When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
2:50pm Tuesday 21st July 2009 in
SCHOOLS have cooked up a novel idea to improve their children’s attendance at school.
Parents are being offered the chance to win a free curry if they get their children to class more often. Local restaurants have joined the scheme by offering a meal to mums and dads.
It has proved so successful that truancy rates by persistent offenders at one school have been cut by more than half.
But the scheme has not curried favour with everyone. One teaching union branded it “bribery” to reward parents for fulfilling their legal obligation to take their children to school.
The scheme was launched at Glenfield Infant School in Bitterne last September after average attendance figures dropped below the recommended level set by Ofsted.
Every youngster at the school with a 95 per cent attendance rate is entered into a draw once a term along with those whose truancy has dramatically declined. Good behaviour is also taken into consideration.
The winner’s parents receive a meal voucher to the value of about £40.
The cost of the scheme has been met by POSH, with no money taken from the school’s budget.
Five sets of parents have so far received a meal voucher at POSH Indian restaurant in Southampton, which also entitles them to alcoholic drinks.
Head teacher Joanne Dorricott, who came up with the scheme, said it was not bribery but a reward and incentive for parents.
She said: “We are delighted.
Even if we can make a difference to one child it’s good news. The number of persistent absentee children has decreased by half since the autumn term.
“We don’t want parents to think that they are not good at getting their children to school. But we need to imbed how important it is to get children to school at this age.
Otherwise we have lost them.”
Barbara Trott, vice-chairman of governors, said: “It’s ultimately about the education of children and if they are not there regularly their education is just going to suffer and we will have failed them. So anything we can put into place to increase their attendance can only be a good thing.
“It’s a way of saying thank you to the parents and that we appreciate their efforts by making sure their child recognises the importance of coming to school. It’s teaching children to abide by the school rules to come in every day and turn up on time. If you start getting behind that’s when problems occur. We want the best for every single child but we need parents to work with us.”
Ron Clooney, Southamptonbased executive member of the NASUWT teaching union, said: “It’s bribery and totally inappropriate.
It is a legal requirement to bring your child to school. It gives out the message that you don’t do anything in life unless there is a reward.
“If a parent doesn’t send their child to school they should get a prison sentence not a curry.
Society is going crazy and it’s bordering on lunacy.”
A similar scheme was also run at Townhill Infant School during the 2006/07 and 2007/08 academic years.
Head teacher Penny Orme said that it also improved attendance after parents received a meal at POSH and Kuti’s Brasserie in Southampton once a month.
Manoj Raichura, owner of POSH Indian restaurant, Queensway, said: “It’s sad in a way that we have to do this but we are doing it for the future of these children.
“If we can do something good and it helps just one or two kids avoid ending up on the streets or doing drugs then at least we can say we tried.
“I think it’s excellent news and we want to increase their attendance even more.”
Comments(66)
Big Boy
says...
12:28pm Tue 21 Jul 09
calmdown
says...
12:33pm Tue 21 Jul 09
AnnieP
says...
12:40pm Tue 21 Jul 09
calmdown wrote:Agreed. The only reward I need is knowing that my son will get a decent education.
Yet again - those that don't conform get rewarded whilst those who take their moral and legal duty seriously get nothing, we are teaching our good children that they are better off being truants and under achievers.
gareth.pn
says...
12:41pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Redback
says...
12:48pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Condor Man
says...
1:01pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Shoong
says...
1:28pm Tue 21 Jul 09
calmdown
says...
1:29pm Tue 21 Jul 09
One Dollar
says...
1:39pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Eve
says...
1:58pm Tue 21 Jul 09
lisa99
says...
2:00pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Condor Man
says...
2:06pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28
says...
2:08pm Tue 21 Jul 09
calmdown
says...
2:19pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28 wrote:Hi
This initiative is rewarding children who had 100% attendance at school for the year not poor attendance. They are rewarding the children not the parents. Get a grip all of you!
Boris Remmington
says...
2:26pm Tue 21 Jul 09
sadtobehere
says...
2:29pm Tue 21 Jul 09
BrixtonSaint
says...
2:37pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28
says...
2:46pm Tue 21 Jul 09
calmdown wrote:Not sure the echo will bother. It seems to me they want to sensationalise a story and belittle a gesture aimed at rewarding children for good attendance.
Bitterne28 wrote: This initiative is rewarding children who had 100% attendance at school for the year not poor attendance. They are rewarding the children not the parents. Get a grip all of you!Hi thats what I want the echo to clarify - its the reporting that is misleading people by calling it a bribe - I dont want the children in the picture to be upset if in fact they are the good kids and getting rewarded (makes a nice change) - can the echo please clarify the story
Bitterne28
says...
2:48pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Eve wrote:Send you child to Glenfield then!
Ive a child who hasnt had 1 day off in over 4yrs, what reward does he get for this??? nothing.... what a surprise.
Redback
says...
3:02pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28 wrote:The Echo states:
calmdown wrote:Not sure the echo will bother. It seems to me they want to sensationalise a story and belittle a gesture aimed at rewarding children for good attendance. I can promise you it was a reward for 100% attendance at school.Bitterne28 wrote: This initiative is rewarding children who had 100% attendance at school for the year not poor attendance. They are rewarding the children not the parents. Get a grip all of you!Hi thats what I want the echo to clarify - its the reporting that is misleading people by calling it a bribe - I dont want the children in the picture to be upset if in fact they are the good kids and getting rewarded (makes a nice change) - can the echo please clarify the story
doodle1
says...
3:16pm Tue 21 Jul 09
wilson castaway
says...
3:20pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28
says...
3:20pm Tue 21 Jul 09
doodle1 wrote:The restaurant picked up the bill!!!!
The taxpayer must footing this bill,which means myself and all the other tax payers in this area are helping to pay for them to have a good old knees up,My children attend school as they should and i expect nothing in return, It's the law to ensure your child attends school,.. not a reward incentive, also.. the people who accept this gift should be ashamed of themselves. absolutely disgusting!
Paul TS
says...
3:27pm Tue 21 Jul 09
greystonesben
says...
3:28pm Tue 21 Jul 09
doodle1 wrote:Doodle you may want to read the story before jumping on your high horse!
The taxpayer must footing this bill,which means myself and all the other tax payers in this area are helping to pay for them to have a good old knees up,My children attend school as they should and i expect nothing in return, It's the law to ensure your child attends school,.. not a reward incentive, also.. the people who accept this gift should be ashamed of themselves. absolutely disgusting!
Ken Hutchinson
says...
3:37pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Redback
says...
3:45pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Smiley69
says...
4:07pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Becky Grubb
says...
4:18pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28
says...
4:22pm Tue 21 Jul 09
AdrianSmith
says...
4:24pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28 wrote:Mother of mercy, you really are stupid, aren't you?
I think the school and the children deserve an apology from the echo for twisting what is a story of the local community and a school trying to reward children for good attendance into one that uses words such as 'truant' and 'bribe'. How can children aged betwen 4 and 7 be truant? Ash Bolton you should be ashamed!
Paramjit Bahia
says...
4:32pm Tue 21 Jul 09
relbats47
says...
4:39pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitternegirl
says...
4:41pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitterne28
says...
4:45pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Bitternegirl wrote:read the article! that was the whole point of what the school did, rewarding the good attenders!
I am absolutely amazed that parents of truants are being rewarded in this way. It is the law that children attend school and it is about time that parents whose children are good attenders at school were rewarded. Just how many of those parents would love a free meal out as a thankyou. I suspect all of them. We must stop rewarding wrong-doers and concentrate on the majority of school attendees and their parents. In the words of Victor Meldrew "I don't believe it!"
lasoton
says...
4:54pm Tue 21 Jul 09
gareth.pn wrote:My thought exactly!
What is going to be done about the resulting obesity issues?
Lone Ranger
says...
4:55pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Redback
says...
5:00pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Becky Grubb wrote:No criticism of you, and I'm glad you had a nice time, but...
I consider myself to be a very competent mother and it was my child who was rewarded not me!! I do not feel that I have been bribed to do my basic legal obligation of taking my child to school. I think the scheme is a fantastic idea and well done to Mrs Dorricott, maybe we need more headteachers like this in our schools. My child had a fantastic time and feels a great sense of achievement. People who have slated this need to get a life and worry about things that are worth worrying about!!
comet71
says...
5:24pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Redback wrote:Perhaps people should read the article thoroughly before passing judgement. It is a reward for good attendance or for those families that have made a big improvement to otherwise poor attendance.
Becky Grubb wrote: I consider myself to be a very competent mother and it was my child who was rewarded not me!! I do not feel that I have been bribed to do my basic legal obligation of taking my child to school. I think the scheme is a fantastic idea and well done to Mrs Dorricott, maybe we need more headteachers like this in our schools. My child had a fantastic time and feels a great sense of achievement. People who have slated this need to get a life and worry about things that are worth worrying about!!No criticism of you, and I'm glad you had a nice time, but... "My child ... feels a great sense of achievement." What have they achieved? Rewarding behaviour that should be the bare minimum creates an expectation in young minds that will not be met as they grow up. It creates a false sense of entitlement, without having actually put in the work to earn anything. What happens when they get a job? Will they expect a meal out just for turning up on time then? We molly-coddle our kids in this ridiculous 'incentivization' culture, and then when they turn 18 we shove them out into the stark reality of the real world. It comes as a massive shock to many of them, and not all of them adjust. Why are we then surprised when a number of them prefer the handout option to working for a living?
Redback
says...
5:27pm Tue 21 Jul 09
comet71
says...
5:41pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Redback wrote:Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
Vconfused
says...
5:43pm Tue 21 Jul 09
comet71
says...
5:58pm Tue 21 Jul 09
wilson castaway wrote:I know children that go to Glenfield and i know that they also issue Termly attendance certificates, Annual attendance certificates and also give out a school mascot to the class with the best attendance for that week.
My child had a great attendance this year and he got a certificate, im sure a curry would of been lovely but you cant hang it on thier bedroom wall.
COOPER PIKEY
says...
6:00pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Big Boy wrote:Do you not watch Jeremy Kyle?
'Breeding sub human species', are you talking about Chimpanzees or Australopithecines?
Millie1212
says...
6:44pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Redback
says...
7:21pm Tue 21 Jul 09
comet71 wrote:Good attendence + effort = good performance.
Redback wrote:Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
Vconfused
says...
8:03pm Tue 21 Jul 09
philliplewis
says...
8:23pm Tue 21 Jul 09
hampshiremum
says...
8:27pm Tue 21 Jul 09
R.Sole
says...
9:39pm Tue 21 Jul 09
snapperdownunder
says...
10:04pm Tue 21 Jul 09
rosie64
says...
10:08pm Tue 21 Jul 09
rosie64
says...
10:11pm Tue 21 Jul 09
Big Boy
says...
7:45am Wed 22 Jul 09
Tommy News
says...
8:14am Wed 22 Jul 09
shane-meh
says...
8:36am Wed 22 Jul 09
Bartonian
says...
10:33am Wed 22 Jul 09
S!mon
says...
11:14am Wed 22 Jul 09
Tommy News wrote:Agree.
Once again Mr Kuti shows his astute business sense. Great PR for £40. No wonder he is so successful.
freemantlegirl2
says...
11:38am Wed 22 Jul 09
doodle1 wrote:Read the article, it says that POSH is providing the vouchers NOT the school!
The taxpayer must footing this bill,which means myself and all the other tax payers in this area are helping to pay for them to have a good old knees up,My children attend school as they should and i expect nothing in return, It's the law to ensure your child attends school,.. not a reward incentive, also.. the people who accept this gift should be ashamed of themselves. absolutely disgusting!
Saintster
says...
2:39pm Wed 22 Jul 09
Redback
says...
3:39pm Wed 22 Jul 09
comet71 wrote:"It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance."
Redback wrote:Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.
mumoftwins
says...
4:24pm Wed 22 Jul 09
comet71
says...
5:40pm Wed 22 Jul 09
Redback wrote:I think you will find that the school does have a responsibility to ENCOURAGE GOOD ATTENDANCE. Otherwise why do they have to answer to the EDUCATION WELFARE OFFICER ONCE A MONTH regarding poor attendance figures.
comet71 wrote:"It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance." No, it doesn't. The school has a responsibility to provide a good education and a nurturing environment. Which according to commenters above it is doing well, so well played them. The responsibility for attendence is the parents, and the parents alone. If the parents are failing in this, then it should be a case of stick, not carrot. If they have kids then they are supposed to be 'grown-ups' after all. I despair. Am I meant to be such a grumpy old man at the tender age of 30? :DRedback wrote: The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
Redback
says...
7:38pm Wed 22 Jul 09
comet71 wrote:Legally/procedurally
Redback wrote:I think you will find that the school does have a responsibility to ENCOURAGE GOOD ATTENDANCE. Otherwise why do they have to answer to the EDUCATION WELFARE OFFICER ONCE A MONTH regarding poor attendance figures.
comet71 wrote:"It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance." No, it doesn't. The school has a responsibility to provide a good education and a nurturing environment. Which according to commenters above it is doing well, so well played them. The responsibility for attendence is the parents, and the parents alone. If the parents are failing in this, then it should be a case of stick, not carrot. If they have kids then they are supposed to be 'grown-ups' after all. I despair. Am I meant to be such a grumpy old man at the tender age of 30? :DRedback wrote: The article very clearly states that POSH are footing the bill. It's not the cost, it's the principle. Rewards for good academic performance, achievements in arts, sports etc I have no problem with. Rewards for just turning up/taking your kids to school consistently are ridiculous. Do you want them to live comfortably, or subsist on the minimum in a McJob? Parenthood comes with duties and responsibilities. Nice PR job by POSH though.Surely getting a child to attend school regularly is the only way to ensure that a child can learn and achieve at school. It is a parents responsibility to do this but the school also has a responsibility to encourage good attendance. Here, here to a school that has thought of a different way of rewarding and improving in this area. Only with a good education and regular attendance, can children grow, acheive and attain qualifications that will lead to them getting a 'decent' job.
And the school can also be brought to task by OfSED if the school's attendance level as a whole is below the min requirement. Therefore they need to encourage the best attendance possible.
Glenfield provide a fabulous education in a wonderful enviroment but you need the children to be there.
saintbone
says...
12:27pm Fri 24 Jul 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
goard says...
12:11pm Tue 21 Jul 09
goard