News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


School using curry 'bribes' to improve attendance


SCHOOLS have cooked up a novel idea to improve their children’s attendance at school.

Parents are being offered the chance to win a free curry if they get their children to class more often. Local restaurants have joined the scheme by offering a meal to mums and dads.

It has proved so successful that truancy rates by persistent offenders at one school have been cut by more than half.

But the scheme has not curried favour with everyone. One teaching union branded it “bribery” to reward parents for fulfilling their legal obligation to take their children to school.

The scheme was launched at Glenfield Infant School in Bitterne last September after average attendance figures dropped below the recommended level set by Ofsted.

Every youngster at the school with a 95 per cent attendance rate is entered into a draw once a term along with those whose truancy has dramatically declined. Good behaviour is also taken into consideration.

The winner’s parents receive a meal voucher to the value of about £40.

The cost of the scheme has been met by POSH, with no money taken from the school’s budget.

Five sets of parents have so far received a meal voucher at POSH Indian restaurant in Southampton, which also entitles them to alcoholic drinks.

Head teacher Joanne Dorricott, who came up with the scheme, said it was not bribery but a reward and incentive for parents.

She said: “We are delighted.

Even if we can make a difference to one child it’s good news. The number of persistent absentee children has decreased by half since the autumn term.

“We don’t want parents to think that they are not good at getting their children to school. But we need to imbed how important it is to get children to school at this age.

Otherwise we have lost them.”

Barbara Trott, vice-chairman of governors, said: “It’s ultimately about the education of children and if they are not there regularly their education is just going to suffer and we will have failed them. So anything we can put into place to increase their attendance can only be a good thing.

“It’s a way of saying thank you to the parents and that we appreciate their efforts by making sure their child recognises the importance of coming to school. It’s teaching children to abide by the school rules to come in every day and turn up on time. If you start getting behind that’s when problems occur. We want the best for every single child but we need parents to work with us.”

Ron Clooney, Southamptonbased executive member of the NASUWT teaching union, said: “It’s bribery and totally inappropriate.

It is a legal requirement to bring your child to school. It gives out the message that you don’t do anything in life unless there is a reward.

“If a parent doesn’t send their child to school they should get a prison sentence not a curry.

Society is going crazy and it’s bordering on lunacy.”

A similar scheme was also run at Townhill Infant School during the 2006/07 and 2007/08 academic years.

Head teacher Penny Orme said that it also improved attendance after parents received a meal at POSH and Kuti’s Brasserie in Southampton once a month.

Manoj Raichura, owner of POSH Indian restaurant, Queensway, said: “It’s sad in a way that we have to do this but we are doing it for the future of these children.

“If we can do something good and it helps just one or two kids avoid ending up on the streets or doing drugs then at least we can say we tried.

“I think it’s excellent news and we want to increase their attendance even more.”

See today's paper for more on this story


Comments(66)

goard says...
12:11pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Talk about the carrot and the stick! I would be using the stick rather than the carrot and that would be for the parents. It's time to put the boot in for some parents and their erstwhile kids - actually I use to truant and scrump for apples, but by golly I was afraid of Mum. All kids do it, but its worrying because we are now breeding sub-human species on a large scale.

goard

Big Boy says...
12:28pm Tue 21 Jul 09

'Breeding sub human species', are you talking about Chimpanzees or Australopithecines?

calmdown says...
12:33pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Yet again - those that don't conform get rewarded whilst those who take their moral and legal duty seriously get nothing, we are teaching our good children that they are better off being truants and under achievers.


AnnieP says...
12:40pm Tue 21 Jul 09

calmdown wrote:
Yet again - those that don't conform get rewarded whilst those who take their moral and legal duty seriously get nothing, we are teaching our good children that they are better off being truants and under achievers.
Agreed. The only reward I need is knowing that my son will get a decent education.

As for an incentive, I don't need one. Im a parent FFS, its my job. If you can't be ar$ed to raise kids properly then don't bother having them.

Can't believe we've got to the point where we are rewarding common sense.

gareth.pn says...
12:41pm Tue 21 Jul 09

What is going to be done about the resulting obesity issues?

Redback says...
12:48pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Astoundingly stupid idea.

Condor Man says...
1:01pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Who will be paying for this? us of course. The people who send their kids to school every day. If you are not happy with this write to the councillors in charge of education to voice your opinions.

Shoong says...
1:28pm Tue 21 Jul 09

So - fail in your duty as a parent & be rewarded with currys. I suppose those who come under the above eat this gunk most nights anyway.

It's a weird society we live in when the good, law abiding citizen ends up paying for 'bribes' so others will fall in line.

How did it get to the point where it is rewarding to be a bad parent? As for the above story, you couldn't make it up.

Shame on Glenfield Infants School.

calmdown says...
1:29pm Tue 21 Jul 09

I was thinking that surely the parents/children pictured would be ashamed of being rewarded for bad behaviour and that they wouldnt want their photo published howvere having just reread the story, I think the echo may be misleading us - are the children who are getting the reward those that have achieved 100% attendence and therefore the reward is for the good children/parents ? Please clarify.

One Dollar says...
1:39pm Tue 21 Jul 09

I agree, if you do the right thing, pay your bills and work for a living, you don't get any help, ever. This country has gone to the dogs, it is ridiculous, not to mention outrageous that people who can't even get their children to school are being rewarded - what next - the world has gone mad!!!!

Eve says...
1:58pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Ive a child who hasnt had 1 day off in over 4yrs, what reward does he get for this??? nothing.... what a surprise.

lisa99 says...
2:00pm Tue 21 Jul 09

My child attend Glenfield and I can clarify that the incentive is for children who have 100% attendance with various incentives, not just curry, so this is rewarding the good attendance. It all changes when they get to junior school though where the good kids get overlooked whilst the naughty ones get all sorts of 'incentives'.

Condor Man says...
2:06pm Tue 21 Jul 09

I can only suggest that if you are unhappy about this contact your councillors, Royston Smith and Peter Baillie cover wards close to Glenfield School. How dare a school, funded by the public person, incentivise attendance when it is a legal obligation to send children to school. Also, what does Clive Webster have to say about it? come on Echo, get the council involved.

Bitterne28 says...
2:08pm Tue 21 Jul 09

This initiative is rewarding children who had 100% attendance at school for the year not poor attendance. They are rewarding the children not the parents. Get a grip all of you!

calmdown says...
2:19pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Bitterne28 wrote:
This initiative is rewarding children who had 100% attendance at school for the year not poor attendance. They are rewarding the children not the parents. Get a grip all of you!
Hi

thats what I want the echo to clarify - its the reporting that is misleading people by calling it a bribe - I dont want the children in the picture to be upset if in fact they are the good kids and getting rewarded (makes a nice change) - can the echo please clarify the story

Boris Remmington says...
2:26pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Pictures of children ! Isn't this illegal ?
The police should be told about those knives on the table!
Why the ethnic food and not McDonalds ?

sadtobehere says...
2:29pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Abhorrent.

The money would be better spent in employing a welfare officer to round up all the children in the shopping centres and streets. Then take them to school and ensure that they have a detention to make up for the hours they have missed. The parents can refund the
cost out of their benefits to the council.

Is this the idea of the new education officer from the council?


BrixtonSaint says...
2:37pm Tue 21 Jul 09

why doesn't society forcibly impose sterilisation on some of those likely to be a burden on taxpayers? We all know the ones, where generations of one family live on benefits. Or did someone already come up with that idea? Oh yes, he wasn't very popular was he?
But seriously, if parents aren't bothered to fulfill their legal obligation, hit them where it hurts, in their pocket. How do these do gooders come up with these ideas and surely enough evidence is out there to tell them it won't make a blind bit of difference. A korma - I ask you. Suspend benefits or fine them on the spot, they'll soon make sure these kids return to the classroom and hopefully get an education which might just lead to a job instead of a life relying on state handouts.

Bitterne28 says...
2:46pm Tue 21 Jul 09

calmdown wrote:
Bitterne28 wrote: This initiative is rewarding children who had 100% attendance at school for the year not poor attendance. They are rewarding the children not the parents. Get a grip all of you!
Hi thats what I want the echo to clarify - its the reporting that is misleading people by calling it a bribe - I dont want the children in the picture to be upset if in fact they are the good kids and getting rewarded (makes a nice change) - can the echo please clarify the story
Not sure the echo will bother. It seems to me they want to sensationalise a story and belittle a gesture aimed at rewarding children for good attendance.

I can promise you it was a reward for 100% attendance at school.

Bitterne28 says...
2:48pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Eve wrote:
Ive a child who hasnt had 1 day off in over 4yrs, what reward does he get for this??? nothing.... what a surprise.
Send you child to Glenfield then!

Redback says...
3:02pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Bitterne28 wrote:
calmdown wrote:
Bitterne28 wrote: This initiative is rewarding children who had 100% attendance at school for the year not poor attendance. They are rewarding the children not the parents. Get a grip all of you!
Hi thats what I want the echo to clarify - its the reporting that is misleading people by calling it a bribe - I dont want the children in the picture to be upset if in fact they are the good kids and getting rewarded (makes a nice change) - can the echo please clarify the story
Not sure the echo will bother. It seems to me they want to sensationalise a story and belittle a gesture aimed at rewarding children for good attendance. I can promise you it was a reward for 100% attendance at school.
The Echo states:

"Every youngster at the school with a 95 per cent attendance rate is entered into a draw once a term along with those whose truancy has dramatically declined. Good behaviour is also taken into consideration.

The winner’s parents receive a meal voucher to the value of about £40."

So which is it?

doodle1 says...
3:16pm Tue 21 Jul 09

The taxpayer must footing this bill,which means myself and all the other tax payers in this area are helping to pay for them to have a good old knees up,My children attend school as they should and i expect nothing in return, It's the law to ensure your child attends school,.. not a reward incentive, also.. the people who accept this gift should be ashamed of themselves. absolutely disgusting!

wilson castaway says...
3:20pm Tue 21 Jul 09

My child had a great attendance this year and he got a certificate, im sure a curry would of been lovely but you cant hang it on thier bedroom wall.

Bitterne28 says...
3:20pm Tue 21 Jul 09

doodle1 wrote:
The taxpayer must footing this bill,which means myself and all the other tax payers in this area are helping to pay for them to have a good old knees up,My children attend school as they should and i expect nothing in return, It's the law to ensure your child attends school,.. not a reward incentive, also.. the people who accept this gift should be ashamed of themselves. absolutely disgusting!
The restaurant picked up the bill!!!!

can the echo please respond as to why they chose the words bribe?

my source says 100% but if the echos says 95% then so be it. But does it matter as the point of it all is that the reward was good attendance. An idea funded by the a local restaurant. I still can't find the problem with this idea. Good on Glenfield!

Paul TS says...
3:27pm Tue 21 Jul 09

How about we name and shame the parents in the local and National press, who half the time even turn off their mobiles when the schools call them?
May seem extreme but in all honesty I cannot understand how some people are allowed to have children, after all you have to be checked to get a cat or a dog from many places!

greystonesben says...
3:28pm Tue 21 Jul 09

doodle1 wrote:
The taxpayer must footing this bill,which means myself and all the other tax payers in this area are helping to pay for them to have a good old knees up,My children attend school as they should and i expect nothing in return, It's the law to ensure your child attends school,.. not a reward incentive, also.. the people who accept this gift should be ashamed of themselves. absolutely disgusting!
Doodle you may want to read the story before jumping on your high horse!

It clearly states that POSH the Indian restaurant opposite the old New York, New Yorks club is funding this and it is NOT coming out of the schools budget (which is presumably funded by tax payers).

While the idea is obviously working, you have to question the morals and mentality of a parents who is more incentivised by a curry and a beer than their child getting a good education, staying off the streets and the life of potential crime which ensues.

Someone joked above making a reference I believe to a certain Austrian and sterilisation, but this 'chav' Wayne & Waynetta, Vicky Pollard and 'Am I bovvered tho' soceity which is rapidly growing, which acts as a parasite on this country sucking valuable money from it while contributing nothing and in a lot of cases, costing more money by way of crime, vandalism and other wrong doings needs to be dealt with.

Ken Hutchinson says...
3:37pm Tue 21 Jul 09

The number of posts from planks who don't bother to read the article properly before commenting astounds me.Engage your brains before you start spouting please....

Redback says...
3:45pm Tue 21 Jul 09

The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill.

It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities.

Nice PR job by POSH though.

Smiley69 says...
4:07pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Another example of how we are becoming a Nanny state. We don't penalise people for doing wrong, whilst rewarding for doing the right thing there are ways & means. The issue re obesity sprung to mind when I first read this. The only incentive there should be is getting a good education but even that these does is not enough as there may not be a job at the end of the day. One other thing though - at least it's not a story about murder, politicians expenses or what's happening next at Southampton FC.

Becky Grubb says...
4:18pm Tue 21 Jul 09

I consider myself to be a very competent mother and it was my child who was rewarded not me!! I do not feel that I have been bribed to do my basic legal obligation of taking my child to school. I think the scheme is a fantastic idea and well done to Mrs Dorricott, maybe we need more headteachers like this in our schools. My child had a fantastic time and feels a great sense of achievement. People who have slated this need to get a life and worry about things that are worth worrying about!!

Bitterne28 says...
4:22pm Tue 21 Jul 09

I think the school and the children deserve an apology from the echo for twisting what is a story of the local community and a school trying to reward children for good attendance into one that uses words such as 'truant' and 'bribe'. How can children aged betwen 4 and 7 be truant?
Ash Bolton you should be ashamed!

AdrianSmith says...
4:24pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Bitterne28 wrote:
I think the school and the children deserve an apology from the echo for twisting what is a story of the local community and a school trying to reward children for good attendance into one that uses words such as 'truant' and 'bribe'. How can children aged betwen 4 and 7 be truant? Ash Bolton you should be ashamed!
Mother of mercy, you really are stupid, aren't you?

Paramjit Bahia says...
4:32pm Tue 21 Jul 09

On this issue I fully support the executive member of the teacher’s union who has expressed opposition to this most ridiculous idea, which is only sending the message to impressionable young minds that bad behaviour pays good dividends.

But considering what the pillars of our society the MPs themselves have been up to and got away with milking the system, I am not surprised that insanity is now spreading even in the educational establishments.

This must stop before it gets too late, so sack the head teacher and remove the school governors before they hit another moment of madness.

relbats47 says...
4:39pm Tue 21 Jul 09

This is just another story written by a headline seeking reporter who cannot see, hear or write the truth. Why do they not repart what is really happening and only what they think will be an attention grabbing story. Marks 0 out of 10!

Bitternegirl says...
4:41pm Tue 21 Jul 09

I am absolutely amazed that parents of truants are being rewarded in this way. It is the law that children attend school and it is about time that parents whose children are good attenders at school were rewarded. Just how many of those parents would love a free meal out as a thankyou. I suspect all of them. We must stop rewarding wrong-doers and concentrate on the majority of school attendees and their parents. In the words of Victor Meldrew "I don't believe it!"

Bitterne28 says...
4:45pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Bitternegirl wrote:
I am absolutely amazed that parents of truants are being rewarded in this way. It is the law that children attend school and it is about time that parents whose children are good attenders at school were rewarded. Just how many of those parents would love a free meal out as a thankyou. I suspect all of them. We must stop rewarding wrong-doers and concentrate on the majority of school attendees and their parents. In the words of Victor Meldrew "I don't believe it!"
read the article! that was the whole point of what the school did, rewarding the good attenders!

lasoton says...
4:54pm Tue 21 Jul 09

gareth.pn wrote:
What is going to be done about the resulting obesity issues?
My thought exactly!

Lone Ranger says...
4:55pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Well if you read it right you would see that it isnt US its POSH.

And go careful as the councillors are Tories you know

Redback says...
5:00pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Becky Grubb wrote:
I consider myself to be a very competent mother and it was my child who was rewarded not me!! I do not feel that I have been bribed to do my basic legal obligation of taking my child to school. I think the scheme is a fantastic idea and well done to Mrs Dorricott, maybe we need more headteachers like this in our schools. My child had a fantastic time and feels a great sense of achievement. People who have slated this need to get a life and worry about things that are worth worrying about!!
No criticism of you, and I'm glad you had a nice time, but...

"My child ... feels a great sense of achievement."

What have they achieved?

Rewarding behaviour that should be the bare minimum creates an expectation in young minds that will not be met as they grow up. It creates a false sense of entitlement, without having actually put in the work to earn anything.

What happens when they get a job? Will they expect a meal out just for turning up on time then?

We molly-coddle our kids in this ridiculous 'incentivization' culture, and then when they turn 18 we shove them out into the stark reality of the real world. It comes as a massive shock to many of them, and not all of them adjust. Why are we then surprised when a number of them prefer the handout option to working for a living?

comet71 says...
5:24pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Redback wrote:
Becky Grubb wrote: I consider myself to be a very competent mother and it was my child who was rewarded not me!! I do not feel that I have been bribed to do my basic legal obligation of taking my child to school. I think the scheme is a fantastic idea and well done to Mrs Dorricott, maybe we need more headteachers like this in our schools. My child had a fantastic time and feels a great sense of achievement. People who have slated this need to get a life and worry about things that are worth worrying about!!
No criticism of you, and I'm glad you had a nice time, but... "My child ... feels a great sense of achievement." What have they achieved? Rewarding behaviour that should be the bare minimum creates an expectation in young minds that will not be met as they grow up. It creates a false sense of entitlement, without having actually put in the work to earn anything. What happens when they get a job? Will they expect a meal out just for turning up on time then? We molly-coddle our kids in this ridiculous 'incentivization' culture, and then when they turn 18 we shove them out into the stark reality of the real world. It comes as a massive shock to many of them, and not all of them adjust. Why are we then surprised when a number of them prefer the handout option to working for a living?
Perhaps people should read the article thoroughly before passing judgement. It is a reward for good attendance or for those families that have made a big improvement to otherwise poor attendance.
Encouraging good attendance at infant school level will hopefully help those children set a pattern for later life.

Glenfield is not alone in rewarding attendance with treats, my children have attended other primary schools with in southampton and have all received a 'treat' for good attendance.

Whilst on the subject of rewarding behaviour that should be a bare minimum, why do fat cat directors get huge bonus payments on top of their already over inflated wages just for doing their job, a bare minimum too surely!!!!!!

Redback says...
5:27pm Tue 21 Jul 09

"Whilst on the subject of rewarding behaviour that should be a bare minimum, why do fat cat directors get huge bonus payments on top of their already over inflated wages just for doing their job, a bare minimum too surely!!!!!!"

Er.... yes. But hardly pertinent to the subject under discussion.

comet71 says...
5:41pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Redback wrote:
The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.

Vconfused says...
5:43pm Tue 21 Jul 09

As usual, misleading reporting by the Echo. But, if it was a reward for children with 100% attendance, then I think they should get a reward. There are obvious links between attendance and progress and achievement. If a child has been at school every single day for the whole year it shows that the child (or more realistically at infants, their parents) are treating their education as really important. The expected attendance for the average child is 94%, set by the govt. So they have achieved significantly better than the 'bare minimum'. Taking steps against parents who do not send their children to school is a separate issue, but unfortunately some parents know how to play the system to avoid a fine.

comet71 says...
5:58pm Tue 21 Jul 09

wilson castaway wrote:
My child had a great attendance this year and he got a certificate, im sure a curry would of been lovely but you cant hang it on thier bedroom wall.
I know children that go to Glenfield and i know that they also issue Termly attendance certificates, Annual attendance certificates and also give out a school mascot to the class with the best attendance for that week.

COOPER PIKEY says...
6:00pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Big Boy wrote:
'Breeding sub human species', are you talking about Chimpanzees or Australopithecines?
Do you not watch Jeremy Kyle?

Millie1212 says...
6:44pm Tue 21 Jul 09

How pathetic, I think its really wrong. Parents should have enough discipline with thier children and respect from them.I would never have not gone to school, trouble is there are too many parents who arent strict enough and unfortunately everyone else has to pay for it!! as for POSH I wont be going there any more and spending my hard earned cash whilst some people get it for free just by being ok parents!!What is the headmistress thinking of!!

Redback says...
7:21pm Tue 21 Jul 09

comet71 wrote:
Redback wrote:
The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
Good attendence + effort = good performance.

Reward good performance, not just turning up.

The points I made re: an incentivization culture stand. Anyone care to comment?

Vconfused says...
8:03pm Tue 21 Jul 09

As I said, 100% attendance is perfect attendance. Why should something that is perfect not be rewarded? It is not the minimum. The minimum is doing just enough to not get fined for your child's truancy. The govt agreed 'average' or target is 94%. Do you work in a school? Have you been to work every day this year? And pupils that have 100% attendance are obviously not the ones that will be in a McJob!! Parents will not be motivated to take their child to school by the possibility for winning a curry. Its a ridiculous idea - the threat of fines is not enough to make some parents get their children to school.

philliplewis says...
8:23pm Tue 21 Jul 09

When i was in a childrens home in the 1990's the onsite school used to pay us cash for each maths book we competed and then when we had built up the cash they would then buy the cigs for us. I was only 12 at the time.

I did tell the staff at the home at the time and not much happened.

hampshiremum says...
8:27pm Tue 21 Jul 09

POSH - my daughter achieved 100% attendance again this year, please may she have a meal voucher? My husband and I both work hard, but she doesn't get to eat out in a restaurant very often.

R.Sole says...
9:39pm Tue 21 Jul 09

This paper and you fools have got it so wrong. l know one of the children in this photo, who comes from a good professional family. He`s loved his 1st year of going to school, hence the reason he had a 100% attendance So dont tar everyone with the same brush. Does everyone think a letter went round to the parents at the beginning of the year or something, that if their kids went to school they`d get a curry?? The reward was only known about by parents about a week ago! So the kids who went were genuinly being rewarded for what they had achieved in the year. I know for one, the boy l know was very proud to have been choosen and has made him even more enthusiastic to keep up his good work. I think this is a great idea, and well done Mrs D! Not everyones a total loser

snapperdownunder says...
10:04pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Curry!! Hardly a good advert for healthy eating.

rosie64 says...
10:08pm Tue 21 Jul 09

It is rather disappointing that the full article as printed in the newspaper does not appear here. It is quite that this in an incentive rewarding continued good attendance and not a bribe as suggested in the headlines. May I suggest before anymore negativity is thrown towards this school that people ignore this shocking headline and read the full article to see this incentive for what it is. I would also like to point out that the photograph of the children does not seem to bear any relation whatsoever to the story.

rosie64 says...
10:11pm Tue 21 Jul 09

Snapperdownunder - Surely the whole idea of a healthy eating regime is to eat a wide variety of foods, and having the occasional treat? This seems to me to be a treat, not a suggestion that these people and children eat a korma on a regular daily basis.
Everything in moderation?

Big Boy says...
7:45am Wed 22 Jul 09

Hi Cooper Pikey, No I don't watch Jeremy Kyle as I am at work. However, I believe that Judge Alan Berg called in 'human bear baiting' in September 2007, so it would seem the subjects are indeed human from a legal stand point. Thinking about that were you actually referring to jeremy Kyle himself?

Tommy News says...
8:14am Wed 22 Jul 09

Once again Mr Kuti shows his astute business sense. Great PR for £40. No wonder he is so successful.

shane-meh says...
8:36am Wed 22 Jul 09

Am I going to also receive a free curry for abiding by the law??

Bartonian says...
10:33am Wed 22 Jul 09

How about chips and burgers, with Jamie Oliver as the chef? It's just about the kind of crap schools serve up.

stay-both

S!mon says...
11:14am Wed 22 Jul 09

Tommy News wrote:
Once again Mr Kuti shows his astute business sense. Great PR for £40. No wonder he is so successful.
Agree.

£40 per term is very good PR.

I wonder how long before other restuarants hop on....

freemantlegirl2 says...
11:38am Wed 22 Jul 09

doodle1 wrote:
The taxpayer must footing this bill,which means myself and all the other tax payers in this area are helping to pay for them to have a good old knees up,My children attend school as they should and i expect nothing in return, It's the law to ensure your child attends school,.. not a reward incentive, also.. the people who accept this gift should be ashamed of themselves. absolutely disgusting!
Read the article, it says that POSH is providing the vouchers NOT the school!

But I agree, it's a daft idea which is attracting negative attention for the school.

It is law and if you deliberately keep your child off school for no good reason, or can't be bothered then you should be fined and have to attend some sort of parenting class. I can also see that the people getting these vouchers will only be the people who are sending them all the time anyway, the others who refuse or who don't care will 'curry' on regardless! ;)

There have always been 'incentives' for attendance, and I think you'll find the target in ALL schools is 95% not 100 as that's impossible to achieve! particularly with swine flu about! My child gets a reward and they got...wait for it.... a pencil!

However, as another parent said the reward is seeing a child thrive and learn. I give my child rewards when she has achieved something special and when she got a good report this year. She was delighted :)

My reward is the odd glass of wine after a stressful day with the kids!


Saintster says...
2:39pm Wed 22 Jul 09

Some of the comments on here are a digrace! I have taken my time to read all of the comments written here, by people who clearly do not know what happens in education these days. All based on what they think they know and I have to say that some of the negative comments are just ridiculous!!! It is also clear that some people have commented on the article, but haven't understood it. My daughter goes to the school and we did not know about the reward so how can the headteacher be bribing the children to go to the school. We send our daughter to the school, because it is a great school and she loves it and is getting a great education. Have any of you researched the fact that the school was in the depths of being satisfactory at it's last Ofsted, but in a recent Ofsted they were judged to be good with elements of outstanding. Some of you including RON CLOONEY (NASUWT) need to get off your high horses!! Anything just to get your name in print hey Mr Clooney????? I take my hat off to the school for trying to encourage the children through their doors. It is not the schools fault that some parents don't send their child, they are doing their utmost to educate them. Some of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves!!! Well done Jo Dorricot and the staff at Glenfield school. You are doing an amazing job!!

Redback says...
3:39pm Wed 22 Jul 09

comet71 wrote:
Redback wrote:
The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
"It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance."

No, it doesn't. The school has a responsibility to provide a good education and a nurturing environment. Which according to commenters above it is doing well, so well played them.

The responsibility for attendence is the parents, and the parents alone. If the parents are failing in this, then it should be a case of stick, not carrot. If they have kids then they are supposed to be 'grown-ups' after all. I despair.

Am I meant to be such a grumpy old man at the tender age of 30? :D

mumoftwins says...
4:24pm Wed 22 Jul 09

Whether or not the scheme is ridiculous, (which it clearly is)
Ron Clooney of the teaching union is very wrong. It is NOT a legal requirement for a child to attend school, only to receive and education.
Quite frankly, if schools have to bribe children & parents with junk food to attend then what on earth does that say about Schools?
As for the comments regarding the famous Austrian - would that be a very poorly educated stab at humour perhaps?
It is utterly ludicrous to suggest that children that do not attend school are all useless offspring of pot smoking, track suit wearing 'chavs'. I think in fact you will find, if you do just a little research that it was the poorer classes school was intended for. The wealthy and the smart educated their children at home with tutors.
Enjoy herding your offspring people!

comet71 says...
5:40pm Wed 22 Jul 09

Redback wrote:
comet71 wrote:
Redback wrote: The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
"It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance." No, it doesn't. The school has a responsibility to provide a good education and a nurturing environment. Which according to commenters above it is doing well, so well played them. The responsibility for attendence is the parents, and the parents alone. If the parents are failing in this, then it should be a case of stick, not carrot. If they have kids then they are supposed to be 'grown-ups' after all. I despair. Am I meant to be such a grumpy old man at the tender age of 30? :D
I think you will find that the school does have a responsibility to ENCOURAGE GOOD ATTENDANCE. Otherwise why do they have to answer to the EDUCATION WELFARE OFFICER ONCE A MONTH regarding poor attendance figures.

And the school can also be brought to task by OfSED if the school's attendance level as a whole is below the min requirement. Therefore they need to encourage the best attendance possible.
Glenfield provide a fabulous education in a wonderful enviroment but you need the children to be there.

Redback says...
7:38pm Wed 22 Jul 09

comet71 wrote:
Redback wrote:
comet71 wrote:
Redback wrote: The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
"It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance." No, it doesn't. The school has a responsibility to provide a good education and a nurturing environment. Which according to commenters above it is doing well, so well played them. The responsibility for attendence is the parents, and the parents alone. If the parents are failing in this, then it should be a case of stick, not carrot. If they have kids then they are supposed to be 'grown-ups' after all. I despair. Am I meant to be such a grumpy old man at the tender age of 30? :D
I think you will find that the school does have a responsibility to ENCOURAGE GOOD ATTENDANCE. Otherwise why do they have to answer to the EDUCATION WELFARE OFFICER ONCE A MONTH regarding poor attendance figures.

And the school can also be brought to task by OfSED if the school's attendance level as a whole is below the min requirement. Therefore they need to encourage the best attendance possible.
Glenfield provide a fabulous education in a wonderful enviroment but you need the children to be there.
Legally/procedurally
, I'm sure you may well be right.

But that's not the point.

saintbone says...
12:27pm Fri 24 Jul 09

Can anyone remember when taking a test at school, the teacher always said read it properly before answering. So the majority of you who have left comments why don't you read the article again. It says that they are rewarding the children who are going to school not the ones who are not. It really is that simple.


Trials are underway into whether an ingredient in the curry spice turmeric can help prevent Alzheimer's disease Curry

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses