News RSS Feed Send your news


Photos and video of school proms from the Daily Echo Follow the Daily Echo on Facebook to get headlines straight to your news feed. Read Chief Superintendent Matthew Greening's Blog Tweet with the Daily Echo

Gosport War Memorial Hospital patients were given wrong medication


THREE out of 10 elderly patients who died at a hospital were given inappropriate medication, an inquest jury ruled today.

The panel of five women and three men spent four weeks at Portsmouth Coroner's Court looking at how the 10 died at the Gosport War Memorial Hospital in Hampshire more than 10 years ago.

They ruled that in the cases of Robert Wilson, Elsie Devine and Geoffrey Packman the medication was not appropriate for their condition and symptoms but had been given for therapeutic reasons.

They also ruled that medication had contributed to the death of Elsie Lavender and Arthur Cunningham (known as Brian) but had been given for therapeutic reasons and was appropriate for their condition.

The jury ruled that medication had not contributed to the deaths of the other five patients, who were Leslie Pittock, Helena Service, Ruby Lake, Enid Spurgin and Sheila Gregory.

The hearings had to be given special permission by Justice Secretary Jack Straw because seven of the bodies have since been cremated.

The inquest heard that each of the 10 patients went to the hospital for palliative care but died while at the community hospital.

The jury heard evidence from members of the patients' families, medical experts and staff at the hospital, including Dr Jane Barton.

She was the only individual to be investigated by police in connection with deaths at the hospital but she was not charged with any offence.

Hampshire Police carried out a series of investigations into the treatment of 92 patients at the Gosport War Memorial Hospital in the late 1990s but no action was taken.

The families of those who died believe that sedatives such as diamorphine were over-prescribed at the hospital and this led to the deaths of their relatives, who were receiving recuperative care.

But staff said that many of those who died were seriously ill.

The inquests were into the deaths of Arthur Cunningham, 79, from Gosport who died on September 26 1998; Elsie Devine, 88, on November 21 1999; Sheila Gregory, 91, of Gosport, on November 22 1999 and Ruby Lake, 84, of Gosport, on August 21 1998.

The other deaths are of Elsie Lavender, 83, of Gosport, on March 6 1996; Geoffrey Packman, 67, of Emsworth, on September 3 1999; Leslie Pittock, 82, on January 24 1996; Helena Service, 99, of Gosport, on June 5 1997; Enid Spurgin, 92, of Gosport, on April 13 1999, and Robert Wilson, 74, of Sarisbury Green, on October 18 1998.

Speaking outside the court, the families of some of the patients called for the police investigation into deaths at the hospital to be reopened.

Bridget Reeves, granddaughter of Elsie Devine, along with her mother Ann Reeves and Ian Wilson also called for Dr Barton to be prosecuted.

She said in a statement: ''The elderly and the public deserve better. If somebody is going to die, it is not up to the doctor to decide when that will be.

''It is their basic right to have their families around them in the last few days.

''A right which Jane Barton took from the families at will.''



Your Say YourEcho

Boris Remmington, Wellow says...
6:14pm Mon 20 Apr 09

My father died there in the 1980's.
It should never have been called a hospital because it wasn't. My father was transfered from Hasler Hospital and as I understood it the War Memorial was purely a hospice with a one way ticket. How any of these wingeing relatives could possibly think it was a hospital when it no proper medical facilities or staff.
They are no doubt only on the band wagon for a compensation pay out assisted by the litigious legal sharks.
My father was treated with the up most sympathetic care and even allowed to have his dog with him until the day he died.
Any drugs administered were only to relieve any pain from cancer.

wake up, hants says...
7:32pm Mon 20 Apr 09

AGENDA 21, = genocide against 80% of the worlds population.
they are culling the elderly & the health authority & government & police ARE NOT GOING TO INVESTIGATE,,,, TOTAL COVER UP TO AUTHORISED MURDER.

research AGENDA 21 ,,,, you'll see the plans that the world government have instore for us all.....

Andy Locks Heath, says...
9:07pm Mon 20 Apr 09

Well said Boris. The sad truth is that many of these people were in severe pain and the drugs were administered to relieve their suffering, not through any malice. Many of the relative may be motivated by compassion but keeping an elderly relative alive at all costs is not helping them. I hope if I am unlucky enough to be that helpless that someone administers a fatal dose out of kindness.

Andy Locks Heath, says...
9:12pm Mon 20 Apr 09

wake up wrote:
AGENDA 21, = genocide against 80% of the worlds population.
they are culling the elderly & the health authority & government & police ARE NOT GOING TO INVESTIGATE,,,, TOTAL COVER UP TO AUTHORISED MURDER.

research AGENDA 21 ,,,, you'll see the plans that the world government have instore for us all.....
You stupid immature berk. I know some of the professionals who work at the hospital and the idea that they are part of some kind of conspiracy merely highlights your gullibility. Only the really stupid could belive that a "conspiracy" involving literally hundreds of thousands of ordinary working professionals could somehow be hushed up. You must be someone who has never had a proper job. I expect you support the ALF as well and believe in the Da Vinci code. Prat.

ActionT4, bournemouth says...
1:52am Fri 24 Apr 09

Andy Locks ignorance of covert mass extermination (under the guise of 'care') is ridiculous - the Nazis exterminated countless thousands of disabled children and mentally ill adults - under the subjective assessment that their lives were not worth living - in the run-up to the Jewish Holocaust. . It was considered to be in their 'best interests' to die, as they were considered 'incurable'. The point this shallow, ignorant posting misses is fundamental - that of consent - few object to voluntary euthenasia - but the sad truth is that hospital doctors across the UK are currently keeping waiting lists down by deliberately depriving our senior and younger disabled citizens of non-life threatening analgesia and treatment, under the guise of it being in their 'best interests' to die. Should anyone doubt this is actually happening the length and breadth of the country, can I suggest you view a website - run by the increasing number of people who have had their family members killed with powerful opiate 'painkillers', often contraindicated for the conditions they had, of them, with no consent sought by the fully competent patients - - see also 'SOS - NHS Patients in Danger'.
You surely recall the nationwide scandal of elderly patients having 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation' orders placed on their medical records - thousands and thousands of people - murdered. What a shame the full evidence was not collected at the time - everyone involved and hundreds of others in the surrounding area knows the hospital had 10 years to forge it - what a shame no one at the hospital will admit someone perjured themselves during this rather unfair Inquest.

ActionT4, bournemouth says...
1:57am Fri 24 Apr 09

Boris Remmington wrote:
My father died there in the 1980's. It should never have been called a hospital because it wasn't. My father was transfered from Hasler Hospital and as I understood it the War Memorial was purely a hospice with a one way ticket. How any of these wingeing relatives could possibly think it was a hospital when it no proper medical facilities or staff. They are no doubt only on the band wagon for a compensation pay out assisted by the litigious legal sharks. My father was treated with the up most sympathetic care and even allowed to have his dog with him until the day he died. Any drugs administered were only to relieve any pain from cancer.
Your late Father had cancer , Boris - the point you are missing is that these 90 people did not. Another sharp distinction between your case and theirs is of course, that they were all such strong and loving families, they would not have dreamt of leaving their loved ones in hospital at the end of their lives - particularly in a ward with such low standards of hygeine that a dog was allowed in!

Comments are closed on this article.

War Memorial Hospital, Gosport Gosport War Memorial Hospital patients were given wrong medication, inquest rules

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »