John B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much money
Billy 2 Baps, says...
9:31am Tue 3 Jun 08
alan wrote:Happy to pay, he doesnt even know how many is lightly to cost..
Nice to see the anti RL lobby getting worked up over nothing - again. This is old news. Jan said at the outset he would be prepared to buy out his contract in Holland to join Saints. We should be celebrating the fact that someone wants to work for us!
Sentient, says...
9:37am Tue 3 Jun 08
Robbie wrote:...because the maximum compensation they can ask for is the amount remaining on his contract, quoted as being 2 years. I would imagine Poortvliet would know how much this is, before he committed to Saints.
But Poortvliet later revealed to a Dutch newspaper that he has only at this stage signed a pre-contract agreement and a compensation fee has yet to be agreed with Helmond, which he is due to pay himself. The Daily Echo understands that, though Helmond are reluctant to lose Poortvliet after he steered them into an unexpected play-off spot in the Eerste Divisie last season, the hitch centres on agreeing compensation rather than if the move to Saints will take place I don't know a lot about the football coaching market, but I would assume that Helmond will be able to demand a much higher severance package now that they know that Lowe and Wilde have touted this coaching pair as the new saviours of saints. This package is still being worked out. What happens now if the Dutchman says that the fee has now gone out of his reach, and that he can't afford it? If I was Helmond, looking at the English game and the money that the big clubs throw around, I would be rubbing my hands with glee. especially if Poortvliet has already done the photo shoot at St Marys. It's well known that when an English club knocks on the door of a foreign club to buy a player, the valuation of that player goes up dramatically, because they know clubs will pay it. WHy would coaches be different? It will be interesting to see how the current board spin this one to their advantage...
John B, Bitterne says...
9:42am Tue 3 Jun 08
billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated.
John B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
saintsdeservebetter, sotonborn says...
9:56am Tue 3 Jun 08
rational wrote:The notion that Jan would pay his own compensation is clearly ludicrous. This could easily mean that he is effeectively working for net zero income next season. If you can show otherwise by quoting some numbers, please do so.
Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.
Stuart, Hamble says...
9:59am Tue 3 Jun 08
Sentient, says...
10:11am Tue 3 Jun 08
saintsdeservebetter wrote:Why is it ludicrous? He's been quoted as agreeing to it. If he's been upfront for, say, a 4 year contract, all he will do is repay unearned income i.e. max. 2 year's salary. He's not going to be out of pocket; he didn;t earn it in the first place.
rational wrote: Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.The notion that Jan would pay his own compensation is clearly ludicrous. This could easily mean that he is effeectively working for net zero income next season. If you can show otherwise by quoting some numbers, please do so. Also to be taken into the overall equation is the matter of how much Lowe and Wilde will be paying themselves. The market rate for running a medium size business is around £75k each. At this level it would likely realise savings over previous incumbents that could have been put into the package for a manager/coach with a good track record, whether Nigel Pearson or someone else.
Bobby, Stoke says...
10:13am Tue 3 Jun 08
rational, says...
10:13am Tue 3 Jun 08
saintsdeservebetter wrote:I cannot give real numbers, as I am only reading the same news reports as everyone else. In these, JP says he will pay it, as do the club.
rational wrote: Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.The notion that Jan would pay his own compensation is clearly ludicrous. This could easily mean that he is effeectively working for net zero income next season. If you can show otherwise by quoting some numbers, please do so. Also to be taken into the overall equation is the matter of how much Lowe and Wilde will be paying themselves. The market rate for running a medium size business is around £75k each. At this level it would likely realise savings over previous incumbents that could have been put into the package for a manager/coach with a good track record, whether Nigel Pearson or someone else.
Itchen to Reply, Southampton says...
10:44am Tue 3 Jun 08
Andy P, MILLBROOK says...
10:58am Tue 3 Jun 08
Itchen to Reply wrote:Sums Lowe and his type up,wait until someones back is turnt and stab.
Good old Rupert the bear. You will finish this great club of ours off forever. The 'mess' you came back to is the mess you created in the first place! Don't forget that. Has anyone else heard that Lowe and Wilde did not have the decency to inform Nigel Pearson personally that he was no longer manager? Pearson told Sky Sports from Malta, where he is on holiday he only found out through them. What a bloody disgrace, and very poor management skills. Rupert Lowe and Co you should be ashamed of yourselves. Drag yourselves down but don't drag our team through the mire with you!
saint, southampton says...
10:59am Tue 3 Jun 08
djames20, Southampton says...
11:06am Tue 3 Jun 08
alan wrote:
Nice to see the anti RL lobby getting worked up over nothing - again. This is old news. Jan said at the outset he would be prepared to buy out his contract in Holland to join Saints. We should be celebrating the fact that someone wants to work for us!
Vijay Kumar, Copnor, Portsmouth says...
11:14am Tue 3 Jun 08
A proper fan of the club I love, with the chairman everyone detests says...
11:19am Tue 3 Jun 08
Well Done Rupert, from Billy Badger says...
11:34am Tue 3 Jun 08
rational, says...
11:40am Tue 3 Jun 08
Itchen to Reply wrote:No, I had not heard that NP was only told by Sky Sports.
Good old Rupert the bear. You will finish this great club of ours off forever. The 'mess' you came back to is the mess you created in the first place! Don't forget that. Has anyone else heard that Lowe and Wilde did not have the decency to inform Nigel Pearson personally that he was no longer manager? Pearson told Sky Sports from Malta, where he is on holiday he only found out through them. What a bloody disgrace, and very poor management skills. Rupert Lowe and Co you should be ashamed of yourselves. Drag yourselves down but don't drag our team through the mire with you!
Mark, says...
11:52am Tue 3 Jun 08
Saint, says...
11:56am Tue 3 Jun 08
alan wrote:Yes he wants to buy out his contract, as he is in the lower leagues of the Dutch leagues, and now been presented with a chance to move up into the English league with a championship side. This is a massive step up and even bigger gamble. As this guy has spent years doing nothing really in the lower leagues of the Dutch league.
Nice to see the anti RL lobby getting worked up over nothing - again. This is old news. Jan said at the outset he would be prepared to buy out his contract in Holland to join Saints. We should be celebrating the fact that someone wants to work for us!
Roger, says...
12:06pm Tue 3 Jun 08
the watcher, The Penthouse, Ocena Boulevard says...
12:08pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Robbie, Fareham says...
12:15pm Tue 3 Jun 08
David Neville Smith, Poole says...
12:17pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Pensioner in Spain wrote:An excellent record?
Why are their so many negative comments about Poortvliet and his team? he hasn\'t started yet!!with respect to NP, Portvliet has a long and excellent record, everyone has to be patient and judge him by Christmas or to the end of the season. Professional Football is a business and has to operate correctly and efficently, success breeds success and it needs profit, Southampton FC have always tried to operate this way, there is no bottomless pit and everyone knows that a Bank will only support a Client to an agreed limit,SFC are no exception, so lets all be optimistic and support SFC with Lowe and the Board, it\'s new Coaching Team and wish them the very best of luck
Robbie, Fareham says...
12:20pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Robbie, Fareham says...
12:42pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Steve, says...
1:05pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Robbie wrote:Erm, yes they are. Perhaps you should look more carefully before accusing people of things!
I see my posts aren\'t making it on here again. No swearing, no abuse, just an attempt at an argument. TVM daily echo. Censorship lives on....
rational, says...
1:08pm Tue 3 Jun 08
dainowel wrote:That's what I like about posting on here - good reasoned debate!
rational wrote: Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.Straight from the horses mouth is it?How much do you get paid for your drivel? Why dont you go away and leave this club alone oh and take your lord and master Lowe with you. You are a prat.
saintsdeservebetter, says...
1:10pm Tue 3 Jun 08
rational wrote:I read he is likely to have to pay the one year left on his contract so on that basis, for the first year, he will be no better off.
saintsdeservebetter wrote:I cannot give real numbers, as I am only reading the same news reports as everyone else. In these, JP says he will pay it, as do the club. If it helps you, I can make some numbers up. If we are offering, say £100k per year, and he is currently on £50k, he\'s better off, isn\'t he? Add to that the fact that here he will have substantial success bonuses, so success will be what pays the bills.rational wrote: Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.The notion that Jan would pay his own compensation is clearly ludicrous. This could easily mean that he is effeectively working for net zero income next season. If you can show otherwise by quoting some numbers, please do so. Also to be taken into the overall equation is the matter of how much Lowe and Wilde will be paying themselves. The market rate for running a medium size business is around £75k each. At this level it would likely realise savings over previous incumbents that could have been put into the package for a manager/coach with a good track record, whether Nigel Pearson or someone else.
swissaint, Basel, Switzerland says...
1:13pm Tue 3 Jun 08
rational, says...
1:26pm Tue 3 Jun 08
saintsdeservebetter wrote:No intention to 'side step' any question. But not my place to offer numbers anyway. What I do know is that Lowe cut all Director salaries on relegation, also that these increased after Lowe left.
rational wrote:I read he is likely to have to pay the one year left on his contract so on that basis, for the first year, he will be no better off. He may well however be getting a good relocation package which will ease the burden and incidentally is an added cost to the club. His cost of house rental would be in the region of £50k per year. The existence of bonuses is a bit of a red herring. A bonus scheme is only effective as an incitement when you have a reasonable chance of earning it. Based on the football vision statements coming out of the club, Jan's bonus will rest on the shoulders (ok, feet) of what he calls 'kids'. He will realise that chances of additional earnings here are extremely slight. Overall, you must feel the poor man is desperate to have a job where all his peers will be earning considerably more than him. Perhaps his advancing years and failure to succeed in Holland have something to do with it. I note you side stepped the question of the Lowe/Wilde salaries. Would you care to offer any numbers there as to what would be reasonable?saintsdeservebetter wrote:I cannot give real numbers, as I am only reading the same news reports as everyone else. In these, JP says he will pay it, as do the club. If it helps you, I can make some numbers up. If we are offering, say £100k per year, and he is currently on £50k, he\'s better off, isn\'t he? Add to that the fact that here he will have substantial success bonuses, so success will be what pays the bills.rational wrote: Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.The notion that Jan would pay his own compensation is clearly ludicrous. This could easily mean that he is effeectively working for net zero income next season. If you can show otherwise by quoting some numbers, please do so. Also to be taken into the overall equation is the matter of how much Lowe and Wilde will be paying themselves. The market rate for running a medium size business is around £75k each. At this level it would likely realise savings over previous incumbents that could have been put into the package for a manager/coach with a good track record, whether Nigel Pearson or someone else.
tobie, London says...
1:37pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Billy 2 Baps, says...
2:19pm Tue 3 Jun 08
John B wrote:Ok John I'll keep it simple, as I'm igornant and not very sensible.
billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
bored, says...
2:33pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Billy 2 Baps wrote:I need a new shivel, and wouldn't mind a larger one!
John B wrote:Ok John I'll keep it simple, as I'm igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn't pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
alpine_saint, Soton says...
2:33pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Barnacle Bill, somewhere on the high seas says...
2:37pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Saint, says...
2:39pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Billy 2 Baps wrote:You will never win with this guy! He has all the answers and thinks most if not all Saints fans have it wrong, and should be shown the light by him.
John B wrote:Ok John I'll keep it simple, as I'm igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn't pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
saintsfc, Southampton says...
2:43pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Barnacle Bill wrote:Please don't use bold type. What you have got to say is not that important!
Every one knew that Rupert Lowe's return would divide our club once more. There was great unity at the end of last season and it has all evaporated in a matter of weeks and we all know why. I put it on record now that we will be playing division one football next season. Remember Lowe told Redknapp that he had to use the youngsters to help stave of relegation from the Premiership and one of England's best managers failed. If anyone thinks that a couple of Dutchman with no experience of Championship football can save us then they are living in cloud cuckoo land. If another one of these demented loons tell me to be positive and get behind the team I shall scream. For gooness sake wake up and smell the coffee. The only reason we have these two Dutchman is because every possible candidate with an iota of sense would have withdrawn their application the moment they realised what Lowe expected. We have got them because they are cheap and they have no idea what they are letting themselves in for. If Lowe sacked Pearson then I think he did him a blo*dy great favour and if Helmond Sport refuse to release Jan Poortvliet they would have done him a blo*dy great favour as well.
John B, Bitterne says...
2:44pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Billy 2 Baps wrote:Calling Somebody a Pratt is rude.
John B wrote:Ok John I'll keep it simple, as I'm igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn't pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
Solent Saint, Netley says...
2:50pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Andy P wrote:Andy P, why don't you head off with the rest of the anti Rupert brigade to Eastleigh as promised and leave us true Saints fans to await and see what happens. Rupert is here to stay and rules ok. Put-up or shut-up.
Itchen to Reply wrote: Good old Rupert the bear. You will finish this great club of ours off forever. The 'mess' you came back to is the mess you created in the first place! Don't forget that. Has anyone else heard that Lowe and Wilde did not have the decency to inform Nigel Pearson personally that he was no longer manager? Pearson told Sky Sports from Malta, where he is on holiday he only found out through them. What a bloody disgrace, and very poor management skills. Rupert Lowe and Co you should be ashamed of yourselves. Drag yourselves down but don't drag our team through the mire with you!Sums Lowe and his type up,wait until someones back is turnt and stab. Lowe waiting until Pearson was on holiday before telling him,Lowe why dont you try and grow some BALLS man.
John B, Bitterne says...
3:00pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Saint wrote:Yes I do think a large number of Saints Fans should accept that Lowe is here and not everything he does is wrong that would be statistically impossible.
Billy 2 Baps wrote:You will never win with this guy! He has all the answers and thinks most if not all Saints fans have it wrong, and should be shown the light by him.John B wrote:Ok John I'll keep it simple, as I'm igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn't pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
Robert J, says...
3:26pm Tue 3 Jun 08
rational, says...
3:28pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Robert J wrote:No he's not!
What RL tried saving is now paying on top/double for his incompetence!
m oates, says...
3:44pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Telling It How It Is, St Marys Boardroom says...
3:56pm Tue 3 Jun 08
John B, Bitterne says...
3:59pm Tue 3 Jun 08
m oates wrote:Perhaps you should write directly to them or write a letter to the Echo because I would be interested in the answers.
As a supporter for 50 years ,I rarely put pen to paper. But would like to make the following comments,which are valid considering the same directors are back in. 1]When Saints were in the premiership,why did the board appoint unknown managers and then fire them before they had chance to prove themselves? 2]Why did Lowe want to take on the positions of executive and non executive director ? 3]Why did Saints sell all their best players when they were relegated despite the parachute payments? 4]What will happen to the young players which the dream team develop,will they immediately be sold off at cheap prices without waiting for them to develop properly and assist the team with promotion. These are just a few of the questions I would have for the new board. Will they reply? Signed Supporter from France
Saint, says...
4:09pm Tue 3 Jun 08
John B wrote:Look, I think you miss the point with most Saint fans you get in disscussion on here with, and you are most certainly miss guided and gullible. No one has said Lowe gets everything wrong.
Saint wrote:Yes I do think a large number of Saints Fans should accept that Lowe is here and not everything he does is wrong that would be statistically impossible. I dont think this Jan has much experience but I think the only way forward is to use our young player the likes of Powell Thomas Viafare BWP Makin Lka Skacel have not been successful and cost us loads of money. I just dont see anyway forward with a huge infux of cashBilly 2 Baps wrote:You will never win with this guy! He has all the answers and thinks most if not all Saints fans have it wrong, and should be shown the light by him.John B wrote:Ok John I\'ll keep it simple, as I\'m igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn\'t pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
saintsdeservebetter, says...
4:55pm Tue 3 Jun 08
rational wrote:Optimism is good - especially when laced with a good deal of realism.
saintsdeservebetter wrote:No intention to 'side step' any question. But not my place to offer numbers anyway. What I do know is that Lowe cut all Director salaries on relegation, also that these increased after Lowe left. Your figure of £50k for house rental is interesting. Not sure why this amount, or why for a year. You seem to have a lot more inside knowlege of such things than me. I would suppose that he is on more here than in Holland, so any increase is just that, so even if he has to pay back a year of his old salary he is not working for free. As for his record, I did note a number of promotions listed among the clubs he managed (and also for Wotte). Not sure if that is what you mean by 'failure to succeed'. Of course, many fans currently seem to feel that success involves dropping into the relegation zone, only to survive on the final day when other results go our way. I reserve the right to be optimistic!rational wrote:I read he is likely to have to pay the one year left on his contract so on that basis, for the first year, he will be no better off. He may well however be getting a good relocation package which will ease the burden and incidentally is an added cost to the club. His cost of house rental would be in the region of £50k per year. The existence of bonuses is a bit of a red herring. A bonus scheme is only effective as an incitement when you have a reasonable chance of earning it. Based on the football vision statements coming out of the club, Jan's bonus will rest on the shoulders (ok, feet) of what he calls 'kids'. He will realise that chances of additional earnings here are extremely slight. Overall, you must feel the poor man is desperate to have a job where all his peers will be earning considerably more than him. Perhaps his advancing years and failure to succeed in Holland have something to do with it. I note you side stepped the question of the Lowe/Wilde salaries. Would you care to offer any numbers there as to what would be reasonable?saintsdeservebetter wrote:I cannot give real numbers, as I am only reading the same news reports as everyone else. In these, JP says he will pay it, as do the club. If it helps you, I can make some numbers up. If we are offering, say £100k per year, and he is currently on £50k, he\'s better off, isn\'t he? Add to that the fact that here he will have substantial success bonuses, so success will be what pays the bills.rational wrote: Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.The notion that Jan would pay his own compensation is clearly ludicrous. This could easily mean that he is effeectively working for net zero income next season. If you can show otherwise by quoting some numbers, please do so. Also to be taken into the overall equation is the matter of how much Lowe and Wilde will be paying themselves. The market rate for running a medium size business is around £75k each. At this level it would likely realise savings over previous incumbents that could have been put into the package for a manager/coach with a good track record, whether Nigel Pearson or someone else.
1098, sms says...
5:14pm Tue 3 Jun 08
rational wrote:Yeah promotion on a par with a tyro league side D.F.
saintsdeservebetter wrote:No intention to \'side step\' any question. But not my place to offer numbers anyway. What I do know is that Lowe cut all Director salaries on relegation, also that these increased after Lowe left. Your figure of £50k for house rental is interesting. Not sure why this amount, or why for a year. You seem to have a lot more inside knowlege of such things than me. I would suppose that he is on more here than in Holland, so any increase is just that, so even if he has to pay back a year of his old salary he is not working for free. As for his record, I did note a number of promotions listed among the clubs he managed (and also for Wotte). Not sure if that is what you mean by \'failure to succeed\'. Of course, many fans currently seem to feel that success involves dropping into the relegation zone, only to survive on the final day when other results go our way. I reserve the right to be optimistic!rational wrote:I read he is likely to have to pay the one year left on his contract so on that basis, for the first year, he will be no better off. He may well however be getting a good relocation package which will ease the burden and incidentally is an added cost to the club. His cost of house rental would be in the region of £50k per year. The existence of bonuses is a bit of a red herring. A bonus scheme is only effective as an incitement when you have a reasonable chance of earning it. Based on the football vision statements coming out of the club, Jan\'s bonus will rest on the shoulders (ok, feet) of what he calls \'kids\'. He will realise that chances of additional earnings here are extremely slight. Overall, you must feel the poor man is desperate to have a job where all his peers will be earning considerably more than him. Perhaps his advancing years and failure to succeed in Holland have something to do with it. I note you side stepped the question of the Lowe/Wilde salaries. Would you care to offer any numbers there as to what would be reasonable?saintsdeservebetter wrote:I cannot give real numbers, as I am only reading the same news reports as everyone else. In these, JP says he will pay it, as do the club. If it helps you, I can make some numbers up. If we are offering, say £100k per year, and he is currently on £50k, he\\\'s better off, isn\\\'t he? Add to that the fact that here he will have substantial success bonuses, so success will be what pays the bills.rational wrote: Everyone just chill! This is not a debacle. The fact that he signed a pre-contract agreement clearly shows that Lowe knew he was still contracted to Helmond, otherwise it would have been a full contract agreement. JP has agreed to pay his own compensation, so if his old club try asking for more, it costs us nothing. Plus, as the article states, it will go to tribunal with maximum compensation levels. There is much that is positive about these appointments. The fact that they are on low basics with big incentives for success is something we surely all must appreciate. If only all players could be paid that way as well. Most of last season we were screaming for youngsters to come in to the first team. With no full backs for most of the year, why were the young guns not even on the bench? Lancashire never got a look in, even when we had only one fit CB. Basseya has been superb, a big, strong striker to support the talented but inactive John? Only McGoldrick got the odd 5 or 10 minutes and Lallana as sub in the last 2 games. Give it a chance.The notion that Jan would pay his own compensation is clearly ludicrous. This could easily mean that he is effeectively working for net zero income next season. If you can show otherwise by quoting some numbers, please do so. Also to be taken into the overall equation is the matter of how much Lowe and Wilde will be paying themselves. The market rate for running a medium size business is around £75k each. At this level it would likely realise savings over previous incumbents that could have been put into the package for a manager/coach with a good track record, whether Nigel Pearson or someone else.
Billy 2 Baps, says...
5:44pm Tue 3 Jun 08
John B wrote:Calling Somebody a Pratt is rude.
Billy 2 Baps wrote:Calling Somebody a Pratt is rude. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. Yes but with lots of money which SFC do not or did not have but he got us relegated. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the English game. How do you know the Dutch people no nothing about the English Game British TV is in every home in Holland Like Wenger can bring in good youngsters from their own country. I think Wenger and Fergusson are only still there because they are successful you only have to look at Newcastle Spurs and Man City to see managers being sacked because of the lack of Success. 3 Lowes Record for sacking managers is not bad as you suggest Jones was under a lot of pressure outside football and I think getting rid of him was the correct decision Hoddle left to go to Spurs. Gray was the wrong Appointment and should have been sacked . Strachan left for family reasons. Sturrock was not acceptable to the players and left by mutual consent. Wigley was unlucky with injuries and probably had to go. Redknapp was a disaster and took us down he was not sacked but returned to Pompey 4. Burley as you say took us to the Play Offs but do you think his judgement with the players he brought in was very good he also in similar circumstances took Ipswich down. 5. Yes we are both Saints fans with different points of view but please do not call people Pratts it upsets them just write your thoughts as you have now done and we can discuss them.John B wrote:Ok John I\'ll keep it simple, as I\'m igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn\'t pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
billy 2 baps, says...
5:50pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Saint wrote:Thank You Excellent points, well put
John B wrote:Look, I think you miss the point with most Saint fans you get in disscussion on here with, and you are most certainly miss guided and gullible. No one has said Lowe gets everything wrong. As to unsuccessful players, I most certainly can not agree with you with regards to Viafara and Licka. Possibly also Thomas. You also unfair about Makin, who has hardly played. As to costing us loads of money, well you might find your wrong on this too. As to using younger players ...yes. Though they need quality around them to develope, or they could just as easily be lost. This is a big gamble, and more so with a lower Dutch league coach who has done nothing really to date. Most fans have reservation about this, and rightly so. We all hope it works, though you seem to be happy to risk all, even if we end up in another relegation fight. Remenber other clubs know we will be using young talent, and behind close doors, they be telling there teams to scare the crap out of them! As to your post further up about manangers leaving. Yes you quote pretty much all as what was given at the time as an explanantion. Though you fail to understand that this was the polictical answer given to the media. Most could not continue with the restraintes Lowe put on them or lack of backing. For example Strachen would most likely stayed after the F.A cup if he got the finacial support he was hoping to get to take Saints onto the next level. Lowe failed and he left, like others before and after him. I am trying very hard to accept that you are a real Saints fan who gose to the games, and not just read papers. Please sometimes take time out to see what Saints fans are trying to say, and you may find another side to everything, because you seem to argue points out all the time with what I can see as only passionate and loyal Saints fans. With pride (dentented at the moment) and positive hopes and desires and dreams!Saint wrote:Yes I do think a large number of Saints Fans should accept that Lowe is here and not everything he does is wrong that would be statistically impossible. I dont think this Jan has much experience but I think the only way forward is to use our young player the likes of Powell Thomas Viafare BWP Makin Lka Skacel have not been successful and cost us loads of money. I just dont see anyway forward with a huge infux of cashBilly 2 Baps wrote:You will never win with this guy! He has all the answers and thinks most if not all Saints fans have it wrong, and should be shown the light by him.John B wrote:Ok John I\\\'ll keep it simple, as I\\\'m igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn\\\'t pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
David Crook, Yorkshire says...
6:50pm Tue 3 Jun 08
John B, Bitterne says...
6:58pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Billy 2 Baps wrote:First of all I did not call you ignorant
John B wrote:Calling Somebody a Pratt is rude. Indeed which is why i did not call you one. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. Yes but with lots of money which SFC do not or did not have but he got us relegated. I thought it is was Lowes mis management,as he was running the club and the selling of our better players. But of course this was nothing to do with Rupert 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the English game. How do you know the Dutch people no nothing about the English Game British TV is in every home in Holland Like Wenger can bring in good youngsters from their own country. Great so from watching TV, he will have an excellent understanding. And he\'s no Wenger is he? I think our budget might me a lttle smaller for bringing players, don\'t you. I think Wenger and Fergusson are only still there because they are successful you only have to look at Newcastle Spurs and Man City to see managers being sacked because of the lack of Success. Look at the clubs you list, they fire managers at least once a year. Sir Alex won nothing for 3 years. I rest my case... 3 Lowes Record for sacking managers is not bad as you suggest Jones was under a lot of pressure outside football and I think getting rid of him was the correct decision. Lowe\'s treatment of Jones was awful, Jones wanted to stay at the club. Hoddle left to go to Spurs. Agreed, written into his contract, we know that. Gray was the wrong Appointment and should have been sacked . Appointed by Lowe, i think that answers that one. Strachan left for family reasons. Rubbish Stractan wanted more money after the cup final to build, Lowe would not agree to this. Sturrock was not acceptable to the players and left by mutual consent. So who runs the club then, the players??? He\'s gone on to be a good manager Wigley was unlucky with injuries and probably had to go. The cheap choice appointed by Lowe Redknapp was a disaster and took us down he was not sacked but returned to Pompey. Because he was no allowed to manager, as he wanted. He was told by a player in training that Crouch was on his way to Liverpool. 4. Burley as you say took us to the Play Offs but do you think his judgement with the players he brought in was very good he also in similar circumstances took Ipswich down. Now the new Scotland manager, he must be rubbish then. All the above appointments make by Lowe and no longer with us, Would does that tell us. 5. Yes we are both Saints fans with different points of view but please do not call people Pratts it upsets them just write your thoughts as you have now done and we can discuss them. When did i call you a prat, although i guess its ok for you to call me igornant and not very sensible. Full of double standards, please see below. Anyone for JCBBilly 2 Baps wrote:Calling Somebody a Pratt is rude. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. Yes but with lots of money which SFC do not or did not have but he got us relegated. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the English game. How do you know the Dutch people no nothing about the English Game British TV is in every home in Holland Like Wenger can bring in good youngsters from their own country. I think Wenger and Fergusson are only still there because they are successful you only have to look at Newcastle Spurs and Man City to see managers being sacked because of the lack of Success. 3 Lowes Record for sacking managers is not bad as you suggest Jones was under a lot of pressure outside football and I think getting rid of him was the correct decision Hoddle left to go to Spurs. Gray was the wrong Appointment and should have been sacked . Strachan left for family reasons. Sturrock was not acceptable to the players and left by mutual consent. Wigley was unlucky with injuries and probably had to go. Redknapp was a disaster and took us down he was not sacked but returned to Pompey 4. Burley as you say took us to the Play Offs but do you think his judgement with the players he brought in was very good he also in similar circumstances took Ipswich down. 5. Yes we are both Saints fans with different points of view but please do not call people Pratts it upsets them just write your thoughts as you have now done and we can discuss them.John B wrote:Ok John I\\\'ll keep it simple, as I\\\'m igornant and not very sensible. 1. Look at what Redknapp has done without Lowe around. One of the best English players in the present game today. I think the reason Harry left you will find was Mr Lowe. 2. I never said we needed an English manager, just a manager who understands the english game. We all know how cut throat the Champoinship can be. If Lowe had pucked a manager from the conference, would you be happy. At least he may of heard of some of our players. 3. Look at the most successful teams in recent years, Arsenal & Man U. The major reason they have won so much silverware. An understanding chairman who stood by their managers. Something our Mr Lowe might want to think about in the futher. How many managers is it now? 4. Burley as you say, couldn\\\'t pick a decent team, yet we were very nearly promoted. 5. Could you explain where I was rude to you in my first post. I was just stating some hard facts. Talking of which please see above. 6. We are both Saints fans with different points of view. 7. Do you need a bigger shivel?billy 2 baps wrote:Well Redknapp knows the Leagues and Players got us relegated. Burley knows the Leagues and Players but could not pick a decent one. Pearson knows the Leagues and Players very nearly got us relegated. I think we should try something. Being rude to me does not show you to be a sensible person and makes you appear ignorant. English Managers do not appear to very successful looking at Man U Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool Spurs the only successful one appears to be HarryJohn B wrote: Saints are in exactly the same situation as was the case with Burley and Scotland and numerous other managerial moves. Crouch said he wanted Burley to stay with SFC but of course everything was resolved in a couple of days. I except the same will happen here and Jan will be with us soon. I know this story will give the Anti-Lowe Brigade a good chance to rant but their only alternative appears to be Nigel Pearson who is probably over rated and wants too much moneyJohn B,what about the alternative of a manager who knows this league or even English football in general. What about a manager who may of seen us play. What about a manager who has list of players he can bring there on a free or loan, the likes of Wright & Perry. Start thinking about other alternatives, and stop looking up Lowes backside. Scotland did not show their new manager off until the ALL paperwork was signed. Admit it,its a **** up and you know it. You have nailed your flag, so must feel you have to go along with this balls up. ,
Billy 2 Baps, says...
6:58pm Tue 3 Jun 08
David Crook wrote:This is one fan happy to eat his words, if it goes well. But would you do likewise, if it blows up in our faces?
Watch this space for next season,Jan will be a sensation for Saints,all of you might have to eat your words of what you have said about Lowe,Wilde and Jan. Lets all stick together on this one. Come on Jan and your super saints,make us great again. Saints for ever David Crook
David Crook, Yorkshire says...
7:09pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Billy 2 Baps wrote:Dear Billy 2 Baps,
David Crook wrote: Watch this space for next season,Jan will be a sensation for Saints,all of you might have to eat your words of what you have said about Lowe,Wilde and Jan. Lets all stick together on this one. Come on Jan and your super saints,make us great again. Saints for ever David CrookThis is one fan happy to eat his words, if it goes well. But would you do likewise, if it blows up in our faces?
tom mcloughlin, london says...
7:31pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Andy P, MILLBROOK says...
7:44pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Solent Saint wrote:Behave,divvy.
Andy P wrote:Andy P, why don't you head off with the rest of the anti Rupert brigade to Eastleigh as promised and leave us true Saints fans to await and see what happens. Rupert is here to stay and rules ok. Put-up or shut-up.Itchen to Reply wrote: Good old Rupert the bear. You will finish this great club of ours off forever. The 'mess' you came back to is the mess you created in the first place! Don't forget that. Has anyone else heard that Lowe and Wilde did not have the decency to inform Nigel Pearson personally that he was no longer manager? Pearson told Sky Sports from Malta, where he is on holiday he only found out through them. What a bloody disgrace, and very poor management skills. Rupert Lowe and Co you should be ashamed of yourselves. Drag yourselves down but don't drag our team through the mire with you!Sums Lowe and his type up,wait until someones back is turnt and stab. Lowe waiting until Pearson was on holiday before telling him,Lowe why dont you try and grow some BALLS man.
Fly on the Wall, Ruperts Office says...
8:38pm Tue 3 Jun 08
the totton scrutineer, TOTTON says...
9:10pm Tue 3 Jun 08
The Fool, tom mcloughlins House says...
9:44pm Tue 3 Jun 08
tom mcloughlin wrote:You Fool
the thing you must remember folks is that Rupert Lowe or Michael Wilde do not have a commercial clue about doing business. God help you all!!!! tom319@btinternet.co m
emma head, lymington says...
9:46pm Tue 3 Jun 08
Kimbo, says...
12:17am Wed 4 Jun 08
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Lowe Out, says...
7:07am Tue 3 Jun 08
LOWE & WILDE OUT