When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
6:20am Monday 5th January 2009 in
A HAMPSHIRE MP has attacked plans to curb teenage pregnancy by giving contraceptive jabs to girls as young as 13.
Romsey and Southampton North MP Sandra Gidley said the plans, recommended by ministers to city health chiefs, is only aimed at meeting targets and would lead to a rise in sexually transmitted infections.
Under the proposed scheme, teenagers would not have to tell their parents before having the injection at school-based clinics.
The Liberal Democrat’s shadow public health minister said it would turn Southampton into the STI capital of the south.
“A contraceptive injection on its own may bring down the rates of teenage pregnancy, but will only lead to more teenagers contracting sexually-transmitted infections," she said.
"More needs to be done to tackle the underlying problem of teenagers having unprotected sex.
“We will only begin to solve this crisis by making appropriate personal, social and health education compulsory in schools.
“I hope the government will see the error in its thinking and will not allow Southampton to slide from being the teenage pregnancy capital of the south into the teenage STI capital of the south."
Southampton is one of 21 cities in the UK identified as a teenage pregnancy hotspot and the Government has issued letters to health chiefs to take “urgent action” to reduce the rate.
Officials say injections or long- lasting implants would make it easier for girls to control their fertility.
Southampton’s teenage pregnancy boss Charlotte Bernard said the jabs are not currently available in the city’s schools and refused to say whether it was something they would bring in until a six-month review into sexual services was completed later this month.
Comments(5)
10 Minute Man
says...
6:58am Mon 5 Jan 09
Vonnie
says...
7:29am Mon 5 Jan 09
Georgem
says...
11:48am Mon 5 Jan 09
10 Minute Man wrote:I daresay that, in the case of your daughter, who appears to have real, actual parents, who actually care about her welfare, medication of this nature would not be necessary in the first place. Many 13 year old girls aren't so fortunate, and to pretend they don't need this protection is a bit short-sighted
We have the final responsiblity for looking after our children (including their health), not the State. Anyone who medicates my child without my permission will find themselve on a whistle-stop tour of the courts.
10 Minute Man
says...
1:13pm Mon 5 Jan 09
Georgem wrote:Fair enough, and ensuring they won't "fall pregnant" (fall? ffs...) will save us taxpayers a lot of money in the long run, and should slow down the breeding of the feckless. Fewer teenage mothers=fewer benefits, council houses, other services which we have to fund.
10 Minute Man wrote:I daresay that, in the case of your daughter, who appears to have real, actual parents, who actually care about her welfare, medication of this nature would not be necessary in the first place. Many 13 year old girls aren't so fortunate, and to pretend they don't need this protection is a bit short-sighted
We have the final responsiblity for looking after our children (including their health), not the State. Anyone who medicates my child without my permission will find themselve on a whistle-stop tour of the courts.
Rob444
says...
6:08pm Mon 5 Jan 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with