News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Council plan to close two Southampton care homes

Whitehaven Lodge Carehome Whitehaven Lodge Carehome

CARE chiefs are launching another bid to close two Southampton City Council care homes despite protests from angry residents and their families.

Tory council chiefs gave the go ahead to shut the 55-bed Whitehaven Lodge and 33- bed Birch Lawn homes six months ago.

However, the closures were put on hold in January after a solicitor hired by angry relatives of residents applied for a judicial review for the decision.

They claimed it was unlawful because it failed to consider the effect on residents’ health of moving them. Many thought they had a home for life.

The judicial review was “stayed” while the council reviewed the decision.

Care bosses have admitted they should have taken into account studies which showed a rise in deaths during closures elsewhere.

But they have now carried out an “audit” of residents’ needs to show a managed move will cause “no real or imminent risk to health or life”.

And, after getting a second costly legal opinion, they are now confident they can press ahead with closures and win a legal challenge.

Tory Cabinet members are now being asked to agree to the closures. Eighteen permanent residents remain at Birch Lawn care home in Sholing and 19 at Whitehaven in Millbrook.

But furious relatives of elderly people living at the two sites say the whole process has been a waste of public money by a council “hell bent” on closing them down – and have vowed to fight on.

Adult care boss Councillor Ivan White refused to say whether he will endorse the closures to be “fair to the residents and his Cabinet colleagues.”

“My original recommendation to close them was accepted and little has changed.”

He added: “Residents will have an opportunity to put their point of view to Cabinet.”

Cllr White also dismissed merging the homes. “You are still closing one home which will lead to disruption moving from one home to the other.

“It smacks of just wanting the council to run a care home. I don’t think state care is always necessarily the best.”

Despite a 5,000-name petition and pleas from residents, relatives and staff, Tory council leaders decided to close the homes in October. They claimed there was a falling demand for residential care in the city and the authority would save around £500,000 by buying cheaper care from the private sector. It could net £1.5m from the sale of the homes sites.

Itchen MP John Denham, who has campaigned against the controversial closure decision, said he was “disappointed”

by the move.

“I’ll obviously want to read the report and try to understand why they have reached the conclusions they have, but I still believe the whole process has been flawed,” he said.

“My basic position has never been that there should not be change, but that what we’re getting instead be better than what we’ve got at the moment.

“I don’t think the council has passed that test.”

A decision will be made by the Cabinet on June 1.

Comments(6)

Nearly an OAP says...
3:26pm Tue 26 May 09

Southampton City Council have stated in the past that private care is cheaper. I find this hard to believe as my mother was in a private care home until she died two weeks ago and the single room rate there was £800 per week. Hampshire County Council still run some care homes so maybe this authority just want to drop this service in which they have to employ staff to run the homes and maintain them. I have visited a fair number of retirement homes and would not put a dog in some of them.

Condor Man says...
4:20pm Tue 26 May 09

It is cheaper in the private sector for SCC as they won't have the liability for 2 aging buildings.

Amazing to see Denham popping up, noticably invisible over the Itchen College fiasco.

Iw61 says...
8:33pm Tue 26 May 09

Typical Tories > Going for the cheap option.

Cheaper isnt always better. These residents will now be subject to a 'beauty' contest of different private providers, the cheaper option winning. Quality of care will go.

Pity the residents havent got a say really isnt it. Case of Tory Councillors behaving like the Nannies and doing what they think is best to satisfy their 'free enterprise ' philosophy.

OSPREYSAINT says...
9:38pm Tue 26 May 09

Will they change their names to Couldn't Care Homes.

Security word shut-deny, who makes them up?

Tommy News says...
1:08pm Wed 27 May 09

It is the right decision. The Council should be the facilitator of residential care and not the provider. It can purhcase good quality care from private homes by exerting its buying power. If the private home fails to deliver then they simply move the contract to another home.

fiddlestix says...
4:56pm Sat 30 May 09

The closure of the homes is to save money! What about the money wasted on bed blocking patients in hospitals waiting for places in Nursing/residential homes?? If places are so plentiful why are the patients still waiting for beds?? the councillors must remember they are going to get old too.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree