When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
2:48pm Monday 14th December 2009 in News
A GROUP of Hampshire residents concerned about the environmental impact of new ferries on the Isle of Wight crossing took their case to the High Court today.
The Lymington River Association says that the bigger boats introduced by Wightlink Ltd are harming mud flats, salt marshes and the river bank, because of their propulsion and steering systems.
The Association's barrister William Norris QC told Mr Justice Owen that there are concerns over the environmental impact of the W Class ferries in an area rich with bird and marine life.
He said the ferries introduced in February this year were "unlawful" and the "project" to bring them in fell foul of the Habitats Directive/Regulations, a European law designed to protect the environment.
The barrister also argued that the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) should have intervened at the time the ferries came in but failed to do so.
"Since no other body with any regulatory authority was willing to intervene, it was left to the Lymington River Association to act," he added.
Mr Norris says that an "appropriate assessment" should have been carried out by a Government department before the ferries were introduced.
He added that the ferries affect the river because of the wash they create, their "drawdown" of water, and the sediment that is stirred up from the river bed.
Wightlink says that the ferries will travel more slowly in the river to mitigate the problems, but Mr Norris insists that won't be enough.
Richard Drabble QC, for Wightlink, urged Mr Justice Owen to dismiss the judicial review challenge as well.
He added that Wightlink had "no reasonable alternative" but to introduce the new ferries as the ones they replaced were "at the end of their safe operational life".
A "careful and rigorous" process of analysis of the impact took place, said Mr Drabble, conducted by ABPmer, a leading UK marine environmental consultancy, and it had concluded that the new ferries would have "no adverse effect".
Proceeding.
Comments(7)
Nothing to say
says...
3:38pm Mon 14 Dec 09
freemantlegirl2
says...
3:54pm Mon 14 Dec 09
Nothing to say wrote:Very well said!!
Please would the Echo investigate where the Lymington River Association is finding the money to fight this in the High Court?
.
Then please ask them if they have sizeable financial resources available to them, how much do they spend themselves on Environmental damage caused by their own boats on the river?
.
I think a light should be shined more closely on this unelected body get their agenda printed without question in the local papers.
Condor Man
says...
6:31pm Mon 14 Dec 09
Zeo
says...
6:56pm Mon 14 Dec 09
Andy Locks Heath
says...
8:14am Tue 15 Dec 09
Zeo wrote:Yes, but the costs of construction could never be repaid Zeo, let alone operation, so who would put up the money knowing not only would they not get it back but they'd have to continue paying more every year for ever?
Brockenhurst to Yarmouth Railway Tunnel - Been mentioned a few time, though the cost's could or would be high but the pros out weigh the cons and no delays or anything due to high winds and rough sea lol
S/W; Rate-Safe
KelvinC
says...
4:48pm Tue 15 Dec 09
Andy Locks Heath wrote:A tunnel might have been viable when there was a railway line at Yarmouth to take people further into The Island. Don't think it is now and people want to take cars. So unless there is some kind of marshalling yard for car-carrying trains each side, it is unlikely to work.
Zeo wrote:Yes, but the costs of construction could never be repaid Zeo, let alone operation, so who would put up the money knowing not only would they not get it back but they'd have to continue paying more every year for ever?
Brockenhurst to Yarmouth Railway Tunnel - Been mentioned a few time, though the cost's could or would be high but the pros out weigh the cons and no delays or anything due to high winds and rough sea lol
S/W; Rate-Safe
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Saintly says...
3:37pm Mon 14 Dec 09
That has been going on for decades, and probably causes as much 'damage'.
Anyone can see that the main protagonists from the LRA are NIMBY's who want the river to be just their own whilst on their weekend jaunts to the coast in their Porsche Cayennes...
The Wightlink ferries offer employment and income to the local area - isn't all this hot air just about the fact that larger ferries spoil their views over the Harbour during their G&T's in the Royal Lymington Yacht Club??