Search called off in Solent after aircraft crash ruled out

A full emergency search for a crashed aircraft in the Solent has been called off - after it was thought to be an optical illusion.

Crews from Solent, Portland, The Needles and Yarmouth coastguard were all involved in the search this afternoon.

However Hampshire police have confirmed that the search has been called off when the only aircraft that could have been involved landed safely in Alderney.

Guests at The Needles Old Battery on High Down, Totland Bay, who were drinking tea in the panoramic cafe, had claimed to have witnessed the aircraft dropping into the sea.

However it is thought what they actually saw was a white plane, which was flying low, close to a white fishing boat that was dropping items overboard - and in fact they blurred to form some sort of optical trick.

Comments(21)

Solomon's Boot says...
1:21pm Sat 12 May 12

The Totland Triangle!

Waiting says...
1:36pm Sat 12 May 12

"5 miles off"
Disappeared into the horizon

Pikey Pete says...
2:22pm Sat 12 May 12

Oh OK...I get it they were dropping the cocaine off the boat.

Yes Hants police stand down!!!!

Huffter says...
3:04pm Sat 12 May 12

I must try some of that tea next time I visit The Needles.

MGRA says...
3:26pm Sat 12 May 12

air traffic control would have been able to confirm whether or not a plane cam down in seconds !? so why was there a full scale emergency search !?

meechy says...
3:38pm Sat 12 May 12

Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.

MGRA says...
3:56pm Sat 12 May 12

meechy wrote:
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...

ChandlersFordKev says...
4:23pm Sat 12 May 12

MGRA wrote:
meechy wrote:
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.

The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.

If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.

http://www.ead.euroc
ontrol.int/eadbasic/
pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB
78E9109E9A80B7AC4232
82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/
Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_
ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-
06-30.pdf

cantthinkofone says...
5:27pm Sat 12 May 12

Clearly it was an alien envoy craft on its way to talk with our aquatic overlords.

IronLady2010 says...
5:42pm Sat 12 May 12

Glad it was a false alarm!!!

MGRA says...
6:04pm Sat 12 May 12

ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
meechy wrote:
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.

The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.

If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.

http://www.ead.euroc

ontrol.int/eadbasic/

pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB

78E9109E9A80B7AC4232

82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/

Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_

ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-

06-30.pdf
so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???

ChandlersFordKev says...
6:40pm Sat 12 May 12

MGRA wrote:
ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
meechy wrote:
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.

The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.

If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.

http://www.ead.euroc


ontrol.int/eadbasic/


pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB


78E9109E9A80B7AC4232


82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/


Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_


ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-


06-30.pdf
so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???
Not really. The fact is that they may and will see the aircraft. The fact is that if reported it may be possible for ATC to miss them, although they would be unlikely to miss it. However the emrergency services must act.

To answer you question about Fawley and London, as you approach Southampton about Calshot you enter the Southampton Control Zone, which is from surface to 2,000ft, Solent Control from 2 to 5, then London above. The same exists around London, so no it can't happen, in theory. However if someone is determined, no matter what exists they will do it.

IronLady2010 says...
6:49pm Sat 12 May 12

Getting far too technical for me now!

Over the Edge says...
6:50pm Sat 12 May 12

Huffter wrote:
I must try some of that tea next time I visit The Needles.
Having read all the posts, I'm with you, I will take tea there any time.

LessRantMoreSense says...
7:12pm Sat 12 May 12

Blardey gurd rapid response by all maritimers.

SOULJACKER says...
7:36pm Sat 12 May 12

Maybe it was a "Foo Fighter", lol....just saying, bwahahahaha ;)

MGRA says...
11:27pm Sat 12 May 12

ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
meechy wrote:
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.

The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.

If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.

http://www.ead.euroc



ontrol.int/eadbasic/



pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB



78E9109E9A80B7AC4232



82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/



Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_



ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-



06-30.pdf
so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???
Not really. The fact is that they may and will see the aircraft. The fact is that if reported it may be possible for ATC to miss them, although they would be unlikely to miss it. However the emrergency services must act.

To answer you question about Fawley and London, as you approach Southampton about Calshot you enter the Southampton Control Zone, which is from surface to 2,000ft, Solent Control from 2 to 5, then London above. The same exists around London, so no it can't happen, in theory. However if someone is determined, no matter what exists they will do it.
so yes its then very easy to attack by air.... a small-ish aircraft enters monitored airspace after flying low but by that time there is no way on earth anyone could respond in time.... we are wide open.... GREAT !!!

IronLady2010 says...
12:06am Sun 13 May 12

MGRA wrote:
ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
meechy wrote:
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.

The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.

If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.

http://www.ead.euroc




ontrol.int/eadbasic/




pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB




78E9109E9A80B7AC4232




82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/




Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_




ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-




06-30.pdf
so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???
Not really. The fact is that they may and will see the aircraft. The fact is that if reported it may be possible for ATC to miss them, although they would be unlikely to miss it. However the emrergency services must act.

To answer you question about Fawley and London, as you approach Southampton about Calshot you enter the Southampton Control Zone, which is from surface to 2,000ft, Solent Control from 2 to 5, then London above. The same exists around London, so no it can't happen, in theory. However if someone is determined, no matter what exists they will do it.
so yes its then very easy to attack by air.... a small-ish aircraft enters monitored airspace after flying low but by that time there is no way on earth anyone could respond in time.... we are wide open.... GREAT !!!
What we should be asking is why such a massive project for the Olympics.

If we can't monitor a small aircraft, yet we are placing missiles on buildings and Sonic thingies.

I just wonder why we are going to such an extreme when this didn't happen for ANY Royal Wedding or indeed any event to my knowledge.

During the Olympics, I'm going to be as far away as possible, there is no doubt that the UK has had a certain threat and I'm out of here!

Donald2000 says...
12:29am Sun 13 May 12

ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
meechy wrote: Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
I am assuming it was seen of the Needles. The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195. If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace. http://www.ead.euroc ontrol.int/eadbasic/ pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB 78E9109E9A80B7AC4232 82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/ Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_ ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011- 06-30.pdf
Yep. As good a display of authentic frontier gibberish as I have seen on these pages.
Can we have all of that in English please?

german saint says...
9:07am Sun 13 May 12

are you sure they were "drinking tea".......

forest hump says...
10:09am Sun 13 May 12

Donald2000 wrote:
ChandlersFordKev wrote:
MGRA wrote:
meechy wrote: Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
I am assuming it was seen of the Needles. The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195. If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace. http://www.ead.euroc ontrol.int/eadbasic/ pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB 78E9109E9A80B7AC4232 82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/ Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_ ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011- 06-30.pdf
Yep. As good a display of authentic frontier gibberish as I have seen on these pages. Can we have all of that in English please?
badges? we don't need no stinking badges!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree