News RSS Feed


Photos and video of school proms from the Daily Echo Follow the Daily Echo on Facebook to get headlines straight to your news feed. Read Chief Superintendent Matthew Greening's Blog Tweet with the Daily Echo

Health Minister insists it will improve dental health


TWO Hampshire MPs have reacted angrily to the Government’s decision to ignore a 15,300-signature petition from anti-fluoride protesters.

Both Romsey MP Sandra Gidley and Eastleigh MP Chris Huhne accompanied Hampshire Against Fluoridation campaigners last month to Downing Street to hand in the petition.

But this week Health Minister Ann Keen insisted the Government remained firmly in favour of fluoridation to improve people’s dental health, as reported in yesterday’s Daily Echo.

Today's main Daily Echo headlines

Mrs Gidley described the decision as “bizarre”.

She said: “They may be in favour of fluoridation but it’s up to them to make the case to the public, which they have clearly failed to do. They are in favour of fluoridation but don’t appear to be in favour of local democracy. I am just filled with despair.

“How will the Government expect anyone to have any faith in what they are doing when in consultations the public is increasingly ignored.”

Meanwhile, Mr Huhne said the Government’s refusal to step in and re-examine the controversial plans was “entirely consistent” with its approach to fluoridation.

“First of all they gave powers to the Strategic Health Authority to over-ride the local community.

“The consultation process was a charade which ignored the views of 72 per cent of the local people.

“I am afraid this is consistent with the past arrogance that has seen local opinion ignored.”

Southampton’s two MPs, John Denham and Alan Whitehead, who have both said the fluoridation plans should be put on hold until there is greater public support, were unavailable for comment.

Health bosses want to add fluoride to the water supplies of 200,000 households covering parts of Southampton, Eastleigh, Totton, Netley and Rownhams.

Throughout the Strategic Health Authority has insisted its consultation into the plan was carried out fairly and that fluoridation would help to improve children’s dental health.

Meanwhile the Royal Courts of Justice is currently considering an application from a Southampton woman to scrutinise the SHA board’s unanimous decision to give fluoridation the go-ahead and the Health Ombudsman is deciding whether to investigate the way the decision was made.



Your Say YourEcho

saintjak, Southampton says...
10:03am Fri 26 Jun 09

no one ever listens until you go out into the street and start throwing rocks...

Congratulations to all those who voted labour


Pam W, Southampton says...
10:11am Fri 26 Jun 09

It's becoming more bizarre by the day, the government is like a huge juggernaut that can't be stopped - despite the empty words, Brown and his henchmen have learned nothing from the embarrassments of recent weeks (no surprise there then)

Paramjit Bahia, Southampton says...
10:22am Fri 26 Jun 09

This NuLabour government and its side kicks in Southampton have the cheek to lecture the rest of the world on democracy, but when it comes to practising it at home it is frequently ignored. Hardly surprising that when it comes to elections disturbingly large number of people do not even vote.

Ignoring majority concern over adding poisonous fluoride to our water and breaking pledges on referendum over EU constitution and keeping Royal Mail into public ownership illustrates that there is not much difference between Robert Mugabee and Gordon Brown.

Jenjo, Southampton says...
11:36am Fri 26 Jun 09

A referendum would be no good - even if the vote was split 60-40 in favour it would still mean 80,000 people being forced to have fluoridated water against their will. 80,000!!! They would need to be provided (free of charge) with all the equipment necessary to take the fluoride back out of their water supply. If not, I can foresee a campaign of civil disobedience with many consumers refusing to pay their water bills, the courts wouldn't be able to cope. And Southern Water couldn't cut them off because that's against the law.
Why doesn't everyone involved just admit it isn't going to work and pull out now before they are forced to back down?

Big Boy, Hythe says...
2:33pm Fri 26 Jun 09

15,300 signatures is not 72% of the affected population! Where do these people get their figures from? I suppose that they have been massaged along with the unemployment & knife crime figures. Politicians = liars.

soton1980, Southampton/Winchester/Fareham says...
5:45pm Fri 26 Jun 09

LABOUR OUT!

I'm fed up of this country being badly run by an unelected leader. Brown has just ignored the public because he thinks he is right. Even if we are heading out of recession by the time of the general election, I will not be voting for Labour.

We live in a democratic country and yet our opinions and ignored by the Government.

Comments are closed on this article.

Anti-fluoridation campaigners. Anti-fluoridation campaigners.

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »