News RSS Feed


Photos and video of school proms from the Daily Echo Follow the Daily Echo on Facebook to get headlines straight to your news feed. Read Chief Superintendent Matthew Greening's Blog Tweet with the Daily Echo

City councillors voice Nursling scheme fears


SOUTHAMPTON councillors are joining objecters to controversial plans to carpet countryside on the border of the city with 350 new homes.

The trustees of the Barker Mill Estate want to build a 27-acre housing estate off Redbridge Lane, Nursling.

They claim the development will support new places in nearby schools, improvements to the village hall and playing pitches, and help Test Valley Borough Council hit its housing targets.

Click below to see a video of today's headlines in sixty seconds

But Southampton councillors have now joined villagers in objecting to the application.

Labour councillor Peter Marsh Jenks, who represents Redbridge, warned: “The development would place extra pressure on Southampton amenities and schools which, I assume, Test Valley Borough Council do not intend to fund.

“I do not see why Redbridge residents should suffer the consequences of overdevelopment in another council’s area.”

Conservative councillor and parliamentary candidate for the west of the city, Jeremy Moulton, added: “The land is clearly defined as part of the local gap and therefore it is not appropriate for housing to go here.”

It comes as a new Ordnance Survey head office is being built nearby as part of an emerging business park alongside the M271.

Nursling parish councillor Nigel Anderdon said villagers fear they will be over-run by traffic and will lose their identity.

“The people like to have a village atmosphere and to feel they are living in the countryside, not a city,” he said.

The development would include 297 houses and 53 flats. Forty per cent would be “affordable” housing.

The site is designated as countryside and a “local gap” between Nursling and Southampton in the adopted Test Valley Borough Local Plan 2006.

The woodland to the north is a site of importance for nature conservation.

Test Valley councillors have already rejected the need for an environmental impact assessment.

Lisa Jackson, director at planning agents Turley Associates, said it had worked hard on an eco-friendly scheme that met the council’s aspirations for the area.

She said: “A decision is expected before the end of the year and we believe this scheme will enable Test Valley Borough Council to move towards meeting housing targets.”


Your Say YourEcho

Unlimited* Service, *fair usage applies says...
6:25pm Thu 22 Oct 09

"I do not see why Redbridge residents should suffer the consequences of overdevelopment in another council’s area."

Great argument - now let's see this work both ways. Perhaps Jenks will be happy if Test place some toll booths on their roads?

Another epic fail by our elected elders.

Condor Man, Southampton says...
6:48pm Thu 22 Oct 09

typical of a leftie like Jenks, where else is there for people to live?

southy, redbridge says...
10:46pm Thu 22 Oct 09

this is the part of redbridge that i told you lot about a while back, the last part of redbridge that never came under southampton, i have no problems with the new homes, has long they are council owned homes and not for private sale. theres to many people on housing waiting list, that need to be sorted and plenty off private homes up for sale for those who want to buy a home.

southy, redbridge says...
10:55pm Thu 22 Oct 09

Condor Man wrote:
typical of a leftie like Jenks, where else is there for people to live?
jenks is no left winger, even lo he in the labour party he is no different from the rest of the labour party right wing, labour stop being a left wing party by the end of the 80's and are now 99% right wing capitalist party.

veracity, Sholing says...
11:28am Fri 23 Oct 09

southy wrote:
this is the part of redbridge that i told you lot about a while back, the last part of redbridge that never came under southampton, i have no problems with the new homes, has long they are council owned homes and not for private sale. theres to many people on housing waiting list, that need to be sorted and plenty off private homes up for sale for those who want to buy a home.
so presume the 'big house' you live in overlooking the ngreen at millbrook(presumably by yourelf) is council owned?

southy, redbridge says...
4:26pm Fri 23 Oct 09

its owned and not by the council, if that helps you any, oh by the way its redbridge not millbrook wrong side of tanners brook where the boundry runs up the middle of the brook. you know the spot where it all ways floods when we get heavy rain.
i have no problems with people buying council homes has long has they get replace by the council, its the only way you can get the homless in to homes, and once they have got a home, then they stand a chance of getting a job. companys will not employ a homeless person.


veracity, Sholing says...
3:56pm Sun 25 Oct 09

so you rent off a Housing trust or something like that.
No problems with this as many people who are not in a [position to fund a mortgage do the same.
If you have no problems about selling council houses you share the same political view as Maggie thatcher and you a died in the wool socialist.
I have family who did well out of council house sales but consider this was v bad policy as it fuelled the consumer boom

Comments are closed on this article.

City councillors voice Nursling scheme fears City councillors voice Nursling scheme fears

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »