News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Legacy of Labour is the cash to build real family homes in Southampton


THE first bricks are being laid for the first new council homes in Southampton for over 15 years.

Some 53 new energy efficient council homes will be built in the city thanks to £3.3m of Government funding, matched by the City Council.

The first four three bedroom houses are being built at Flamborough Close in Millbrook.

The homes are being built on disused land and underused garage sites across the city.

Over the next year 33 new homes will go up in Borrowdale Road, Pennine Way/Chiltern Green, and Flamborough Close in Millbrook; Keynsham Road, Bitterne, Orpen Road, Sholing and Grateley Close, Weston.

Click below to see a video of today's headlines in sixty seconds

A further 20 houses and flats will then be built in Cumbrian Way, Millbrook and Leaside Way, Swaythling.

Tory Councillor Peter Baillie, the city’s new housing boss, said: “We have listened to what our residents want and this is why we are building a high proportion of family houses with gardens and all are built to very high energy efficiency standards – which will save tenants money on their heating bills.”

The Government’s Homes and Communities Agency provided funding for the new homes through the Local Authority New Build programme set up by Itchen MP John Denham’s former department.

HCA south east director David Edwards said: “I’m delighted to see work start on the first new council homes in Southampton for 15 years.

“Our partners have worked extremely hard to deliver the next generation of council homes for the city, with energy efficient technology, and have listened closely to the community that they serve.”

Southampton City Council is struggling with 13,887 people on its housing waiting list and needs to build 1,000 more affordable homes a year to keep pace with growing demand, stoked by high house prices and a rising population.

The council has a stock of 17,025 houses, mostly flats.

After the Tory Government of the 1980s allowed tenants to buy their own homes under the right to buy the city lost around 10,000 council houses.

Rules that have prevented the council from borrowing against its housing stock have largely left social housebuilding to housing associations through the Government funded Housing Corporation.

The new homes in Southampton are being built by Drew Smith. They will be managed by the Radian housing association.


Comments(17)

G0Rf says...
10:35am Fri 30 Jul 10

why are Radian housing association looking after them if they are council?

Ted Rogers says...
10:59am Fri 30 Jul 10

Good but not enough. Statistics are that Southampton need to build 1000 homes, are we really going to see an impact with these 33?

There is a huge demograpghic of people/families that cannot afford to either buy a home or pay inflated private rental rates, but could afford more than a highly subsidised council funded rent. There lies the opportunity for the council to build appropriate housing and earn profit through rental. That's the type of housing policy the council should concentrate on, which would have the greatest impact for the people of Southampton.

Fur Q says...
11:16am Fri 30 Jul 10

Ted Rogers wrote:
Good but not enough. Statistics are that Southampton need to build 1000 homes, are we really going to see an impact with these 33? There is a huge demograpghic of people/families that cannot afford to either buy a home or pay inflated private rental rates, but could afford more than a highly subsidised council funded rent. There lies the opportunity for the council to build appropriate housing and earn profit through rental. That's the type of housing policy the council should concentrate on, which would have the greatest impact for the people of Southampton.
for once, i agree totally

non sailor, lymington says...
11:24am Fri 30 Jul 10

G0Rf wrote:
why are Radian housing association looking after them if they are council?
I think its because Radian will not accept people/families that are claiming benefits, unlike the council who are obliged to.

KA says...
12:30pm Fri 30 Jul 10

They should be building four and five bedroom houses..

Tommy News says...
12:38pm Fri 30 Jul 10

It annoys me that they are legally obliged to build them to a higher specification than the private sector. So if you are no good waster on benefits you can have a decent home, otherwise the rest of us work long hours paying a mortgage for 30+ years for a smaller low standard home. Good to see IDS taking steps to tackle the benefit culture.

KA says...
1:21pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Tommy News wrote:
It annoys me that they are legally obliged to build them to a higher specification than the private sector. So if you are no good waster on benefits you can have a decent home, otherwise the rest of us work long hours paying a mortgage for 30+ years for a smaller low standard home. Good to see IDS taking steps to tackle the benefit culture.
so... everyone who rents are wasters on benefit??

RadicalEmu says...
1:22pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Tommy News wrote:
It annoys me that they are legally obliged to build them to a higher specification than the private sector. So if you are no good waster on benefits you can have a decent home, otherwise the rest of us work long hours paying a mortgage for 30+ years for a smaller low standard home. Good to see IDS taking steps to tackle the benefit culture.
You could fly a baloon with all that hot air!
.
Not everyone in a council house is on benefits.
.
Not everyone on benefits is a scrounger.
.
Back on topic: Are they truly council houses if they're being managed by a non-council entity? Seems odd to me.

Condor Man says...
1:58pm Fri 30 Jul 10

it's a sad reflection on the city if people can't afford to buy property anymore. The flat I bought 12 years ago for £32k is now worth over 3 times that amount. That's ridiculous. Most people buying into these schemes will eventually buy the homes outright and their values will increase too. The last government allowed house prices to inflate and now people are trapped having to rent again. So much for progress

saintslou says...
2:08pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Has anyone seen the size of the houses being built? I hope they dont want wardrobes in the bedrooms!!!!

security word: vast-tiny

snorkel says...
6:06pm Fri 30 Jul 10

Good idea but don't sell them off this time and inspect them regularly.
If the homes are not kept clean and tidy, remove the occupants and give someone else a chance who will be more grateful.

geoff51 says...
9:48pm Fri 30 Jul 10

I just hope that they are not allocated to any other than long standing local residents, and not to outsiders

geoff51 says...
9:51pm Fri 30 Jul 10

KA wrote:
They should be building four and five bedroom houses..
So the Chavs can breed to fill them?

IanRRR says...
12:52am Sat 31 Jul 10

Can someone explain some maths to me please?
If 10000 homes were sold off, presumably they still house 10000 families? Whether the original buyers have sold them on or not, is not relevant, because if they had not been allowed to buy them, they would still be council tenants, except for the few that may have died? So whether they were sold off or not, there would still be 13887 on the waiting list or thereabouts? Its just the demand that has increased, and the Councils have not kept up with it? Simples!

Brite Spark says...
1:28am Sat 31 Jul 10

How many 14 year old 'Britneys' are being primed by their 29 year old mothers to get themselves pregnant in order to jump the queues, and get themselves moored into this new council accomodation?

"Ere Britney - the council are knocking up some nice places in Cumbrian Way, do yourself a favour, drop yer 'omework and get yourself a sprog, then we can all move in together!"

I hope that these homes go to those who have earned them, and worked hard for a few years, but I wont be holding my breath.

Jparcoeur says...
4:18pm Mon 2 Aug 10

Build houses for poor unemployed people and we'll end up with a city full of poor unemployed people. We need more jobs, not more houses.

fatwombat says...
11:34pm Tue 10 Aug 10

I am so sick of SCC. Perhaps they should spend their time implementing a policy that says if you have not contributed £15 000 in National insurance and tax to this country...you get nothing...nadda! Instead they just build house after house after house for people who choose to lay about and eat up tax payers money. In Southampton people pat their 15yr old daughters on the back when they fall pregnant....well done darling...you will never have to work again! You are oficailly an employee of the state...but just make sure you get knocked up before that brat turns 7! SCC is a complete and utter walk over! Who is paying for these houses-the tax payer- that`s who. If we stood up and said NO MORE! The trash would have to stop breeding. Crime statistics would go down and this already over populated country due to scum breeding for cash regime would die out. But no...keep building them houses and no doubt give them plenty of relocation money too!


Property officer Keith Gunner, left, and new cabinet member for housing Cllr Peter Baillie. Property officer Keith Gunner, left, and new cabinet member for housing Cllr Peter Baillie.

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses