- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@dailyecho
Daily Echo on Twitter
@the_saints
Saints News on Twitter
SceneSouth
Leisure news on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
Facebook
Daily Echo on Facebook
'Crashed plane' was actually an optical illusion (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Search called off in Solent after aircraft crash ruled out
12:57pm Saturday 12th May 2012 in News
A full emergency search for a crashed aircraft in the Solent has been called off - after it was thought to be an optical illusion.
Crews from Solent, Portland, The Needles and Yarmouth coastguard were all involved in the search this afternoon.
However Hampshire police have confirmed that the search has been called off when the only aircraft that could have been involved landed safely in Alderney.
Guests at The Needles Old Battery on High Down, Totland Bay, who were drinking tea in the panoramic cafe, had claimed to have witnessed the aircraft dropping into the sea.
However it is thought what they actually saw was a white plane, which was flying low, close to a white fishing boat that was dropping items overboard - and in fact they blurred to form some sort of optical trick.
Comments(21)
Waiting
says...
1:36pm Sat 12 May 12
Disappeared into the horizon
Pikey Pete
says...
2:22pm Sat 12 May 12
Yes Hants police stand down!!!!
Huffter
says...
3:04pm Sat 12 May 12
MGRA
says...
3:26pm Sat 12 May 12
meechy
says...
3:38pm Sat 12 May 12
MGRA
says...
3:56pm Sat 12 May 12
meechy wrote:but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
ChandlersFordKev
says...
4:23pm Sat 12 May 12
MGRA wrote:I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.
meechy wrote:but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.
If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.
http://www.ead.euroc
ontrol.int/eadbasic/
pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB
78E9109E9A80B7AC4232
82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/
Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_
ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-
06-30.pdf
cantthinkofone
says...
5:27pm Sat 12 May 12
IronLady2010
says...
5:42pm Sat 12 May 12
MGRA
says...
6:04pm Sat 12 May 12
ChandlersFordKev wrote:so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???
MGRA wrote:I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.
meechy wrote:but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.
If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.
http://www.ead.euroc
ontrol.int/eadbasic/
pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB
78E9109E9A80B7AC4232
82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/
Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_
ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-
06-30.pdf
ChandlersFordKev
says...
6:40pm Sat 12 May 12
MGRA wrote:Not really. The fact is that they may and will see the aircraft. The fact is that if reported it may be possible for ATC to miss them, although they would be unlikely to miss it. However the emrergency services must act.
ChandlersFordKev wrote:so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???
MGRA wrote:I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.
meechy wrote:but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.
If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.
http://www.ead.euroc
ontrol.int/eadbasic/
pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB
78E9109E9A80B7AC4232
82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/
Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_
ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-
06-30.pdf
To answer you question about Fawley and London, as you approach Southampton about Calshot you enter the Southampton Control Zone, which is from surface to 2,000ft, Solent Control from 2 to 5, then London above. The same exists around London, so no it can't happen, in theory. However if someone is determined, no matter what exists they will do it.
IronLady2010
says...
6:49pm Sat 12 May 12
Over the Edge
says...
6:50pm Sat 12 May 12
Huffter wrote:Having read all the posts, I'm with you, I will take tea there any time.
I must try some of that tea next time I visit The Needles.
LessRantMoreSense
says...
7:12pm Sat 12 May 12
SOULJACKER
says...
7:36pm Sat 12 May 12
MGRA
says...
11:27pm Sat 12 May 12
ChandlersFordKev wrote:so yes its then very easy to attack by air.... a small-ish aircraft enters monitored airspace after flying low but by that time there is no way on earth anyone could respond in time.... we are wide open.... GREAT !!!
MGRA wrote:Not really. The fact is that they may and will see the aircraft. The fact is that if reported it may be possible for ATC to miss them, although they would be unlikely to miss it. However the emrergency services must act.
ChandlersFordKev wrote:so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???
MGRA wrote:I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.
meechy wrote:but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.
If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.
http://www.ead.euroc
ontrol.int/eadbasic/
pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB
78E9109E9A80B7AC4232
82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/
Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_
ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-
06-30.pdf
To answer you question about Fawley and London, as you approach Southampton about Calshot you enter the Southampton Control Zone, which is from surface to 2,000ft, Solent Control from 2 to 5, then London above. The same exists around London, so no it can't happen, in theory. However if someone is determined, no matter what exists they will do it.
IronLady2010
says...
12:06am Sun 13 May 12
MGRA wrote:What we should be asking is why such a massive project for the Olympics.
ChandlersFordKev wrote:so yes its then very easy to attack by air.... a small-ish aircraft enters monitored airspace after flying low but by that time there is no way on earth anyone could respond in time.... we are wide open.... GREAT !!!
MGRA wrote:Not really. The fact is that they may and will see the aircraft. The fact is that if reported it may be possible for ATC to miss them, although they would be unlikely to miss it. However the emrergency services must act.
ChandlersFordKev wrote:so thanks for illustrating just how easy it would be for terrorists to attack fawley, the olympics and about 100 other locations that matter !!! is it really that easy ???
MGRA wrote:I am assuming it was seen of the Needles.
meechy wrote:but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.
The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195.
If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace.
http://www.ead.euroc
ontrol.int/eadbasic/
pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB
78E9109E9A80B7AC4232
82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/
Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_
ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011-
06-30.pdf
To answer you question about Fawley and London, as you approach Southampton about Calshot you enter the Southampton Control Zone, which is from surface to 2,000ft, Solent Control from 2 to 5, then London above. The same exists around London, so no it can't happen, in theory. However if someone is determined, no matter what exists they will do it.
If we can't monitor a small aircraft, yet we are placing missiles on buildings and Sonic thingies.
I just wonder why we are going to such an extreme when this didn't happen for ANY Royal Wedding or indeed any event to my knowledge.
During the Olympics, I'm going to be as far away as possible, there is no doubt that the UK has had a certain threat and I'm out of here!
Donald2000
says...
12:29am Sun 13 May 12
ChandlersFordKev wrote:Yep. As good a display of authentic frontier gibberish as I have seen on these pages.
MGRA wrote:I am assuming it was seen of the Needles. The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195. If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace. http://www.ead.euroc ontrol.int/eadbasic/ pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB 78E9109E9A80B7AC4232 82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/ Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_ ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011- 06-30.pdfmeechy wrote: Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Can we have all of that in English please?
german saint
says...
9:07am Sun 13 May 12
forest hump
says...
10:09am Sun 13 May 12
Donald2000 wrote:badges? we don't need no stinking badges!
ChandlersFordKev wrote:Yep. As good a display of authentic frontier gibberish as I have seen on these pages. Can we have all of that in English please?MGRA wrote:I am assuming it was seen of the Needles. The zones are Catergory D from 3,500 ft to 5,500 ft and Cat A from 5,500ft to FL195. If it was below 5,500ft and VFR it would have been Cat D and would not require it contact ATC in any form, unless it encroached on a Cat A or C airspace. http://www.ead.euroc ontrol.int/eadbasic/ pamslight-5DF3D5E6AB 78E9109E9A80B7AC4232 82/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/ Charts/ENR/AIRAC/EG_ ENR_6_1_4_1_en_2011- 06-30.pdfmeechy wrote: Because any aircraft flying really low that side of the IoW would probably be below radar coverage and not necessarily in radio contact with ATC as it's outside of controlled airspace.but it would have had to have taken off from somewhere where its take off was recorded obviously. so surely it should only take a few seconds to work out if any planes are missing from the solent area !? we are not talking about crop dusting planes in the middle of nebraska... the solent is not a place you can loose a plane...
Solomon's Boot says...
1:21pm Sat 12 May 12