News RSS Feed


Living Mobile news, sport and travel from the Daily Echo Read Chief Superintendent Matthew Greening's Blog Tweet with the Daily Echo

Benjamin Vine and Alex Farrelly must serve 12 years for killing of William Wickham


TWO teenagers were jailed for life today for killing a man in the grounds of a Hampshire church.

Benjamin Vine, 17, and Alex Farrelly, 16, both from Gosport, were ordered to serve a minimum of 12 years after admitting the ''wicked, brutal and cowardly'' murder of William Wickham on February 25.

Mr Wickham was kicked to death by the pair who had drunk 20 bottles of Stella Artois lager between them.

Farrelly, then aged just 15, had started the attack by hitting the 44-year-old with a bottle, knocking him to the ground, Winchester Crown Court heard.

The pair then kicked him as if they were ''playing football'' with his head with Vine, then aged 16, stamping on his head with such force that the print from his trainers was imprinted in his face.

Mr Wickham, 44, of South Street, Gosport, died from 27 separate injuries suffered in the attack at Holy Trinity Church, Gosport. They included a fractured larynx, nose and left cheekbone.

Click below to see a video of today's headlines in sixty seconds

The judge, Mr Justice Butterfield said: ''This was a wicked, brutal, cowardly and senseless killing.

''Your victim, sadly an alcoholic, slight in built and very affected by drink, posed no threat to you two lads.

''I reject as incredible that you were in fear of an attack by him.

''You were both drunk, you were both aggressive, you both attacked him because he annoyed you or you intended to rob him or as a drunken sport.

''This was a ferocious attack, you beat him to death.''

The court heard that less than £5 in change and a set of house keys were stolen by the defendants from the victim's body as he lay unconscious after the attack.

Nicholas Haggan QC, prosecuting, said a woman who witnessed the attack initially thought that the two boys were ''playing football with a lampshade''.

He said that only as the witness got closer that she realised it was Mr Wickham's head being kicked back and forth between the pair.

Mr Justice Butterfield lifted reporting restrictions so that the two boys, who pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing, could be named by the Daily Echo because of the ''overwhelming public interest'' in the case.

David Whitehouse, defending Farrelly, told the court that his client suffered from dyslexia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and who has a low IQ, had become involved in violence as he struggled in school.

The court heard that Farrelly and Vine, now 17, had been convicted previously of offences of assault causing actual bodily harm and of battery.

These convictions included the violent bullying of other pupils outside the school gates, the court heard.

Mr Whitehouse added that Farrelly, who was remorseful for the killing, was taunted by other pupils because of his education special needs and started to truant and became violent and objectionable to his classmates and to teachers.

Michael Hubbard, representing Vine, said that his client, a promising footballer, had started to get into trouble as he got involved in cigarettes, alcohol and cannabis.

Saying that his client was also remorseful, he added: ''He is a young man who up to the age of 14 had all things positive going for him.

''He was a keen sportsman - at the age of 14 it was thought he would qualify for football trials for Portsmouth (Football Club), he was that good.

''What led him from football was starting to smoke, he wasn't fit, the smoking, the cannabis, the alcohol led the descent into crime.''

Detective Sergeant Philip Bateman, from Hampshire Police’s major crime unit, welcomed today’s jail terms.

He said: “These sentences are the conclusion to the process that began with the tragic murder of William Wickham and ended with the successful prosecution and conviction of the two youths charged by police with the murder.

“Our investigation was extensive and thorough, and we are very pleased at the end result.

“We hope that these sentences will reassure the local community that justice has been served, and our thoughts at this time are with Mr Wickham’s family, who have suffered so much grief due to his death.”

Chief Inspector Jerry Patterson, district commander of Gosport, added: “My sincere condolences go out to Mr Wickham’s family, and I hope that these sentences will give them some measure of relief at this difficult time.

“I would like to praise the hard work of the investigation team, who worked tirelessly to not only find those responsible for the murder, but to reassure the local community that every effort was being made to ensure this crime did not go unpunished.

“The police in Gosport do not believe that the actions of the two youths convicted of this offence in any way represent the young people of the area.

“We actively engage with the young people of the area through community based projects, and we work hard to reach teenagers and build a positive relationship between them and the police.

“We work actively to tackle any youth crime by cracking down on premises that sell alcohol to minors, with Operation Calling Time being our latest initiative to accomplish this. We also mount extra patrols at weekends and use the full powers of the law to identify troublemakers and prevent them from committing crimes by moving them on.

“Our aim as a whole is to continue to make Gosport a safer place to live and work and to make sure the circumstances that led to Mr Wickham’s death are never repeated.”


Your Say YourEcho

southy, redbridge says...
12:35pm Thu 18 Dec 08

jailed for life but could be out in 12 years, bit weak, should off been 25 years at lest, judges are getting to soft on murders

DinkDankDoo, Lordswood says...
12:44pm Thu 18 Dec 08

LIFE SENTENCE at 16 & 17?????
Serving a minumum of 12 years
They could be out before they are 30. Some LIFE SENTENCE that is!!!
One thing is for sure...they will have bigger hoops when they come out!!!
Mr Big is sooooo looking fwd to his very own Christmas gifts!

Rudd Gillett, Saffhampton says...
12:47pm Thu 18 Dec 08

Kick someone to death in a sustained attack 12 years! Hit someone with a stray shot 22 years? Both should be 25 years IMO but why the 13 year difference? The law is not consistant. By the way ruining a Football Club should be throw away the key for ever!!!

Nearly an OAP, Southampton says...
2:29pm Thu 18 Dec 08

Another case of the law favouring the criminal and NOT the poor defenceless victim. Surely the death penalty should return to this sad country.

Finlay, Des Moines Iowa says...
2:32pm Thu 18 Dec 08

Rudd Gillett, Saffhampton says...
12:47pm Thu 18 Dec 08
Kick someone to death in a sustained attack 12 years! Hit someone with a stray shot 22 years? Both should be 25 years IMO but why the 13 year difference? The law is not consistant.

My sentiments exactly

30 years for robbing a train where a guard was slapped and 12 years for cowardly slime kicking a good man to death?

Thats f****** in the head.


Bright Spark, Stubbington says...
3:09pm Thu 18 Dec 08

Bit of a contradiction ... Life and out in 12 years, they should never be released, and certainly not whilst they are still in their 20's. Judge should have said no chance of parole until they are 44, the age of their victim.

Beer Monster, Hythe says...
4:14pm Thu 18 Dec 08

Totally agreed with Nearly on this - if you can prove murder without a shadow of a doubt (as in this case), then save taxpayers money and rid the planet of them

Condor Man, Southampton says...
4:19pm Thu 18 Dec 08

as a gesture of good will perhaps the families of the 2 scum bags should pay compensation to the victim's family for being TOTALLY USELESS PARENTS in failing to bring their sons up properly.

stuartjebbitt, Eastleigh says...
4:24pm Thu 18 Dec 08

It's clearly not anything like a long enough sentence. If the issue is prison spaces, then we need to build more prisons. Of course in most parts of the world, they'd be going direct to death row. 

The Grey Mystery, Shirley says...
5:22pm Thu 18 Dec 08

tough guys - give them the choice life in jail or afgahnistan for 5 minutes i know what the gutless ba---rds would choose bring back hanging and conscription

Stubs, Eastleigh says...
5:45pm Thu 18 Dec 08

Dont drop the soap!

MattProbert, Harefield says...
6:03pm Thu 18 Dec 08

Nearly an OAP wrote:
Another case of the law favouring the criminal and NOT the poor defenceless victim. Surely the death penalty should return to this sad country.
Yeah? Like Colin Stag should have been executed for the crime he never did?

Vengeance is not ours, if we seek vengeance we are no better than the criminals. Rather we must protect the vulnerable - hence locking away dangerous people, and all accept responsibility jointly as a society for helping to create these murderers.

Reality-man, Southampton says...
6:09pm Thu 18 Dec 08

So everything looked rosey up until he found out he could possibly play for Portsmouth........

Snowman, prairies says...
6:29pm Thu 18 Dec 08

I hope they get the same treatment wherever they go, what b****y cowards. I had three kids with Dyslexia and ADHD , they are all productive members of society,. These vicious attacks should end with a full LIFE sentence!! Tired of the so-called "remorsefull" after the fact thugs.

Finlay, Des Moines Iowa says...
2:17pm Fri 19 Dec 08

Last night I was at a Xmas Party when a guy who worked with us was noticed absent. I was told he was in jail for 10 years (yes TEN).

'Who did he murder' I asked. No one was the reply He had been stopped a couple of years ago with some weed in his truck. He done 6 months for that and this year was found with a small quantity which was argued was left by one of his friends recently in his truck.

They also recovered a handgun that was registered to this guy's friend.
One point locked this guy up - It was his second conviction of being caught with weed.

The gun was proved to be his friends, who was permitted to hold the weapon and so charges were dropped. Convicted felons cannot have guns here.

If he commits any crime after his release in 2018 he will go away for the rest of his natural life. Yes really!

He is a great guy with a calm and balanced nature and has/could not harm anyone. The three counts and you're out rule is very very harsh and it stops offenders.

Compare this - Caught in possession (NOT intent to supply) = 10 years in jail and potentially the rest of his natural life vs Kick an innocent man to death = 12 years potentially 6 years.

Yeah right!

27shez, torbay says...
2:52pm Fri 19 Dec 08

The reason that your work colleague was given a more hefty sentence for a less serious crime, was because these two young people were tried as youths. Whether or not you agree, it is the law and yes sometimes it sucks!
Both of these young people will serve the FULL sentence given. It will not be halved.
I am definitely not condoning what they did or the sentence that was given, but i think people need to know the reason why this sentence is relatively short.

Your sayYour Echo

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

William Wickham William Wickham

Video News Food & Restaurant Reviews

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »