News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Southampton docks' crane collapse raises questions over how it happened again

The crane lying on top of crushed containers The crane lying on top of crushed containers

HOW could this happen again?

That was the question being asked today after a crane collapsed on to a container ship leaving its operator fighting for his life after plunging more than 100ft.

All shipside operations at Southampton’s container terminal have been suspended until further notice in a move that could lose the port millions of pounds.

The crane operator, named as Jay Squibb, was last night in a critical but stable condition at Southampton General Hospital.

He was believed to still be undergoing surgery some 14 hours after the disaster.

He had been at the controls of the terminal’s number six crane when it its boom – attached to his driver’s cab – collapsed on to the NYK Themis while loading containers yesterday morning.

Just 19 months ago another crane made by the same company – Morris – crashed down on to the Kyoto Express. Luckily no one was hurt.

Matt Tipper, Unite regional industrial organiser, said: “This is the second serious incident in nearly two years involving crane operations in DP World and we are obviously concerned over the health and safety implications for the workers there. This is of paramount importance to us and we will fully assist in the HSE investigation also providing full support to our member and his family at this very worrying time for them in every way we can.”

Yesterday paramedics, firefighters, police and the coastguard helicopter all helped to carry out the dramatic rescue at Dock Gate 20 after the emergency call came in at 5.20am.

Ambulance crews scrambled up ladders to scale the top of the ship’s crumpled containers where the driver lay trapped inside the mangled metal of his cab and collapsed boom.

As firefighters, including Redbridge and St Mary’s crews, worked to release him, paramedics were able to give pain relief to the critically injured man. It is understood he was conscious throughout his ordeal.

He was eventually put on a spinal board and winched to safety by Solent Coastguard’s helicopter and transferred to the dockside where a waiting ambulance took him to Southampton General Hospital.

Alex Grossart, South Central Ambulance’s operations manager, said: “It was difficult because the driver’s cabin was all part of the wreckage on the containers.

“The crew had to go up a series of ladders and were working on top of the damaged containers hit by the crane. They did not have a level floor to work on. We are very proud of them and they did a splendid job.”

He said Mr Squibb, aged in his 30s and from Woolston, was in a very serious condition when the ambulance crew got to him. He has a wife, Alison, and two young sons. It is understood his two brothers were both working at the container terminal during the shift when the accident happened.

Three inspectors from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) were yesterday sent to the container terminal to find out what caused the crane to collapse.

HSE officials say they are currently “tying up” that investigation.

It is understood their findings will be released within a month. Parts of that crane are still on site.

Although no one was hurt in last year’s incident the port was shut for weeks afterwards and three of the terminal’s cranes underwent “recommended precautionary works”.

The crane that collapsed in January 2008

However, it has not been confirmed if crane six – involved in yesterday’s accident – was among those that needed repairs.

An HSE spokesman refused to comment on either of their investigations as both are ongoing.

Now container terminal bosses face losing valuable business if the terminal is forced to remain fully or partially closed for up to three months – as it did last year.

Landside operations at the terminal resumed at midday yesterday, and last night the NYK Themis was moved along the dock away from the collapsed crane.

Managing director of the container terminal Campbell Mason, confirmed all shipside operations were currently suspended.

See today's paper for more on this story

Comments(15)

Ozmosis says...
8:01pm Tue 14 Jul 09

Fingers crossed the chap is ok, but it's painfully clear that the cranes need to be replaced. There was one lucky escape - this one hasn't been. How many more people need to put themselves at risk working this machinery?

bodge2656 says...
8:02pm Tue 14 Jul 09

This cannot be a coincidence - twice in 18 months is totally unacceptable. I am a Docker from The Port Of Felixstowe, there are two things that hurt us the most; serious injury to any Docker and job losses unfortunately Southampton has now suffer both. Jay - you get well soon all of us at Felixstowe are thinking about yourself and your family.

Yours sincerely

Michael ( Bodge ) Rogers

long memory says...
9:39pm Tue 14 Jul 09

Although this has been a very tragic accident,and my sympathy goes out to the family, I do believe that this incident has been blown out of proportion.
If you want to make an issue about health and safety,write about the construction industry,where many people die every year, and it hardly gets a mention

saint tom says...
10:06pm Tue 14 Jul 09

long memory wrote:
Although this has been a very tragic accident,and my sympathy goes out to the family, I do believe that this incident has been blown out of proportion. If you want to make an issue about health and safety,write about the construction industry,where many people die every year, and it hardly gets a mention
tit.
aint got a clue ave you.
container logistics is a very dangerous enviornment.
the building industry has 100 times more workers for a start most of whom are either stoned or just plain thick.
and you can hardley compare 900 tonnes of crane crashing down on top of you to standing on a rusty nail can you ?
these guys are highley skilled in what they do and should be able to drive reliable machinery.
most if not all accidents on site are human error.
not lack of maintenance.

