News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Dismay as company is hired to design scheme to home up to 20,000


PLANS for a major new eco-town to home up to 20,000 people have taken a major step forward with the hiring of a company to design the controversial scheme.

Despite fears the town could virtually join Fareham to Wickham and the Government scrapping housing targets, the firms behind the plans are pressing ahead.

Prudential Assurance Company and Buckland Development have appointed Basingstoke based design and engineering consultancy Scott Wilson to draw up a masterplan for the project.

It will see between 7,000 and 8,000 homes built between Wickham, Knowle and Fareham. A planning application is expected to be made in 2012 and development largely completed by 2030.

Scott Wilson, which is leading a design team of Swedish and British architects, said the scheme was intended to be “an exemplar of environmental, social and economic development”.

In March, it was announced that Fareham Borough Council would be given £200,000 to help it undertake more detailed work, including green infrastructure assessments and studies on waste, water and renewable energy for the site, north of Junction 10 of the M27.

However, Housing Minister Grant Shapps has now reduced this payment to £100,000.

The minister is also demanding that local authorities produce further evidence that they are listening to residents and MPs in developing their plans. Scott Wilson said community engagement would be “at the heart of the masterplanning process”.

Scott Wilson’s project director Patrick Clarke, said: “This is a great opportunity to create a new community for Fareham based on the vision of local people and drawing upon best international thinking on sustainability and place making.”

Many locals are fiercely opposed to the plan and have formed a group known as South Hampshire’s Unheard Voices (SHUV) to protest.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England is a SHUV member and warns the new town would be the same size as Petersfield.

Spokeswoman Caroline Dibden said: “It is clear that there was dubious support for these new towns, but the public were always told that these numbers were forced from on high.”

However, now that regional targets were no more, she said the local authority could scrap the idea.

“If it went ahead, it would be solely Fareham Borough Council’s decision and they could not pass the buck,” she added.

Brenda Clapperton of the Fareham Society, which is also a member of SHUV, said: “We were always against this huge development in the north of Fareham which is well in excess of Fareham’s local needs, and will have a major effect on the environment of Wickham and Fareham itself.”


Comments(6)

Balmoral says...
2:34pm Sun 5 Sep 10

"development largely completed by 2030". ...................M
eaning, by completion, most of the enviromental technology will be largely out-dated...........
I can only imagine the filth that the council will fill this estate with, my only hope there is a sewage system large enough to wash away the inevitable trash that will decend on this place, including their abused "staffies".......Don
't forget to build an "eco" corner shop full of ciggies and cheap vodie, including the "eco" vets surgery to cope with the staffie problems, with an "eco" hospital for the childrens disfigured faces to be re-built, that the single mums left with the grandparents whilst getting slaughtered in the "eco" pub.

RealTalkMuhFuggas says...
2:46pm Sun 5 Sep 10

Balmoral wrote:
"development largely completed by 2030". ...................M

eaning, by completion, most of the enviromental technology will be largely out-dated...........

I can only imagine the filth that the council will fill this estate with, my only hope there is a sewage system large enough to wash away the inevitable trash that will decend on this place, including their abused "staffies".......Don

't forget to build an "eco" corner shop full of ciggies and cheap vodie, including the "eco" vets surgery to cope with the staffie problems, with an "eco" hospital for the childrens disfigured faces to be re-built, that the single mums left with the grandparents whilst getting slaughtered in the "eco" pub.
Where does it say it's going to be a council estate??

Balmoral says...
5:17pm Sun 5 Sep 10

RealTalkMuhFuggas wrote:
Balmoral wrote: "development largely completed by 2030". ...................M eaning, by completion, most of the enviromental technology will be largely out-dated........... I can only imagine the filth that the council will fill this estate with, my only hope there is a sewage system large enough to wash away the inevitable trash that will decend on this place, including their abused "staffies".......Don 't forget to build an "eco" corner shop full of ciggies and cheap vodie, including the "eco" vets surgery to cope with the staffie problems, with an "eco" hospital for the childrens disfigured faces to be re-built, that the single mums left with the grandparents whilst getting slaughtered in the "eco" pub.
Where does it say it's going to be a council estate??
If you really think Fareham council would allow 20000 homes to be built under their noses without taking a huge lump for their thriving under-class, you should really reconsider your thoughts before posting. Look at every major developement surrounding major towns. The councils/housing associations are falling over themselves to look for more innovative ways to squeeze development companies into handing over plots for these people. "These people" are the same people that are rubbing their hands thinking they are first on the list for a new home. I don't believe this underclass deserve a new home. They deserve what they can afford to buy with the money they earn, not what they can scrounge from tax payers. The same old argument will always arise in these situations "I pay my taxes too, why can't i have a new home if i'm paying the rent". The reason they shouldn't, is because they cannot afford to buy it. They should rent a typical house in a typial neighbourhood, not a brand new house that has been strongarmed by a thieving council (very often below cost price) to house the parasites of society.

The Wickham Man says...
6:10pm Sun 5 Sep 10

I don't object to this development per se - if the town includes all the infrastructure needed including community centres, surgeries, bus and rail links, a cycle path network and road and motorway junction improvements etc then fair enough. What I object to is this ridiculous "eco" prefix. This is a new town where fields stood previously so what is "Eco" about it? Come to think of it what does it even mean? Can the journalist wiriting this story even tell us what an "Eco town" actually is? Echo journalists should stop using this pathetic prefix simply because it appears in the press releases handed to them.

Zeo says...
7:22pm Sun 5 Sep 10

Well Knowle would have it's railway station rebuilt and the track south of Botley Station to Fareham Station would be double tracked, though I would personally suggest they reopen the Meon Valley Railway as it's largely intact and just some minor altercations to the alignment could produce a great express main line service allowing more fast trains between Portsmouth/Fareham/K
nowle and then fast to Alton and London (or could go via the old Bishops Waltham Branch which was suppose to once upon a time connect to it the Meon Line).

Mental Micky says...
10:11pm Sun 5 Sep 10

Zeo you are a lovable old dreamer, but I'll have some of what you've been smoking.


Houses at Knowle village Houses at Knowle village

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses