When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
12:10pm Wednesday 28th July 2010 in News By Rachel Masker
MORE than 180 jobs are to be axed in children’s services at Hampshire County Council as bosses strive to save £25m.
The council said the job losses were driven by cuts in Government funding to reduce the national deficit.
The axe has already been wielded on £6.2m of funding and the council anticipates the loss of a further £15.9m in grants after April 2011.
Meanwhile the council is faced with rising bills from the increased number of children taken into care in the wake of the Baby P scandal and home to school transport.
Managers are now planning to chop £24.8m from the £170m children’s services budget in 2011-12. Schools are funded separately.
A consultation with unions over the 185 posts to be shed, equal to six per cent of the departmental workforce, has begun.
Staff will be offered voluntary redundancy and early retirement in an attempt to keep compulsory redundancies down, Children’s services is the first county department to announce cuts as a result of the squeeze on public spending.
Managers say cuts to services have been “minimised” and no social workers involved in frontline child protection work will lose their jobs.
Some 46 senior management posts will be shed as the council streamlines services with fewer area and district teams.
Other job losses Other job losses include 25 youth support workers involved in careers information and counselling work in schools and colleges, four social work posts in special educational needs and four departmental communications officers.
Some nine jobs are also to be lost as the number of performance targets the council has to meet is to be cut. The council has had to employ staff to serve the demands from Government for data.
The voluntary sector will also be a casualty as there will be a £1.4m cut in funding with no more grants awarded during the current financial year.
Other cuts include £200,000 from county music education service. This means the service will have to charge more for the hire of instruments and some bands stopped.
Councillor David Kirk, executive member for children’s services, approved the cuts behind closed doors last Monday.
He said: “We face unprecedented financial challenges as a result of spending cuts and are having to make extremely difficult choices.
“Along with the requirement to make significant savings we must balance the need to ensure we continue to deliver high quality services, to keep children and young people in Hampshire safe and to maintain a vibrant educational system.”
The council has warned further job losses are likely after the Government’s autumn spending review.
Peter Terry, regional organiser for Unison, said: “We don’t believe you can make cuts as deep as these without affecting services.”
Mr Terry said he did not believe the job cuts could be justified and the union will be consulting its members of what action to take.
Comments(27)
Paramjit Bahia
says...
12:26pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Lone Ranger
says...
12:36pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Ben Durutti
says...
12:40pm Wed 28 Jul 10
hulla baloo wrote:Oh the irony of somebody suggesting cutting funds to "immigrants", when said bigot actually lives in Turkey.
Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support. How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u seless leaflets/work shy etc first.
southy
says...
12:59pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Cyber-Fug
says...
1:07pm Wed 28 Jul 10
southy wrote:I think you're already there
one more step closer to that depression heading our way.
southy
says...
1:24pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Cyber-Fug wrote:just catching you up, debate will ya and leave the semi insults out of it.
southy wrote:I think you're already there
one more step closer to that depression heading our way.
Condor Man
says...
1:39pm Wed 28 Jul 10
RadicalEmu
says...
1:50pm Wed 28 Jul 10
hulla baloo wrote:Maybe you could outline how these budgets would be cut.
Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support.
How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u
seless leaflets/work shy etc first.
StEmmosfire
says...
2:19pm Wed 28 Jul 10
hulla baloo wrote:Or maybe stop allowing people that are incapable of looking after themselves have children? It's about time social services interviewed would be mums before being allowed to have children.
Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support. How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u seless leaflets/work shy etc first.
RadicalEmu
says...
2:41pm Wed 28 Jul 10
StEmmosfire wrote:So, does that extend to forcing someone to have an abortion too?
hulla baloo wrote:Or maybe stop allowing people that are incapable of looking after themselves have children? It's about time social services interviewed would be mums before being allowed to have children.
Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support. How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u seless leaflets/work shy etc first.
StEmmosfire
says...
2:46pm Wed 28 Jul 10
RadicalEmu wrote:I leave that open to debate but I do question the motive behind some of these parents. It's crazy, if you want to adopt an animal in this country you get a home visit to make sure you are capable of looking after it!
StEmmosfire wrote:So, does that extend to forcing someone to have an abortion too? . Unplanned pregnancy is quite common.hulla baloo wrote: Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support. How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u seless leaflets/work shy etc first.Or maybe stop allowing people that are incapable of looking after themselves have children? It's about time social services interviewed would be mums before being allowed to have children.
hulla baloo
says...
3:11pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Ben Durutti wrote:Not that I need to justify myself to you, but I am self sufficient and do not need handouts to survive.
hulla baloo wrote: Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support. How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u seless leaflets/work shy etc first.Oh the irony of somebody suggesting cutting funds to "immigrants", when said bigot actually lives in Turkey.
Atpost
says...
6:28pm Wed 28 Jul 10
hulla baloo wrote:Yes - a big teabag in a little cup. - Nice!
Ben Durutti wrote:Not that I need to justify myself to you, but I am self sufficient and do not need handouts to survive.hulla baloo wrote: Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support. How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u seless leaflets/work shy etc first.Oh the irony of somebody suggesting cutting funds to "immigrants", when said bigot actually lives in Turkey.
The Edge of Reason
says...
6:59pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Condor Man wrote:The answer may be because Ken Thornber gave jobs to his friends at his local Con club.
you have to wonder why there were 46 senior managerial posts in the first place?
The Edge of Reason
says...
6:59pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Condor Man wrote:The answer may be because Ken Thornber gave jobs to his friends at his local Con club.
you have to wonder why there were 46 senior managerial posts in the first place?
Condor Man
says...
7:56pm Wed 28 Jul 10
The Edge of Reason wrote:if that's the case I drink at the same Con Club as Royston Smith so perhaps I should have tapped him up for the new SCC's chief ex job?
Condor Man wrote: you have to wonder why there were 46 senior managerial posts in the first place?The answer may be because Ken Thornber gave jobs to his friends at his local Con club.
The Edge of Reason
says...
8:24pm Wed 28 Jul 10
The Edge of Reason
says...
8:24pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Maine Lobster
says...
8:52pm Wed 28 Jul 10
The Edge of Reason wrote:That's probably near the truth.
Condor Man wrote:The answer may be because Ken Thornber gave jobs to his friends at his local Con club.
you have to wonder why there were 46 senior managerial posts in the first place?
mummsie
says...
10:28pm Wed 28 Jul 10
mummsie
says...
10:34pm Wed 28 Jul 10
fraggled
says...
10:58pm Wed 28 Jul 10
sass
says...
1:09am Thu 29 Jul 10
Ben Durutti wrote:Well he is an emigrant not imigrant.
hulla baloo wrote: Great. Reduce funding for most vulnerable and those that need the support. How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u seless leaflets/work shy etc first.Oh the irony of somebody suggesting cutting funds to "immigrants", when said bigot actually lives in Turkey.
Condor Man
says...
8:44am Thu 29 Jul 10
Hants
says...
12:18pm Tue 3 Aug 10
georgefjoyce
says...
11:49pm Thu 12 Aug 10
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
hulla baloo says...
12:18pm Wed 28 Jul 10
How about cutting the funding/budgets for the drug abusers/immigrants/u
seless leaflets/work shy etc first.