wife of a docker says...
10:12pm Tue 14 Jul 09

well said saitn tom, my husband is a very high skilled crane driver and i feel he and other dockers would be very offended by long memorys comment, when something goes wrong it goes bad. really badly when dealing with big machinery NOT TONKER TOYS.

saint tom says...
10:32pm Tue 14 Jul 09

wife of a docker wrote:
well said saitn tom, my husband is a very high skilled crane driver and i feel he and other dockers would be very offended by long memorys comment, when something goes wrong it goes bad. really badly when dealing with big machinery NOT TONKER TOYS.
i know 1st hand and had 7yrs down there in witch i witnessed a fatallity, i wont name names but he was a highley respected man.
it was sickening and was the reason i left.
it still haunts me today and should NEVER happen again.
so long memory unless you have a constructive coment to ad pi** off and play with your battery drill.
get well soon jay:-)

wife of a docker says...
10:39pm Tue 14 Jul 09

saint tom wrote:
wife of a docker wrote: well said saitn tom, my husband is a very high skilled crane driver and i feel he and other dockers would be very offended by long memorys comment, when something goes wrong it goes bad. really badly when dealing with big machinery NOT TONKER TOYS.
i know 1st hand and had 7yrs down there in witch i witnessed a fatallity, i wont name names but he was a highley respected man. it was sickening and was the reason i left. it still haunts me today and should NEVER happen again. so long memory unless you have a constructive coment to ad pi** off and play with your battery drill. get well soon jay:-)
your welcome hun, i no what your going through. my husband has been in the docks for a long time, and believe me he has seen alot. and its the wifes and families of the dockers that have to help them through all there emotions.

bazza29 says...
11:04pm Tue 14 Jul 09

ALL ARE THOUGHT ARE WITH YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FROM ALL THE DOCKERS ON SEAFORTH CONTAINER TEMINAL LIVERPOOL

Redback says...
8:46am Wed 15 Jul 09

Are dock workers losing wages whilst operations are suspended?

If so, and if DP is found to have been negligent, would they be able to sue for loss of earnings?

Just a thought.

Nearly an OAP says...
10:35am Wed 15 Jul 09

At 7 am today from Totton Causeway it looked like some sort of shipside operations were operating again with some of the new cranes so perhaps the port is gearing itself up to restart.

southy says...
11:47am Wed 15 Jul 09

saint tom wrote:
long memory wrote:
Although this has been a very tragic accident,and my sympathy goes out to the family, I do believe that this incident has been blown out of proportion. If you want to make an issue about health and safety,write about the construction industry,where many people die every year, and it hardly gets a mention
tit.
aint got a clue ave you.
container logistics is a very dangerous enviornment.
the building industry has 100 times more workers for a start most of whom are either stoned or just plain thick.
and you can hardley compare 900 tonnes of crane crashing down on top of you to standing on a rusty nail can you ?
these guys are highley skilled in what they do and should be able to drive reliable machinery.
most if not all accidents on site are human error.
not lack of maintenance.
saint tom, hate to say this, but he right on the construction industry but only just, it is more dangerous to work in the construction industry than in the docks, its not all about small building work like homes, hotels and offices, need to remember about the heavy plant stuff like oil refinery's ect, they get cranes that can lift a 1000 tons.
the problem in both industry's is multi-skilled labour this need to be done away with, and under manning any job is dangerous. look how the accident rate has gone up since the interduction of multi-skill labour from the 80's.

CompassPressureGroup says...
2:38pm Wed 15 Jul 09

Firstly it is pleasing that Jay Squibb is now in a stable condition thanks to the fine hospital staff, but he should not be in this situation.


There have been some very informed and interesting posts relating to this incident. Some questions that hopefully those people (e.g. Andy Locks Heath, saint tom, Nearly an OAP) or others can answer:
"less than a day after crane six collapsed on to the NYK Themis, six gantry cranes and a mobile harbour crane are being used again."
1. Are the cranes that have resumed operations the same type of cranes and the same age, with potential metal fatigue, as the two that have collapsed?
2. What assessments on metal fatigue and other structural weaknesses were made after the first collapse? Why did these assessments not lead to crane 6 being deemed unsafe? And are these same flawed assessments being used in assessing whether operations are "safe" to resume?
3. Are the HSE findings on the initial investigation available to the public? If not, why not? Are HSE investigations exempt from Freedom of Information requests?
4. As costs have been cut, including via redundancies, has safety also been sacrificed due to workload targets (e.g. 25 moves an hour), loss of experienced staff and costs? I agree with "Nearly an OAP" who said:
"Peoples lives should come before profit every time." That didn't seem to be the case with Railtrack, which
was why it was pretty much nationalised into Network Rail.
5. "saint tom" - "however in 2004-2005 this type of crane was made 5 meters higher and the booms extended by 4 meters with swl increase from 36 tonnes to 41 tonnes". My basic understanding of physics (not a mech/civil engineer) would reason that the turning effect on the holding structures by increasing weights and increasing the length of the boom without reliable strengthening of the crane could explain one or both of the collapses?

Would be very interested to hear informed opinions on this.

southy says...
3:27pm Wed 15 Jul 09

CompassPressureGroup wrote:
Firstly it is pleasing that Jay Squibb is now in a stable condition thanks to the fine hospital staff, but he should not be in this situation.


There have been some very informed and interesting posts relating to this incident. Some questions that hopefully those people (e.g. Andy Locks Heath, saint tom, Nearly an OAP) or others can answer:
"less than a day after crane six collapsed on to the NYK Themis, six gantry cranes and a mobile harbour crane are being used again."
1. Are the cranes that have resumed operations the same type of cranes and the same age, with potential metal fatigue, as the two that have collapsed?
2. What assessments on metal fatigue and other structural weaknesses were made after the first collapse? Why did these assessments not lead to crane 6 being deemed unsafe? And are these same flawed assessments being used in assessing whether operations are "safe" to resume?
3. Are the HSE findings on the initial investigation available to the public? If not, why not? Are HSE investigations exempt from Freedom of Information requests?
4. As costs have been cut, including via redundancies, has safety also been sacrificed due to workload targets (e.g. 25 moves an hour), loss of experienced staff and costs? I agree with "Nearly an OAP" who said:
"Peoples lives should come before profit every time." That didn't seem to be the case with Railtrack, which
was why it was pretty much nationalised into Network Rail.
5. "saint tom" - "however in 2004-2005 this type of crane was made 5 meters higher and the booms extended by 4 meters with swl increase from 36 tonnes to 41 tonnes". My basic understanding of physics (not a mech/civil engineer) would reason that the turning effect on the holding structures by increasing weights and increasing the length of the boom without reliable strengthening of the crane could explain one or both of the collapses?

Would be very interested to hear informed opinions on this.
one thing that has happen again, is that fully qualified riggers have been push out of the loop of the investigation, this is the third time this has happen where the container port is concerned, riggers would ask the right questions, and look in to it the right way. ever since the mid 80's fully qualified riggers have been push out of the loop of any H/S matter.

veracity says...
11:22am Thu 16 Jul 09

would be v interested to read southeys report on the accident
sure the report would be very comprehensive, easily read and factual with blame placed on capitalism,Office workers, the management,erosion in soton water, lack of riggers, no ice rink and lastly the boogy!!
in the circumstances best left to the Hse, or indded the Compass pressuer group who seem to be asking the right questions

keepinitreal says...
2:09pm Thu 6 Aug 09

I work in the health and safety construction sector not for the HSE but for a souhmampton based company. I spent 5 years working in the port of southampton as a rigger.

What has happened here is negligence. The HSE i am sure will come to this conclusion of both incidents and heads will be on the block. It is great that the crane driver survived this ordeal and lucky that there were no riggers on or around the containers when it collapsed.

From my observations whilst working in the port, i witnessed a total lack of health and safety whilst working on the container terminal. On induction into the container port I was shown videos of what procedures are in place regarding health and safety. In the videos men were transported around the container ships in gondolas so they could get to where they needed to get to safely. In reality I only see these gondolas in operation a few ( 6 or less ) times. Guys that were working for Drakes at the time were drinking beer in their mess room under the noses of supervisors, drugs were being smoked openly. Within their mess room were at least a dozen fridges that were full of beer that was sold to guys that were still on their shift. So for the person that thinks pot smoking and lager louts are on building sites I suggest you look nearer to home. What amazed me was the fact that no supervisor seemed to care what they were doing. These were guys that were drinking and smoking and then driving straddle carriers or padding out or securing cargo. I know that drink and drugs were not anything to do with this incident but the record should be put straight. Another sad thing for the workers in the port is the union. If they are in the T&GWU then I do feel for you. This union is spineless when sticking up for its members. For the record whilst working in the port of southampton i did not ever witness any SCT workers drinking or smoking drugs.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree