When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
8:46am Friday 9th January 2009 in
A BUS service used by thousands of pensioners, workers and shoppers is facing the axe for the second time in 18 months.
The X27 Solent Shuttle between Southampton and Portsmouth was almost ditched in the summer of 2007 before a U-turn which reduced it to a two-hourly service.
Now the route is set to be scrapped because bus company Bluestar says it costs too much.
Operations director Andrew Wickham said the firm was losing £1,500 a week on the service and it would end on February 22.
However, Southampton Pensioners’ Forum and its sister group in Portsmouth are joining forces to fight the decision.
Forum secretary Don Harper said: “This could be a disaster for people who use the service. It is vital that we do all we can to keep this up and running. You never see this bus empty, it always has loads of passengers.”
A protest is planned for the final day of the service. Pensioners are planning to travel on the X27 from Portsmouth to Southampton and stage a demonstration with placards and signs.
Mr Wickham said the company did not want to cut the service but had no choice.
He said: “We are the fourth operator to try to make this route work.
It is just too costly and we don’t make enough revenue. We are sorry this will have an effect on all the people that use it but it is just too expensive to run.”
He said the route used to be supported by Southampton and Portsmouth local authorities but both stopped funding after Bluestar took over the contract four years ago.
He blamed the company’s heavy losses on the free bus passes for the over-60s, claiming it was not sufficiently reimbursed.
Asked what it would take for the company to keep the service going he said it would be necessary for the Government to look at the way bus operators are reimbursed for bus pass users or for the local authorities to reintroduce their subsidies.
A Southampton City Council spokesman said: “We used to jointly fund the service with Portsmouth but when it withdrew we decided we couldn’t make up the shortfall.
“Because of this Bluestar decided to cut the frequency of journeys from hourly to once every two hours and make it purely commercial.
“As the council has no further budget for subsidies at the moment it is unlikely that we would be able to provide funding, but we are constantly reviewing our subsidised services.”
The shuttle runs six return services a day on weekdays and five on Saturdays.
The Daily Echo understands that rival Black Velvet is currently looking at whether it could make a profit from the route.
Comments(13)
Paramjit Bahia
says...
9:13am Fri 9 Jan 09
Condor Man
says...
9:23am Fri 9 Jan 09
goard
says...
9:50am Fri 9 Jan 09
Andy Locks Heath
says...
10:24am Fri 9 Jan 09
Bright Spark
says...
11:56am Fri 9 Jan 09
Northamboy
says...
12:33pm Fri 9 Jan 09
Bright Spark wrote:Used by thousands but they all have free passes :-)
Used by thousands? Surely this is a slight exaggeration.
Northamboy
says...
12:33pm Fri 9 Jan 09
Bright Spark wrote:Used by thousands but they all have free passes :-)
Used by thousands? Surely this is a slight exaggeration.
Paramjit Bahia
says...
3:41pm Fri 9 Jan 09
Andy Locks Heath wrote:Andy you have made very valid points. In some developing countries like India both nationalised and privately owned bus services operate comparatively cheaper and reliable (Although state of buses is no so good) services, because remedies you are suggesting are implemented.
I'd half agree with you Paramjit but there is nothing wrong with the profit incentive in transport - earning a profit requires efficiency, hard work and a lot of planning - it doesn't just happen and the idea of money just rolling in to fat cats is an unrealistic myth. But I do strongly agree with you that privatised public transport should be actively regulated by both central and local Goovernment with integrated timetabling, multi modal through ticketing and subsidy of loss making services but not on a pound for pound basis - there needs to be an incentive to make the private company work to reduce subsidy or lose the franchise. All these things the Government could have rectified and hasn't. Isn;t it funny how all the things we want our taxes to pay for - eg education, health, transport, care for the elderly etc we can't afford, yet they take second place to things we don;t want - such as wars that others won't fight, a bail out of Icelandic incompetence, a burgeoning public sector full of non jobs, index linked pensions we can no longer justify, illegal immigration, the "human rights" of terrorists we are scared to repatriate.......
The Funky Monkey
says...
6:20pm Fri 9 Jan 09
gorf
says...
9:25pm Fri 9 Jan 09
ninebob
says...
2:40am Sat 10 Jan 09
Phantomdoll
says...
9:01am Sat 10 Jan 09
joanne.harrison@talktalk.net
says...
12:07pm Sun 11 Jan 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with