A TOP Southampton councillor has today said the city council would never have backed fluoridation if it had known children’s dental health had improved.
Deputy leader Cllr Royston Smith said new survey results, which show the city’s five-year-olds suffer the same amount of tooth decay as those across England, have dramatically weakened the case for
The survey found tooth decay among Southampton children at a ten-year low, as reported in yesterday’s Daily Echo.
The city council’s backing for the plan – affecting nearly 200,000 residents – in last year’s public consultation was seen as key to those in favour of the scheme.
Every other local authority – Hampshire, Eastleigh, New Forest and Test Valley councils – opposed the proposals.
Cllr Smith said: “The council was probably the most important consultee, and whatever we said or did was going to be taken very seriously.”
Every councillor had a free vote in November, and they backed fluoridation 26 to 18.
The report for the meeting claimed the city’s dental health was deteriorating and worse than regional and national averages.
Cllr Smith said the latest figures showing Southampton has lower levels of tooth decay than fluoridated Birmingham, are another nail in the coffin for the case for adding fluoride to the water.
“The main thrust was the poor state of dental health in Southampton, and that’s now shown not to be the case,” he said. “That, combined with the overwhelming public opposition and will of the
people should be enough for the SHA to rethink their plans and abandon them.”
South Central Strategic Health Authority has said it remains committed to fluoridation.
Southampton City Council's vote on fluoride 'would be different'
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network | A Gannett Company
Newsquest Media (Southern) Ltd, Loudwater Mill, Station Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. HP10 9TY|1350|Registered in England & Wales
This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here