Report this comment
  • "
    Lone Ranger. wrote:
    MGRA wrote:
    southy wrote:
    MGRA wrote:
    sotonbusdriver wrote: I can see this coming back and biting the local tax payers in the backside. It's going to be the usual Council flop and last of money. No Company with any sense in this financial climate is going to commit to spending money on a whim of a Council. Like most projects that the woolly headed Council come up with this again is looking to be a big flop. Although it may have an interest in 2012 as the 100th anniversary of the disaster of Titanic it will not have a long term interest..
    you don't see the commercial hook in here... there are plenty of companies that would sponsor the museum when the time is right... just not now. This museum was planned years ago so SCC are just reacting to the reality on the ground. It won't be a flop. Since cruise turn around offers a gift-wrapped potential for customers... although it does seem a strange prospect for a cruise passenger,,, to see evidence of a sunken liner !?!?
    Well your going to have a long wait, the economy is slipping down again, its going to be a good 10 years just to get back on the same level of 2 years ago.
    southy. the economy is not "slipping down" again, we are experiencing sluggish growth, so once more you are incorrect.
    Back from the dizzy heights of 0.5% to 0.2%. . That looks like slipping back. . Bit there again i was never too good at spin
    For once (and yes, only once), I AGREE WITH SOUTHY!

    I work in financial services, and I think we are slipping back, and will be lucky to get out of this hole, inside ten years.

    Now, where I disagree, is that there is a market for both Belfast (which is fast slipping back to the bad old days, but the spin doctors are hiding it well), and our project. The problem is that we are hopeless at publicity! The launch of the clipper race being a great example of not getting the message across.... A free night out, at Ocean Village, watching top bands, and only a couple of thousand turn out for it, because there was no publicity. I only found out about it, because I read a bit of shipping news on here!"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Southampton City Council to run Sea City Museum after operator pulls out

How the Sea City Museum will look when finished How the Sea City Museum will look when finished

THE last private firm bidding to run Southampton’s flagship Titanic-themed museum has pulled out.

Council bosses are now planning to manage the £15m Sea City themselves for at least a year.

And as dignitaries yesterday celebrated the highest point of the new building being completed, opposition councillors claimed that there is a £5m hole in the budget to pay for it.

Southampton’s leisure boss last night insisted that there is “no gap” in the funding, but admitted that the authority might have to settle outstanding bills up front, before fundraising efforts bring in the cash.

Cllr John Hannides added that the council running the museum to begin with is in the best interests of taxpayers.

He said that the process to find a private firm to manage Sea City Museum has proved difficult because the council wants any deal to provide better value than managing it inhouse.

Specialists have assessed the costs to the council of running the attraction, which is due to open in time for next April’s centenary of the Titanic disaster, and all private bids have been measured against that.

Cllr Hannides said: “We have said unless you’re able to exceed the performance that’s already estimated if it’s a council operation then it would not be in our interests to put it out to tender. On that basis we’ve been able to exclude some bids, or companies have removed themselves from the process.”

Cllr Hannides said that part of the problem for firms has been that bids are based on pessimistic guesses of visitor numbers to minimise risks.

The council hopes that by successfully running the museum for one or two years it will provide a proven business model that can be offered again to firms, some of which he said remain “very enthusiastic” about taking on the project.

The project is being funded by a £4.9m Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) grant, £5m of council cash and a further £5m from “fundraising”.

As representatives from HLF, the council and builders Kier Southern gathered at yesterday’s topping out ceremony, Labour councillors said that no cash has yet been found from private benefactors or sponsors, leaving “hardpressed council taxpayers”

to pick up the bill.

Cllr Hannides said that a fundraising team has been recruited, but it would be “unfair” to expect immediate results.

He is confident that the money will be raised, but admitted that the council would provide any “cash flow” needed to pay bills in the meantime.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree