News RSS Feed


Mobile news, sport and travel from the Daily Echo Coverage of the swine flu outbreak The Daily Echo is now on Facebook Southampton Cenotaph Memorial Wall Campaign


Agency doctor paid equivalent of £172,965 annual salary

11:40am Saturday 3rd January 2009

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »


A PATIENT group has condemned Hampshire hospital bosses for paying agency staff nearly £100 an hour to cover shifts.

Latest figures show that the highest amount paid to an agency hospital worker in Southampton was £88.70 per hour – equivalent to an annual salary of £172,965.

The money was paid to a temporary consultant during August and September last year.

It is likely that that the agency worker came from a privately run firm rather than NHS Professionals, a non-profit, Government organisation set up to provide flexible staff with considerably lower costs.

Meanwhile, Hampshire Partnerships NHS Trust, which runs the county’s mental health services, paid a temporary consultant psychiatrist £82.85 an hour from May to October.

This is the equivalent to an annual salary of £161,557.

No one was available for comment from Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, responsible for running Southampton General and Princess Anne Hospitals, or from Hampshire Partnerships NHS Trust, who employed the two agency workers.

Michael Summers, vice-chaiman of the Patients’ Association said: “It’s surprising to find these sums of money are spent on agency staff which does ultimately affect patient care.

“Better staff planning and fewer staff cuts would reduce the need for agency staff, and it seems that neither trust is using the NHS’ own organisation for temporary staff.

“It is just leading to vast sums of money disappearing from the NHS as the private agency firms are making huge profits.

“Patients dislike changes in staffing on a regular basis as there is no continuity of care.”

The figures were obtained under the Freeedom of Information Act after the Conservatives asked all NHS organisations about the highest amount paid to any agency worker in each month from May to October last year.

No figures regarding agency staff costs were provided for Southampton Primary Care Trust and Hampshire Primary Care Trust, responsible for local health services such as GP surgeries.

Nationwide, almost £800 million was spent on agency staff in 2006/07, although the Department of Health insists this figure is falling.

A Department of Health spokesman said: “Increasing the quality of and achieving best value for money from temporary staffing is an important aspect of workforce planning in the NHS.

“We are spending less on agency staff year on year.”


Your Say YourDaily Echo

goard, Southampton says...
12:02pm Sat 3 Jan 09

Oh, for goodness sake, this has gone on for yonks, Do not suppose these poor 'Agency' medical staff are getting this amount of money - NO, its the Agency and 'handling staff'. How do they have a voice - they are treated like confetti, they provide an income to these nefarious agencies and massage the Government figures - such is the disgraceful state of our 'so called' economy. We KNOW, the Government chose NOT TO KNOW. What a sick society we are in!!

goard

Derek of Dibden Purlieu, Hampshire says...
2:09pm Sat 3 Jan 09

Somewhere else in the NHS, one of the thousands of 'Effectiveness Managers' has probably trousered a nice bonus for reducing the number of full time Nurses on the books showing some idiot in the Government how the NHS can be run with fewer full time staff.

666wizard, New Forest says...
2:48pm Sat 3 Jan 09

This old chestnut has surfaced again. In fact, most local NHS Trusts manage their full time headcount using agency staff (who are often full time NHS staff who are trying to boost their earnings on their days off) to manage peaks and troughs in demand. The headline rates quoted in the Echo article are exceptions, most agency staff earn between £12 and £35 per hour, very similar in cost to full time NHS staff cost once other factors such as holiday, pension, overheads (such as management and bureaucracy!) are added in. The fact that skilled ex-NHS staff choose private agencies over the govt set-up agency is simple, the pay rates are better, and the top skills will always follow the money.

The NHS in the Southampton area would find it very difficult to function without top-up staff, especially when 'flu hits the hospitals and sickness levels rise. Staff retention also contributes to the situation, with many senior experienced staff "stuck" at the top of their pay levels with only below inflation pay rises, leaving the NHS for full time agency work.

The situation isn't perfect, but is actually working quite well overall, and it's a bit of an own goal for the local tories to criticise this free market situation, that actually improves the service the local NHS delivers. To really get to the root of the problem, the NHS needs to pay NHS staff a proper wage and the retention of skilled staff will improve. But agencies will always play a part.

RJG, Bitterne Park says...
5:04pm Sat 3 Jan 09

It is completely legitimate to object to increased costs from a high number of agency staff that should be on proper long-term contracts. That appears to be what the Patients' Association is objecting to. But it's ridiculous for the Echo to pick out the HIGHEST payment made and suggest this is indicative of agency staff payment across the board. It would be like me saying publishing how much the Echo Editor earns and suggesting that all journalists get paid a similar amount (which they certainly don't!)

Paramjit Bahia, Southampton says...
7:10pm Sat 3 Jan 09

Scandalous situation that has been going on for too long has various reasons, some genuine and most other are devious.

Yes due to staff sickness etc. sometime temporary cover is essential. But why use private agencies, which are no better than slave traders of the old days, while non profit bodies like NHS Professionals are available?

Although the agencies charges are exceptionally high, only fraction of that is in fact paid to the workers.

Bosses and the government in cahoot ignore syphoning of funds because end profit makers (agencies) probably have right connections, and managers can keep the head count of employees down while saving on the cost of overheads for full time employees.

downfader, southampton says...
4:32pm Sun 4 Jan 09

Southampton general hospital is facing big cut backs and they spend a fortune on advisers and agencies. I work in the nhs for near minimum wage - if I was paid for my performance and what I'm expected to do I'd be on double.

NHS staff have to pay for parking, travel costs, food and drink - an adviser comes in and gets freebies thrown at him - I've seen it happen too many times. Imagine how worthless it makes regular staff feel?

Then theres the cheif exec.. gets paid nearly 200k for what he does - but watch outside his office and he's taking about 10x ciggie breaks during his day. ;-/

Comments are closed on this article.

Video News Food & Restaurant Reviews

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »